Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Us reform movements
Assignment on the declaration of independence
The declaration of independence today
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Us reform movements
Every major reform movement in American history has been advanced by persuasive writings of the people. Before the American Revolution, Thomas Jefferson’s “Declaration of Independence” and Thomas Paine’s “Common Sense” called the people to action against the British. During the Civil War Era, both freed slaves, such as Fredrick Douglas, and white abolitionists, such as Henry Lloyd, called for the end of slavery. The Civil War Era also featured the first piece of true feminist literature, a novel written by Margret Fuller, who called for an increase to women’s civil and civic liberties (Margret Fuller). Another prominent civil rights author was Harriet Beecher Stowe who originally wrote “Uncle Tom’s Cabin” as an abolitionist, anti-slavery …show more content…
The Fugitive Slave Clause was established in the Constitution under article IV; “No person held to service or labour in one state, under the laws thereof, escaping into another, shall, in consequence of any law or regulation therein, be discharged from such service or labour, but shall be delivered up on claim of the party to whom such service or labour may be due” (Constitution Art. IV, Sec. III). The clause established that if any slave, or indentured servant, was to escape to another state, the citizens of that state had an obligation to return him or her to their proper owner. However, the law was met with severe criticism and hardly enforced. In 1850, in an attempt to mollify the South, Congress passed the “Fugitive Slave Act of 1850,” which gave out harsher punishments for aiding slaves and set up an official patrol to catch run-away slaves (McNamara). The act ended up having the reverse effect, because it only enraged the Northerners more, causing an even deeper split between North and South. The Fugitive Slave Act was passed under the same legislation as the Compromise of 1850 which also played a decisive role in the split between the country. It created a balance of free and slave states in Congress and temporarily halted the splitting of the Union, which was its ultimate goal (McNamara). Even though the Compromise of 1850 achieved equilibrium between slave and free states, the balance was just as quickly ruined again by both Kansas and Nebraska wanting to join the Union as states. The goal of the Kansas- Nebraska Act was essentially the same as that of the Compromise of 1850, and did succeed in keeping the balance for around nine more years. Despite the fact
Thornton, Tracey. “Between Rhetoric of Abolition and Feminism: Harriet Beecher Stowe’s Uncle Tom’s Cabin”. 1998. 8 Jan 2002. <http://www.womenwriters.net/domesticgoddess/thornton.htm>.
According to Rochester the Fugitive Slave Act, is a law that was created on February 12, 1793 targeting the runaway slaves and bring them to justice. (Rochester 16) It Law states that if a runaway slave passes west or south of the Ohio River then they were considered a Fugitive from Justice. (Rochester 16) As a result of running away the law also stated that if a fugitive slave is the custody of anybody, he or she must transport them back to the state or territory which they had fled from. It stated that if person refuses to give up a slave, then the slave owner had the right to arrest or seize the slave from anyone. (Rochester 17) It further enacted that anybody who was refuse to cooperate with the law and give up a slave would have to pay a fine of five hundred dollars or be arrested. (Rochester 17)
Originally thought of as a benefit to slaveholders, the act ended up hurting the Southern cause for slavery. The act not only allowed escaped slaves to be hunted in the North, but also required federal marshals to assist slave catchers. In spite of the fact that each section received and experienced many benefits, I think that the north seemed to gain the most from the Compromise of 1850. The equilibrium of the Senate was at the present time with the free states, in spite of the fact that California often voted with the south in regards to many issues in the 1850s. The major success for the purpose of the south was the Fugitive Slave Law. In the final analysis, the north refused to impose it. “Massachusetts even called for its nullification, stealing an argument from John C. Calhoun. Northerners claimed the law was unfair. The flagrant violation of the Fugitive Slave Law sets the scene for the tempest that emerged later in the decade.” Yet at this point in time, Americans anticipated that the fragile peace would succeed. In conclusion, the North got more advantages because California was admitted as a free state, minimizing the Southern on voting power in Congress. This is the reason why Northerns perceived that they should make a pro-Southern signal by accepting the new Fugitive Slave Act. It horribly rebounded them, evoking and arousing sympathy for oppressed
It would organize the new lands acquired from Mexico into territories, which could apply for statehood as either free or slave states, depending upon popular sovereignty. This violated the earlier Missouri Compromise’s Mason-Dixon Line with California becoming a free state, and by giving territories the choice of whether or not they would become free or slave states. The compromise also enacted the Fugitive Slave Act, which stated that any free person who does not report a slave that escaped from the South will be fined, and that the escaped slave has to be returned back to their owner. This was disastrous, as it “Sowed the seed of destruction” by creating animosity between northerners and southerners of the union, and began destroying the unity of the
The indeed started to return all the runaway slaves back to the south. The united states kept trying to defend the rights of slaves owner throughout other countries but the federal government was all for slavery so they bumped heads. Therefore the abolitionists began a petition asking for the congress to end slavery in columbia which the national government controlled. As the petition got to the congress the southerners became infuriated and decided to go out and kill those abolinistor who was promoting to end slavery.Abolitionist and the anti slavery advocates stated that “ the federal fugitive slave act was unconstitutional “ because it does not give specifically give congress permission to return all the runaway slaves and “ the act’s provisions deprived accused runaways of various right specified in the bill of rights” . In Prigg v. Pennsylvania , the supreme court over ruled the act and its guaranteed the slave owner and catcher the rights to hold all slaves without going to court for seizing them.The state 's law is considering that as kidnapping and requires proof. Now in the south slave owner would not have to prove
Harriet Beecher Stowe publishes “Uncle Tom’s Cabin” in 1852. This anti-slavery book was the most popular book of the 19th century, and the 2nd most sold book in the century, following only the Bible. It was said that this novel “led to the civil war”, or “the straw that broke the camel’s back”. After one year, 300,000 copies were sold in the U.S., and over 1 million were sold in Britain.
Common Sense written by Thomas Paine in January of 1776, enlightened its readers and ignited the colonists towards the American Revolution. Common Sense was the first document that established a suggestion towards a constitutional form of government. The foundation of the main points in Common Sense were the upbringing of the Declaration of Independence. The Declaration of Independence was written by Thomas Jefferson in July of 1776 approximately 7 months after Thomas Paine’s work of Common Sense. The Declaration of Independence stated the Americans freedom from Great Britain. The Declaration of Independence was derived from Common Sense and due to this, they have various similarities. The similarities
What would influence you to fight for American Independence? Would your family's’ views, your friend’s views, or the views of a political pamphlet influence you? In the beginning of the American Revolution, a man by the name of Thomas Paine wrote a political pamphlet that would influence many Americans to fight for independence from Britain. Thomas Pain used several ideas that include government is a necessary evil, America will eventually be independent, Britain will always oppress the American Colonies to influence the American People, and the importance of allies.
Compare and Contrast Declaration of Independence and Common Sense When I was asked to read the Declaration of Independence by Thomas Jefferson and Common Sense by Thomas Paine, I was kind of scared. As I started to read it, I found it to be truly interesting. Reading over them several times to make sure I understood the text and the meaning of them both. Throughout, out this paper I will share many comparisons and contrasts between the Declaration of Independence and the Common Sense pamphlet. There are many reasons why these two documents had a great effect on the American Revolution.
Common Sense During the late 17 hundreds the American colonies were split between separating from Great Britain or not. Some colonists felt they did not need to leave the rule of Britain, while others saw potential for the American colonies without Great Britain parliament. In the pamphlet titled Common Sense, Thomas Paine expressed his beliefs to separate from Great Britain in order to achieve greater opportunities for the Americans.
It was the 4th of July in 1776 when delegates from all thirteen colonies assembled at Independence Hall in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. Not knowing the full significance of what was about to take place that day,the delegates would do something that would forever change the course of the American people.
The Fugitive Slave Act was part of the Compromise of 1850. This act required that authorities in the North had to assist southern slave catchers to retrieve and return slaves to their owners. Southerners favored this act because they saw no slavery in the territories to the west, by the passing of the Fugitive Slave Act it would help preserve slavery in the south. This act allowed southern slave owners to get their slaves back when they escaped to the North that is why this act was important and critical to southern survival. The view of this act by the North was the opposite, especially from those who were black, they feared this act. The blacks in the North were terrified that this act would make it so they could be ushered back to the south even if they were innocent. This led to the creation of resistance groups in the North.
In 1850, a document called the Fugitive Slave Act was passed. Primarily, this document dealt with the reclaiming of runaway slaves. This law allowed southerners to call upon the federal government to capture runaway slaves who had fled the South and may be living in the North. The Fugitive Slave Act and the laws that went with it only caused controversy in the North. This split the North and South. In reaction to this, some northern states passed laws forbidding state officials to enforce the Fugitive Slave Law, which only angered the southern states. Northerners had become aware of the hypocrisy of slavery and became resolved to end slavery. Many abolitionists started to take action to help slaves escape. This major controversy over the runaway slaves sparked the beginning of the Civil War.
The original Fugitive Slave Act was made in 1793. One of the things this stated was that slave owners were allowed to search for their escaped slaves in states that didn’t believe in slavery. When a slave (or a person suspected of being a slave) was caught, the people (or person) went to court to get the slave returned to it’s owner. If enough evidence was provided, the slaves were returned to their owners. This act also made it so that anyone who helped slaves in anyway, such as hiding them, were to face a $500 fee. Many people, especially those from northern states, disagreed with this act. The people of the northern states felt as if their land was being used by bounty hunters. They also disliked how, with people taking free African Americans as slaves, it felt as if the act was leading up to the legalization of kidnapping. Certain people who disagreed with this act created groups to help save slaves, and even created housing for them that would be safe for them to escape to areas where slavery was illegal.
“For the Slave South to deter its most potentially destructive slave resistance, potential fugitives had to dread coercion outside as well as inside their masters’ estate” and the act provided that coercion. The free blacks, at the very least inspiring images to slaves, encouraged potential runaways through their lifestyles and knowledge. Without these slaves’ attempts to gain freedom, the act would not have been necessary. The northern states would not have made laws allowing citizens not to participate in slave catching, and the southern states would not have been nervous about northern state compliance with the return of their