Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Repression of women in literature
Repression of women in literature
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Repression of women in literature
Another key point is the dejection these characters face when pursuing their eccentric interests. Joan lives within a time period in which wanting to be anything else but a mother is considered obscene and unimaginable. Her ambition to acquire new knowledge is looked down upon and viewed as a sin, “ I read by night so no one would know. I knew you would not approve “ (Cross 57). Due to the constant reprimands she receives she is left to fight her inner struggles of self-worth and deal with rejection from her family and society. This rejection underlines how she is an outcast within her own time period. As for The Creature he aspires to be a friend to society,yet he is constantly leered at for believing it would ever happen. His belief that
“Why? Why? The girl gasped, as they lunged down the old deer trail. Behind them they could hear shots, and glass breaking as the men came to the bogged car” (Hood 414). It is at this precise moment Hood’s writing shows the granddaughter’s depletion of her naïve nature, becoming aware of the brutality of the world around her and that it will influence her future. Continuing, Hood doesn’t stop with the men destroying the car; Hood elucidated the plight of the two women; describing how the man shot a fish and continued shooting the fish until it sank, outlining the malicious nature of the pair and their disregard for life and how the granddaughter was the fish had it not been for the grandmother’s past influencing how she lived her life. In that moment, the granddaughter becomes aware of the burden she will bear and how it has influenced her life.
This passage defines the character of the narrators’ father as an intelligent man who wants a better life for his children, as well as establishes the narrators’ mothers’ stubbornness and strong opposition to change as key elements of the plot.
As the creature explores the teaching form the history book and the story and communication of the De Lacey family he insists, “I ought not to make the attempt until I had first become master of their language; which knowledge might enable me to make them overlook the deformity of my figure” (Shelley 95). Because the humans run away with fear in response to the creatures looks, he believes that the best way for him to relinquish their fear is by learning how to speak their language. Not only does he want to learn how to communicate with them, but he wants to become the “master of their language” so that his words overshadow the effects of his features. As many humans do, they judge the creature immediately without giving him an opportunity to explain his story. The creature is similar to humans in the way he responds to the judgment by others.
King, in introducing the little convent girl to the reader, goes to great lengths to present her as a dreary and uninteresting creature. She wore dark clothing, sat rigidly upright, secluded herself in her room, and displayed little zest for life. Therefor, when King uses the work "blac...
The Creature, pushed away from his creator because he is an abomination, and indicates his isolation as the only one of his species. As the Creature gets more comfortable with the De Lacey’s, he approaches the old man as his children are gone but before he can explain himself, the children come home and see the Creature, “Who can describe their horror and consternation on beholding me? Agatha fainted, and Safie, unable to attend her friend, rushed out of the cottage” (122). As regular humans, the De Lacey’s cannot accept the creature’s
The contrast between how She sees herself and how the rest of the world sees Her can create extreme emotional strain; add on the fact that She hails from the early 1900s and it becomes evident that, though her mental construct is not necessarily prepared to understand the full breach against Her, She is still capable of some iota of realization. The discrimination encountered by a female during this time period is great and unceasing.
... against the societal patriarchal norms, thus coding her as “other” and the facilitator of horror.
...She writes of the type of person that one can only hope exists in this world still. The message of her writing and philosophy is contained in a single phrase from the novel: “I swear by my life and my love of it that I will never live for the sake of another man, nor ask another man to live for mine,” (731). This is an inspiration, awakening an inner voice and drive that impels each person to do their absolute best. It implores the soul of the reader to awaken, to become the ideal of the human spirit, and to rise until it can rise no higher. It is a call to anyone with reason, anyone with the strength to be an Atlas, and it is reminding him or her of their duty to live up to the individual potential. For as long as there are those who would hear the message, there will still be hope for mankind.
The story shows prejudice of people. Like “Lusus Naturae”, the family treats her like a monster which starts from the stereotyping of appearance. Actually the behavior and mind of the family are cruel like a monster nature although their figures are not a monster. People should be concerned more on inner sight as compared to visible sight. Also, the appearance should not be a reason to discriminate human
...s important both symbolically and literally within the novel. Since manhood and masculine features are so heavily valued within this society, the challenge of one’s personality or actions can completely change them and push them to drastic measures.
In conclusion, in Lusus Naturae we see what it is like to be deemed a monster by both your family and community through the eyes of a young girl afflicted with a condition that makes her appearance look monstrous. We see how the Narrator’s family and community treats her because of her family’s shame and the community’s ignorance of her being a human being with feelings. Lusus Naturae allows us to see that it is not wise to judge a book by its cover or a “monster” by its
His failure to separate visible physicality from inner morality is a complication that the sense of sight confers upon reasoning. Shelley emphasizes how Elizabeth becomes a criterion of virtue; notably the descriptions of Elizabeth center around her exterior, rather than justify this model by her actions. Elizabeth’s “cloudless blue eyes” lack obstruction, suggesting that she has no ulterior motives or secretive nature (20). This transparency is non-threatening and promises clear skies free of the troubling storms/lightning that accompany the appearances of the Creature in the novel. Furthermore, her “clear” brow reflects her clear conscience/soul, and her “expressive face” does not resist translation by her companions (20). This exterior appearance is what elevates her to the ephemeral, with a “celestial stamp in all her features”, conferring purity and praise without her ever having to speak through her actions (20). The religious visual imagery used to describe her contrasts the antithetical Creature repressed by his demonic hideousness. This lack of foundation for character highlights society’s perverted belief that integrity manifests in the appearance, which the Creature, in all his unsightliness, falls victim
However repugnant he was on the outside, when Frankenstein’s creature begins to tell his tale of sorrow and rejection the creature does not seem to be monstrous. Although rejected multiple times by the humans around him when he finds a family in poverty and “suffering the pangs ...
They had to sacrifice their motherhood in some form or another in order to gain success in other aspects of their lives. Joan, a young girl wanted to have an education and so she ran away from home under the disguise of a boy to gain higher knowledge which was not an option for a girl in her time. Joan stated, “I dressed as a boy when I left home”… “I was only twelve. Also women weren’t/allowed in the library. We wanted to study in Athens” (8). Joan having to disguise herself as a boy, showed that women were not allowed to have an education; they had limited opportunities. However, under the disguise as a male, Joan was given the opportunity to be a pope, a role generally reserve for a man. Nevertheless, it was discovered that she was a female when she gave birth in public and hence, she was stoned to death. Even other women who did not have to choose between motherhood and career, were unable to get promoted even if they were more qualified than men. This is due to the gender gap and the historical male domination. Louise, who came for a job interview at Marlene’s employment agency stated, “Nobody notices me, I don’t expect it, I don’t attract attention by making mistakes, everybody takes it for granted that my work is perfect” (52). This illustrates that even though the feminist movement had made significant advances in gender equality, there are still limitations in inequality concerning
It is clear that aunt Jennifer was not the type of woman that spoke her mind and did as she wanted, she was constricted not only through her marriage but also by society and it’s opinions of the roles of women. Aunt Jennifer longed to be a strong, independent woman who didn’t fear men just like her tigers. Because she was never able to be the strong woman she wanted to be in her life she decided to create a way that would be eternal, hence the fearless tigers. No one would be able to destroy her brave soul then, not even her husband.