Decline Of The Safavid Empire Essay

1099 Words3 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: Fall of the safavid empire

In his text, Foran explores the decline of the Safavid empire and presents changes in the Empire’s structural- economic conditions as being responsible for decline. (Foran, 1992; 281) Following the death of Abbas, his successor Safi further instituted the policy of converting state provinces which were managed by the local Qizilbash tribes, into crown provinces managed by representatives of the Shah. This was under the guidance of his grand vizier Saru Taqi; the objective being to centralize the Empire’s wealth and weaken tribal opposition. (Foran, 289) While the institution of crown provinces strengthened the place of the Shah there were consequences. The instituted governors were remarked as ‘insatiable bloodsuckers’ and were filling the royal treasury at the expense of public interest. (Chardin, 1811; 252) At the same time it became common place for govenors to be accused of lining their pockets and selling positions of power. This corruption and exploitation, …show more content…

The context of each is significant with religion, leadership and political-economy playing a different role in each. However, we can see the prevalence of some over- arching themes. Each Empire saw a decline in quality of leadership; they each faced economic and military threats of differing significance. It is a combination of these factors that hastened their decline. Overall, the most significant lesson of the rise and decline of the three great Muslim Empires, is that each had unique circumstances and not one factor can be attributed to the decline of the Islamic empire. Effective interpretations of decline require an eclectic approach to the various facets of the three Empires; attributing the decline to one factor obscures the relevance of the others. Highlighting the most important factors would focus the declining leadership quality alongside economic

Show More
Related

  • Comparing the Post-Classical Empires of Arabia and the Byzantine.

    977 Words  | 2 Pages

    The political structure of the Arabian and Byzantine empires greatly differed from each other. The Arabian empire was ruled over by a Caliphate. The Caliphate was the successor to the great prophet Muhammad. Politically, the Caliphate sometimes caused trouble for the stability of the empire. With multiple groups such as the Umayyad and the Abbasid believing the were in charge of the Caliphate led to conflicts and violence. An example of conflict would be towards the end of the Abbasid empire when the death of Harun al-Rashid brought several full scale revolutions. Another example would be at the beginning of Abbasid empire when they went as far as too kill off all of the remaining Umayyad leaders to sustain full control with little to no interference. Politically, the Arab/Muslim empire stretched from India and the Middle East into the Africa, the Mediterranean, and Iberia. They also had a large influence in Southeast Asia. When they conquered these areas, there was no forced conversion. On the other hand, they did enforce a higher tax for non-Muslims which prompted people to convert. Only later were there violently forced conversions. A testimony to this would be when the Muslims invaded India and did not touch the Buddhist or Hindus already there. They even respected the Hindu leadership and allowed them to continue. The Muslim empire was successful in other parts of the world due to tolerance, and continued to operate in the face of power struggles.

    Read More

  • The Fall Of The Han, Rome, And Gupta

    580 Words  | 2 Pages

    In a period of four centuries the Han, Roman, and Gupta empires fell. First in China, then in the Mediterranean, and lastly in India. The civilizations deteriorated from foreign invasion, internal conflicts, and internal weakness that made it to where invaders could invade and cause the decline of these major civilizations.

    Read More

  • Similarities Between Han China And Rome

    352 Words  | 1 Pages

    Han China and Rome, despite having some political and cultural differences, fell in ways that were almost directly parallel to one another. Both civilizations experienced declines in everything from culture and population to economy and government, as well as both suffering from attacks by nomadic invaders. However, each civilization's fall had their own unique factors, and the lasting impact of their falls differed greatly.

    Read More

  • Ottoman vs. Qing

    875 Words  | 2 Pages

    The "Ottoman Decline" San Francisco State University, San Francisco, CA. 23 Mar. 2010. Web. The Web. The Web. 06 Apr. 2011.

    Read More

  • Comparing and Contrasting the Han and Roman Civilizations

    1013 Words  | 3 Pages

    Around the years 200 B.C.E two great civilizations emerged as powerful and influential Empires. The Han civilization and the Roman Civilization. Both civilizations contributed to the ancient world, with revolutionary technologies, literature, mathematics, and extensive trade. Although these were powerful nations, the causes of their decline were quite similar. Inept rulers, social discordance, and hostile incursions, are some of the numerous factors that brought about their inevitable downfall.

    Read More

  • Compare And Contrast Islamic Empires

    432 Words  | 1 Pages

    Three Muslim empires rose during the spread of Islam. These empires are different, yet also similar. They are the Ottomans, Safavids, and Mughals. They united other Muslims but also conquered other territories to form their own empires.

    Read More

  • The Project

    1014 Words  | 3 Pages

    Finally, both the Ottoman empire and the Ming Dynasty declined because of the same reason. The reason both empires fell was because of weak rulers. The latter Ming Emperors were weak and corrupt, and because the Ming Dynasty was imperial, the rulers weakness deteriorated the empire drastically. The Ottomans locked up the heirs in the royal palace, which left them with no experience with governing.

    Read More

  • How Did Rome Fall

    604 Words  | 2 Pages

    What can cause a strong empire to fall? Rome is known for having many achievements that have helped to advance culture such as, aqueducts, irrigation systems, and trade. They also helped improve the structure of cities by plotting them in grids which are still used today. Also, religions were taken very seriously. In fact, it got so serious that rulers insisted that they were to be worshiped as the god. Religion was a huge part of Rome’s structure. But when conflicts of religions surfaced, failure rose. Religion may not seem like a huge issue, but actually, it is one of the biggest problems known in history. This along with poor leaders and urban decay has contributed to the decline of Rome.

    Read More

  • European Influence on the Ottoman Empire and Egypt During the 18th and Early 19th Centuries

    1084 Words  | 3 Pages

    From the 18th century through the beginning of the 19th century, European influence was a significant force in various aspects of the Ottoman Empire, Egypt, and Iran. Although the reforms, coined primarily by Gelvin as “defensive developmentalism,” were initially intended to centralize governmental control and strengthen the military, the actual effects were much broader. Based on varying pre-existing conditions and unique approaches to governorship, this process of modernization affected each region differently. This essay will explore the manner in which European influence shaped each territory, the primary areas of civilization, politics and culture that experienced reform, and the degree to which that influence was significant, or in the case of Iran, insignificant. European influence was most prominent in Egypt, beginning with the dynasty of Muhammad Ali who initiated the reforms that would lay the groundwork for future rulers.

    Read More

  • The Byzantine Empire: The Ottoman Empire

    1152 Words  | 3 Pages

    Together but separate they started an economy centered on some form of money. While very different from each other both Empires saw it important to have some form of art and to show their people the glory they earned. Although they created Empires with a decent economy they were just as bad as previous Empires before them and did not last past the 1600s. It seems that in order to keep things straight and keep a country lasting without down fall wars and fighting need to end and instead people should join freely with each other or leave each other alone to do as they wish. All Empires, kingdoms, etc… must fail at some point it seems this conclusion is based on the falling of the Roman Empire, Byzantine Empire, Ottoman and Habsburg Empires and all other Empires that lasted several thousand years before they reached their

    Read More

  • The Rise and Fall of the Persian Empire

    2005 Words  | 5 Pages

    Iran was included in the territory of what was then the ancient Persian Empire. For centuries Iran (land of the Aryans) was also referred to as Persia, which was the official name until 1935. Fourteen years had passed before the Iranian government allowed the use of both names. Few groups of people today have significant history like the Iranians, descending from the ancient Persians, who possess one of the world’s richest and oldest cultures. Historically, a variety of other cultures and groups had once occupied the ancient Iranian plateau as early as 4,000 B.C.E, with little importance. Beginning by the third millennium, Persia was ruled by some of the greatest kings of all time, from Cyrus the Great to Darius the III, who turned the Persian Empire into one of the world’s greatest civilizations.

    Read More

  • The Decline and Fall of Empires

    1115 Words  | 3 Pages

    One of the most common causes of the decline of an empire results from having weak military power and martial spirit. In order for an empire to be successful, that empire must present a strong will to fight or sacrifice property and life in order to defend its state. If an empire does not possess this characteristic, it often will quickly diminish. For example, the Roman Empire became successful because of the willingness of the males to defend the state. Shortly after, the males lost their willingness to defend and the empire had to recruit unreliable mercenaries to fight in war. Unlike the successful army of the past, these mercenaries did not have true loyalty to Rome. Because of constant warfare, the Romans had heavy military spending. The Roman Empire had become too large to control effortlessly. Families and soldiers in parts of the Roman Empire adopted local customs. The Roman Empire was made up not only of natives from the Italian peninsula, but it was also made up of barbarians from the conquered lands. The barbarians were very knowledgeable when it came to Roman warfare and military tactics. Corruption became widespread throughout the Em...

    Read More

  • Describe and Explain the Decline of the Abbasid Caliphate

    2158 Words  | 5 Pages

    The decline of the Abbasids was not a steady of rapid series of events. There were numerous revivals of the Caliphate in which certain strong Caliphs gained more control and influence over the Islamic world than their predecessors had had. However at no point after the death of Harun al-Rahid (reigned 786-809) was the Caliphate ever as powerful. This period is regarded as the Golden Age of the Abbasid Caliphate and was followed immediately by civil war between his sons. Harun’s two sons were called Al-Amin and Al-Mamun. Al-Amin was the elder and was nominated as the heir to the Caliphate. However Al-Mamun, who was the effective governor of the eastern provinces was ambitious. He was spurred towards seizing the Caliphate for himself by his prominent advisor Al-Fadl. In 810 he declared himself an Iman causing his brother to disinherit and dispatch a great army to snuff out his ever increasing dominance of the Caliphate east of Baghdad. It seemed likely that Al-Mamun would be defeated, his army numbered around 4,000 men but faced 40,000. However he was fortunate in his commander, called Tahir bin Husain, who won him a spectacular victory at Rayy in 811. Tahir proceeded to siege Baghdad in 812. In that year Al-Amin was captured and forced to hand over the office of Caliph to al-Mamun. Al-Amin was executed after trying to escape Baghdad after it had been captured.

    Read More

  • The Fall of Ancient Rome and Egypt

    2278 Words  | 5 Pages

    Throughout history, there have been a variety of great and powerful empires. However, regardless of how powerful they were able to become, each empire had it's unfortunate downfall and ultimate ending. Perhaps two of the most powerful empires ever to exist and crumble were the Roman and Egyptian empires, both of which enjoyed long periods of wealth and success in their pasts. While the two empires operated on extremely different terms and conditions, there is undoubtedly good reason for comparison of their downfalls considering that the causes generally surrounded the fact that the empire suffered invasions. Of course, this was not the only reason in either case, but in both circumstances invasion played a significant role in the fall.

    Read More

  • Rise And Fall Of Empires Essay

    586 Words  | 2 Pages

    Power, control, influence and greed all describe the history of the rise and fall with some of the greatest empires, which all involve the jurisdiction of a central state including large quantities of land and diversity amongst it’s people. The growths of empires happen for different reasons such as military, victories, political control and economic growth and can be very short lived or last five hundred years ("Rise and fall of empires (article) |Khan Academy," n.d.). When an empire collapses it happens over a period of time as the central state gradually loses its power. The Roman, Anglo-Saxon and British Empires have many similarities that helped the creation and fall of these kingdoms.

    Read More

More about Decline Of The Safavid Empire Essay

Open Document