Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Pros and cons of dakota access pipeline
Pros and cons of dakota access pipeline
Legal and ethical issues in the Dakota access pipeline
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Pros and cons of dakota access pipeline
The Dakota Access Pipeline is a controversial project that extends over 1,800 miles, transporting more than 580,000 barrels of crude oil per day from North Dakota to southern Illinois. The Pipeline crosses paths with Native American territory including an ancient burial site, runs underneath the Missouri River and Lake Oahe, and may possibly cause many environmental and health issues. As a result, environmentalists and Native Americans have started protests and set up camps at the Standing Rock Sioux tribe’s reservation and other areas in order to combat and end the project. The National Guard along with many police officials have tried to stop the protesting and alleged trespassing on private land with force, leading many to believe that they have treated …show more content…
"People at the front lines of the battle over the Dakota Access Pipeline are calling it a 'death sentence.'" Business Insider, Insider, 1 Nov. 2016, www.businessinsider.com/ north-dakota-access-pipeline-protest-drinking-water-2016-10. Accessed 8 May 2018.
Meyer, Robinson. "Oil Is Flowing Through The Dakota Access Pipeline." The Atlantic, Atlantic Monthly Group, 9 June 2017, www.theatlantic.com/ science/archive/2017/06/oil-is-flowing-through-the-dakota-access-pipeline/ 529707/. Accessed 9 May 2018.
Mufson, Steven. "Showdown over N. Dakota pipeline provides lesson in power and perils of protest." The Washington Post, 6 Nov. 2016, www.washingtonpost.com/business/economy/ showdown-over-n-dakota-pipeline-provides-lesson-in-power-and-perils-of-protest/ 2016/11/07/ 113ad8fa-a13e-11e6-8832-23a007c77bb4_story.html?noredirect=on&utm_term=.5c42d4cba 6c0. Accessed 8 May 2018.
United States, DC Circuit Court. Standing Rock Sioux Tribe v. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. 27 July 2016. District Court Pleadings Caption, earthjustice.org/sites/default/files/files/3154%201%20Complaint.pdf. Accessed 21 May 2018. slip op.
On the 9th of February 2004 TransCanada Corporation, an energy company based in Alberta, Canada proposed a plan for the installation and use of a pipeline that would stretch from Alberta, Canada to oil refineries in the Gulf Coast of Texas in the United States. The pipeline, titled the Keystone Pipeline, would be installed in four separate phases and once completed would transport up to 1.1 million barrels of synthetic crude oil per day. Phases two through four of the pipeline encompass the parts of the pipeline that would be installed in the United States and would be located in the states of North and South Dakota, Nebraska, Missouri, and Illinois. TransCanada is currently awaiting approval from the US government in order to begin the installation of the US portion of the pipeline.
The Dakota Access Pipeline and the Keystone XL Pipeline are two pipeline projects that were suspended in the past. These pipelines were stopped because they could have a big impact of people and the environment. The making of these pipelines would cause a great amount of carbon pollution. Recently, President Trump signed the orders to approve the pipeline project. The projects have pros and cons, the people in favor of the pipelines think we would be able to rely less on foreign oil. The people against the pipeline believe that the pipelines would cause the release of gases into the air that could be harmful for other people.
In this essay we will be looking at why the Keystone XL Pipeline should not be built. This is a hot controversial issue that has been in the news for awhile. We will discuss the pros and cons of what will happen if the United States passes legislature to allow the Keystone XL Pipeline to be built. You have to ask yourself if destroying the environment is for our children is worth it to make a few billions richer or maybe little bit cheaper gas. If you agree with building the Keystone XL Pipeline you need to look your children in the eyes and tell them you’re sorry for destroying the environment for them and their children.
and Henry David Thoreau’s ideas of how government should not be followed if laws are morally unjust according to religion are reflected in the Dakota Access Pipeline protests at Standing Rock, South Dakota. They are a form of independent action and nonconformity that are quite distinct in their nature because they truly mirror ideas of great transcendentalist thinkers, unlike other protests in this era that seem to be unorganized and without clear purpose. The protests at Standing Rock are over the proposed Dakota Access Pipeline that would have to run through Sioux territory. The nonconformity seen at the Standing Rock protests is due to a feeling of a greater purpose due to religion. As a part of the Sioux religion, the people “[attach] religious and cultural significance to properties with the area” (Bailey). Therefore, any changes to the land around them goes against their morals and their religion, so action must be taken. This applies the principles of Thoreau because people are protesting the naturally unjust government, and the ideas of Martin Luther King Jr. can be seen because people are making their own decisions over whether or not the rule of government is just. Furthermore, it is not just the Sioux who are protesting, but also “religious communities such as the United Methodist Church and the Nation of Islam” (Bailey) This is because people of other religions also recognize the plight of unjust laws and act independently. They also
The Keystone XL Pipeline Imagine the world not as how it is now, but as how people wish it could be. There is no pollution, everyone has a job, the world is at peace and a safe place to live, and most importantly, everyone is happy. This is but a mere dream. Now open your eyes and look at it. See the reality of what the world truly is: we are intentionally hurting the environment, many people in the world are unemployed, many different countries are at war and people are dying because of it.
This paper will discuss the effects of Keystone XL Pipeline project and how the findings of the research might be beneficial to the United States. The first point of argument will be the negative impact of the Keystone Pipeline to America’s economy and the environment. The second point of view will be the positive impact of Keystone Pipeline to America’s economy. Keystone XL Pipeline is TransCanada’s tar-sand transportation project. The pipeline is supposed to cut across America to be linked with Canada’s tar-sand mines. It is aimed at increasing energy security in America. However, the project has received a lot of criticism from both the citizens and environmentalists for climate reasons (Mendelsohn and Dinar 154). To understand the implications of Keystone XL Pipeline, it is important to look at its environmental and economic impacts to the United States.
The proponents of the pipeline include TransCanada, other companies that will connect into the pipeline to transport their product and companies that will benefit financially from the construction of the pipeline. Persons that will benefit from present and future employment also support the pipeline. Opponents include environmentalists and landowners along the path. The ethical dilemma is that companies, including TransCanada, have the right to operate and transport their product to market so they can generate a profit. The health and future of these companies and the jobs people enjoy from employment with them are at risk. The affected landowners have rights due to ownership. The environment should be protected
The Keystone XL pipeline continues dividing the opinion of the people and being a controversial issue. The precious “black gold”, represents one of the main factors that moves the economy, nationally and globally. This extra-long pipeline will transport oil all the way from Canada to Texas. Some experts and the private oil corporation, who is the one in charge of this project, point to the benefits of this project, for example, will make the USA more independent from foreign oil, will create thousands of jobs and improve the economy. Nevertheless, are experts revealing how the pipeline is an unnecessary risk and will be negative for the environment, dangerous for the population living close to the big pipes, and long-term negative for the
The Keystone Pipeline started construction in 2008 for the main purpose of connecting Canadian and American oil refineries to transport crude oil from the oil sands of Canada faster and more efficient. So far the first three phases of the pipeline have been completed but the proposed and most controversial is Phase IV. It connects Hardisty, Alberta to Steele City, Oklahoma which requires a presidential permit and it also connects the 485-mile southern leg known as the Gulf Coast Project between Steele City and Port Arthur, Texas, which is now operating (Eilperin). The benefits of the pipeline include an increase in jobs, contribute $3.4 billion to the U.S economy and also save time and money from transporting the oil by pipeline instead of tanks and rails. At the same time it would be a great harm to the environment, making the climate unstable, and could cause possible future oil spills. The articles covering the Keystone Pipeline generally list out the same points, covering the same benefits and consequences of building the pipeline. Sources like Fox News and CNS have more of an opposition towards the pipeline and narrow in on the risks and of the effects it would have on the people. Whereas news stations such as CNN and The Washington Post address both sides of the controversy but are subtle about being in favor of the pipeline. The international sources such as Al Jazeera and Reuters oppose the pipeline and are more open with supporting the environmentalists.
Almost every single nation in our world today, the United States included, is extremely reliant on oil and how much of it we can obtain. Wars have started between countries vying for control of this valuable natural resource. The United States as a whole has been trying to reduce its reliance on foreign oil and has had some success, especially with the discovery of the Bakken formation and projects like the Keystone Pipeline. Projects like the Keystone Pipeline are important as they will allow us to transport more oil than we would be able to in train cars, and grant larger access to oil reserves in the United States and Canada. The Keystone Pipeline itself is an oil pipeline which runs from the western Canadian sedimentary basin in Alberta, Canada to refineries in the United States.
Conflict between residents in northern Nevada and SNWA has risen (Brean, 2015). In 2012 the U.S. Bureau of Land Management announced its support of SNWA wanting to build a pipeline from rural Nevada to Las Vegas, rural Nevada being primarily in the northern portion of the state (Larsen et al., 2015). Residents including farmers who depend on water for their crops argue that redirecting water supplies would harm the environment and wildlife that inhabit northern Nevada (Brean, 2015). There is also an issue of oversubscription, this is due to the Colorado River not only supplying water to Nevada but neighboring states which include “Wyoming, Colorado, New Mexico and Utah” (Wockner, 2014). Both Arizona and California are expecting water shortages in the future as they too depend on the Colorado River (Wockner, 2014).
In most ways people think that the pipeline industry is all for itself,and in its process it destroys the enviroment.In fact there are protests and riots happening often, to say the least.People also hop on the bandwagon saying that the industry should be protested for its safety hazards.In this paper I will explain how the industry takes every precaution to prevent environmental and personal harm and what they can actually do for you if the right of way runs through your land.
Protestors at the Standing Rock Sioux Reservation, which straddles North and South Dakota, are actively using methods of civil disobedience to oppose the Dakota Access Pipeline. For example, recently over 70 protestors were arrested for camping on private property to protest the pipeline, which they argue will threaten the water supply used by the reservation and damage sacred grounds. Police have arrested many other Standing Rock activists on charges of criminal trespassing for setting up camps in illegal areas. Protestors at Standing Rock have been using these methods of peaceful resistance to prevent the company working on the project, Energy Transfer Partners, from disrespecting Native American lands and threating the safety of many people. Like those involved with civil rights movement and the anti-Vietnam War movement, activists at Standing Rock have been working to secure freedom to Americans whose liberties are
If the pipeline breaks, the river and land could potentially be contaminated with oil. This is similar to the Overthrow because in both situations, the rights and land of native people are threatened. Just as Hawaiians could do little to stop the rise of Americans and the Overthrow, Native Americans are struggling against the American government to keep sacred lands at Standing Rock safe and undisturbed. Hawaiians lost Hawaii to Americans and Native Americans lost sacred land to oil.
The North Dakota and Keystone pipeline leaked and a majority of oil spilled and caused a lot of damage . The governor of Dakota and two other congressmen have let Obama build the new pipeline on The Standing Rocks Sioux . The pipeline is being built on sacred land granted to The Oceti Sakowin (Sioux )Tribe by treaty. Although some people believe that the pipeline will do a great cause and help create jobs ; Meanwhile others believe that this will have a big effect on the peoples water supply and cause more problems than actually helping the circumstances