Darren Wilson's Argumentative Essay

In the world we live in today, racial discrimination occurs in almost every diverse society. The United States is one of the countries in which are no exception to this issue. More specifically, Missouri is a state which holds a vast population of African Americans, causing animosity towards particular races. In the summer of 2014, a reported robbery to the Ferguson police caused a 90 second scene between Michael Brown, an African American teenage boy, and Darren Wilson, a white officer. This act created a massive conflict which lead to the end of the boy’s life. Although one’s perspective differs from another’s, the Grand Jury’s decision not to indict officer Darren Wilson was justified because of Wilson’s self-guardianship, and the physical

Eighteen year old Michael Brown, was involved in an intense conflict with Ferguson officer Darren Wilson. When Brown was first encountered by Wilson, the officer may have hesitated not knowing if Brown was armed. For this reason, Wilson may have had the urge to protect himself in self defense, due to an obvious threat and insecurity. When Brown caught a glimpse of Wilson's eyes, Wilson said he felt as if Brown wanted to “intimidate me or overpower me.” Wilson’s initial thoughts were that Michael Brown was physically much bigger than him, which is factually true. Brown, at 292 lbs, would clearly beat Wilson, being 210 lbs, in a physical attack. As Wilson grabbed Brown, he said “I felt like a five year old holding onto Hulk Hogan.” Wilson’s feelings express how tense and insecure he felt during this moment, which lead him to take action. There was a bullet captured in the inside of the driver’s door of Wilson’s police car, which was shot at a downward angle. This shot was most likely fired during the close range combat between Wilson and Brown, and perhaps conveyed how Wilson did not know what or where he was shooting, he simply wanted to protect himself. Many eyewitnesses described this scene as a “punching” or “tussling” action. Others described it as a “fight of tug of war.” However one may call it, it was clearly a difficult and pressured episode. One can imagine the

These assumptions are often based on racist stereotypes. Following this episode, protesters broke out in the streets, arguing that “black lives matter,” and that Michael Brown’s death should not go in vein. They used this as an example of racial abuse, and unjustified murder of black people. They claimed that their lives are not valued as much as the whites. This movement caused a widespread discussion amongst all kinds of people, and the subject of discrimination was again a hot topic of discussion in the media. Many would say that Wilson, being white, did not have enough reason to shoot and kill Brown, with the knowledge that Brown has previously committed a crime. Although Brown was formerly guilty of stealing, and deserved a punishment to some extent, many think that the uprising chaos that Wilson caused, was too harsh of a consequence. Taking all of this into consideration, the jury agreed that all lives matter, not just a specific race. To protect the law enforcement’s safety, and those subject to the scene, officers involved have a right to defend themselves if demands are not met. For this specific case, the officer is innocent unless proven guilty that his action was not justified without a reasonable doubt. In other words, the jury can not indict a person if they are not fully proven guilty of