Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Is democracy necessary for development
Is democracy necessary for development
Corruption in developing countries essay
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Is democracy necessary for development
Assisting developing countries should be the responsibility of the developed countries.
To what extent is this statement true?
Today’s world has been divided into developing and industrialized country. Developed countries play an indispensable role in assisting developing nation in dealing with essentials areas as health, education and trade. Developed country should help the developing countries depending upon the resource and the ability of a country. This could lead to a good working relationship in the future also breaking the poverty cycle.
Countries like United States, Japan are considered as developed or industrialized because of the form of government (democracy), free market economy, lack of corruption, prevalent technology they possess. And the country likes India, Thailand, Brazil with low standard of living are considered developing countries because of the lack of modern technology, undeveloped industry, and low-level education. A country is considered to be developed or developing mainly on the basis of economics, per capita income, industrialization, literacy rate, living standards etc. A developed country has highly developed economy and advanced technological infrastructure comparison to other developing countries. Developing countries are still struggling for their basic needs such as education, health and employment. While on the other hand, the developed countries are far better in education, health and employment. There is massive gap between economies of developed countries and developing countries. Many developing countries faces difficulties to stimulate and sustain economic growth due to high unemployment lack of education, poor infrastructure and unsuitable rules and regulations.
Although, it is controve...
... middle of paper ...
...nited States is the world leader in humanitarian assistance and food aid offering over $3 billion in 2000. It has spent $ 1billion per month for the war on terrorism and in addition $97 million of funds has been offered to international peacekeeping. United States is the top source of private capital to developing nations, be around $36 million yearly between 1997 and 2000.
In my conclusion, I agree assisting developing countries should be the responsibility of the developed countries. Developed countries has to enrich the potential from developing countries so that developing countries can stand on their own base. the developed countries plays a vital role in assisting developing countries in dealing with essential areas such as health, education and trade. We all are human being and we all want to live in better world with peace and harmony. Helping each other
The United States continues to give around $550 billion in aid to other countries each year, making America the world's top donor by far (Richardson). While the United States government only supplies $252 billion to needy Americans each year. Former Assistant to the President for Communications, Patrick Buchanan said, "The idea that we should send endless streams of tax dollars all over the world, while our own country sinks slowly in an ocean of debt is, well, ludicrous" (Foreign Aid). The United States need to give money to support the domestic impoverished rather than supporting developing foreign countries because the poverty and homelessness in America is increasing faster than the aid necessary to reduce this trend. Part of the reason that the United States should aid the domestic impoverished is that some foreign countries cannot be trusted with the money given to them and in certain cases, the money intended to aid countries are harmful for that country’s well-being.
I do believe that we have the obligation to help people in our world but no in the way Peter Singer puts it we should let people live their lives make choices to help themselves but we should make it easier for them to help themselves. Financial aid from global powers is a good step but until we have the freedom to join a nation without going through checkpoints and bureaucracy the problem will still exist. Money can't fix the problem but better diplomatic relations and the freedom to do and be who and what you want would be a good
Before extending aid to other countries, we should focus on our more prevalent domestic problems. Patrick Buchanan said, "The idea that we should send endless streams of tax dollars all over the world, while our own country sinks slowly in an ocean of debt is, well, ludicrous. Almost every American knows it, feels it, believes it." The topic of United States foreign policy is greatly debated, and a decision on how to handle is very hard to come by. It seems as if we are finally leaning towards less aid to foreign countries, as we try to cut wasteful spending. The American government is finally opening its eyes to the realization that all of the aid we are giving out may not be worth it. Our priority should be to help our homeless, instead of other countries' poor.
The globalized nature of today’s society means we cannot afford to put our heads in the sand and live in our own little bubble. For the world’s economy and the world’s trade to succeed and prosper, the whole world must succeed and prosper. By creating jobs and giving them the tools...
The wealthy countries cannot help everyone, there would not be enough for themselves. People should always do what they can to help one another out, however we can, ignoring the problem will make more problems. By helping out your fellow man it will to help yourself indirectly. Immigration adds to exhaustion of food, and will destroy resources faster. Although, without immigration we would not have such a diverse culture, or exchanging of different ideas. The creation of the World Food Bank was intended to help the poor around the world, but it is used unfairly. Not everyone can contribute equally, so often countries only take from the bank without giving anything back. On the other hand, without the world food bank people would die. Countries should give to the bank if they have extra, or even if they never have to use it for themselves, it is only right.
The United States is one of the leading suppliers of Foreign Aid in the world, and even though the US gives billions, European countries give aid money to the same countries, this causes many areas of the Middle East, Africa, and Asia to be almost fully dependent on foreign aid. This means that without aid from other countries, they would not be able to support themselves at all. Foreign aid is meant to help countries that are struggling with civil unrest, disease, or natural disasters, it is not meant to help keep the country out of debt, but that is where more and more of the US and The EU’s foreign aid budget is going. The question is, does all this money actually go where it is intended? It should be going towards the government and to help the people, but in many cases, the countries government does not have the resources to properly track the flow of money. The countries in most cases have poor infrastructure and corrupt or oppressive leaders, not always at a national level, but in the towns and cities. So this means there is almost no way to oversee the flow of foreign aid through the country, all we can see is that their situations aren't getting any better and the countries are still impoverished. If this is the case, where are the millions of dollars going? Countries like Afghanistan and Iraq receive the most money from American foreign aid and European aid, yet they are still under oppressive governmental rule and there is still an extreme difference between the rich and poor. Garrett Harding’s theory of “Lifeboat Ethics” exemplifies how not giving aid to others will allow the strongest of society to thrive, while teaching the impoverished to help themselves. He believes that giving aid to poor countries will only make ...
are more advanced than their own. Third world countries can receive food from stronger nations
Third world countries have the name underdeveloped countries, but it is better to call them over-exploited countries. Developed countries are implementing several foreign policies and trading blocks that have nothing to develop the less developed countries; on the contrary, they exploit the development and block growth in many ways such as imperialism, globalization, and capitalism. These practices of developed nations prevent third world countries from development. The countries that have advanced technologies and standard economical status are considered as the developed countries. Besides their growth, these countries have started taking advantage of third world countries that are also less fortunate in terms of economy and technology.
When looking through the topic of development, two drastically different ways to assess it arise. The majority of the western world looks at development in terms of per capita GNP. This means each country is evaluated on a level playing field, comparing the production of each country in economic value. Opposite this style of evaluation is that of the alternative view, which measures a country’s development on its ability to fulfill basic material and non-material needs. Cultural ties are strong in this case as most of the population does not produce for wealth but merely survival and tradition.
Every year there is a ‘league table‘ published showing the level of economic growth achieved by each country. The comparison is made using each countries Gross Domestic Product, or GDP. An important factor to look at is the difference between actual and potential economic growth. Actual economic growth increases in real GDP. This increase can occur as result of using previously unemployed resources, or reallocating resources into more productive areas or improving existing resources. Whereas potential economic growth is the productive capacity of the economy. For example, it can be shown by the predicted ability of the country to produce goods and services. This changes when there is an increase in the quantity or quality of the resources. All countries have different ways of achieving this with the resources they have available to them. For this reason it party answers the question of why some countries are richer than others. It is widely thought that the productive capacity of an economy will increase each year largely due to improvements in education and technology. This will obviously differ from country to country. For example, in the UK the quality of fertilizer could be improved, hence forth increase the years fruit and vegetable output.
four adults in ten who can read and write and less than one in four
However, on the other hand economists will link. development to developed/developing economies and will use GNP (Gross). National Product) and GDP (Gross Domestic Product) to measure it. These are examples of two definitions of development, however it needs. to be said that technological improvement and justice are also interrelated features, which need to be considered.
Through individual, national, and global aid, we can take steps to decrease the overwhelming amount of poverty in less-developed countries and even in our own lands.
If these developed countries continue to prejudge underdeveloped countries by wealth or other conditions, when people are faced with serious problems in society, these problems become global. By helping each other, all countries offer hope and compassion, and share new knowledge with each other. Therefore, people all over the world suffer less, because they know they are not alone.
Underdevelopment can be understood in relation to development. Development is explained by the Oxford Dictionary as the process of developing or developed in a specified state of growth or advancement. Underdeveloped, as according to the Oxford Dictionary, is ‘not fully developed or not advanced economically’ which is meant for a country or a region. We can certainly see the difference between underdeveloped and developed, where the changing situation emerges from the economic point of view. To be more specific, worlds within the world were created i.e. the nomenclature of First World and Third World came into picture.