Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The relationship between man and animals
Essay under evolution by natural selection
The relationship between human and animal essay
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: The relationship between man and animals
Dawkins’ statement about how the ‘theory’ of evolution is actually a fact is supported by natural selection. Natural Selection is the process where organisms better adapted to their environment tend to survive and produce more offspring. Natural selection leads to evolutionary change when individuals with certain characteristics have a greater survival or reproductive rate than other individuals in a populations and pass on these inheritable genetic characteristics to their offspring. It is observed that places that are isolated from other places have species that are very different from other places. For example, Australia has hundreds of species that are found nowhere else in the world. The peppered moth lives in England and changes in the …show more content…
Homologous structures are features of organisms that are controlled by some of the same inherited genes. Many species have features that are structurally very similar for example, the pentadactyl limb with five digits, and characteristic of tetrapod vertebrates. The five fingered limbs are functionally different as they are under the same inherited genes. This suggests that organisms with homologous structures, such as the pentadactyl limb have common ancestors and have and evolved.
An example is the homologous structure of a human, act, whale and bat. These species show the same skeletal elements in the radius, ulna and humerus as they share a common origin. However these skeletal elements have been modifies over time to suit the different functions to suit the type of mammal. Scientists say that the similarities in Homologous Structures are evidence that life on earth share a common ancient ancestor from which many or all other species have evolved over time. These examples support Dawkins’ theory of evolution because of how homologous structures are controlled by some of the same inherited
…show more content…
Fossil records show that organisms that lived in the past are different from organisms that live today. This suggests that the organisms have changed or evolved. This supports that evolution is a fact because most evidence for evolution comes from the fossil record, they show how much or how little organisms have changed over time. An example that supports this is that about how whales once walked on land but changed and is a different organism that lives today. Fossil evidence showed that the earliest relatives of enormous whales like humpbacks were comparatively small land animals. Discovered in Pakistan, Pakicetus lived 50 million years ago. They primarily lived their life on land, it is linked as a whale relative through its unique inner ear shape. Another relative of the whale is the Basilosaurids, they lived around 40 million years ago and where the first known obligate aquatic whale, indicating when whales made their permanent transition to the ocean. Another example of how evolution is supported by fossil evidence is because of the animal Tiktaalik Roseae, this is an example of a fossil that transitioned from a vertebrate life from land to water. It was discovered in Nunavut in 2004 and it is an ancient fish called sarcopteryigian. Although they have many similarities to fish with gills, scales and fins, other key characteristics link the Tiktaalik Roseae to land
For instance, the whale, the biggest mammal that lives in the water, was found to have had legs and used to dwell on land millions of years ago. While in Pakistan, Phil Gingrich, a geologist and paleontologist, came across a fossil that resembled that of a wolf but had a “bump” on the back of the skull which was found to part of an inner ear,
The results of natural selection in Darwin 's finches and British Columbian sparrows change my view of species because every living animal changes to survive conditions that get in the way of normal life.
Scientists had some idea to the evolutionary process of whales. “It has always been clear that aquatic cetaceans must have evolved from terrestrial mammals and returned to the water, and the forelimbs of recent cetaceans still have the same general pattern as that of land mammals.” (Walking with Whales) It was known fact that land mammals and whales were related. However, the change from ancient whales to modern whales is drastic.
"On the Origin of Species by Means of Natural Selection, or the Preservation of Favoured Races in the Struggle for Life," usually shortened to "the Origin of Species," is the full title of Charles Darwin's book, first published in 1859, in which Darwin formalized what we know today as the Theory of Evolution. Although Darwin is the most famous exponent of this theory, he was by no means the first person to suspect the workings of evolution. In fact, Charles owed a considerable debt to his grandfather Erasmus, a leading scientist and intellectual, who published a paper in 1794, calledZoonomia, or, The Laws of Organic Life. This set down many of the ideas that his grandson elaborated on 70 years later.
Charles Darwin’s theory of natural selection explains the general laws by which any given species transforms into other varieties and species. Darwin extends the application of his theory to the entire hierarchy of classification and states that all forms of life have descended from one incredibly remote ancestor. The process of natural selection entails the divergence of character of specific varieties and the subsequent classification of once-related living forms as distinct entities on one or many levels of classification. The process occurs as a species varies slightly over the course of numerous generations. Through inheritance, natural selection preserves each variation that proves advantageous to that species in its present circumstances of living, which include its interaction with closely related species in the “struggle for existence” (Darwin 62).
Anyone with even a moderate background in science has heard of Charles Darwin and his theory of evolution. Since the publishing of his book On the Origin of Species by Means of Natural Selection in 1859, Darwin’s ideas have been debated by everyone from scientists to theologians to ordinary lay-people. Today, though there is still severe opposition, evolution is regarded as fact by most of the scientific community and Darwin’s book remains one of the most influential ever written.
The origin of modern day whales, a mystery that has puzzled paleontologists for years, may have just been solved with the discovery of an ankle bone. This discovery might sound simple and unimportant, but the bones of these ancient animals hold many unanswered questions and provide solid proof of origin and behavior. The relationship between whales and other animals has proven to be difficult because whales are warm-blooded, like humans, yet they live in the sea. The fact that they are warm-blooded suggests that they are related to some type of land animal. However, the questions of exactly which animal, and how whales evolved from land to water, have remained unanswered until now.
In this essay I will discuss that I do not agree with Richard Dawkins and will prove this by using the theory of Intelligent Design as to why I do not agree with him.
For Dawkins, evolution of a species is dependent upon the transmittance of this information to the next generation; the individual species is irrelevant (2). This theory is a departure from Charles Darwin's theory of evolution, which concentrates on the species. Species, to Dawkins, are "survival machines" whose purpose is to host these genes, as species are mortals and fleeting, whereas genes are not (2).
There was a Dutchman named Hugo DeVries who found something interesting one day. He found a flower that had mutated. All of the Evolutionists went crazy over this and thought that this was their big breakthrough as to how life evolved. But scientists refute this claim because they can find no incident where a mutation is good. Every mutation that they have come across has hurt or damaged the organism. They describe a process called natural selection.
Charles Darwin has had the greatest influence on the world by proving the evolution of living things. Charles Darwin had first noticed the similarities of plants and animals when he took a five-year cruise on the H.M.S. Beagle, which was available to him through a friend from school. During the cruise Charles Darwin started becoming interested with the similarities between the plants and animals that were similar on different islands with similar climates, so he decided to study them more closely.
The evolution hypothesis holds that living life forms that don 't adjust to their surroundings neglect to survive. Hereditary varieties are presented in species through arbitrary DNA transformation. These changes show themselves in diverse phenotypes, or physical qualities, in living creatures. Life forms whose attributes are more qualified for the encompassing environment survive and replicate, going on their changed DNA to resulting eras. This is regularly called "survival of the fittest", and it is not an irregular procedure. As the surviving creatures imitate, and this procedure repeats more than a few ears, the animal varieties develop.
Convergent evolution and evolutionary reversal can be reasons for similar traits to arise independently in species that are distantly related. With convergent evolution distantly or unrelated species generate traits that are similar for reasons other than inheritance through a common ancestor. This happens as a result of having to adapt to similar environments or ecological niches ( the role that a species plays in an ecosystem). One example of this would-be dolphins and bats. They have very little in common, however, the ability of echolocation, which they use to hunt for food, arose independently in each group.
Without evolution, and the constant ever changing environment, the complexity of living organisms would not be as it is. Evolution is defined as a process that results in heritable changes in a population spread over many generations (8).Scientists believe in the theory of evolution. This belief is based on scientific evidence that corroborates the theory of evolution. In Figure 1 the pictures of the skulls depict the sequence of the evolution of Homo-sapiens. As the figure shows, man has evolved from our common ancestor that is shared by homo-sapiens. The change of diet of homo-sapiens over time has thought to contribute to the change in jaw structure and overall skull shape.