Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Theme of death and loss in literature
Theme of death and loss in literature
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Theme of death and loss in literature
“Where else could the necklace be?”, asked Monsieur Loisel.
Undoubtedly, Madame Loisel had discussed with her husband about where they needed to go. Madame was guilty about losing the necklace, and was trying to visualize locations where the necklace could be.
“Let’s try looking around the ministry.” Madame Loisel proclaimed.
Both Madame and Monsieur went to the ministry, where Monsieur noticed a woman with the exact same diamond necklace that Madame Loisel had borrowed from Madame Forestier.
“Excuse me.” Madame Loisel uttered.
Monsieur had just realized the same observation Madame Loisel had made about the woman’s diamond necklace.
“Have you seen a diamond necklace identical to your diamond necklace?” Monsieur
…show more content…
Loisel asked, grasping for the stranger to say yes. “Sorry Sir, I have not. I received my diamond necklace from the jeweler down the street from here.” the female stranger said. “Well, thank you for helping us. Good day.” Monsieur proclaimed with feelings of grief for not finding the necklace. Monsieur and Madame Loisel continued their search to find the diamond necklace. They had walked past the ministry coming across an alleyway where Madame Loisel had noticed something shiny and very bright hiding under a pile of trash. “Look over there.” Madame Loisel said. She removed the basket finding one diamond from the necklace. Madame placed the diamond in her pocket. “I still can not believe how you lose such a precious and valuable necklace? How stupid of you.”, Monsieur said. Madame had begun to weep, but kept herself quiet.
“Maybe we should ask around to see if anyone had noticed you dropping the necklace.” Monsieur said.
Madame and her husband walked towards the police station. She had taken out the diamond from her pocket ready to show the officers if they had seen any diamond necklace. All of a sudden, Madame Forestier had arrived to accompany them.
“Hello, how was the ministry, Madame?” Madame Forestier stated.
“Splendid, I especially adored the diamond necklace you had let me borrow.” Madame Loisel said.
In that moment Madame Loisel had realized what she had said and quickly tried to change the subject. Madame Forestier was shocked to realize that Madame was not wearing the diamond necklace.
Madame Forestier asked “Where is that necklace?”
Madame Loisel had begun to weep. “I am so sorry, it was an accident.” Madame Loisel stated.
“It’s ok, I will definitely try my absolute best to assist you in finding that diamond necklace.” Madame Forestier said.
“Oh, thank you so much.” “How will I ever repay you.” Madame Loisel said.
“Oh, you do not have to, it’s my gift to you.” Madame Forestier said.
Monsieur called out a cab to transport them back to his home. Madame and Monsieur Loisel had gotten in the
car. “Ow, that really hurt.” Madame Loisel yelled. Madame Loisel had inspected under her seat when she noticed that she was sitting on her diamond necklace. “Ah, I found it.” Madame Loisel cried. “Here, is the diamond necklace back. Also, thank you for lending me the diamond necklace.” “Good bye.” Monsieur and Madame Loisel said. “Good bye.” Madame Forestier said. Madame Loisel was so happy. She hugged Monsieur. “Thank you.” Madame Loisel said.
5. (CP) Madame Loisel borrows seemingly expensive necklace to satisfy her arrogance and attend a party that was way above her social class, only to lose it. She has been blessed with physical beauty, but not with the lifestyle she desires. She may not be the ideal protagonist, but she went through a tough time after she lost the necklace and had to make money to replace it.
“The Necklace” gives a strong representation of what the story is about. When Madame Loisel was looking for jewelry with Madame Forestier, “She came
“Ok,well let’s go ask the owner and check to see if she was there” says Sheila.
“this is going to be a treasure” Kristina stated from the other side of the room
Mrs. Loisel and the grandmother are very similar due to the fact that they both had the same motivation prior to their accident. It was a selfish motivation that cost them their lives. Mrs. Loisel's character was selfish in "The Necklace" because instead of wearing flowers like her husband suggested, she chose to borrow her friend's jewelry. "You can wear some natural flowers. At this season they look very chic. For ten francs you can have two or three magnificent roses. 'No, she replied, there is nothing more humiliating than to have a shabby air in the midst of rich women.'" (67) This is truly an act of selfishness on Mrs. Loisel's part. If she wouldn't have been so arrogant, she could have just worn the flowers to the party and it would have saved her a lot of trouble.
Situational irony occurs throughout most of The Necklace; it appears when Madame Forestier lends Madame Loisel a diamond necklace since “[she’s] upset because [she] haven’t a single piece of jewelry or a gemstone or anything to wear with [her] dress.[She’ll] look like a pauper. [She] almost think[s] it would be better if [she] didn’t go” and lets her borrow it for a ball one night so Madame Loisel can fit in; however, she ends up losing the necklace(174).Madame Loisel was not informed of the fact that the diamond necklace was actually fake. In a panic, Madame Loisel and her husband work hard and pay the loans off for many years trying to replace the necklace only to find out it wasn’t real; they gave up their decent lifestyle and had to save up for ten years. The situational irony is the fact that Madame Loisel thought that if she borrowed the diamond necklace it would help her become closer to the life she wanted, but the necklace ended up putting her and her husband into poverty and without the life that she longed for, instead. The ten years of poverty that Madame Loisel and
In 1785, the court jewelers, Bohmer and Basange, constructed a necklace with five hundred and forty diamonds of varying sizes in an ugly arrangement that resembled the collars worn by circus animals. They hoped that King Louis XV would purchase it for his favorite, Madame du Barry. Unfortunately, the king died before the necklace was completed. So, naturally the jewelers tried to sell the piece to the newly crowned Queen, Marie Antoinette, because she was known for her extravagant spending and taste. They priced the jewelry at and equivalent of two million dollars in modern money. The Queen declined the offer. She did not like the necklace and the price was even too high for her. Knowing that they would be ruined if the Queen didn’t buy their product the jewelers continued to plead with her for ten years. Each time she turned them down. Then, one day the Queen received a note signed by Bassange which said, “We have real satisfaction in thinking that the most beautiful set of diamonds in existence will belong to the greatest and best of Queens.” Puzzled by the message, the Queen, put the note to flame by a candle sitting on a nearby table (Komroff 85).
Guiscard noticed his guest’s fascination at his coat collection. “Feel free to grab one if it catches your eye.”
Immediately, Mathilde realises necklace is not on her neck anymore it is lost. They checked the cab, but could not find it. Monsieur follows there step back, but unfortunately he could not find it. They decide to go to the jewelry store and look for similar diamond necklace Mathilde Loisel was wearing. De Maupassant let 's reader know the price of Necklace, “ The price was forty thousand francs. The store will let them have it for thirty-six thousand” ( Maupassant 177 ). Monsieur made some arrangement for the money. He had Eighteen thousand franc which his father gave to him and the rest he had to borrow from other people and promised to pay them as early as possible and with a healthy interest rate. They successfully replace the new necklace and went to Mathilde friend 's house to return it. give to her friend. And start paying up people they loaned money
“The Necklace” ends up to be a very ironic story as it explains why valuing the more important things in life can be very effective towards a person’s happiness. One example of the story’s irony is when she is at the party dressed as a beautiful and fancy woman. ‘She danced madly, wildly, drunk with pleasure, giving no thought to anything in the triumph of her beauty, the pride of her success…’ (pg 193). This is a form of dramatic irony because Guy explains earlier that Mme. Loisel is just a middle class woman who dreams of a wealthy life, but she is just alluding herself as a luxurious woman. Another example of irony in the story is when Madame found out that the necklace was paste. On page 196, Mme. Forestier, Ma...
But the misery taught Madame Loisel to accept her situation. She was dressing like commoners; she was doing all the household chores without complaining. She was living a poor woman’s life and she accepted it. Because she knew that she has to pay the debt for the necklace. So this misery lasted for ten years when they finally cleared all the debts. It was a huge relief for them. That little incident has shaken her life; she realizes that it losing it was the reason of her misery. This is where she is wrong, instead of thinking that she should be thinking why she borrowed it at the first
The Necklace also displays distinctive realism in the use of socioeconomic influences which are essential to the plot. The major conflict in the story would be absent and the theme would not be obtainable without Mathilde Loisel’s insecurity about her own socioeconomic reputation. An example of Loisel’s self-deprivation nature is presented when she realizes she does not have a necklace, she says “I shall look absolutely no one. I would almost rather not go to the party” (Maupassant, sec. 3). Another example of the self-conflict caused by social pressure is Loisel’s immediate attempt to replace the necklace and her reluctance to speak to her friend Madame Forestier about the necklace for ten whole years. If she were not conflicted by societal pressures she might have avoided the whole situation altogether. The Necklace establishes a realistic difference in value between the necklaces and proposed clothing. Her husband proposes flowers which were valued 10 franks so in any case if she had chosen the flowers there would have been an insignificant economic loss. Her decision not to tell her friend about the necklace ends up costing her seven times the worth of the original. The roses symbolize the simpler things in life to the theme of the story. Mathilde Loisel’s withered appearance at the end
In the short story “The Necklace”, the main character, Loisel, is a woman who dreams of greater things in her life. She is married to a poor clerk who tries his best to make her happy no matter what. In an attempt to try to bring happiness to his wife, he manages to get two invitations to a very classy ball, but even in light of this Loisel is still unhappy. Even when she gets a new dress she is still unhappy. This lasts until her husband suggests she borrows some jewelry from a friend, and upon doing so she is finally happy. Once the ball is over, and they reach home, Loisel has the horrible realization that she has lost the necklace, and after ten years of hard labor and suffering, they pay off debts incurred to get a replacement. The central idea of this story is how something small can have a life changing effect on our and others life’s. This idea is presented through internal and external conflicts, third person omniscient point of view, and the round-dynamic character of Loisel. The third person limited omniscient point-of-view is prevalent throughout this short story in the way that the author lets the reader only see into the main character’s thoughts. Loisel is revealed to the reader as being unhappy with her life and wishing for fancier things. “She suffered ceaselessly, feeling herself born for all the delicacies and all the luxuries.” (de Maupassant 887) When her husband tries to fancy things up, “she thought of dainty dinners, of shining silverware, of tapestry which peopled the walls…” (de Maupassant 887) As the story goes on her point of view changes, as she “now knew the horrible existence of the needy. She took her part, moreover all of a sudden, with heroism.” (de Maupassant 891) Having the accountability to know that the “dreadful debt must be paid.” (de Maupassant 891 ) This point-of-view is used to help the reader gain more insight to how Loisel’s whole mindset is changed throughout her struggle to pay off their debts. Maupassant only reveals the thoughts and feelings of these this main character leaving all the others as flat characters. Loisel is a round-dynamic character in that Maupassant shows how she thought she was born in the wrong “station”. “She dressed plainly because she could not dress well, but she was as unhappy as though she had really fallen from her proper station.
This quote shows that she is sly because she knows that it is the exact amount that he was saving up. She is asking no less and no more, and she knows that he has that money to give to her. Madame Loisel gets her dress, but she doesn’t have enough money for jewelry. She complains to Mr. Loisel, ““I'm utterly miserable at not having any jewels, not a single stone, to wear,” she replied. “I shall look absolutely no one.
So Loisel go sit and searches for an identical necklace, but when she does find it, it’s worth thirty-six thousand francs including discount.