Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
'Confessions' of Van Der Sloot vs reality
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: 'Confessions' of Van Der Sloot vs reality
Another main point about the disappearance of Natalee Holloway witch hunt is the fact that no factual evidence convicting Van Der Sloot has been found the single person who is accused, meaning that at the end of the day, even this one person cannot be linked to the killing Natalee Holloway The police when starting this investigation interrogated Van Der Sloot, who was with Natalee Holloway when she disappeared. Van Der Sloot revealed his side of the story “saying she choked on her own vomit and in a panic, he threw her off the boat”(Last)(Not that he killed her of course).In Fact this lines up with what Van Der Sloot’s friend was saying as well, besides the fact that after she had died from choking on her own vomit they “buried her body behind a house in a specific location”(Last) admits that the alibi is somewhat true even with some facts being slightly altered. This along with an element of the police not able to gather enough evidence to convict Van Der Sloot of Holloway’s death. Another point within the case is the search area of the place. Since Natalee Holloway was missing within the island of Aruba is the fact that it is a …show more content…
“69-mile coast line”(Briscoe) and the investigators have find a “strand of hair within a strand of duct tape on the other side of the island”(Briscoe) where Natalee Holloway disappeared. Simply put not only do the police not have the evidence to admit arrest him in order to find the evidence they need ,which is Natalee’s body, they would have to scour the entire island in order to find the body. Yet when they conducted the experiment it was evident that with the current technology ,around 2005 or even within present day, they would need a specific area to conduct the research on sea if what Van Der Sloot said was true but then again not only would the sea around the island would need to be searched the investigators would also need to conduct the search on the land itself further increasing the odds that the body of Natalee Holloway has disappeared forever never to be found or at least, not to be found in our lifetime. Indeed, another matter occurred where yes Van Der Sloot was convicted and charged and is serving around 28 years in prison it is not from the killing of Natalee Holloway but from Van Der Sloot admitting to murdering another woman in a casino.
Or if u heard otherwise from the news that Van der Sloot had indeed confessed. However Van Der Sloot’s videotaped confession admitting that he had killed Natalee Holloway is at most, from Dave Holloway (The father of natalee) is a “Is an obvious publicity stunt unworthy of belief … A lot of people don’t realize that in Aruba, a verbal or recorded confession is not valid, unless it’s a statement signed in writing”(Lhor). As such unless Jordan Van Der sloot has a signed confession that he had killed natalee holloway the video means nothing to the case as it was all for attention and possibly
money. The idea of a witch hunt occurring in the Natalee Holloway case is false in any case you make for it. There was no mass hysteria only the mother and father and there is no mass accusation there is only one person Van Der Sloot and if you REALLY want to push it further well then how about you could question Van Der Sloot’s friends who were also present, but then again it wouldn’t work anyway, as they also have an alibi and there is no evidence available to the police to bring them in for question less go to court and try to imprison them. In fact, when comparing this to the Red Scare or the Salem Witch trials There is almost nothing in common with the events, the disappearance of Natalee holloway showed no mass hysteria, no panics, no political gains, not because of cultural differences, no racial differences, no generation differences, no change in the social norm the only things that could relate were economic gains for Van Der Sloot as he demanded 250,000 in dollars from Natalee Holloway’s mother in order for him to give her the location of her daughters body. Which, while Holloway’s mother gave him a down payment of 25,000 he never revealed the body’s location and just fled with the money given before being captured and imprisoned for the said conviction he pleaded to in court.
On June 19th of 1990, Robert Baltovich’s girlfriend Elizabeth Bain went missing. Elizabeth told her family that she was going to check the tennis schedules at her school, the University of Toronto Scarborough Campus. She never returned, but her car was eventually recovered. It was found with blood on the backseat, with forensic tests showing that it was Elizabeth’s. With no clear evidence, the “solving” of the case was completely based on eyewitness testimonies, which eventually had Robert arrested for the murder of his girlfriend.
When Hae Min Lee disappeared on January 13, 1999, all of her friends (including the subsequently charged killer, Adnan Syed) thought that she moved to California. Hae’s body turned up a few weeks later on February 9, and the police later charged Adnan Syed, her ex-boyfriend with her murder. Jay Wilds, an alleged accomplice to the crime, confessed to the police that he knew that Adnan killed Hae and Adnan tasked him with burying her. The state later used Jay’s testimony as the foundation for their case, even though it contradicted some of the state’s own physical evidence. While Jay’s eyewitness testimony does identify Adnan Syed as Hae Lee’s murderer, it is self-serving and inconsistent, with no physical evidence to corroborate it. Therefore,
Fisch, Harmanpreet Kaur drank alcohol and did cocaine. She then went to Mrs. Fisch’s address,
Derrick Wallace, an ambitious handsome straight A student at Monroe College, has his entire life set out. He has recently won his basketball championship game and received exciting news from his girlfriend, Julia, about her moving back to the city from upstate university.
...lice or lawyers used their integrity. The police skirted around the law and use evidence that the witnesses said was not correct. They had a description of the suspect that did not match Bloodsworth but, they went after him as well. They also used eyewitness testimony that could have been contaminated.
The evidence presented to myself and the other juror’s proves that Tyrone Washburn is guilty beyond a reasonable doubt of the murder of his wife, Elena Washburn. On March 12, 1979 Elena Washburn was strangled in the living room of her family’s home. Her body was then dragged to the garage, leaving a trail of blood from the living room to the place it was found. Her husband, Tyrone Washburn, found her in the family’s garage on March 13, 1979 at 1:45 A.M. When officer Dale Chambers arrived at the scene he found her lying face down in a pool of blood. The solid evidence in this case proves only one person, Tyrone Washburn, is guilty of murder.
...y the accused there really was no hard evidence of witchcraft, the only reason anyone hanged was because the judges believed themselves so righteous that no one would dare lie in front of them, therefor the girls were telling the truth. I see no reasoning in the whole system they used to find witches back then in Salem.
While reading the case about Mr.Hossack 's murder i saw the wife, Mrs.Hossack, as innocent at first. The children all claimed that the two did not argue for over a year, so why would she kill him now verses a year ago? When the youngest child, Ivan Hossack, came to the stand and "told his story in a straight, unhesitating manner" it made it easier for me to believe in Mrs. Hossack 's innocence. The child even said that he saw his mother aiding his father when he called out for help. If she had been the one to swing the axe, why would she help him and risk getting in trouble? Most importantly, if he was conscious and talking, why wouldn 't he say who to murderer was? He could have easily identified his wife in the dark after being married for over twenty years, and yet he didn 't identify who had tried to kill him. Dr. Dean first stated that the axe did not hit the speech portion of the brain, so he could have been conscious and yelling out for his wife. Dean later stated that the fatal blow from the axe would have left Mr.Hossack unconscious. The murder weapon had blood on in and apparent hairs stuck to one side; "Prof. John L. Tilton of Simpson college... was unable to say definitely that the hair had been
Her body had been bathed and thoroughly washed before being placed, it was also completely drained of blood [2]. Two detectives were assigned to the case: Harry Hanson and Finis Brown. When they and the police arrived at the crime scene, it was already swarming with people, gawkers and reporters. The entire situation was out of hand and crowded, everyone trampling all over in hopes of good evidence. One thing they did report finding was a nearby cement block with watery blood on it, tire tracks and a heel print on the ground.
The new evidence added to the case is footage from both a dash and body cam, showing the events leading to Keith’s death. The new video evidence will be detrimental in the Keith Scott case because it shows how police attempted to resolve the intense situation. Nick Valencia provides evidence showing that Keith was instructed to drop his weapon several times, Keith’s wife had misinformed police numerous times, and Keith was actively taking prescription medication (Nick Valencia, CNN News). The situation is very interesting because the Scott family is claiming that Keith never had a firearm on him while the police were at the scene. From the article attorney, Justin Bamberg states, “The videos don’t show anything that should of lead to
For instance, the defense has denied to present you with the crucial evidence that would prove her innocence: an alibi. Justine was totally unaccounted for on the night of William’s murder, giving her ample time to commit the atrocity of causing his death. The defense has never presented you with anything that could account for her presence at some other location than the crime scene.
In Corsicana, Texas Cameron Willingham and his family’s home was burned down the twenty-third of December is 1991. According to the report Cameron was asleep when the fire started and survived the accident with only a few injuries, as for his children they were not so lucky, they lost their lives to the tragic accident. At the time of the accident Cameron’s wife was buying presents for their children for Christmas. According to a witness and her Daughter Diane and Buffie from a few houses down went outside and saw Cameron screaming, “My babies are burning up!” Diane and Cameron tried countless attempts to rescue the girls from their room until the fire department could get there. According to the New Yorker “The house, in short, had been deliberately transformed onto a death trap.” According to the reports on December twenty-fourth and twenty-seventh of 1991 the fire was declared arson and they later decided to conduct a criminal investigation. Cameron was questioned by the investigators on December 31st and was then later arrested on January 8th of 1992 for the death his three daughters.
As a result of the evidence that I found make me believe Adnan Syed was the murder of his ex girlfriend; Hae Min Lee death.
was left of the murderer, so in a way the police were not too blame,
Homicide is defined as “the killing of one human by another.”(Legal-dictionary, 2008) There are 3 categories of homicide which include first and second degree Murder, Manslaughter and Justifiable Homicide. First degree murder is when a person plans to and follows through with the killing of another person where the intent was death such as a boyfriend finding out his girlfriend is pregnant but because he does not want the baby he pushes the girlfriend down the stairs and kills them both he could then be charged with two counts of first degree murder. Second degree murder is almost like first degree murder in the sense that a person killed another person but they did not plan to kill them for example if a person were driving while drunk and caused an accident that killed another person she could be charged with second degree murder because she did not plan to crash and kill the other person but her actions of drinking caused the accident and the death of that person