Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Advantages and disadvantages of cultural diversity
Advantages and disadvantages of cultural diversity
Advantages and disadvantages of cultural diversity
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Advantages and disadvantages of cultural diversity
Cultural conformity, specifically in religious customs is a influential facilitator within social perception. Israeli-Palestinian conflict are deep-rooted with social perceptions of their rival, and only through reconciliation and reducing the opposing views between the two groups will reconciliation ever occur. The divergent principles create a bias religion supporting and maintaining traditionally held typecasts of each other. Religion is the central theme within the conflict, while that same conflict could serve as a basis of bridge building between the differences. Creating peace often alters perceptions promoting social interactions with emphasis on common ground (Byrne, 1961).
Cultural Conformity
Conformity is one form of a social influence that changes the attitude or behavior of an individual, adhering to that of a group or social norm (Shiraev &Levy, 2010). Social psychology explains conformity as a need to provide accommodations for the majority or group, uphold the consensus, lessen negativity, and live up to specific expectations of other individuals while maintaining a encouraging relationship (Shiraev &Levy, 2010). Rational actor theory suggests that conformity is a rational choice allowing individuals to choose other alternatives after considering the benefits of a choice and the negative consequences that will result because of that choice.
In regards to the conflict between Palestine and Israel, each group behave according to each of the groups own religious doctrine. Islamic and Judaism cultures consist of religious views and attitudes that are complex in nature even more so than other religions. Both cultures consist of following rules with high expectations of religion and religious norms. Because of this c...
... middle of paper ...
..., have been documented falsely regarding the students and other members of the group. Perception in the social eye, has changed, and even with the extraordinary changes which are challenging, mediate many of the long-standing dislike, working alongside of social perception accomplishing the emphasis and acceptance of the similarities within the religious views. Both cultures act within the guidelines of social conforms, specifically through the expression of predictability of the economic, religious, and social considerations. Israel has conflicted with other groups leading the strengthening of those of basic gender roles. The solution to the problem with the two groups and cultures are too complicated to get through just in a paper, the middle eastern conflicts are very complicated and need to be addressed here, through increased bilingual education for children.
...r remains faithful to the memory of his peaceful childhood when Jews and Palestinians lived together in peace, and the prospect of a better future. Despite the political wrongs his people have suffered, he is proud of his heritage and intends to “restore race relations between Jews and Palestinians, (by restoring) human dignity” (146). To do this, Chocour implements innovative techniques: he has Palestinians visit the Kibbutzim, and has Jews spend time with Palestinian families. Chocour’s message is quite honorable, “to change hearts not institutions” (222). Chocour remembers that “Jews and Palestinians are brothers, the(y) have the same father, Abraham, and believe in the same God” (34). It is sad that peoples in this region need to be remnded that they are brothers, but it is comforting that there are men like Chocour, who valiantly assume this task as their own.
The Middle East has since time immemorial been on the global scope because of its explosive disposition. The Arab Israeli conflict has not been an exception as it has stood out to be one of the major endless conflicts not only in the region but also in the world. Its impact continues to be felt all over the world while a satisfying solution still remains intangible. A lot has also been said and written on the conflict, both factual and fallacious with some allegations being obviously evocative. All these allegations offer an array of disparate views on the conflict. This essay presents an overview of some of the major literature on the controversial conflict by offering precise and clear insights into the cause, nature, evolution and future of the Israel Arab conflict.
On the streets of Jerusalem, in the rubble of Ramallah, in synagogues, in mosques, in the hearts and minds of millions in the Gaza Strip, the West Bank, and the remainder of Israel, Israelis and Palestinians are locked in a clash of civilizations. In his masterful work, The Clash of Civilizations, Samuel L. Huntington outlines a theory which approaches international politics on the scale of civilizations. However, he circumvents discussion about Israel. Huntington cautiously describes Israel as a “non-Western” (Huntington 90) country, but identifies the Palestinian-Israeli conflict as one along a fault line between civilizations (267). Though he chooses to avoid the issue, Huntington’s theory provides a groundwork for analyzing the conflict in Israel in terms of a clash of civilizations between Judaism and Islam. This is a dangerous and provocative idea. But if we dare examine its implications and explore its insights, we risk a more complete understanding of the conflict which has plagued relations between Palestinians and Israelis in particular, Muslim countries and Israel in general, for over fifty years.
While mass culture fostered conformity Americans preferred and been known for their prominent individual identities. The further mass culture pushed conformity, the debate became one in which Conformity and communism were equated and that mass culture was creating a conformist society that could easily succumb to the faults of communism. Billy Graham preached about the rise of a new mass culture and America's prosperity and the misuse of it being the equivalent of idolatry. Ironically, religion was becoming a part of mass culture during the same period. Graham also preached about the common link between Christian teachings and American values he also warned against the evils of communism which he called a great sinister anti-christian movement masterminded by Satan.
Conformity is defined as the occurrence of people yielding to social pressures as a result of pressure from a group of their peers; when faced by the pressure to conform, people will alter their behaviour and actions to fit the norm demonstrated by their peers (Lilienfield et al., 2012). Conformity is studied so that is can be understood and used in society to facilitate positive outcomes, and help avoid situations where peoples’ predisposition to conform leads to negative consequences (Lilienfield et al., 2012). By understanding conformity and other social processes society as a whole is able to understand themselves better and motivates them to work on improving as a whole (Lilienfield et al., 2012).
Since the inception of an Israeli nation-state in 1948, violence and conflict has played a major role in Israel’s brief history. In the Sixty-One year’s Israel has been a recognized nation-state, they have fought in 6 interstate wars, 2 civil wars, and over 144 dyadic militarized interstate disputes (MIDs) with some display of military force against other states (Maoz 5). Israel has been involved in constant conflict throughout the past half century. Israel’s tension against other states within the Middle East has spurred vast economic, social, and political unity that has fostered a sense of nationalism and unity in Israel not seen in most other states. Over the next several pages I will try and dissect the reasons for why the nation state of Israel has been emerged in constant conflict and how this conflict has helped foster national unity and identity among the people of Israel.
Andersen, Roy, Robert F. Seibert, and Jon G. Wagner. Politics and change in the Middle East: sources of conflict and accommodation. 9th ed. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall, 1982. Print.
From my experience, bilingual education was a disadvantage during my childhood. At the age of twelve, I was introduced into a bilingual classroom for the first time. The crowded classroom was a combination of seventh and eighth grade Spanish-speaking students, who ranged from the ages of twelve to fifteen. The idea of bilingual education was to help students who weren’t fluent in the English language. The main focus of bilingual education was to teach English and, at the same time, teach a very basic knowledge of the core curriculum subjects: Mathematics, Social Sciences, and Natural Sciences. Unfortunately, bilingual education had academic, psychological, and social disadvantages for me.
The Arab-Israeli conflict is perhaps the most complex political issue of our time. Many have resorted to simply blaming one side or the other. If people took the time to understand the history and correct the misconceptions a potential path forward for the Palestinians comes in place. The main reason as to why the conflict continues is because both Palestinians and Israelis have been fighting over land for the past 66 years.
Jews have a long history in a world which is being considered one of the ancient holy religions in the world. However, Jews became one of most people who suffer from discrimination and hate among other religious. Many Jews lose their identity and cultural because of the lock of the Jewish nationalism. On the other hand, Palestine is an consider to be very valuable in a religious aspect to Arabs Muslims. The Jew is believed that by creating a state for Jews could solve their problem and unite them under one nationalism and identity that the main ideology of Zionism movement and to establish a new state to Jewish. Therefore, The establishment of Jewish problem state has helped to solve Jews problems that they have suffered from losing identity as Haam believed and unified Jews under on the state which is Isere’s.However, creating Jews state has a high disadvantage in the Arabs region because of a merge conflict between Jews and Arabs in the Middle East region especially in Palestine. In this research paper will focusing on the problem that emerge by establishing Isere’s state and how that impact of Palestine refugee problem and their right to return.
Hence, the concepts fundamental attribution error, conformity and prejudice play an essential role in the psychology behind the Palestinian – Israeli conflict. Palestine and Israel are two different nations of people who primarily overestimate the value of the other personality and not the influence of the situation. Secondly, each ethnic group is conformed to feel the need to belittle one another only for the satisfaction of fitting in. Prejudice also proves to show how pre-judgment is a leading factor which impacts the minds of a great majority. Psychology is a leading factor behind the unending fight amongst the two groups.
Psychologytoday.com defines conformity as “the tendency to align your attitudes, beliefs, and behaviors with those around you”. According to informational social influence individuals conform because they believe that other’s interpretation of a vague situation is more noticeable, or valid, than their own.
Conformity can also be simply defined as “yielding to group pressures” (Crutchfield, 1955). Group pressure may vary in many forms such as bullying, persuasion, teasing, or criticism. Conformity is also known as group pressure. The term conformity is often used to describe one side arguing with the other side by a desire to ‘fit in’ or be liked, or because of a desire to be correct, or simply to conform to a social role. The desire to be accepted and belong to a group is every human’s need. However, how does this need affect an individual? There are many researches that include groups can change their members’ thoughts, feelings and behaviors.
Characterize and analyse differing Muslim or Christian attitudes to possession of holy land or holy sites that might constrain peacemaking and explain alternative Muslim or Christian points of view that might facilitate peacemaking.
The Palestine War of 1948 was not the only major conflict between the two nations in the Middle East. Since then, there has been the Six Day War of 1967, the October War of 1973, the Palestinian Uprising of 1967, and perhaps more recently going on at this very moment the newest surge of Palestinian uprising in Israel that began in September of 2000. There are still tough issues to resolve between the two sides, issues such as Jerusalem, which is holy to both Jews and Muslims. Since both nations want full sovereignty over the Holy City and nothing less, this has become an important issue in their nationalistic views. Violent conflicts over such continue to spill blood, both Jewish and Arab, and bring more fear and pain into the already desperate situation. These conflicts are a continuing reminder of how nationalism, in this case both Jewish and Arab, can cause revolutions, uprisings, and wars in order for the creation of states. It is a continuing reminder of how nationalism relates to international relations and its importance in each individual country in the world.