Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The relevance of the declaration of independence
Analysis of declaration of independence
The relevance of the declaration of independence
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: The relevance of the declaration of independence
On July 4, 1776, 56 wealthy, White men asserted, “All men are created equal” as they signed The Declaration of Independence. Thirteen years later, George Washington, became the first president of the United States of America, a nation where only six percent of the population could vote (Huskerson). This drastic departure from the principles of the Declaration of Independence represents the beginning of the endless cycle of political deception. Like most political decisions, disregarding the Declaration of Independence was motivated by self-interest. The Declaration of Independence represents the self-interest of rebels, and the attendees of the 1787 Constitutional convention were no longer rebels. Instead, they were wealthy, White men seeking …show more content…
They were freed into a world that gave them no opportunity for independence. To remain in the South was to once again be subjected to servitude. Taking advantage of their fragile social status, politicians began characterizing Black people as stupid, corrupt, hyper-sexual, and innately criminal. Their evidence was in the high rates of Black crime and the forced lynching’s this incurred (274). Their narrative allowed the conviction of any Black man accused of rape, and the acquittal of any White man accused of raping a Black woman. The post-reconstruction era policies show Republicans did not care about Black people, and that skewed policies were in the self-interest of Southern …show more content…
The act, which the court suggested was made to prevent corruption, mute the voice of the rich, and slow the increasing cost of political campaigns. Was deemed unconstitutional in the 1976 Buckley v Valeo decision because the court decided monetary donations was correlated with political support. What this does not consider is the value of $1000 to a rich person compared to a poor person. It deems all equal monetary contributions equal in level of
As an unabridged version of his other book, Eric Foner sets out to accomplish four main goals in A Short History of Reconstruction. These points enable the author to provide a smaller, but not neglectful, account of the United States during Reconstruction. By exploring the essence of the black experience, examining the ways in which Southern society evolved, the development of racial attitudes and race relations, and the complexities of race and class in the postwar South, as well as the emergence during the Civil War and Reconstruction of a national state possessing vastly expanded authority and a new set of purposes, Foner creates a narrative that encompasses some of the major issues during Reconstruction. Additionally, the author provides
America celebrates their independence on July 4th of every year, the declaration of independence states that “all men are created equal”. This document was signed in 1776 and meanwhile there were plenty of men and women still in shackles under their will. So, tell me how “all men are created equal” if it wasn’t until almost 90 years later when the rest of these men were set “free”. This document is fascinating because of the
Reconstruction(1865-1877) was the time period in which the US rebuilt after the Civil War. During this time, the question the rights of freed slaves in the United States were highly debated. Freedom, in my terms, is the privilege of doing as you please without restriction as long as it stays within the law. However, in this sense, black Americans during the Reconstruction period were not truly free despite Lincoln’s Emancipation Proclamation in 1863. While legally free, black Americans were still viewed through the lens of racism and deeply-rooted social biases/stigmas that prevented them from exercising their legal rights as citizens of the United States. For example, black Americans were unable to wholly participate in the government as a
Ida B. Wells-Barnett is an investigative journalist who wrote in honesty and bluntness about the tragedies and continued struggles of the Negro man. She was still very much involved with the issue even after being granted freedom and the right to vote. Statistics have shown that death and disparity continued to befall the Negro people in the South where the white man was “educated so long in that school of practice” (Pg. 677 Par. 2). Yet in all the countless murders of Negroes by the white man only three had been convicted. The white man of the South, although opposed to the freedom of Negroes would eventually have to face the fact of the changing times. However, they took every opportunity and excuse to justify their continued horrors. There were three main excuses that the white man of the South came up w...
During the four decades following reconstruction, the position of the Negro in America steadily deteriorated. The hopes and aspirations of the freedmen for full citizenship rights were shattered after the federal government betrayed the Negro and restored white supremacist control to the South. Blacks were left at the mercy of ex-slaveholders and former Confederates, as the United States government adopted a laissez-faire policy regarding the “Negro problem” in the South. The era of Jim Crow brought to the American Negro disfranchisement, social, educational, and occupational discrimination, mass mob violence, murder, and lynching. Under a sort of peonage, black people were deprived of their civil and human rights and reduced to a status of quasi-slavery or “second-class” citizenship. Strict legal segregation of public facilities in the southern states was strengthened in 1896 by the Supreme Court’s decision in the Plessy vs. Ferguson case. Racists, northern and southern, proclaimed that the Negro was subhuman, barbaric, immoral, and innately inferior, physically and intellectually, to whites—totally incapable of functioning as an equal in white civilization.
The Strange Career of Jim Crow, by C. Van Woodward, traces the history of race relations in the United States from the mid and late nineteenth century through the twentieth century. In doing so Woodward brings to light significant aspects of Reconstruction that remain unknown to many today. He argues that the races were not as separate many people believe until the Jim Crow laws. To set up such an argument, Woodward first outlines the relationship between Southern and Northern whites, and African Americans during the nineteenth century. He then breaks down the details of the injustice brought about by the Jim Crow laws, and outlines the transformation in American society from discrimination to Civil Rights. Woodward’s argument is very persuasive because he uses specific evidence to support his opinions and to connect his ideas. Considering the time period in which the book and its editions were written, it should be praised for its insight into and analysis of the most important social issue in American history.
Though campaign finance laws deal primarily with limitations on money expenditures, campaign finance is dealt with as a first amendment issue. Though it was argued in Buckley v. Valeo (which will be discussed in detail later on) that campaign donations should be considered conduct, comparable to burning a draft card, rather than speech. The Court claimed, however, that spending money makes communication possible. Often, this communication involves speech alone, not conduct. Furthermore, the Court recognized that virtually every means of communicating ideas requires money, pointing to several examples, such as the pr...
Throughout history, only a few documents have changed the way we as a nation view politics and carry out our everyday lives. The document mentioned above was the Declaration of Independence. It changed the course of history because it granted America its freedom from Great Britain. Originally, there was a committee created to compose the document which consisted of John Adams, Benjamin Franklin, Roger Sherman, Robert R. Livingston, and Thomas Jefferson. After conversing with one another, the committee decided that Thomas Jefferson would be the one to write it with the final approval coming from the other four. After writing it and receiving approval from the committee, Jefferson presented it to the House. What happened here was not what the committee originally expected. Not all of the delegates attending the convention approved the document. However, through compromising for the greater good of the “New Nation” and editing to accommodate everyone’s preferences, the document was finally approved by all thirteen colonies.
Overall, the Declaration of Independence, drafted by the United States of America, has not only become an anchor to protect those against oppression and tyranny, but from others within this precious country, as well as those outside. With the Declaration of Independence, we have motivated other nations to take action against their very own tyranny, whether it be the Egyptians in their revolution against their corrupt government in modern day or the French in the mid to late 1800s against their very own corrupt monarchy against King Louis and his family. Not only has it become a motivator, but a reminder on how we should appreciate our values and morals today, and take note on every action we take against certain issues on our country; whether the issue is on abortion or gay marriage. All Men are Created Equally.
The Declaration of Independence is focused for the most part toward King George III and the British Parliament. Jefferson wanted them to understand the reasoning behind the American's decision of independence. From paragraphs 6-32 he lists all the acts of tyranny that King George III forced upon the Americans. The list is longer than all the other parts of the document put together. It demonstrates how much emphasis Jefferson placed on providing reasons. But, this list is not only directed at Jefferson, it is a reminder to all Americans and the whole world of what disturbing times have been overcome in the past.
The Declaration of Independence includes four parts. The first part is the Preamble, which explains why the Continental Congress drew up the Declaration. They felt their reason should be explained to England.
The Declaration of Independence listed the grievances such as, “He has erected a multitude of new offices, and sent hither swarms of officers to harass our people and eat out their substance.” The next important step to the foundation of a new government was to gain peoples ambition by showing how the government would be run if a new party took over. This goal was achieved by stating the rights of man. “We hold these truths to be self evident: That all men are created equal; that they are endowed by their creator with certain unalienable rights; that among these are life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness.” This statement made people hopeful and feel kindly toward this new government.
Even though Blacks were granted independence, laws were set up to limit this accomplishment. Jim Crow Laws, enforced in 1877 in the south, were still being imposed during the 1930s and throughout. These laws created segregation between the two races and created a barrier for the Blacks. For example, even though African Americans were allowed to vote, southern states created a literary test exclusively for them that was quite difficult to pass, since most Blacks were uneducated. However, if they passed the reading test, they were threatened death. Also, they had to pay a special tax to vote, which many African Americans could not afford. This obstacle caused Blacks to not have a voice in the USA’s political decisions. Furthermore, they were left with the worst jobs in town and had the poorest schools because of segregation (The Change in Attitudes…). In the southern states, compared to White schooling education, the Blacks received one-third of school funding. The White people dominated the states and local government with their decisions and made sure that the Blacks were weak. They weren’t being treated in hospitals because the doctors refused to do treatment on them. Also, because of the laws and segregation, people claim that there was a ‘visible colored line’ in publi...
Buckley V. Valeo was a landmark case in political funding and donations. It has great precedents as what is legally defined as donations, and contribution compared to expenditures. Buckley V. Valeo was argued over the last few months of 1975 and into January of 1976 where the decision was made on the 30th . The final decision, there must be some reasonable limit on campaign contributions however it is unconstitutional to hold expenditure limits. To further understand this reason Americans must know the legal definitions of these words. A contribution is the use of money to support a candidate which must be fairly regulated in the eyes of the United States government. An expenditure is the use of money to support a political belief. Putting
When in the course of adolescent events, it becomes necessary for young adults to break away from the restraint of adults which has been controlling us for years, we as teenagers have the same God-given and natural rights. Therefore, we must declare the reasons that compel us to obtain freedom.