Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Compare Michelangelo’s sculpture of “David” (Renaissance Era) and Bernini’s (Baroque Era) artwork
Comparing michelangelo and donatello david sculpture
3. Contrast Bernini’s David with Michelangelo’s David
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Compare Michelangelo’s sculpture of “David” (Renaissance Era) and Bernini’s (Baroque Era) artwork
In the Baroque period of the seventeenth century, Renaissance ideals were both incorporated and taken of the work of the artist. While the artwork still brought focus on making humanistic artworks, Baroque art was made in a way to bring out powerful and intense responses from its observers. Some of the details that are most evident in this style of artwork include: rich colors, diagonal movement in space, and lighting. This style of artwork was more dramatic and moving than the Classical art previously practiced. The different styles of art from these two different eras can be seen through two statues of David. Michelangelo completed the David statue in 1501, and Gianlorenzo Bernini completed the other statue, also entitled ‘David’, in 1623. …show more content…
When one first looks upon both sculptures, they will immediately notice the moment in time that the artists chose to represent in their sculptures.
Bernini’s David appears to be in the middle of battle, perhaps even defending himself. Bernini sculpts his David as he is in the process of using his sling as a weapon to defeat his enemy, Goliath. Upon further observation, you will notice the tension of David’s body. His arms are tensed as well as his chest to show the momentum he is gathering before he releases the rock from his sling. Bernini also chose to capture the moment of David’s robe falling from his body, instead of exposing his nudity. This statue was carved during the Baroque Era and proves to be a typical art piece of this time period because it depicts the subject in motion, instead of just in a pose. At the time that Bernini carved this statue, it gave way to a new idea of looking at space. His David seems to have left his designated sculpting area and has spilled over into a space that is not necessarily his own. Bernini also made it a point to make his sculpture life-size, which contributes to the life-likeness of his artwork. It is also just as important to notice the significance that this particular David gives you a concept of a specific time, which is another characteristic of the art in the Baroque Era. This further helps the viewer to idealize the realism that was important to the artwork in this …show more content…
era. In contrast to Bernini’s David is Michelangelo’s sculpture also entitled ‘David’.
At the time of the Renaissance, there was a great fascination with the human body. Michelangelo “sought after finding the ideal human form from his entire life” (historyand humanities). Michelangelo began his sculpture of David at the begging of the 16th century, where as Bernini’s came more than a century later. In Michelangelo’s version, the body of David is unrealistic. It shows the male form at the highest level of greatness, it appears almost “god-like”. Another interesting aspect of Michealangelo’s David is that the texture is more lustrous and has a greater flesh-like appearance. While Bernini focused more on telling a story with his sculpture, David designed his as a vessel for illustrating his version of the perfect human form.
After extensive research and close observation of both Bernini’s David and Michelangelo’s David, I have to say that I find Michelangelo’s David more fascinating. The detail that Michelangelo’s David contains is amazing. The veins in his hands, and the muscles in his arms make him look so life-like. The watchful eyes are so interesting to me and I like to imagine what exactly it is that Michelangelo was thinking as he carved this statue. I do hope to visit Florence someday so I can see this sculpture in person, and fully appreciate its beauty and
detail. While Michelangelo’s sculpture of David and Bernini’s sculpture of David are similar in the aspect that they depict a ‘god like human’, they contrast greatly in the energy and movement of the figures. Bernini prided himself in the emotional involvement he evoked in his viewers, while Michealangelo used his sculpture to portray the human form in a perfected state. They both, undoubtedly, created works of art that defined the area in which they lived. Both of these talented artist were talented and have set standards for their own ideas that have carried down through history.
This invention distinguish his David from any other David Statue before him. At Bernini’s ear, David was a popular subject in Italy. At that time Italy did not have a powerful central government, and cities were seeking for their independence. The story of David killed Goliath and won the independence of Israel was understand as a symbol of independent. Therefore the statue of David also had political meanings. The two most famous David were from Donatello and Michelangelo. Donatello made two David, one was marble and one was bronze, but the ideas behind them are same. Donatello’s David stood still. He had successfully achieve his goal and killed Goliath, whose head lying at his feet. Michelangelo’s David was nude and had perfect athletic muscles and proportion, and fairly smooth flesh. His body was so perfect that made him immortal and divine. He had not yet embarked on the actual combat but would departure instantly. He stood still confidently. Michelangelo’s David was actually much more vivid than Donatello’s. Nevertheless, when compared to Bernini’s David, even the former seems lack the sense of motion. Bernini made his David a mortal. Bernini expressed a man in the middle of his ferocious action in an ultra realistic
The most well-known statue of David is the one by Michelangelo, but it is important to look at one of the original statues and the influences each preceding statue had on the next. The statues by Donatello, Michelangelo, and Bernini portray different views concerning the interaction between man and God.
Anticipated similarities exist between the Roman copy of Doryphorus and Donatello’s David, for the former replicates a product of Classical Greece while the latter is reminiscent of this artistic epoch (The Renaissance was a “re-birth” of this classical form). However, though formal qualities of Classical Greece may be present in David, they are uncharacteristically fashioned; therefore, major degrees of difference are established in terms of characterization. While Doryphorus is a typical example of reconciling idealism and naturalism, Polykleitos does not provide a depth of narrative subtext to this figure. On the other hand, Donatello overtly characterizes David through his effeminate if not androgynous form to deliver a powerful narrative (Duro). From the stance and posture of each sculpture to the use of nudity, Polykleitos’s Doryphorus and Donatello’s David present similarities accountable for in a historical context; however, the obvious structural differences must be
The statue of David best describes the ongoing influence of Protestant and catholic controversy on the visual arts. Michaelangelo uses David, a character from the Old Testament as his subject matter. The story goes that David, a mer man throws a stone with a slingshot at the mighty giant Goliath and kills him. (Your basic good vs. Evil.) Michaelangelo uses Clericism in this piece by incorporating a story from the bible, and on the other hand also incorporates his humanism influence into the work of art by placing himself as the character David; Giving us the impression that even the mer man can overcome his problems with knowledge of how to defeat them, instead of continually relying on the almighty to solve your problems for you. David shows the 2 conflicting views in a magnificent statue form.
Michelangelo was commissioned to build the statue for the establishment of a new republic in Florence, Italy. Michelangelo’s David shows the ideals of the male nude. His statue was meant to be looked at, and admired. The physical proportions of David are highly idealized and sought after. He isn’t fazed by Goliath and is so calm even when he knows he is going to fight him. Unlike Michelangelo, Bernini’s David is more about showing the action of the figure. Specifically, he is shown in action with his dramatized physical arrangement and exaggerated facial expressions. His muscles are shown as working really hard and there is so much tension in the sculpture, the viewer is more focused on what is happening than what David really looks like. While Michelangelo’s David focuses on the statue’s physical form, Bernini’s David focuses on the action of the
The pieces of art I will be comparing and contrasting are the three statues of David, by Donatello (Donato di Niccolò di Betto Bardi), Michelangelo (Michelangelo di Lodovico Buonarroti Simoni), and Bernini (Gian Lorenzo Bernini). The statues are modeled after the biblical David, who was destined to become the second king of Israel. Also most famously known as the slayer of the Philistine giant Goliath with a stone and a sling. The sculptures are all based on the same biblical hero, but differ from one another. Each David is unique in its own certain way.
Bernini’s “David” is 5 foot, 7 inches tall and was made in the year 1623. It is from the Baroque period, a time of discovery, exploration and increased trade. Bernini’s “David” is a three-dimensional sculpture that gives the viewer the ability to relate the image with one’s body and not only in one’s mind. Bernini wanted to show the intensity and dramatic tension in the hero David as he prepares to cast the stone from the sling. In contrast to the intensity of Bernini’s David, Michelangelo’s “David” looks much more contemplative, statuesque and less “life-like” than Bernini’s. This marble sculpture, unlike Michelang...
Michelangelo’s David does not react with the surroundings but it stands alone with the little movements disguised behind it. The sculpture brings out David as a soldier preparing for war and not a person engaged in a battle (Miller, Vandome, & McBrewster, 2010). The hands are larger than normal and the arms are longer than his body. This is meant to illustrate the renaissance period. In contrast, the Bernini’s David has aspects of motion, showing that he was already engaged in the battle with Goliath. The idea of movement is enhanced by the loosely flowing robes. In addition, the sculpture demonstrates that unlike Michelangelo’s David that has longer hands, Bernini’s David has contracted muscles. The Michelangelo’s sculpture was created during Renascence period while the Bernini’s sculpture was done during the Baroque period.
Michelangelo Buonarroti is one of the greatest artists of the Renaissance times, as well as one of the greatest of all time. He did was a painter, a sculptor as well as an architect, excelling in all areas from a young age. Michelangelo’s art was a symbol of the Florence people’s cultural and political power and superiority. Michelangelo thought of himself as a divine being, meaning he thought he was perfection and no one could ever compare. To this day through, in terms of his art, this may hold some truth depending mostly on opinion. He created some of the most magnificent, and most sought after pieces of all time. Some of them are still around today for us to witness including Michelangelo’s Pieta, and one of his most famous Michelangelo’s David.
The second period (1425-43) is generally characterized by a reliance on the models and principles of the sculpture of antiquity. From 1425 to 1435 Donatello worked with the Florentine sculptor and architect Michelozzo on a number of projects, including the monument to Bartolomeo Aragazzi (Cathedral of Montepulciano). In their joint work Michelozzo executed the architectural designs and also helped in the making of the bronze castings; Donatello executed most of the statues. From 1430 to 1433 Donatello spent periods in Rome, where he created a number of works, notably the ciborium in the sacristy of the Basilica of Saint Peter, decorated with the reliefs Worshiping Angels and Burial of Christ. It was in Florence, however, that he created the most noted work of this period-the bronze David (circa 1430-35, Bargello), the first nude statue of the Renaissance.
The masculine and idealized form of the human body is an ever-present characteristic of Michelangelo’s sculpture. Many people over the years have speculated why this may be, but there has never been a definitive answer, and probably never will be. Through all of his sculpture there is a distinct classical influence, with both his subject matter and his inclination to artistically create something beautiful. In most cases, for Michelangelo, this means the idealized human figure, seeping with contraposto. This revival of classical influences is common for a Renaissance artisan, but the new, exaggerated form of the human body is new and unique to Michelangelo’s artistic style.
The David’s that we are going to compare are all within the Renaissance time period and by comparing them you can see the shifts in thought and viewpoint within that period. The three statues of David by Donatello, Verrocchio, and Michelangelo all are great depictions of this story while portraying values of the Italian Renaissance period. They have many things in common while also having their own
The Italian Renaissance and the Baroque era are two major periods in art history, some of the types of art in those periods were painting, sculpting, and architecture. During these periods, many artist gained enormous fame from creating wonderful pieces of work that represented their beliefs and artistic thinking. This essay will analyze and evaluate two pieces from those major art periods. Rembrandt 's painting The Anatomy Lesson of Dr. Nicolaes Tulp and the sculpture David, by Michelangelo. These two masterpieces shed light of their significance in art history. David represents the Italian Renaissance for it being a strong symbol of the new republic, The Anatomy Lesson of Dr. Nicolaes Tulp depicts the focus on human progression.
Comparison of Michelangelo’s David and Aristide Maillol’s The Action Chained The art works that I choose to compare are sculpture David with The Action Chained. They are both famous around the world and be treated as two representations of their style, though one is man’s body and the other is woman’s, they still strongly expressive as human statues. But they are different. The former is ideal, perfect and naturalistic, is to represent a perfect male body; the latter is a Symbolism, is to express the artist’s suffering of repeated persecution and imprisonment for his political views.
Just as other works that reflect art, pieces in the category of fine arts serve the important message of passing certain messages or portraying a special feeling towards a particular person, function or activity. At times due to the nature of a particular work, it can become so valuable that its viewers cannot place a price on it. It is not the nature or texture of an art that qualifies it, but the appreciation by those who look at it (Lewis & Lewis, 2008).