Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Dictatorship merits and demerits
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Dictatorship merits and demerits
The Dictator’s Learning Curve: Inside the Global Battle for Democracy by William Dobson presents a thorough analysis of the continuous struggle in the modern world of dictatorship. For this research, Dobson travelled to a lot of countries with dictatorial government, with the intention of showing the rest of the world how modern dictatorship maintain its power and deal with any opponents who threaten its regime. In the beginning of the book, Dobson mentions that it is hard for dictators to keep their crimes away from the world. Dobson also talks about how communication media first affected dictatorship. In 1974, the Portuguese military played a song that signaled for a military coup, which caused the nation to exile its own dictator the following day (3). In essence, Dobson proposes that throughout the years the internet and social media have greatly hurt dictatorial regime’s power. However, Dobson also claims that dictators have learned their mistakes over the years and somehow managed to increase their power on their people, hence meaning of the dictator’s learning curve.
Throughout his book, Dobson mentions several examples of the effect of social media and mass media on dictatorship. For example, Dobson thoroughly talks about how a large group of people around the world quickly came together to protest against the dictatorship. This incident arose from “an anonymous call for a Chinese Jasmine Revolution…over social media and the Chinese equivalent of Twitter” (Dobson 50). Dobson later mentions that China’s senior leaders had a meeting on how they should control China’s mass and social media on the events happened in the Middle East, so that such incident would not occur in the future (50). This effect of social media and the ...
... middle of paper ...
... dictators have been exiled or even executed as a result of the widespread use of these technologies. Dobson also writes that the biggest problem that dictators and authoritarians face is their own people (9). These factors drive dictators to learn their mistakes and their fellow dictators’ mistakes, causing the nature of dictatorship to change over the years. Particularly, Russia and China are still going strong as dictatorial regimes even though they do not appear to be so. Additionally, the involvements of non-state actors such as the CANVAS, have also affected the dictatorial regime power. With these non-state organizations have grown stronger and more powerful over time, the power of dictatorial regime has become more vulnerable to attack. In fact, these non-state actors can easily overthrow some less powerful dictator and might forget their democratic identity.
The authoritarian regimes of the Middles cycled through a pattern of anti-western policy until the globalization effects of economics and information demanded reform. As conservative Arab states try to maintain the autocracy they relied on after gaining independence, their citizens, affected by information and education expansion, challenge their resistant governments as typified by Syria’s unwillingness to capitulate. The proliferation of information and education underscored the protest movements of the Arab Spring because citizens’ contempt for their obstinate governments grew to large under economic pressures, as the current situation in Syria demonstrates.
Malcolm Gladwell’s article "Small Change: Why the Revolution Will not be Tweeted" raises a significant question about the prospective contribution of web-based social networking to the advent of progressive social movement and change. Gladwell bold declaration that "the revolution will not be tweeted" is reflective of his view that social media has no useful application in serious activism. Contrasting various elements of the “high-stakes” lunch-counter protests in Greensboro, North Carolina in the 1960’s with the “low-stakes” activism achieved through social media, Gladwell concludes that effective social movements powerful enough to impose change on longstanding societal forces require both “strong ties” among participants and the presence of a hierarchical organizations. In contrast, Gladwell characterizes the social networks as an interwoven web of "weak ties" that is inherently devoid of a hierarchy. Gladwell’s prerequisites for social movement are firmly based in strong body of sociological evidence, but his views regarding the nature of online social networks are laughably lacking in foresight and obstructed by a misleadingly selective body of evidence.
Imagine yourself in a world where you are constantly having to fear not being able to ever be free from this cage that you've been wanting to get out of for so long. Now imagine that suddenly just being your real life and not just a world that was just imagined, it’s almost too unbearable to think about but this happens. The book “Before We Were Free is a good example of that. The books takes place in the Dominican Republic in the 20th century, when the Dictator at the time was Rafael Trujillo, or in other words El Jefe. Dictators are a ruler with total power over a country, typically one who has obtained power by force. Till this day there are countries that are still ruled by dictators, for example, North Korea However, having a dictator
Americans as they go through their day to day lives, do not very often see corruption of power here at home, so they very frequently forget the sufferings of other nations under the power of oppressive regimes. It is important to remember that human power, in its pure form, will tend to be used for evil rather than good. In fact Golding creates such a situation in his book Lord of the Flies which will later be seen. It is also important to know that even if a person is conditioned to use his human power for good and not for evil, the temptation to use that human power for evil is often so great that the user will succumb to the temptation and could use that human power to do something terrible. This is seen in both I Only Came to Use the Phone and Lord of the Flies. Another important aspect of human power is that human power with good intent is often stamped out by human power with evil intent. This is demonstrated by some characters in Lord of the Flies. So basically, human power is an indiscriminate force which can be used for either good or for evil depending on the human who is yielding said power; however, in general, human power is used to achieve selfish and evil desires.
Many citizens today are truly unaware of how much of their private lives are made public. With new technological advances, the modern democratic government can easily track and survey citizens without their knowledge. While the government depicted in 1984 may use gadgets such as telescreens and moderators such as the Thought Police, these ideas depicted can be seen today in the ever evolving democratic government known to be the "equivalent" of the people's voice. Orwell may have depicted a clearer insight into modern day surveillance than one may have imagined from this "fictional" novel. Furthermore, a totalitarianism based government is a dictatorship, in which the dictator is not limited by constitutional laws or further opposition.
At first dictators can just be simple leaders but when power gets to them they want more and more and soon become dictators and they often tell lies to keep that power or in some cases people want dictators because it seems right at the moment but in the long run it isn’t always the right choice. George Orwell, the author of the famous book Animal Farm shows us in great detail the consequences of having a dictator through Napoleon the evil pig who murders anyone that gets in his way to gain control. By causing terror, committing violence, and telling lies Napoleon shows us what it could be like having a dictator for a leader.
In an authoritarian regime there are two kinds of people having their feet stick to the power, the soft-liner and the hardliners both groups present different chemistry in an authoritarian regime. More specifically the authors of the book identify these two groups as “duros” hardliners and blandos as soft-liners. The duros or hardliners are the ones who still believe that continuation of the authoritarian regimes in some cases are possible by ignoring and rejecting democratic reforms. In an authoritative regime these hardliners are composed of various fictions and layers and cling to the idea of position of authoritarian for various purpose and reasons. Some adopt this position to maintain and keep their positions
Notably, authoritarian governments substantially influence the orientation of a society with multiple methods. In V for Vendetta, the authoritarian government employs the combined efforts of five different departments in order to suppress the citizens of Britain. Utilizing a police force known as the Fingers, the government continuously uses physical means to enforce the immensely subjective laws while remaining imposing to the denizens (Moore, et al. 11). And then, the government manipulates the population through broadcasting since the airwaves are inundated with constant propaganda (Moore, et al. 17). In addition, the government exploits the omnipresence of surveillance cameras in order constantly monitor the masses and this method prevails as the government’s most formidable technique to quell the citizens.
However, books and newspapers are not our sole source of the written word. Online blogs, articles, and newsletters now exist. Television and books have merged into one: the Internet. Revolutions, riots, and rebellions don’t just happen in our living rooms now, they happen on the go with us. On the subway, when we’re waiting in line at Subway, at our friend’s house as he talks about how he’s “way into subs.”
dictator into power, the US is making the people in these countries suffer and go through very
In comparing the average citizen in a democratic nation, say the United States, to that of a non-democratic nation, for instance Egypt, it will be found that the citizen in the democratic nation is generally better off – free of persecution, free from fear of the authorities, and free to express his opinions on governmental matters. And while national conflicts occur everywhere, incidents like violent revolts have shown to be more prevalent in nations where citizens are not allowed to choose who governs them. It is slightly paradoxical that democracy, so inherently flawed in theory, can lead to such successful outcomes in practice. The question, then, becomes: “If democracy has so many weaknesses, why does it work?”
Safranek, Rita. 2012. The Emerging Role of Social Media in Political and Regime Change. s.l. : Proquest, 2012.
Are the leaders’ personalities to blame or is it the weak institution at fault for the downfall in democracy? My theory is that populist leaders are the proximate cause that destroys the balance of institutions and diminish democratic law. They first establish predominance; and then control all branches of government, and diminishing the check and balances of their country. In addition, using case studies such as in Ecuador, Venezuela, and Bolivia will help unfold an even greater understanding of populism in these countries and show the similarities and differences among the regions. Some case studies will show how it can also lead to authoritarian leaders.