Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Tort law case studies on negligence
Wrongful negligence case
Classification of negligence
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Tort law case studies on negligence
Question No 3 3(a) In the case between Derrick v Ocean Beach Company (OBC), the issue is whether OBC owed a duty to Derrick’s safety and well being as a guest to their event, and whether OBC was in any way at fault to the injuries sustained by the plaintiff.
Derrick is filing claims of Negligence and is seeking Compensatory Damages for the injuries, pain and suffering he sustained. To win a negligence case, a plaintiff must prove five elements. Those are: Duty of Due Care, which means the defendant had a legal responsibilty to the plaintiff; Breach, which means the defendant breached her duty of care or failed to meet her legal obligations; Factual Cause, which means the defendant’s conduct actually caused the injury; Proximate Cause, which means it was forseeable that the conduct like the defendants’ might cause this type of harm to the plaintiff; and Damages, the plaintiff has actually been hurt or has actually suffered a measurable loss. A plaintiff generally receives compensatory damages, which means an amount of money that the court believes will restore him to the position he was in before the defandant’s conduct caused injury, for medical expenses that he has proven by producing bills from doctors, hospitals, etc. A plaintiff is also paid for pain and suffering.
Butfor the Surf Groupies that were hired by OBC, the bleachers that were setup would not have failed and injured Derrick, who then would not have needed the services of the EMTs, who then would not have failed to adequately attach the gurney to the inside of the ambulance, who then would not have been in the crash to re-injure Derrick. Ocean Beach Company owed a Duty of Due Care to Derrick of the Highest Liability. Derrick was an Invitee, which is someone who has a right to be on
…show more content…
As a result, Ocean Beach Company is liable for Compensatory Damages to be paid out to Derrick for medical expenses, pain, and
The case of the State of Florida vs. Chad Heins happened in 1994 in Mayport, Florida. It was on April 17, 1994 that Tina Heins, who was pregnant at the time, was found stabbed to death in her apartment. She shared an apartment with her husband Jeremy Heins and Jeremy’s brother Chad Heins. At the time of the incident Jeremy Heins was on a ship because he worked in the navy but Chad Heins was at the apartment. Before the incident happened Chad Heins, the defendant, who was nineteen at the time, used his brothers license to buy alcohol at a strip club near the apartment. After that Chad Heins had went to another bar where his brothers license got confiscated. He left the bar around 12:45 a.m. and went back to the apartment. He then washed his
City of Pinellas Park v. Brown was a case brought to the District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District by the plaintiff Brown. In this case, the Brown family sued the City of Pinellas Sheriff Department on the grounds of negligence that resulted in the tragic death of two Brown sisters during a police pursuit of a fleeing traffic violator Mr. Deady. The facts in this case are straight forward, and I shall brief them as logical as possible.
Medical malpractice cases are difficult for the families who have lost their loved one or have suffered from severe injuries. No one truly wins in complicated court hearings that consist of a team of litigation attorneys for both the defendant and plaintiff(s). During the trial, evidence supporting malpractice allegations have to be presented so that the court can make a decision if the physician was negligent resulting in malpractice, or if the injury was unavoidable due to the circumstances. In these types of tort cases, the physician is usually a defendant on trial trying to prove that he or she is innocent of the medical error, delay of treatment or procedure that caused the injury. The perfect example of being at fault for medical malpractice as a result of delaying a procedure is the case of Waverly family versus John Hopkins Health System Corporation. The victims were not compensated enough for the loss of their child’s normal life. Pozgar (2012) explained….
The book, Celebrated Cases of Judge Dee (Dee Goong An), takes place in China, during the Tang dynasty. The Tang dynasty took place from 618-907 CE and included both Confucian and Legalist influences. Located in the Province of Shantung, is the town district called Chang-Ping, where Dee Goong An served as the town 's magistrate. A magistrate is a judge, detective, and peacekeeper who captures criminals and is responsible for their punishments. The people of China looked at magistrates as the "mother and father" of their town. Magistrates received a large amount of respect from the people due to the amount of authority and power they had. With so many people relying on him to make their home
Was Dred Scott a free man or a slave? The Dred Scott v. Sandford case is about a slave named Dred Scott from Missouri who sued for his freedom. His owner, John Emerson, had taken Scott along with him to Illinois which was one of the states that prohibited slavery. Scott’s owner later passed away after returning back to Missouri. After suits and counter suits the case eventually made it to the Supreme Court with a 7-2 decision. Chief Justice Taney spoke for the majority, when saying that Dred Scott could not sue because he was not a citizen, also that congress did not have the constitutional power to abolish slavery, and that the Missouri compromise was unconstitutional. The case is very important, because it had a lot
In the same year that Zimpfer was rejected, Palm Beach County filled only 4 percent of managerial positions with persons over 55 years of age and only 16 percent with persons over 39. Do these data indicate illegal discrimination using disparate impact theory? Should Zimpfer's lawyer use disparate impact theory for his claim of age discrimination?
In the case of Kolchek suing to recover for Litisha’s injuries, she can sure under the negligence liability. Every product should be fully tested in every way possible to see if the product functions correctly and will it injure individuals. There should not have been a whole that is not covered. Like stated in our book The Legal Environment of Business, “if a manufacture fails to exercise “due care” to make a product safe, a person who is injured by the product may sue the manufacture for negligence”. Kolchek could sue the manufacture. In this case which is Great Lakes spa. Porter was just a company that was selling the product. Great Lakes spa should have taken the initiative to examine their products throughly before putting it out on the make for individuals to buy. Like in our book The Legal Environment of Business stated, “A manufacture, seller, or lesser is liable for failure to exercise due care to any person who sustains an injury proximately caused by a negligently made (defective) product.”
Medical malpractice lawsuits are an extremely serious topic and have affected numerous patients, doctors, and hospitals across the country. Medical malpractice is defined as “improper, unskilled or negligent treatment of a patient by a physician, dentist, nurse, pharmacist, or other health care professional” (Medical malpractice, n.d.). If a doctor acts negligent and causes harm to a patient, malpractice lawsuits arise. Negligence is the concept of the liability concerning claims of medical malpractice, making this type of litigation part of tort law. Tort law provides that one person may litigate negligence to recover damages for personal injury. Negligence laws are designed to deter careless behavior and also to compensate victims for any negligence.
There are many steps to go through once you decide to file a lawsuit. Many Americans suffer from injuries but only a small percentage of them file a lawsuit because many of them have valid claims but they have little money. Sometimes when plaintiffs, the person filing the lawsuit, go to trial there is a lot of money that has to be spent up-front. “Taking a large case on a contingency fee and advancing all the out-of-pocket cost is a very expensive proposition” (Bourhis, 2005, p. 76). Lawyers have created the contingent-fee arrangement. This is where “a lawyer agrees to take a case without any money up front and without requiring the client to pay an hourly or flat fee. In return, the lawyer is entitled to receive a percentage of the actual amount of money collected, generally 33 percent, but sometimes 40 percent if ...
The malpractice must be filed within two years after the incident was discovered but with no more than four years after in case of fraudulent concealment or intentional misinterpretation. However, this should not be beyond seven years after the occurrence of the actual incident (Miller, 2006). Many states have implemented no limit on the award given on the victim if he wins the case and the total sum to be given is dependent on the decision of the jury. However, the state of Florida implements caps on the amount of award to be given. Non-economic damages ranges from $500,000 to $1,500,000 only and may be doubled in severe injury on the patient and depending on the circumstances of the malpractice and its effects on the individual and immediate family.
To succeed in a negligence action, you must prove each of the following. The first element, did George owe the plaintiff a legal duty of care? Legal duty of care paradigm includes that a person acts towards others with attention, prudence, and caution. George owed a duty of care to people by leaving his car in park.
According to the facts in this case, Walkovszky was hit by a cab four years ago in New York and the cab was negligently operated by defendant Marches. The defendant Carlton, who is being sued, owned and ran the cab company in which he set up ten corporations, including Seon. Each of the corporations had two cabs registered in its name. The minimum automobile liability insurance required by the law was $10,000. According to the opinion of the court the plaintiff asserted that he is also ?entitled to hold their stock holder personally liable for damages, because multiple corporate structures constitutes an unlawful attempt to defraud the general member of the public.?
For 34 years, Bruce Petito, a partner at Petito & Petito has successfully handled hundreds of personal injury cases, ensuring these injured victims receive the compensation and help they deserve, some of these cases had $500,000 or more awarded. He also has a 17 year history of representing insurance companies as a trial counsel. This unique perspective gives him an edge when it comes to knowing what an insurance
As outlined by Colorado State University-Global Campus, (2014), this accident is an example of a civil wrong that resulted in the victim being awarded compensatory damages for losses stemming from injury. The lawyer obtained by my parents was initially seeking punitive damages against the City of Lakewood as a punishment for gross and wanton negligence to deter future wrongdoing, but the negotiations resulted in the award of only compensatory damages being paid by the city. The tortfeasor in this situation was the City of Lakewood, as it did not ensure the workers maintained required safety controls at the construction site, but it was not an intentional tort on their part. The lawyer’s responsibility on the side of the plaintiff was to prove n...
Another claim for relief, tortuous interference with business, concerns the intentional act of the physician’s report to the sheriff with the knowledge that it might interfere with their contracted employment with the hospital. Actual damages and losses resulted when the nurses lost their jobs.