Dichotomy In Fight Club

578 Words2 Pages

The dichotomy between Tyler and narrator serves a greater purpose than expected. It provides a physical illustration of the conflict between the Id and superego. The id the basic animalistic instinct that dwells in our minds. The superego is the civil part of the mind that obeys the laws and cares for societal standard. Tyler embodies the savage ways if the id while the narrator is the superego that cares for the rules. The emotional aspect of a relationship is a new creation in the history of humanity. Before our species, saw sex as a pleasurable act that brought a new generation to protect.In every instance of sex, Tyler is the one performing it. Tyler is the narrator sexual drive. The id is a representation of the sexual instinct that lays dormant in us all. Tyler immediately givens into the urge to have sex. In addition, Tyler chooses not to maintain any emotional relationship. The narrator is left to do that part. In everyday life, it is not our intellect that drives our sexual desires. It is our primitive instinct. With lust also comes the affinity for violence. Tyler instigate the spirit of violence in the narrator.Tyler said, "I want you to hit me as hard as you …show more content…

"You said so yourself. You were fighting everything you hate in your life.(Palahniuk ch22)" The instinct to survive and to extinct is the embodiment of Tyler. To seek pleasure is the aim of most species. The narrator saw his life as “Desire is the residual remainder/by-product of the subjection of jouissance (i.e., Trieb an sich, the unconditional attachment to das Ding) to the ego-mediated negotiations between the pleasure and reality principles. In other words, desire is symptomatic of the drives’ dissatisfaction with the pleasure-yielding compromises of sublimation.(Johnston, A. (2001). The Vicious Circle of the Super-Ego: The Pathological Trap of Guilt and the Beginning of Ethics.Psychoanalytic Studies, 3(3/4), 411-424.

Open Document