Delcamp's Reflection On The Facilitators And Regis University

428 Words1 Page

Moreover, Delcamp et al. (2017) further analyzed how this type of inadequate class structure impacts not only on the student’s perspective, but also on the facilitators and Regis University as a whole. The aforementioned inconsistencies and hardware variations obviously have great impact upon the students and are paramount in their mind. Additional hardware concerns noted by Delcamp et al. (2017), though, illustrate when students, perhaps due to financial concerns, try to complete the course without the minimum hardware requirements. While less attributable to the class structure and more to the student’s poor judgement, it still leads to frustration and often failure, which is an undesired outcome by all. The facilitator’s perspective ties closely to that of the students. As outlined by Delcamp et al. (2017), facilitators obviously feel less than successful when students have to drop a class not because they could not understand the concepts but because of the ancillary reasons already mentioned. Other impacts on the facilitator’s perspective mentioned by Delcamp et al. (2017) is the class structure’s …show more content…

Delcamp et al. (2017) primarily noted the reputational and financial concerns associated with students dropping from a class due to frustration over inconsistent labs, leaving negative remarks concerning Regis on any of the numerous sites devoted to ranking colleges and universities, and how that, along with negative connotations that would result from an unwillingness by Regis to evolve their classes, would cause potential future students to shy away. Furthermore, Delcamp et al. (2017) noted that all of these factors would have a negative impact on facilitator turnover which also has negative financial impacts upon Regis University. All of these plethora of factors culminate into the unescapable conclusion that the MSES602 DevOps labs must

Open Document