“Las Meninas “is a 1656 painting by Diego Velazquez. It’s located in the Museo Del Prado in Madrid. Las Meninas, which translates to the Maid of Honor, is a portrait of Infant Margarita, the daughter of King Philip IV, and his second wife Mariana of Austria. The painting is made out of oil paint on canvas, the canvas was divided into a grid. The painting measures 10 ft. ¾ inches x 9 ft. ¾ inches. This painting is the masterpiece of Spanish painting, its controversial, talked about, analyzed and imitated painting in history. ‘Las Meninas’ was referred to as ‘La Familia’ in the Royal Court Inventories.
I like this painting because it’s very interesting looking. When you first take a glance at it; you think they staring at you, the viewer. As you keep observing the painting you realize they are look at the queen and king. Which, at first I thought it made me feel like I was the queen who everyone was staring at. In the fact there is a mirror in the back of Velazquez right side of the painting that is the reflection of the king and queen. In
…show more content…
The use of light helps to highlight the different focal points on the picture as well as adding definition to the subjects. The points of the light illuminate the characters and establish an order in the composition. The light that illuminates the room from the right hand side of the painting focuses on the viewer’s look on the main group, and the open door at the back, with the person positioned against the light, is the vanishing point. Velazquez uses linear perspective, tone and overlapping shapes in order to create the feeling of depth in the painting. The mirror which reflects the monarchs is a key piece, it transforms the reader into an integral part of the painting and its composition. The king and queen been sketched with quick brushstrokes so that the reflection is the same that the viewer
The central focus on the table, in the painting, is what it appears to look like a book of Sor Juana. Sor Juana Inés de la Cruz, is a huge Mexican, feminist icon. During the seventeenth century, while the Spanish still occupied mexican territory, The catholic church had a significant amount of power. Sor Juana challenged the church by being a controversial figure at the time by her being a well-educated woman, nun, and poet/writer, during a time where men were
Mariano Escobedo was a healthy man he was my Grandparents great great grandparent. He was a Mexican General from Mexico. He wanted to govern Mexico, he fought against dynasty and he won. Escobedo fought against the French Invasion in Mexico to govern Mexico. He became a great general who fought against Napoleon III (French.) In Mexico City airport and in Monterey his name is printed and also in some streets of difference parts of Mexico. Mexico had borrowed money from England, France and Spain. In 1861 representatives from this countries got together in London to find a way to get Mexico to pay this countries. Troops from this three countries went to Veracruz in 1862. They were welcomed from representative from Mexico. The general Juan Prim, from Spain accepted the way Mexico was going to pay little by little so as England. The representative from France is not accepted he wanted the money and ordered his troops to prepare to fight. The government of Benito Juarez organize the defense. He made in charge the general Ignazio Zaragoza to get to Puebla and fight with the French. They attacked each other in the " Fuertes de Loreto y Guadalupe. The troops of Zaragoza, helped from the Indians Zacapoaxtla. In 1862of Mat 5 they won against the French. The emperor from France, Luis Napoleon Bonaparte, wanted to extend his powers in America and in Asia. He dreamed to form a great empire. Mexico took advantage of that situation to peek an European emperor to govern Mexico and to stop the politic anarchy. Luis Napoleon made them recommend Fernando Maximiliano de Habsurgo, brother of the emperor Francisco Jose. Maximiliano accepted his embarkation to Mexico but with her wife, the princess Carlota Amalia de Belgica. Luis Napoleon send his army to wish napoleon luck. Austria and Belgica also send troops. The emperors arrived to Mexico at the end of 1864. In Veracruz, Puebla were great big welcomes. To confront the invaders, to the president Juarez formed a government itinerante, who traveled from the capital to the north border. From this places it continue the position of the millitar action from the armies from the North, West, command from
He also illustrates principles of design. If you were to place a vertical line on the picture plane the two sides would balance each other out. The painting can also be divided half horizontally by the implied divisional line above the horses head and the sword of the man who St. Dominic has brought back to life. Contour horizontal lines that give the expression that the dead man on the ground is sliding out of the picture plane, and dominate the bottom of the painting. On the top of the picture plane, behind the spectators is the brightest intermediate color, which is red orange that gives the impression of a sunrise.
Two of the most extensively analyzed works of art are Diego Velasquez's Las Meninas and Jan Van Eyck's Arnolfini Double Portrait. Both of these artist's talent won them recognition not only during their lifetime but after as well. Both Velasquez and Van Eyck have a justly earned title as the most talented artists of their respective times. A detailed examination of the details and intricacies of these artist's respective masterpieces, their similarities, and what sets them apart not just from each other but from other paintings from their time period and style, will lead the viewer to a better understanding of the mentalities of these gifted artists and how they transcend their respective genres and contemporaries to create their own artistic identities.
One of Spain’s awe-inspiring painters in history, Diego Velazquez not only painted beautiful and detailed artwork, but also created a broad story for the viewer to recreate and reinvent. One such painting, according to the Prado Museum, is “Las Meninas,” in which he tells the story of Infanta Margarita, her little meninas, and of course her parents (“Museo del Prado”). Velazquez effectively uses baroque style, intricate colors, and accurate positions in “Las Meninas” to allude that social status is imperative.
The next most noticeable point of this painting is where the figures of the Queen of Sheba and Solomon stand. They appear to protrude out from the rest of the painting. Each has an out turned foot that comes into the viewer’s space. This aspect and the symmetry make it apparent that the Queen and Solomon are the characters to be focused on.
guitar. Because of this Andres developed his own technique, he had discovered quite early that
The artist used the colors and materials to make the painting look flawless. The gold used in the painting shines upon lights reflection. The dark green border compliments the dark green cloth used only in decorating the king’s horse.
Diego Rivera was deemed the finest Mexican painter of the twentieth century; he had a huge influence in art worldwide. Rivera wanted to form his own painting fashion. Although he encountered the works of great masters like Gauguin, Renoir, and Matisse, he was still in search of a new form of painting to call his own (Tibol, 1983). His desire was to be capable of reaching a wide audience and express the difficulties of his generation at the same time, and that is exactly what h...
A huge element to the mural is Leonardo’s use of color. Jesus persona is illuminated and given much more light than the others, but light and dark are not the extend of what makes this painting unforgettable. Most of the disciples as well as Jesus are wearing blue emphasizing a sense of unity. Jesus is the only one wearing bright shade of reddish/orange but many think it may have been the foreshadowing for the tragic events. The table they are eating on is also draped with white cloth, a symbolic color to show purity and emotional cleanliness of Christ. Leonardo employs a fully frontal One-point perspective system. This system focuses our attention on Christ, since the perspective lines almost as rays of light radiating from Christ head. Representing the effects of color and light in creating believable space. The clarity and contrast between light and dark emphasize the foreground elements. The small details of the mountains in the far background, the doorway, and the clouds in the sky commendably difficult to paint. The object farther away appear less distinct and often bluer in color. Varieties of lines including wide, vertical, horizontal, thick, curved indicating the edge of a two-dimensional flat shape and three-dimensional form of the rectangular table, flat surface wall, and the dining room ceiling. Lines are frequently used to outline shapes, forms and space. The volume, movement, and patterns can all be created using line in both 2D and 3D such as objects on the table, doorway, rectangular table, and the simple artistic effect of the dining room
Wealthier people might have it in their homes because it portrays the landscape of western parts of North America; a part where most have still not traveled to, yet still thought was it was absolutely beautiful. This work of art was made to communicate the idea of The West. The West to most people in Easterners was a foreign idea, it still part of their unknown. This painting as well as other similar ones, were paintings that were created to show the breathtaking landscape of the western side of North America. I think the function of this painting is to act as a tool to exemplify the natural wonders and beauties of The West. The painting’s function is to get people to want to move to peaceful places such as the one in “Autumn on the
Vermeer’s artwork emphasizes some certain elements and principles of art. He uses value on the blue figure to show more emphasis of it. He also uses the element of line on the on the black and white tiles. It shows balance on how the black and white tiles are in symmetry. There is form being used on the black figure which has movement when holding an object in its
Some may dismiss Gomez’s art as showing a political statement or even as an attempt to remove deceit from the world and fallaciously argue that he is rebelling the traditional art and mocking those who are interested in it. A reason one might believe this is because he is, in a sense, defacing artworks that have been highly esteemed within the art community. Not only has he derived from Hockney, but also from Marina Abramović’s The Artist Is Present and Jeff Koons’s Balloon Dog (Blue). Some audiences may interpret his quasi-replications of these venerated art pieces as offensive because he is mutilating and in the process removing their immaculateness. In Gomez’s Las Meninas, Bel Air, 2013, he derives from Diego Velazquez’s Las Meninas; however,
The illusion of depth is present as the viewer can clearly distinguish that there exists some sort of space between her and the back; however, no other information is given to help determine how far away the wall is, if the tabletop is flat underneath the cloth, and nor whether she is standing or sitting. Theses unknown questions raise tension and give movement to the painting. Movement is created similarly like in Degas’ painting- the viewer’s eyes is directed along the combination of curved and straight lines through the work of art. As opposed to the curved lines in Degas’s painting, three straight lines arranged in a x-y-z plane manner is responsible for directing the viewer’s gaze to the focal point of this composition- the woman’s face. Emphasis to her face reveal a thoughtful and grim expression on a rosy and bright complexion, which suggest that the root of her despondent mood is not due to some internal suffering, but rather provoked by some external factor. Like Degas, Cézanne slices off the lower body of the woman to emphasize proximity and intimacy from the viewer to the woman. Both works incorporated the art elements of lines and space to draw the viewer’s attention to the woman, specifically her facial expression, but Degas and Cézanne each had their own
To me the painting is a way of showing you what everyone else is seeing. That the painter had the men looking right at each other so they can see themselves running away. In turn I got to see myself doing the same thing and was able to change because of it. When other people look at the painting they probably see something else. That is why I choose to do the painting, it gives you the choice too interpret it any way you see fit. Or it can just be a beautiful painting to look at, but the painting was so much more to me. It painted a thousand words for me.