Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
American native relations
American native relations
Relationship w. native americans
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: American native relations
When the English set their sights on the colonization of the New World, they expected to be arriving in a vast wilderness, untouched by any man. They were quite surprised to discover that there were, in fact, many tribes of people spread throughout the “new” land. At first, these Natives were not a problem. They were actually a blessing to the English settlers. However, within a few years the relationship between the British and the Native Americans started to sour, turning from friendliness and a certain degree of codependence to suspicion, until all-out warfare eventually broke out between the two peoples. As the first Englishmen settled in the New World and discovered it was populated with other men quite unlike themselves, their relationship with said peoples began as one of mutual friendship and curiosity. While the Native Americans were at first cautious of and curious about the Europeans, they also immediately showed the white men …show more content…
hospitality and friendliness.
In document 2 Mr. Barlowe recalls how one Native “came running out to meet us very cheerfully and friendly,” and how they even carried the white men “on their backs to the dry ground.” The Indians took them into their homes, washed their clothing and feet, and “entertained [them] with all love and kindness” (doc 2). The English also showed great hospitality to the Natives as their relationship developed, leaving their homes “open to the savages, who were always friendly entertained at the tables of the English,” and even having them “commonly lodged in their bedchambers” (doc 10). The two often traded, as well, each intrigued by the treasures the other had to offer, as discussed in documents 2 and 10. The early settlers even had trade laws to protect Indians, decreeing that “no man shall…take away
anything from any Indian coming to trade…upon pain of death” (doc 9). Their punishment for attacking an Indian was even worse than that for attacking a female colonist! Though they did consider them savages, the English also admired the Natives’ culture. Arthur Barlowe wrote of how “no people in the world carry more respect for their King,” and that they were “faithful, void of all guile and treason” (doc 2). The settlers even commended the Natives’ reverence of their sun god, though they saw it as heathenism, saying “no Christian will keep their oath better” than a Native would when sworn upon the sun (doc 5). However, this seemingly perfect relationship between the Native Americans and the English settlers could not last. Suspicions and distrust started to grow on both sides for various reasons. The Natives began to fear the white men when they realized that in every Indian town the English visited “people began to die very fast” – but never the Europeans (doc 3). As the Natives had no knowledge of the European diseases that were the real causes of the deaths, rumors about the English began to circulate, including prophecies that there were more of them to come to “kill…and take their places” (doc 2). The Europeans did indeed come with intentions to conquer “heathen and barbarous lands,” and anywhere not “inhabited by Christian people” by “subduing and possessing,” not that they shared those ambitions openly (doc 1). Document 1 displays the Europeans’ clear belief in their superiority to these heathen people. The Native Americans began to suspect such intentions, but were still trusting, as shown in document 5 when Werowance tells his people that the English “take but a little waste ground” in response to their worries. Such trust led to the Indians being taken advantage of, and the chief Powhatan, knowing he would rather not fight with the Europeans, acknowledged his people’s concerns openly with John Smith. He tells the captain how he would rather “laugh and be merry” with the English than “be forced to flee from you all” (doc 7). He tried to repair their previously amiable relationship by asking Smith “what will it avail you to take by force [that which] you may quickly have by love” (doc 7)? This is clearly a turning point in the relationship between the Native Americans and Europeans, as the Indians are recognizing the English’s power but also the fact that they are not being treated very well by them anymore. The Europeans unwittingly continued to walk the fine line of how far they could push the Natives before there is retribution. Unfortunately, they ended up pushing a little too hard. Eventually, the tenuous balance of their relationship collapsed and gave way to fighting, death, and even all-out war. It began with the Natives launching a surprise attack on the colonists and killing over 300 of them. According to a report of the incident, the Indians “basely and barbarously murdered, not sparing either age or sex” (doc 10). In many instances they even used the Europeans’ own weapons against them, and knew where to find them as they had been consistently welcomed into the English settlement as friends. That was the spark that set off what would become a war between the two peoples. The colonists saw this as justification for retribution in every way possible, saying they are now “set at liberty by the treacherous violence of the savages” (doc 10). They vowed to “invade the country, and destroy them who sought to destroy us” (doc 10). The settlers were not content with one singular counter attack; they instead were going to take over the Natives’ villages and possess all game in the wilderness, effectively starving their new enemies. The Europeans also were now able to realize their original intentions regarding the Native Americans – conquest. They believed it was easier than “civilizing them by fair means,” and now can take that easier route as they are now enemies of the Natives (doc 10). While the Indians were the first to attack both on the first day of the English’s arrival and then again after the friendship had been forged, the settlers took their retribution to an irreparable place. Therefore both sides had a role in the disintegration of and eventual permanent burial of their once-positive relationship. The relationship between the Native Americans and the English was quite complex. As it developed the complexities increased. The Natives knew more about how to survive in New England than the English, which made them valuable to the settlers. However, the Europeans had much more advanced weaponry and expansionist ambitions, making them a large threat to the Natives. At first, this power balance played out as a friendship that both sides benefitted from. For various reasons, however, the relationship started to sour, leading to the balance of power tipping to whomever was willing to pull the trigger first. Some people on both sides attempted to save the relationship, out of fear or rationality, while others were hoping to gain the upper hand by displaying dominance first. Eventually, the tensions escalated to a point of no return, and the once-amicable relationship between the English and Natives was forever scarred.
In Jamestown, the settlers had to deal with the Powhatan Indians. The relationships with them were unstable. John Smith, whom was the leader of Jamestown, was captured by these Indians while he was on a little trip with some of his men. As he left two of his men, he came back to find them dead and himself surrounded by two hundred members of the tribe, finding himself being captured. “Six or seven weeks those barbarians kept him prisoner…” 87). After this event, the relationship only grew worse and there was constant fighting between the settlers and Indians. The Indians practiced many methods in capturing settlers such as “scalping” and other dreadful techniques. The settlers did many negative practices also which is the reason they fought so many wars and battles against each other. Later on, the Indians killed the English for their weapons that were rare to them. In contrast to the Plymouth colony, these settlers dealt with the Pequot Indians and the relations were much more peaceful for a certain time frame. At one point, one Indian was brave enough to approach them and spoke to them (in broken English). He taught them the ways of the land, and developed a peace with the man. The settlers from the Plymouth colony learned many ways to grow food from these Indians. “He directed them how to set their corn, where to take fish and to procure other commodities, and was also their
Although the English and Native Americans were both every different in how they viewed the land, there were some similarities between the two cultures. First of all, both agreed to the terms of a monarchy- the idea that a monarch that ruled over the land was more a symbolic figure of a whole people rather than a rich and wealthy land owner. Even though the English called their monarch a King, and the Indians’ a Sachem, the ideas behind the two were virtually the same. Secondly, if hunters were in pursuit of game, both cultures agreed to the fact that they could cross otherwise strict borders in attainment of the game. This shows that even though both were fairly precise in drawing village borders, food superseded otherwise legal boundaries. Lastly, the English and the Native Americans both were little different in their sense of how land could be bought or sold. Now, this does not mean that they thought viewed property the same or that they us...
In the fourth chapter titled “Native Reactions to the invasion of America” in the book, “Beyond 1492: Encounters in Colonial North America, the author James Axtell shares with us an essay he wrote and shared at a conference at Vanderbilt University. Historical accounts are followed beginning at the arrival of explorers and settlers until the 1700’s with various Native tribes in North America. Axtell’s goal is to educate us on the multitude of ways Native Americas reacted during various periods of colonization, and the various methods that the Native Americans perished. Axtell also educates us in his essay on the ways that Native Americans tried to ultimately prevent their extinction at any cost. Overall, the authors intent is to educate us
The Europeans invaded America with every intention of occupying the land, the bountiful natural resources as well as the complete domination of the native people. The Europeans desire for the land created an explosive situation for the native peoples as they witnessed their land and right to freedom being stripped from them. They often found themselves having to choose sides of which to pledge their allegiance to. The Europeans depended upon Indian allies to secure the land and their dominance as well as trade relations with the Indians. The Indians were in competition with one another for European trade causing conflict among the different tribes altering the relationships where friends became enemies and vice versa (Calloway, 2012, p. 163). These relationships often became embittered and broke into bloody brawls where it involved, "Indian warriors fighting on both sides, alongside the European forces as well as against European forces invad...
In Thomas King’s novel, The Inconvenient Indian, the story of North America’s history is discussed from his original viewpoint and perspective. In his first chapter, “Forgetting Columbus,” he voices his opinion about how he feel towards the way white people have told America’s history and portraying it as an adventurous tale of triumph, strength and freedom. King hunts down the evidence needed to reveal more facts on the controversial relationship between the whites and natives and how it has affected the culture of Americans. Mainly untangling the confusion between the idea of Native Americans being savages and whites constantly reigning in glory. He exposes the truth about how Native Americans were treated and how their actual stories were
The article, “Native Reactions to the invasion of America”, is written by a well-known historian, James Axtell to inform the readers about the tragedy that took place in the Native American history. All through the article, Axtell summarizes the life of the Native Americans after Columbus acquainted America to the world. Axtell launches his essay by pointing out how Christopher Columbus’s image changed in the eyes of the public over the past century. In 1892, Columbus’s work and admirations overshadowed the tears and sorrows of the Native Americans. However, in 1992, Columbus’s undeserved limelight shifted to the Native Americans when the society rediscovered the history’s unheard voices and became much more evident about the horrific tragedy of the Natives Indians.
The process of assimilation, as it regards to the Native Americans, into European American society took a dreaded and long nearly 300 years. Initially, when the European’s came to the hopeful and promising land of the “New World”, they had no desire or reason anything but minimal contact with the Indians. However, starting in the 1700s the European colonists population skyrocketed. The need for more resources became evident and the colonists knew they could attain these necessities by creating a relationship of mutual benefit with the Native tribes. The Indians, at first skeptical, however became growingly open to the colonists and the relationship they were looking to attain. Indian furs were traded for colonial goods and military alliances were formed.
“ [They] spent most of the conquest and colonial periods reacting and responding to the European strangers and invaders” (99). Both sides were different in many ways; Their communication, transportation, culture, and the way they survived differentiate the Europeans from the Native Americans. They both acted as wisely as they could when this encounters began after the discovery. “[Tribes] worked mightily and often cleverly to maximize their political sovereignty, cultural autonomy, territorial integrity, power of self identification, and physical nobility” (100). The Europeans were stronger, had better technology, better weapons, and had plenty of experience fighting people like the Native Americans. They could have easily conquer them , but they had a problem of resources, reinforcements and survival. Native American were many but they lacked the knowledge and experience of war and evolution. Europeans were technologically evolved and were experienced at fighting wars, but they ...
They landed in Virginia unaware of the treacherous winter that was nearing. They found out very quickly that the heavenly narrative was quite the opposite. Staying alive was hard for many, especially when the first winter came. A staggering amount of people died the first winter even with the helping hand of the Native Americans. Edward portrayed the relationship between the two groups as peaceful as the Native Americans took the settlers under their wing. He noted that “The old planters (as they thought now come to reape the benefit of their long travels) placed with wonderful content upon their private dividends, and the planting of particular Hundreds and Colonies pursed with a hopeful alacrity, all our projects…in a faire way, and their familiarity with the natives, seeming to open a faire gate for their conversation to Christianitie.” This demonstrates that there was no tension between the settlers and Native Americans. The hospitality shows courteous relationship they shared with one another. Gary Nash shares the same stance of a peaceful friendship when he wrote about trade, stating that “Only a friendly Indian could be a trading Indian. If trade was key to overseas development, then English promoters logically suggested that the Indian might be receptive and generous- a person who could be wooed and won to the advantages of trade.” In other words, there was conflict with one another due
The clash between the Native Americans and the colonists did not start off tumultuous. In the early days of the exploration and settlement of the New World they lived in peace. The Indians taught them how to farm and live off the land. In a strange land the colonists made an ally. However, the subsequent turn of events was inevitable. Perhaps the chaos that ensued could have been postponed but there was never going to be a peaceful cohabitation between the colonists and the indigenous people. There were so many vast differences between the religious views and ultimate goals of the two groups. The Native Americans had established trade relationships with various tribes, they had their own religions, and their way of life was a stark contrast to that of the colonists. The worldview of the respective peoples was foreign to the other and the idea of a holistic and unbiased approach to the life of others was foreign.
The first settlers arrived in New England in 1620. They wanted to live in peace with the Natives. Problems began because settlers and the Natives had different views for the land. Settlers wanted to own large amounts of land because owning land often meant you were wealthy and powerful. The Native Americans believed that no one could own land but they can use it. The Native Americans taught settlers how to plant crops on this land but they did not understand that the settlers were going to keep the land for themselves. More settlers began to come over and take more land. They began kicking the Natives out. All of land taking was starting to cause tension between these two groups of people. By the 19th Century, the westward expansion of the US caused many of the Native Americans to move further west, usually by force. The Indian Removal Act of 1830 caused tens of thousands of Native Americans to be relocated. The Native Americans were not treated right. In the movies The Searchers and Avatar the bad way people treat natives is very evident.
...e relatively positive relations that characterized early trade relations between European traders and Native Americans quickly deteriorated. Cultural clashes and disputes over land escalated as English towns grew and population pressures intensified colonists' demand for more land.
Towards the development of the United States of America there has always been a question of the placement of the Native Americans in society. Throughout time, the Natives have been treated differently like an individual nation granted free by the U.S. as equal U.S. citizens, yet not treated as equal. In 1783 when the U.S. gained their independence from Great Britain not only did they gain land from the Appalachian Mountains but conflict over the Indian policy and what their choice was to do with them and their land was in effect. All the way from the first presidents of the U.S. to later in the late 19th century the treatment of the Natives has always been changing. The Native Americans have always been treated like different beings, or savages, and have always been tricked to signing false treaties accompanying the loss of their homes and even death happened amongst tribes. In the period of the late 19th century, The U.S. government was becoming more and more unbeatable making the Natives move by force and sign false treaties. This did not account for the seizing of land the government imposed at any given time (Boxer 2009).
One of the critical tasks that faced the new nation of the United States was establishing a healthy relationship with the Native Americans (Indians). “The most serious obstacle to peaceful relations between the United States and the Indians was the steady encroachment of white settlers on the Indian lands. The Continental Congress, following [George] Washington’s suggestion, issued a proclamation prohibiting unauthorized settlement or purchase of Indian land.” (Prucha, 3) Many of the Indian tribes had entered into treaties with the French and British and still posed a military threat to the new nation.
Tension and disputes are sometimes resolved by force but more often by negotiation or treaties. On the other hand, the Natives were described as strong and very innocent creatures awaiting the first opportunity to be christianized. The Indians were called the “Noble Savages” by the settlers because they were cooperative people, but sometimes, after having a few conflicts with them, they seem to behave like animals. We should apprehend that the encounter with the settlers really amazed the natives, they were only used to interacting with people from their own race and surroundings and all of this was like a new discovery for them as well as for the white immigrants. The relations between the English and the Virginian Indians were somewhat strong in a few ways.