Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Impact of pesticide use in agriculture
Pesticides effects on the environment
Pesticides effects on the environment
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Impact of pesticide use in agriculture
It is necessary to creat a set of standards to control the use of pesticides which is consistent all over the world. After exposure to pesticides, pests can also have some changes, such as increased resistance to pesticides and the survival of pests may be passed on to the next generation. Due to the emergence of resistance, people have to increase the amount of medication and increase the number of drugs, the consequences of the pest caused by higher resistance. It leads to reduce crop production, have high cost of disease pests, environmental pollution and harmful human health. Therefore, the country governments have the responsibility to use the appropriate standard to prescribe the number of pesticides used and the dosage.
From the research, Since 1996, the EPA has been involved in international negotiations to control the use of DDT and other POPs in all parts of the world. Under
…show more content…
the United Nations Environment Program, it was a treaty that has limited exemptions for the use of DDT to control mosquito-borne microorganisms and malaria, which still kills millions of of people worldwide to impose global prohibitions or Restrictions on persistent organic pollutants, including DDT. People began to participate in some organizations for discussing how to use pesticide accurately and build such strategies. In 2013, they launched a vector control Advisory Group on new tools and paradigms (VCAG) to promote the development and adoption of new vector control methodologies and strategies. It is expected that these and related initiatives will lead to a wave of new product submissions and evaluation methodologies. Most countries give the agreement to the international standards of pesticides. For example, In 2005, the country's agriculture minister said that future imports of pesticides in Egypt must conform to the standards of international authorities. These institutions include the United Nations Food and Agriculture Organization and the World Health Organization. According to international standards, the use of any pesticide only after 3 years of trial to prove its safety and reliability can be widely used before Egypt has banned imports of Europe and the United States 47 of pesticides, because these pesticides do not meet the basic safety standards. However, DDT should be used as a control mechanism in the global fight against malaria.
Although DDT has several harmful effects, it still can be used to effectively control the malaria. This chemical can kill mosquitoes that spread malaria. It helped eradicate the disease in southern Europe and North America in the 1960s. But DDT is also toxic to birds, fish and mammals. It accumulates in the food chain, and can exist for several years in the environment. After eating the plants that have been sprayed with DDT, the animals accumulate in the body for a long time. Since the 1970s, DDT has been banned globally and scientists have been able to detect DDT from many animals today. In 2001, the Stockholm Convention of United Nation Environmental program suggest to stop using the 12 chemicals include DDT.At the same time, there are signs of malaria in Africa because there is no suitable substitute.
After that, the voice for countries to use DDT as an important component of malaria control strategies is growing. African countries such as Tanzania and Uganda have begun to loosen their ban on
DDT Because that disease Malaria didn't disappear without DDT, it recently restart to use the DDT to prevent the Malaria, even though most developed countries have policy to be banned. The World Health Organization (WHO) in September 2006 announced support for the use of DDT in African countries where malaria remains a major health problem, but the benefits of pesticides outweigh health and environmental risks. In addition, The World Health Organization has reviewed the study on the use of DDT, which concludes that DDT can be safely sprayed indoors. This decision could lead to an increase in aid agencies ' efforts to fund the control of malaria in the form of indoor spraying of DDT. The WHO position is consistent with the Stockholm Convention on Persistent Organic Pollutants, which prohibits all uses of DDT other than malaria control.
By the name of “superspecies” we try to change the world feature and control the nature with science. With science, a lot of technology has been invented to support people demand for products. Without anticipation about the bad consequences, sometime the invention is causing more damaged than it provide in later on. In 1930, DDT that use for killing insect was discovered by Paul Mueller, working for the chemical company Geigy in Switzerland. For this reason, the benefits of using DDT became immediately obvious (65). Years letter, the unbelievable side effect of using DDT was found. While Biologists investigated the decline of eagles and hawks, they discovered the hitherto phenomenon of “biomagnification”, which compounds gather as they are ingested up the food chain (67). DDT phenomenon proves that thinking like science is only to understand the world in separate pieces. It is lack of understanding the rhythms, patterns and cycles of the nature. Therefore, we need to think beyond the science to see the connections between us and nature because in the reality this world is the world of
The pesticide DDT banned in 1987 was a detrimental to the environment leading to it to be banned in 1987. DDT remains in the soils for a long period of time. The chemicals affect the ecology of the soil and water run off causing contamination of livestock and native animals and aquatic species. Studies indicated a range of human health impacts from DDT including cancers, infertility, miscarriage and nervous system impairment. The social and economic impact of DDT use in viticulture was significant.
The Baby Boomer generation and the time period has a lasting effect on the economy and the environment. The baby boom for the United States was similar to other countries after World War II. Several economies also blossomed, but overall with very little care for the environment. After World War II the use of industrial made chemicals increased in popularity throughout the United States and the world (The “New Environmentalism” OF THE 1960S). The chemical DDT was originally being used widespread to eradicate disease vectors, such as mosquito carrying Malaria ("The DDT Story."). DDT influenced more than just mosquitoes as it had lasting effects in the environment where it noticeably bioaccumulate in the food chain and caused high mortality in young bald eagles ("The DDT Story."). Rachel Carson’s book, Silent Spring released to the public in 1962 which is the time period in which environmental health and human health were connected (The “New
The documentary about DDT and Silent Spring is really sad. DDT is an innovation that was seen positive by the public yet they did not studied about it hard enough to find out what will the effects of it will do. At first I saw a positive light about it because it is said to help farmers and neighborhoods kill pests. It really does kill the pests but it has effects to all life forms too.
In his short story, “Top of the Food Chain”, T.C. Boyle effectively argues that humans are destroying their planet with chemicals and that the general consensus of the public is that it is okay. He argues this efficaciously through the use of rhetorical and satirical devices, which are used throughout his story. Overall, I agree with Boyle’s argument that DDT is an especially harmful chemical to our planet, and while it may have had a place at one time, there is no need for it any longer.
The Environmental Protection Agency, or EPA is the result of a 1970 executive order by President Richard Nixon for the purpose of protecting the environment of the United States through regulation on business and citizens. Public opinion on the Environmental Protection Agency has been divided fairly evenly across the population of the United States as of recently, as compared to the widespread public concern of the 50’s and 60’s that led to the agency’s creation. Recently the agency has come under scrutiny for its contributions of millions of dollars in grants to researchers in order to hide the potential trade off of its actions in order to further the agency’s agenda. The EPA’s ever-expanding regulation could end up harming more than it actually
"Pesticides." Issues & Controversies On File: n. pag. Issues & Controversies. Facts On File News Services, 18 July 2005. Web. 20 May 2011. .
...ortation of plants, fruits, vegetables, and animals. Indiscriminate pesticide use kills the good with the bad. Long term and wide spread pesticide use poisons underground water sources, which, in turn, poison plants, animals, and humans. And, finally, by our uninformed actions, new super races of pests continue to evolve and create even greater dangers than the original.
By the time naturalists learned of DDT's effect on wildlife, it was almost too late.
As time has progressed, there has always been an overarching need for high amounts of crop production throughout the world. With the rapid rate of population growth, the need for crops and other sources of nutrients is only increasing. In order to meet these high demands and increase yields, farmers and other agriculturalists have started implementing the use of pesticides. These chemical mixtures are being used in order to prevent, destroy, repel or mitigate any pests from destroying growing crops. However, using pesticides on crops can create massive amounts of pollution, negatively affect an individual’s health, and can spark biodiversity loss within an ecosystem. According to Michael C.R. Alavanja, “Over 1 billion pounds of pesticides are used within the United States (US) each year and approximately 5.6 billion pounds are used worldwide”. With all this in mind, it is clear that pesticides should not be made available to farmers and agriculturalists, and should
Instead of using pesticides in farming a better alternative would be biological control. This is when a natural predator is released into the crop growing area as a result the number of pests can be reduced.
...at researchers are doing to try to eradicate malaria in underdeveloped countries such as Africa.
Pesticides are designed to kill something. In agriculture, pesticides are use to kill the organisms or compounds that feed in crops. For example, preventing the spread of bacterial, the growth of mould, to control mice and rats, and also kill the organisms that is not beneficial for the plant. Pesticides is very convenience to famers because it protect the crops and increase the harvests. But over using the pesticides will cause pollution to the enviromrnt and also the ecosystem. In our lives, pesticides also make us easier. For example, the use of pesticides in wood makes will makes our furniture last longer. And also our clothes, the pesticides are also been using in the wool to make our clothes as longer shelf life.
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, (FWS). (2014, January 15). Pesticides and wild life. Retrieved form http://www.fws.gov/contaminants/info/ddt.html
The pesticide is a controversial topic since farmers are used it to gain their yield. Especially, pesticide is discovered during World War II as a chemical weapon that mixture of multiple chemicals together to kill human. Therefore, Chantries redesign pesticide to kill an organism where and when we don’t want it. Because people want to go to the grocery store to buy the perfect product, pesticide makes it happens and with a little cost for farmers. Nonetheless, pesticide also is the expenditure of life expectancy, which directly threatens people and poses risk of mortality rate. Abusing the pesticide has multiple affects on our society, (Add). (Add thesis)