Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Fate and free will of Oedipus rex
Fate vs free will shakespeare
Fate and free will the drama of oedipus
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Fate and free will of Oedipus rex
Avoidance of Prophecy in Oedipus Rex
Oedipus Rex illustrates the Greek concept that trying to circumvent prophetsÕ
predictions is futile. The play includes three main prophecies: the one made to
Laius concerning his death by the hands of his son, a similar one directed to
Oedipus, and one made by Tiresias foretelling OedipusÕ discovery of the
murdererÕs identity. Both recipients of these oracles attempt to avoid their
destinies, but both wind up following the paths which the Fates have
prescribed. Laius had received a prophesy which declares Òthat doom would
strike him at the hands of [his] son....Ó Jocasta, in an attempt to ease OedipusÕ
worries, endeavors to defame prophesy in general by describing LaiusÕ
apparent circumvention of the augury. When LaiusÕ son wasnÕt yet three days
old, the king had the infantÕs ankles fastened together, and then gave the boy
to a henchman to be flung onto Òa barren, trackless mountainÓ; Jocasta
believes her son dead. Laius had believed that by killing his only son, he
would be able to avoid the oracleÕs prediction. However, the shepherd
entrusted with the terrible task of infanticide pitied the baby and gave him to
another shepherd, who, in turn, donated the child to the King and Queen of
Corinth. The boy, Oedipus, was raised as the son of King Polybus and Queen
Merope, and still believes himself to be their issue even as Jocasta relates the
ironic story of his own previous Òdeath.Ó Oedipus, of course, finds out that it
was indeed his own, true father, Laius, that he has killed at the crossroads at
Phocis. LaiusÕ attempt at foiling fate didnÕt work; Oedipus killed him because of
a slight insult. Because Laius felt to shameful to kill the infant himself, he took
a risk in hoping that his loyal shepherd would murder the child for him. That
risk allowed Oedipus to live and, therefore, to kill his own father without
knowing his true identity. Had Laius not attempted to have his newborn 1
killed, the boy still would have caused his fatherÕs death somehow, because
the oracles are never wrong, and most Greeks realize thereÕs no way to
escape fate. Oedipus also tries to avoid his fate, which he had received from
ApolloÕs oracle at Delphi. While Oedipus lived as Prince of Corinth, a drunken
That thing in the Dumpster--and he refused to call it human, let alone a baby--was nobody's business but his and China's. That's what he'd told his attorney, Mrs. Teagues, and his mother and her boyfriend, and he'd told them over and over again: I didn't do anything wrong. Even if it was alive, and it was, he knew in his heart that it was, even before the state prosecutor presented evidence of blunt-force trauma and death by asphyxiation and exposure, it didn't matter, or shouldn't have mattered. There was no baby in the room. There was nothing but a mistake, a mistake clothed in blood and mucus.
”(153) It becomes clear that the parallels presented throughout the play are there to further illuminate the flaws of Hamlet’s character. Laertes is a hot-headed man looking for revenge. His father was killed by Hamlet and his sister was driven insane due to the series of events that took place because of Hamlet. Like Hamlet, Laertes wants to avenge his father by killing the man who killed Polonius.
When establishing whether it was fate or free will that determined the outcome of Oedipus’ life we must take in to consideration each side. Some people can say that he brought all of his suffering on himself but then again some people can say that it was his destiny that bad things were to happen to him.
Patricide is a term used when an individual has committed the crime of murdering his father. However one can only commit patricide when he is aware that the murdered human being was in fact his biological father. Oedipus was adopted and had no idea that the man he killed was his father he thought he was adopted throughout his childhood and adulthood. Even thought his destiny was in fact to kill his own father, the unique reason the crime of patricide was committed was in self-defense. Laios, Oedipus' biological father, considered a wandered on a foreign road by Oedipus, insulted and assaulted his poor son, and other negative events transpired, which resulted in his own death. When someone commit murder by self-defense, it is...
It was not until a plague infected his city that he summoned a seer, only to find out that he was the cause of it by his relations with his wife/mother. He then questioned his father, who adopted him, and discovered the truth about how he was abandoned as a baby by his natural parents after a seer had foretold that he would kill his own father.
When Jocasta became pregnant and gave birth, the baby’s ankles were cut and he was sent away to die. After that, she does not know what became of him, though Oedipus is ailed with club foot – a result of the damage done to him as a newborn. When Jocasta tells him of this, Oedipus begins asking questions about Laius. He was killed at a crossroads and had graying hair, she says, and Oedipus begins to recall a man that he once killed at a crossroads, years before. “I have a deadly fear,” he says to Jocasta, “that the old seer had eyes” (lines 811-813). Indeed, Teresias could clearly see what Oedipus and Jocasta did not want
Robert Lee Frost and Emily Elizabeth Dickinson portray their individual objectives on their hardships in most of their poems. All through Dickinson’s adult life she never really traveled far from her hometown or far from her home at all. The individuals in her community thought of her as being an eccentric woman. She became known to the people for her fashion dressing in white, and her unwillingness to greet guests (Kirk, P4).
Prior to the birth of Oedipus, a prophecy was spoken over Laius and his wife Jocasta. They were told that their son would one day be his father’s killer and would then marry his mother. In fear, King Laius and Queen Jocasta sent the baby Oedipus off with a slave to be killed. He was never killed, but rather was given to a childless king and queen which lovingly raised him. Oedipus was never factually told about his lineage. Later in his life, Oedipus was confronted by several unknown men while traveling. Upon confrontation, Oedipus killed all but one of the men in self defense. Unknowingly, Oedipus had begun to fulfill the prophecy for one of the men had been his birth father, Laius.
Oedipus finds out that he is the killer of King Laius and will become the archetypal sacrificial scapegoat for the city of Thebes. Throughout this passage from the play, Oedipus is continually gathering incriminating evidence against himself from the source of his own wife and mother, Jocasta. He discovers through her attempted reassurance that his quest from Corinth set his fate to be the killer of his biological father and the sacrificial scapegoat for the welfare of the people and land of Thebes.
Dickinson's poetry is both thought provoking and shocking. This poem communicates many things about Dickinson, such as her cynical outlook on God, and her obsession with death. It is puzzling to me why a young lady such as Emily Dickinson would be so melancholy, since she seemed to have such a good life. Perhaps she just revealed in her poetry that dark side that most people try to keep hidden.
“The fear of death follows from the fear of life. A man who lives fully is prepared to die at any time.” There are several different types of death in the world and each person can imagine and describe death in his or her own way. Each individual see’s death in a different formant some see it as a horrible thing and are always terrified from it. On the other hand, some people might find death as interesting and an end to a beautiful journey. There are many questions asked about death, what happens after you die, what you feel after death, and what can you see in death. All these questions have no answer too and are always wondered about and make death a petrifying thought. Emily Dickinson is a poet which has a concern to death and the afterlife; many of her poems focus mainly on death and are rotated around the several aspects of death. Emily describes death in her poems in altered ways, two of the most known poems about death are” I heard a fly buzz- when I died” and "Because I could not stop for death". Both poems perceive death in their own aspect but, share the overall aspect of death. Although both poems describe the day that the speaker died and the speaker’s death itself, “I heard a Fly buzz – when I died,” is fully concentrated on the physicality of death, such that the speaker misses all view of any spiritual light, while “Because I could not stop for Death –“is concentrated on death decently as a spiritual trip from life to afterlife.
As she dies, with all her loved ones around her, she notices the buzzing of a fly at the window, as if it is trying to escape. In this poem, Dickinson writes, "I willed my keepsakes--Signed away What portion of me be Assignable--and then it was There interposed a Fly--" this displays the ability of the human mind to be in different mind sets, to understand and see different than NGOs based in the situation. Poole states, "...Both their buzzing and their liminality recall Emily Dickinson 's poem... Where the fly provides a distraction from the deathbed but also functions as a kind of shaman, buzzing between the living and the dead." In this, Poole is obviously agreeing that the fly in this poem represents a distraction from death, one of the most intriguing things. Through this poem Dickinson displays the power of our minds, even in the compelling case of
Emily Dickinson, one of the greatest American poets of the nineteenth century used many different themes, styles, and techniques that make her poetry so widely popular. The enigma that is Emily Dickinson continues to befuddle experts and leaves readers with a sense of deep, intimate connection through poetry. Even though she was a recluse, Emily Dickinson’s poems present universal themes that can communicate with the reader of the poems.
Life is journey that all are forced to take and it always ends in the same place; death. Emily Dickinson was one of America’s great poets and she “defined herself and her experience by exclusion, by what she was not” (“Dickinson, Emily” 457). Death is a well versed topic for Dickinson due to her many poems dissecting the subject. In her poem “I heard a Fly buzz – when I died –“the subject is experiencing their last few moments along with the reader. Dickinson’s life experiences, writing style and even the echoes of Hamlet resonate to provide a picture of the transition between life and death. The question that should be addressed first though is what kind of life leads Dickinson to the topic of death?
The objective of this report is to give understanding on the culture of Nigeria, the diversity of its people and the overwhelming struggles that exist. It also discusses the movements of the people, and how kingdoms arose and grew, and the expansions in their industries, in petroleum and their rural contributions, also the demographic features of the population of Nigeria, including population density, ethnicity, economic status, religious affiliations and added aspects of the population, and how Nigeria incorporates a more complete range of climate settings, and the environmental dangers the lands face, with corrosion, and the campaigns local and national, that fight to protect land from industrial development. The country's land that varies greatly, with lowlands in the south, hills and plateaus in the central region and plains in the north, with coastal swamps and tropical forests take over the southern lands, while the north is mostly savannah and semi-desert.