Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Importance of Democracy
Essay on Role of elections in democracy
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Importance of Democracy
Dalil Harchaoui
Professor Hudson Meadwell
Teacher Assistant Fouad Sherif
POLI 212
09 April 2014
Elections in Democracy
As the world observes an electoral tsunami, with most of the modern countries holding national or sub national elections every once in awhile a big question imposes itself: Are elections a necessary and sufficient condition for democratic politics? In fact, we can look at the coming April elections in Algeria, where Abdelaziz Bouteflika will probably win the elections with a striking majority of the votes, although he has obvious health issues that will clearly prevent him from ruling the country effectively. This quick example shows the relevance of the question regarding elections in democracy. Depending on the answer of the question, some regimes can be characterised as democratic without giving the power to the people. This has enormous impacts on notably the legitimacy of a regime and of the power holders in all countries. Being appointed by the people and viewed as such certainly makes actions and decisions more legitimate. This is why I will argue that election is necessary for democracy to hold, but it is far from being a sufficient condition for democratic politics. In this essay, I will start by defining democracy and base my argumentation around it. After, I will discuss the necessity of elections in a democracy and finally, I will argue that elections are not sufficient in order to hold a democracy.
Definition of Democracy
In this first section, I will define what is democracy. This is an important point to make, because the entire essay depends on what constitutes democracy. In other words, the arguments and explanations rely on the assumptions that the definition provided in this section will make. ...
... middle of paper ...
...s to the people. Even though they are necessary, elections are not sufficient to have a democratic states. Alone, they cannot channel political aspiration of the voters into a system that will respond correctly to their demands. Other conditions have to be met in order to have a real accountable democratic state. These conditions include, universal suffrage, respect of civil and minority rights, and the respect of “the rules of the game”. All of these conditions and more, clearly expose how elections are necessary but not sufficient in defining democratic politics. Furthermore, elections are means to come to an end – which is democratic rule of officials – therefore, it would be interesting to see if other means can come to the same results without the elections’ negative points. Yet, it is still the only way that democracy has to function effectively and properly.
1. Janda, Kenneth. The Challenge of Democracy. Houghton Mifflin Co. Boston, MA. 1999. (Chapter 3 & 4).
Janda, Kenneth. Berry, Jeffrey. Goldman, Jerry (2008). The Challenge of Democracy (9th ed.). Boston; New York: Houghton Mifflin Company.
Debating which constitutional form of government best serves democratic nations is discussed by political scientist Juan Linz in his essay “The Perils of Presidentialism”. Linz compares parliamentary systems with presidential systems as they govern democracies. As the title of Linz’s essay implies, he sees Presidentialism as potentially dangerous. Linz points out the flaws as presidentialism as he sees them and sites rigidity of fixed terms, the zero-sum game and political legitimacy coupled with lack of incentive to form alliances as issues to support his theory that the parliamentary system is superior to presidentialism.
The United States is run by a democracy. There are many pieces to democracy that must be in good health in order for democracy to be effective and work. In this essay I will critique some of the most important parts of democracy in America and go deeper. I will first focus on the strengths of United States democracy and then I will dive into categories of democracy that I believe to not be thriving. I believe that the current conditions of United States democracy are becoming a hindrance to this nation, because the opinions and freedoms the public possess are being stripped away through poor media, education, and economy.
In making this argument this essay seeks to five things. Firstly, to define democracy within the contemporary context offering the key characteristics of a modern re...
Particularly in recent years, our elections have been non-representative – even undemocratic – but we retain the right to practice what we want due to the constitutional democracy. Our identity as a constitutional republic has been renewed from the previous elections. The president was elected by government representatives through the Electoral College rather than directly by the people, which cements our government’s classification as not a democratic government (Gore). Even though we are nominally a democratic country, we are not practicing true democracy. The last presidential elections showed that we have a political system in which the majority maintains absolute power by means of “democratic” elections (Horowitz).
Firstly, K. Isbester mentions that democracy has a different meaning for everyone, as some can define democracy as a good aspect for development, on the contrary other believe that it is nothing more than voting after several years. Although, Latin America see democratic g...
In deciphering what constitutes the brilliance of democracy then, we find that it is not citizens’ ability to make informed decisions or an unflawed and subtly manipulated election process, but the unapparent way in which democracy persuades citizens – informed or not - and leaders – corrupt or not – toward working to build better, more prosperous societies.
Every country differs in their preference of political system to govern their countries. For democratic countries, two possible choices of governing are the presidential system and the parliamentary system. Since both the presidential and the parliamentary systems have their own strengths and weaknesses, many scholars have examined these two forms of government, and debate on which political system is more successful in governance. In this paper, I will first provide a detailed analysis of both the parliamentary and the presidential system. I will also evaluate each system’s strengths and weaknesses, addressing any differences as well as any commonalities. Finally, I will conclude by using historical examples to analyze and support the presidential system, which would be a more desirable system for a democratic government.
Throughout history different types of instrumental regimes have been in tact so civilizations remained structured and cohesive. As humanity advanced, governments obligingly followed. Although there have been hiccups from the ancient times to modern day, one type of government, democracy, has proven to be the most effective and adaptive. As quoted by Winston Churchill, democracy is the best form of government that has existed. This is true because the heart of democracy is reliant, dependent, and thrives on the populaces desires; which gives them the ability for maintaining the right to choose, over time it adjusts and fixes itself to engulf the prominent troubling issues, and people have the right of electing the person they deem appropriate and can denounce them once they no longer appease them. In this paper, the benefits of democracy are outlined, compared to autocratic communism, and finally the flaws of democracy are illustrated.
In a democratic state, elections, interest groups, and political participation give the people more power who live under this type of government. There is an important factor to take into consideration when looking at democratic systems, and that is to understand that there are two main systems; one is presidential and one is parliamentary. Even though Presidential and Parliamentary systems are based on a similar feature, that free and competitive elections will determine who will govern, there are many differences between the two including, how a president or prime minister comes into power, and who holds the power and because of this the policies that have been created have designed very different democratic governments (41).
In terms of democratic governance, it is commonly acknowledged as the exclusive, valid system of government in this modern-day period. Hence, it is habitually correlated with entirely everything that is wholesome (Gilley, 2009). Nevertheless, while the introduction of democracy in its present form, there have been countless reproaches intended at either cultivating or eradicating democratic governance (Gilley, 2009). Although censure of democratic governance is warranted, it maybe incumbent upon us to disapprovingly scrutinize the forms of criticisms in order to enhanced our understanding of the validity of the criticisms, or the absence of the things that were mention. Undeniably, the criticisms of democracy frequently proceed in two distinctive classifications; “the first inquiry about democracy’s viability, while the following inquiry its appeal” (Gilley, 2009, p. 114).
There have been enormous efforts to spread democracy as a political system throughout the world by the developed democratic countries and the international development organizations including the World Bank. By the late 1990s the United States alone spent over a half billion dollars to promote democratic expansion throughout the world (Diamond, 2003). These were done considering that the democratic system leads towards development. As a result in the late 20th century we saw a huge political transformation towards democracy. During the last few decades a huge number of countries adopted democracy as their political system. However, it retain a big question how far democracy is successful in bringing development of a country? At this stage, some people also criticizes the effort of democratization arguing that it is done without considering the context of a country, sometimes democracy is not ideal for all countries and it is an effort to extinct diversity of political system. In studying the literature regarding the debate, we found a paradoxical relationship between democracy and development. Some argue that democracy has failed to ensure expected outcomes in terms of development. While others confronted that democracy has a considerable impact on development. Another group of people argue that form of political system actually does not have any impact on development process. On the verge of these debates, some development institutions and academics throw light on why democracy is not working properly, and what measure should be taken to make it more successful in bringing effective development of developing countries. Consequently, this writing is an effort of revisiting the different views about impact of democra...
Democracy is a broad and far-reaching idea, and carries with it a specific set of relatively vague values. This becomes especially evident when attempts are made to transform the ever expansive interpretations of democracy into actual, tangible practice. An idea - however widely admired in theory - remains only as effective and representative as the mechanisms and persuasions in place to implement it into practice. How people interpret an idea and manipulate its indefinite principals - however self-serving at times or benevolent at others - will determine the subsequent outcomes.
Throughout this semester in history we have been learning about democracies. Before this class I knew little to nothing about a democracy. Now I understand a lot about democracy, and how democracies have changed over the years. Through this class I can now answer the three core questions “who am I”, “what should I know”, and “how should I act”.