Deontological Ethics In The Movie 'Thank You For Smoking'

770 Words2 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: Ethical problems in filmmaking

Thank You for Smoking was best described best described by the Seattle Post as “… a breathtaking satire.” The movie is a hilarious comedy about a lobbyist, Nick Naylor (Aaron Eckert) who is a charismatic Spokesperson for Big Tobacco whose job is to discredit all the problems associated with smoking to the public, even if it kills him. This movie puts many ethical theories and concepts into perspective, which normally aren’t discussed in film. The major ethical dilemma that is present throughout the movie is how Naylor and Finistirre both go against everything Deontological ethics stands for.
Deontological ethics states that an action is considered morally good because of some characteristics of the action itself, not because the product of the action is good. A German philosopher by the name of Immanuel Kant’s is commonly associated with Deontology. His Law of Autonomy states “A moral agent is an agent who can act autonomously, that is, as a law unto himself or herself, on the basis of objective maxims of his or her reason alone.” Kant believed that all people are morally bound to do good because we are creatures invested with reason. One of his most important principles is the freedom to act morally, which for him is desire to do what is right. The problem with Kant’s ethics, are that not all good actions can be universalized and where has the line been drawn. For example if we have a categorical imperative not to lie, it is wrong to lie even if by lying to a crazy gunman, we can save an innocent person’s life?
Naylor’s greatest enemy in the movie is Senator Ortolan Finistirre (William Macy) who campaigns for cigarette companies to put a picture of skull and crossbones on every pack of cigarettes. Ultimately Naylor and Finist...

... middle of paper ...

...use he also does some ethically questionable things to get supporters for his cause. He deceivingly uses a child with cancer as a plant to boost his campaign and supporters. Senator Finistirre says:
“Fucking non-profits! When you're looking for a cancer kid, he should be hopeless. He should have trouble talking, he should have trouble breathing. He should be in a wheelchair, carrying a little goldfish in a Zip-lock bag, hopeless.”
He obviously doesn’t care about the kid who has cancer; he just wants support by any means necessary proving Naylor correct. The governor uses terms like “cancer boy” like he is an object, he only cares about his election. Even though the product of Finistirre’s campaign is positive, the actions he takes throughout the movie are considered morally wrong. This is the absolute opposite of what the deontological ethics states.

Personally I

Show More
Related

  • Rhetorical Analysis: Thank You For Smoking

    1086 Words  | 3 Pages

    Thank You for Smoking Rhetorical Analysis: Thank you for not smoking. The film Thank You for Smoking is an obscure jesting that follows a petitioner, Nick Naylor, for the tobacco industry. Murky comedies take a grave topic, and light the topic through mockery. A worthy example of rhetoric can be found in Thank You for Smoking, during a scene where Nick Naylor delivers an argument against putting a skull and crossbones label on every pack of cigarettes. Senator Finistirre does this during a hearing in front of a congressional committee lead by Vermont.

    Read More

  • Consequentialism In Training Day

    908 Words  | 2 Pages

    Deontology diverges from consequentialism because deontology concentrates on the rightness or wrongness of the actions themselves instead of the consequences. There are different types of deontological theories. According to Kant, theoretical reasoning helps us discover what we should believe whereas the practical reasoning tells us what we should do. Morality falls under theoretical reasoning. In Kantian deontology, motives matter. Rather than consequences, it is the motive of an action makes that action morally right or wrong. Likewise, if an action intends to hurt someone, but eventually it benefits the other person, then it does not make that action morally right. All in all, deontology comes down to common-sense: whether it is a good action or a bad

    Read More

  • Deontology in Jim and the Indians

    891 Words  | 2 Pages

    The deontological view would be that we should act according to a set of rules, obligations, or duties that we must fulfil, unmindful of the consequences. Kant, a popular deontological philosopher of the 19th century, wrote in his “Foundations of Metaphysics of Morals”,

    Read More

  • The Rhetorical Analysis Of The Nicotinell Anti-Smoking

    912 Words  | 2 Pages

    Every year in the United States, more than 480,000 people die from tobacco use and exposure to secondhand smoke; consequently, making this the leading cause of preventable death in this country. People are usually introduced to smoking at a young age; mostly around the preteen years. During this critical time preteen are transitioning from middle school to high school; teens at this age find it a little harder fitting in with others all while forming their own sense of identity. Preteens only pick up the habit of smoking to cope with these challenges. What these teens do not know is that smoking at an early age only increases their chances of suffering from a lifelong addiction. To help assuage the situation the Nicotinell anti-smoking organization

    Read More

  • Case Analysis: Case Study: If Looks Could Kill

    1269 Words  | 3 Pages

    Deontology is when an action is considered morally good because of the action itself not the product of the action ("Deontological Ethics"). When applying Kant’s theory one also has to take into account the two aspects in determining what exactly the right thing in any situation is. They include universality and respect for persons. Universality states that you must “act only on that maxim which you can at the same time will to be a universal law”(Manias). Respect for person’s states that one must “act so that you treat humanity, weather in your own person or that of another; always as an end and never as a means only” (Manias). With this being said one must apply both of these to any option they are

    Read More

  • Rhetorical Analysis Of Thank You For Smoking

    1194 Words  | 3 Pages

    In the film Thank you for smoking, Nick Naylor- the main character of the film employs rhetorical devices such as re-framing, hyperbole and numerous logical fallacies to win his argument

    Read More

  • Ethics in Nursing

    1924 Words  | 4 Pages

    Deontology is an ethical theory concerned with duties and rights. The founder of deontological ethics was a German philosopher named Immanuel Kant. Kant’s deontological perspective implies people are sensitive to moral duties that require or prohibit certain behaviors, irrespective of the consequences (Tanner, Medin, & Iliev, 2008). The main focus of deontology is duty: deontology is derived from the Greek word deon, meaning duty. A duty is morally mandated action, for instance, the duty never to lie and always to keep your word. Based on Kant, even when individuals do not want to act on duty they are ethically obligated to do so (Rich, 2008).

    Read More

  • Compare And Contrast Nietzsche And Kant's Theory Of Ethics

    1054 Words  | 3 Pages

    Immanuel Kant’s theory of ethics is rooted in deontology. Describing Kant’s ethics as deontological means that they are derivative of mankind’s moral duty. For Kant, this critical component of ethics is an extension of Hume’s fork as it creates a third category, which is synthetic Apriori. This category is comprised of math, ethics and causality. His rules-based ethics revolves around the good will, as deontology in its nature revolves around adhering to the rules. Kant says that intelligence is great by nature, but means very little unless you apply them in virtuous and good will. In order for something to be truly good, it must be intrinsically good and without qualification.

    Read More

  • Essay On Ethical Lens Inventory

    1718 Words  | 4 Pages

    Deontological ethics are “ethical theories that place special emphasis on the relationship between duty and the morality of human actions” (Encyclopaedia Britannica, 2018). This viewpoint focuses more on the action itself rather than the outcome. Per Kant’s Categorical Imperative one should “so act that you treat humanity in your own person and in the person of everyone else always at the same time as an end and never merely as means” (Encyclopaedia Britannica, 2018). An example of this is that killing is wrong, even if it is in self-defense. Many of the values and morals of the ELI Responsibilities Lens are based on the deontological

    Read More

  • Deontological Moral Theory

    1228 Words  | 3 Pages

    Deontological moral theory is a Non-Consequentialist moral theory. While consequentialists believe the ends always justify the means, deontologists assert that the rightness of an action is not simply dependent on maximizing the good, if that action goes against what is considered moral. It is the inherent nature of the act alone that determines its ethical standing. For example, imagine a situation where there are four critical condition patients in a hospital who each need a different organ in order to survive. Then, a healthy man comes to the doctor’s office for a routine check-up.

    Read More

  • The Dark Knight: Utilitarianism Or Deontology?

    1179 Words  | 3 Pages

    Deontology in Immanuel Kant’s point of view is all about duty and not inclination of morality. For example, the First Proposition of Morality is an action that must be done from duty to have moral worth (298). In other words, if one were feeling generous and wanted to give money to the ones who really need it, this technically would not be moral worthy according to Kant. The reason why for this is because that person did not do it out of duty but instead out of free will. For one’s action to have moral worth, it could be an example of one going to work everyday. Everyone has their own specific job to do at work and that is their duty. All in all, Kant views that deontology must come from an action of duty in order for it to be moral worthy and it is not the consequences that determines what is right or wrong.

    Read More

  • Kant's Categorical Imperative

    1532 Words  | 4 Pages

    Kant's Categorical Imperative Deontology is the ethical view that some actions are morally forbidden or permitted, regardless of consequences. One of the most influential deontological philosophers in history is Immanuel Kant, who developed the idea of the Categorical Imperative. Kant believed that the only thing of intrinsic moral worth is good will. Kant says in his work Morality and Rationality “ The good will is not good because of what it affects or accomplishes or because of it’s adequacy to achieve some proposed end; it is good only because of it’s willingness, i.e., it is good of itself”.

    Read More

  • Cigarette Smoking and Lung Cancer

    675 Words  | 2 Pages

    ...his funding from the government and was sentenced 270 years in federal prison for “falsely curing” his patients. All of this is centered on money. The government receives luxury tax on cigarettes and hospitals receive billions of dollars because of the copious patients that are not forced into the hospital to receive radiation treatments and chemotherapy. Each person who is diagnosed with cancer is suddenly worth a minimum of $300,000 to the cancer industry. If the government eliminates tobacco, they are also eliminating one of the main causes of cancer, which would mean a loss of funds. The government’s focus should not be within monetary bounds. They should be more concerned with the estimated 159,260 Americans are expected to die from lung cancer in 2014.

    Read More

  • Analysis Of Thank You For Smoking

    1088 Words  | 3 Pages

    Thank you for smoking is a satirical comedy about a lobbyist whose job is to promote tobacco use at a time when the disease burden secondary to smoking threatens to cripple the nation. The film presents how industries, media and the government interact to influence the consumers’ decision. While the use of rhetoric, such as fallacies and twisted truths, is evident throughout the film, it is most evident midway when the chief spokesman, Nick Naylor, assists his son with his assignment. The son, Joey Naylor, enquires why the American government is the best and in response, the father argues it is because of America’s ‘endless appeals system’ (Thank you for smoking). His response seamlessly captures the tone of the movie as much as it represents the extensive use of a combination of fallacious arguments and twisted truths.

    Read More

  • Ethics Of The Tobacco Industry

    1021 Words  | 3 Pages

    One way that the tobacco industry can be more ethical is changing their advertising strategy. I believe that today’s advertising strategy is very misleading about cigarettes. Examples of this unethical advertising is in Argentina, here 20 percent of television advertising is spent on smoking commercials, as well as in countries in and around Africa there are billboards that depict a man in a business suit stepping out of a black Mercedes as a chauffeur holds the door. This displays that cigarettes make people classy and sophisticated, making cigarettes look not only harmless but stylish. Another good example of unethical depiction on cigarettes is in Nigeria; here they promote a cigarette for graduates, with a picture of a university and a student in a cap and gown. As if this wasn’t a misleading visual they add a slogan that says, "A very important cigarette for very important people." These ads and slogan are ...

    Read More

More about Deontological Ethics In The Movie 'Thank You For Smoking'

Open Document