Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Explain the importance of democracy
Explain the importance of democracy
Us constitution history essay
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Explain the importance of democracy
Question 1:
The framers of the constitution created the Democratic Republic, these are just some of the features that define the Democratic Republic. First is that a Democratic Republic is both a republic and a democracy. Democracy is based upon the majority rule and a person’s individual rights. A Democracy protects against all powerful central governments and transfer government to regional and local levels, and is a political system for choosing who should be in office based on free,and fair elections. Also makes sure that there is a protection of human rights. Citizens get the right to vote.
The decisions of the framers are still affecting today’s society, because even though the Bill of Rights was added to the constitution in 1791,
…show more content…
it is still relevant and used today. Society is still using and basing laws off of the constitution. Society is bound to the rules of the constitution and if laws are broken there are consequences. Question 2: The purpose of the tenth amendment is to figure out and establish the rate of power between federal and state. When the framers wrote the constitution they stated “Each state retains its sovereignty, freedom, and independence, and every power, jurisdiction, and right, which is not by this Confederation expressly delegated.” The problem with this statement is that it was too broad for the government. The reason why the election in 2009 was such a big deal was because Bush did not win the popular vote but yet, he won the election.
1888, 1876, and 1824 where the only elections in American history that a winner in the popular vote was denied presidency through the Electoral College System. The electors are chosen by state and only one candidate gets all the electoral votes for that state, even if they did not get all of the votes, as long as they get the “majority of’ then they get all of the votes for that one state. The pros are that a person still gets the right to vote and some people may even prefer the idea that someone else knows best, but the cons are that even if the candidate you voted for got the popular vote they still may not get the electoral college vote. They could still lose the election even if technically they won? but not actually. The process ultimately works in the countries benefit if the people are not able to pick the most qualified …show more content…
candidate. Question 3 When creating a federalist system of government there are three different types of powers. These powers are, Reserved Powers “All powers retained by the states”, Enumerated Powers “Those specifically granted only to the Union government” Concurrent Powers “Matters over which both the Union and the state governments have control” The sole purpose of the Tenth Amendment is to “define the establishment and division of power between the Federal government and state governments. This amendment also protects these powers from both entities. This amendment was used to define the federal taxing power, federal police power, and federal regulations.” Federal Government is the only form of government that can impose a tariff. Question 4 “The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.” The right’s to the accused intent is to insure that someone is not being forced to confess to something they did or did not do, because there should be probable evidence that would clearly show that person had committed the crime.
A person should always be read their rights before they begin with any kind of
questioning. The rights of the accused works in the accused favor for the most part. If they don’t want to speak, they are not required to. They can “Plead the Fifth” a person is invoking their fifth amendment rights when they plead the fifth. Ernesto Miranda was convicted of kidnapping, rape, and armed robbery. Ernesto confessed while being under police interrogation. Ernesto, However was not read his rights or told he had the right to remain silent. There was then a (Miranda vs Ernesto) case, in which he won and was released even after confessing to his crimes. Question 5 The Civil Rights Act of 1964 is a piece of civil rights legislation that outlawed discrimination with sex, race, religion. When someone applies for a job there is a disclaimer that states that the company does not discriminate, however the applicant must be a U.S citizen. This is regulated by having the applicant turn in proper documentation of citizenship.
According to the Merriam-Webster dictionary Democracy is a form of government by the people; especially: rule of the majority(Webster). This is what the United States is represented as, and this is based on the United States Constitution from which the United states draws all legal powers. In Robert Dahls book How democratic Is the American Constitution? He challenges this idea by trying to appeal to his readers in a way that they may view the United States Constitution in a different light. Dahl does this by pointing out flaws that the Constitution has and, draws on facts based on the other democracies around the world that the United States is compared too. He points out how many democratic ideas and innovations have a occurred since the conception of the American Constitution yet it has only adopted some of those idea.
Democracy is the structure of government still used today in many countries.The definition of democracy is a system of government where people who rule directly are freely elected representatives.In addition, democracy comes from the Greek word demokratia. Demo meaning people and kratia meaning power of rule. For instance, here is an example, Great Britain has a democratic government since elected officials and laws are voted on by the people and also the representatives they elect. Therefore Athens exemplifies a democratic government. “Athenians would meet and vote on a simple question …. is anyone becoming a threat to democracy? If a simple majority voted yes,then they dispersed and reassembled two months later,
The fact that the popular vote holds no power to whom becomes president shows that only some of the people have the power. This seems like a sign that our own government doesn’t have faith in the population to make an educated decision on who should become president. The way smaller states votes are more important than bigger states, shows that states are still not equal in power. The way to win the presidency is more of a strategy than having the ideas to be elected. An example of this is how the electoral college elected George Bush when Al Gore won the popular vote. George Bush is said to be one of the United States worst presidents and was elected through a thought to be flawed system. I also feel as though corruption plays a role in the electoral college compared to the popular vote being authentic. I think this should be replaced with a system of electronic voting that could accurately and clearly show who the majority of the population voted for. But I also think that some sort of requirements to vote should be enacted. Education plays a big role in politics and I feel as though there are people who just vote to be voting with no kind of background knowledge. As bad as it sounds I feel like it could narrow a better decision being made than smaller, less developed states being “mind controlled” into voting for
On December 15, 1791 the Bill of Rights was ratified to limit the government 's power, but no one could have predicted how the world would change and how the amendments would be tested. Since the Bill of Rights was written the world has changed drastically. With advances in technology, that the founders of the constitution could have never predicted, many of the amendments are not applied in the same ways as they were when they were written. The Fourth Amendment in particular has changed very much. The modern forms of communication have tested the Fourth Amendment and the government 's responses.
The first article “Why the Electoral College” by Frank Kuchar, published March 10, 2016, illustrates the advantages of the Electoral College rather then that of a direct popular vote adding that abolishing the already existing system and replacing it with a direct popular vote would change the entire U.S. government system. While in the other article “Point: Abolishing the Electoral College” by Benjamin Bolinger, published in 2007, illustrates the authors argument in favor of abolishing the Electoral College thinking that it would allow for the election of a president through a popular vote that most closely reflects the will of the American people. The Electoral College system of electing a President and Vic-President is an outdated system
By dismembering the Electoral College and replacing it with a popular vote, some Americans believe this would eradicate any further issues on who is placed in office, while others want a system to do the dirty work and select their future leader. But by eliminating the very system created to keep the states at peace, the Electoral College has, in fact, caused turmoil and confusion among the people in regards to American politics; many people have a sense of displacement and lack of care for politics due to the mindset that someone else is in charge and their voice does not matter. Allowing the American people to cast their choice for who takes care of their future and eliminating the middle man ideals of the Electoral College, government can give back to its people in ways they might not have thought about before. They give the people a voice, choice, and a sense of personal expression and freedom.
In 1787, the Constitution, created by a group of men known as the “Framers”, is the highest law in the United States. At first, the Constitution was not ratify because it did not have a bill of rights which is a list of rights that belong to the people. Therefore to allow changes to the Constitution, the Framers created the amendment process. In 1791, congress proposed twelve changes to the Constitution. Ten of the twelve changes were agreed to by the states and were called “The Bill of Rights.” Some of these rights include the right of free speech, the right to practice your own religion and the right to be silent if you are arrested.
Finally, these consequences go far beyond simple "fairness" issues. Too many times in American history the Electoral College has single-handedly defeated the purpose of democracy in our country. Since the first presidential election, there have been more than a dozen instances in which somebody has been elected president without a majority of the votes. The following are examples from how the electoral college has disrupted an election: Woodrow Wilson, Harry Truman, John F. Kennedy, Richard Nixon, Jimmy Carter, Michael Dukakis, Bill Clinton, and now George Bush.
The most significant issue of this system is that it is nearly impossible for a third-party candidate to win the election (Black). In all states, besides Nebraska and Maine, a winner-takes-all system exists for allocating electoral votes. Thus, the candidate who wins the majority of the votes in that state receives all of that states’ electoral votes. So even if a third-party has any significant support in a state if he/she does not receive majority they receive no electoral votes. Another drawback is that it is possible for the loser of the popular vote could win the electoral vote hence becoming president (Black). So the people’s choice is not always the winner. Many feel the people should choose the president rather than having the unpopular lead the country. Lastly, it makes voters feel that their votes do not matter since the most states vote the same way for most elections (Josephson). Voter turnout is usually low in the nation and without the Electoral College the incentive to vote may increase since people will feel that their vote actually counts since a direct election makes people vote for the president. Due to these drawbacks, countless Americans feel the nation may be better off without the electoral
First, the Electoral College system is not the optimum election system for the country of America because of the fact that it allows for a candidate with a minority of the popular vote to win the presidency. On several occasions, such as in 2000, a president has been elected with less popular votes than the major opposing candidate. According to the Encyclopedia Britannica, “I...
When the founding fathers of the United States met together to create a new government system, they had imagined a system that limited government power and protected the rights of the individuals. The framers wanted popular consent but with limits on the amount of power the majority would be allowed. A republican government, by definition, celebrates freedom and individual rights but views too much government and majority rule as threats to individuals. (pg. 5) A democratic government is ruled by the majority without consideration of the thoughts or wellbeing of the minorities.
Since the early history of our country, the protection of basic freedoms has been very important to Americans. The American voice on freedom has been shaped throughout history. The Bill of Rights was originally drawn up in June, 1789. On December 15th, 1791, the Bill of Rights were ratified and added to the United States Constitution. James Madison said that a bill of rights was good for the “tranquility of the public mind, and the stability of the government” (Burgar, Michael, 2002). Free speech and free press were most important to the drafters of the Bill of Ri...
Throughout history, many events have been passed and have made a significant impact on how the United States has changed and improved over time. One of the most known events to happen in history that has impacted the United States is the making of the Bill of Rights. According to our book, By the People, the Bill of Rights “form a crucial feature of the Constitution and of American government”. In the late 1700s there was a lot of controversy on whether or not the Bill of Rights would be beneficial to the Constitution and the United States. Strong arguments on both sides have been made, ranging from the opinions of federalist and antifederalist, and from articles that were discussed in class
The Bill of Rights was crafted in 1791 by James Madison. It was put in place to protect the rights of all people within the borders of the United States when it is applied by the government. It is a very important document that means a lot in the hearts of Americans.
A memorable expression said by President Abraham Lincoln reads, “Democracy is government of the people, by the people, and for the people”. Democracy, is a derived from the Greek term "demos" which means people. It is a successful, system of government that vests power to the public or majority. Adopted by the United States in 1776, a democratic government has six basic characteristics: (i) established/elected sovereignty (where power and civic responsibility are exercised either directly by the public or their freely agreed elected representative(s)), (ii) majority rule(vs minority), (iii) (protects one’s own and reside with) human rights, (iv) regular free and fair elections to citizens (upon a certain age), (v) responsibility of