Deepwater Horizon Spill Essay

681 Words2 Pages

Due to a failure of the vessel’s blowout preventer as the only guard against an explosion, the rig owned by Transocean imploded under numerous problems of maintenance. As dead batteries were investigated to be present inside the blowout preventer alongside defective wiring , BP was not the only company concerned with potential profit loss from acceptable safety standards. In order to maximize revenue generated by the Deepwater Horizon rig, Transocean officials failed to recall the vessel for maintenance inspection throughout its active nine-years. With BP officials discovering more than three hundred ninety maintenance issues within the Deepwater Horizon rig, the estimated time for such errors to be corrected came out to be approximately three …show more content…

These cumulative issues in turn allowed for oil to gather within the oil rig deck thus ultimately setting the rig aflame.Furthermore, Newman later admitted to knowing that Transocean recorded a dilemma in assuring safety with a track record exemplifying a total of four workers being killed in previous 2009 rig accidents. Thomas Roth, a senior Halliburton executive in charge of cementing operations during the period of the spill, confirmed that well design alongside other external factors resulted in “the cement placement to be a job that would have a low probability of success” (Krauss,Meier). Even with conducted stability tests on cement samples and proceeding investigations clearing indicating that the cement was not stable, BP accused Halliburton of destroying evidence of its cement testing in order to continue through with cement placement despite the risks.Finally, under the Clean Water Act, fines could range from $1,100 for every barrel spilled through simple negligence to as much as $4,300 a barrel if gross negligence is

Open Document