Decision Making Model In Human Service

As a human services professional, your main job is to help people, motivate them to better their lives and overcome the situations and obstacles placed in their paths. The job was created to make the world a safer place by establishing more effective communities. Although the jobs are to ease the situations people face, in life and in the workforce things do not always go as smoothly as we would hope. At times we face certain circumstances where we are forced to make tough decisions that can alter another person's life. These decisions go beyond the law and the ethical code and instead focus on what is right as a human being.
The main focus of this article is meant to educate the audience of human service professionals of their duty to warn,

The model began with beneficence. Its goal is to promote client welfare. Principle two was non -maleficence which means that no harm can happen to any party. The third principle is autonomy which is meant to protect the freedom and independence of clients. Next is justice which states that all clients are treated equally. Finally, the last principle focuses on fidelity where the professional must fulfill their commitments and obligations. Later on, a sixth principle was added called veracity where the professional must be truthful with the client. This model has set the tone for future decision-making models in the human service profession. The main assumptions of the article are that human services professionals must warn the identified potential victim and in some cases must also alert law enforcement agencies. Because the situations differ from state to state, it becomes the professional's job to know their state’s laws. The implications in this article are meant to educate the reader and to make them understand that the job of a human services major is a very complex one and they sometimes have to put their logical and subjective standpoint aside and make the responsible and ethical