Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Machiavelli
Machiavelli's views on power and the acquisition of power
Machiavelli
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Machiavelli
In Florence, Italy on May 3rd, 1469, a boy who would grow up to be one of the most hated people in history was born. His name was Niccolo Machiavelli and though many believe he was a malicious, diabolical person, others believe he was a political realist, genius and someone who dared to say the truth. He was most famous for his book, Il principe (The Prince) which regards the topic of how rulers can acquire and maintain their power. Despite the harshness of his writings, Niccolo Machiavelli was simply showing his interest and care for the amelioration of government in Italy. The people Niccolo Machiavelli grew up watching were people that influenced the way he thought. Some of these influences were ones he saw early on in his life. Machiavelli was born into a rich family, and had a rigorous education. In 1494, he went into the Florentine government as a clerk. This was the same year that the powerful Medici family lost their dominance over Italy and were forced into exile. This is when he began his career as a diplomat and did work for the major cities in Italy, France and Spain. During this time, he met many important people like Louis XII and Pope Julius II. However, around 1502, Machiavelli began to serve as a political advisor for the Borgia family, the family who was ruling Italy at the time (Machiavelli and Political Thought). He came into contact with Cesare Borgia, the son of Pope Alexander. (European Graduate School, Machiavelli Biography). Borgia greatly impacted him, and Machiavelli watched as he expanded his power across central Italy, using cruelty, not kindness. Borgia was evil, and not only was he a murderous warlord, but he also did other outrageous deeds like taking the church’s wealth for his own family, and e... ... middle of paper ... ... the things he did. Machiavelli’s genius was so overlooked in his time especially since people were so caught up being offended by the things that he said. He was so legendary, in fact, that people still talk about him today, with the conspiracy around Tupac Shakur, who “died,” yet some believe he is still alive and faked his death. People believe that Shakur was going in his footsteps because he read a prodigious amount of Machiavelli books when he was in jail, and even changed his stage name to “Makaveli” just before his alleged death. Machiavelli’s name is still tossed around today, hundreds of years after he was alive. Ultimately, Machiavelli was concerned for the greater good of Italy and tried to help by inputting his ideas about ruling. It is too easy to deem someone as “evil” or “wrong” if the views they express are different from what is commonly accepted.
Machiavelli’s views were drastically different from other humanists at his time. He strongly promoted a secular society and felt morality was not necessary but stood in the way of a successfully governed state. He stated that people generally tended to work for their own best interests and gave little thought to the well being of the state. He distrusted citizens saying, “In time of adversity, when a state is in need of its citizens, there are few to be found.” In his writings in The Prince, he constantly questioned the citizens’ loyalty and warned for the leaders to be wary in trusting citizens. His radical and distrusting thoughts on human nature were derived out of concern for Italy’s then unstable government. Machiavelli also had a s...
After five hundred years, Niccolo Machiavelli the man has ceased to exist. In his place is merely an entity, one that is human, but also something that is far above one. The debate over his political ideologies and theories has elevated him to a mythical status summed up in one word: Machiavelli. His family name has evolved into an adjective in the English language in its various forms. Writers and pundit’s bandy about this new adjective in such ways as, “He is a Machiavelli,” “They are Machiavelli’s,” “This is suitable for a Machiavelli.” These phrases are almost always the words of a person that understands more about Niccolo’s reputation than the man himself. Forgotten is that Machiavelli is not an adequate example of the ruler he is credited with describing; a more accurate statement would be to call someone a “Borgia” or a “Valentino.” Most of the time they are grossly mistaken in their references. All these words accomplish is to add to the legend, and the misinterpretation, of the true nature of Niccolo Machiavelli.
Machiavelli?s model for his ideal prince was Cesare Borgia, also known as Duke Valentino and son of Pope Alexander VI. He believed Cesare Borgia possessed all the qualities of a prince destined to rule and maintain power in his state. He believed that politics has a morality of its own. There is no regard of justness or unjustness, of cruelty or mercy, of approval or humiliation, which should interfere with the decision of defending the state and preserving its freedom. Therefore, the ruler/prince's single responsibilit...
Niccolo Machiavelli lived in Florence, Italy in the 1400’s. The country of Italy was divided into city-states that had their own leaders, but all pledged alliance to their king. In time in which great leaders were needed in order to help the development of a city-state and country, Machiavelli had a theory that man needed a leader to control them. In his book The Prince, he speaks of the perfect leader.
Machiavelli lived amidst a deteriorating, corrupt, totalitarian, 16th Century political infrastructure when The Prince was composed. It’s original intention was simply to influence Lorenzo The Magnificent son of Piero Di Medici in the hope for possible appointment within public office. The Prince is therefore merely suggestions on possible theories in terms of a governing policy.He does not infer that this account is the be all and end all of successful rule and acknowledges himself as a humble man who has taken the time to study the deeds of great men to form an ideology that can be taken by the reader, in this case Lorenzo Medici as he interprets it.He does not claim to have the answer to politics just a different perspective by way of analyses of the past and present. I have been unable to find among my possessions anything, which I hold so dear or esteem so highly as that knowledge of the deeds of great men, which I have acquired through a long experience of modern events and a constant study of the past. (Social and Political Philosophy. Somerville and Santoni p.101) It is from this initial examination of politics from a purely scientific and rational perspective that Machiavelli has been named the founder of analysing politics as a science. However his reputation has been unfairly appointed due to a misinterpretation of his work. If read in context The Pri...
When you not only have the ability to controls some ones actions, but have the power to control their actions for the benefit of your own, you can consider yourself a very powerful individual. During the Renaissance era, many aristocratic families had control over intellectuals of the time. Some of them included, Michelangelo, da Vinci, and Machiavelli. However, throughout The Borgias, the narrator makes notes of how Machiavelli sees the Borgia family and gives hints to his liking toward the family. To the reader, Machiavelli seems like a well-adjusted citizen, capable of being reliant and separate to other aristocratic families other than the Borgias. By being, as one would say, loyal to the Borgias, Machiavelli is able to gain a quality insight on the Borgia family. Machiavelli, during the time period, was the well know author of his book, The Prince, and being a close acquaintance of the Borgia family, became an informer to Florence about members of the Borgia family’s actions. During his time in the Papal States, he observed the Borgias “…without excessive exaggeration, these lands were ‘a nursery of all the worst crimes, of outbreaks of rapine and murder, resulting from the wickedness of local lords and not, as these lords maintained, from the disposition of their subjects’.” The reader can only best assume that Machiavelli thought of the Borgias as a disgusted and disgraceful joke of a family. In spite of the repulsiveness of the family, Machiavelli had an idolization for Cesare Borgia. Machiavelli exclaims: “this lord is very proud…and, as a soldier, he is so enterprising that nothing is so great that it does not seem trivial to him.” During this part in the book, Machiavelli has been following Cesare, and keeping tabs on him and then reporting back to Florence. Throughout Cesare’s conquest throughout Italy, Machiavelli accompanies his army, once
Niccolò Machiavelli was an Italian philosopher who was of great importance to his time period in Europe and also significantly impacted the western world as a whole. He was born in Florence, Italy, on May 3, 1469 (NiccolÒ Machiavelli Biography). During his youth, Florence was controlled by the powerful Medici family. When the Medici’s fell from power, Girolamo Savonarola became the leader of Florence. After the fall of Savonarola’s government, the Florentine republic had been reestablished and Machiavelli was selected to be secretary of the Second Chancery, a position in which he coordinated and organized relations with Florence's territorial possessions (Harvey Mansfield). Because of his intelligence, Machiavelli was also appointed
Niccolò di Bernardo dei Machiavelli was born May 3, 1469. He was an Italian writer, politician, and philosopher who’s considered very influential in modern political science. He was secretary of the Second Chancery in the Republic of Florence from 1498 to 1512, when the Medici, with help from Pope Julius II used Spanish troops to defeat the Florentines. After the Medici took power, they accused Machiavelli of conspiracy against them and soon after he was captured and tortured.
Niccolo Machiavelli was an Italian statesman and author. He was born on May 03, 1469 in Florence, Italy. Machiavelli was educated in the tradition of Roman and Greek writers with the Renaissance custom. His writing proves that he read the classics and in addition, reading was highly considered by his family. His father Bernardo di Niccolò Machiavelli was a lawyer in Florence. In addition, print media was the only form of communication at the time. In fact, in 1455,
Machiavelli’s works supported whst he called the new prince. A new prince is someone who could rise to power versus and old prince who is simply born into power. This challenged monarchies and the church. It was the English that were really responsible for the negative reputation of Machiavelli. His works threatened their very structure of government with ideal that anyone can simply raise to power by being tactical and crafty. Modern day scholars see no need to fear the works of Machiavelli because they regard the prince as simply a book on trickery that exposes the
Niccolo Machiavelli was born in the 16th century. He is called the father of modern political theory. He was also historiographer, a diplomat and an author. Some of Machiavelli’s conventions were “Discourses on the First Decade of Titus Livius” which was his discussions on what how he viewed issues inside of the Roman Empire and another on of his writings that he was famous for was the Seven Books of the Art of War. (Kreis 2013).
Machiavelli’s, “The Prince” marks the turning point in history, the origin of the study of politics and critical thinking. The Prince, is a handbook or an instruction manual for all rulers to use and to successfully rule a kingdom or state. Machiavelli wrote this during a time where modern day Italy was not unified. It was divided into small republics or kingdoms, which were constantly at war with each other. These republics were either in control of the church or rich families. Machiavelli originally wrote ‘The Prince” for Lorenzo Di Piero De Medici” of the Medici family that ruled Florence at the time. It was an attempt to come in his good graces, which was very ‘Machiavellian’ of him. During his lifetime Machiavelli observed many Politicians
After the temporary fall of Florence’s ruling family the Medici in 1494 Machiavelli became a diplomat for 14 years. During this time he earned a reputation for deviousness, enjoying shocking his associates by appearing more shameless than he truly was. Machiavelli was tortured, jailed, and banished from an active role in political life, after it became known he was trying to organize a militia against the return of the Medici family to power in 1512. During his time away from politics gave him the chance to read Roman history and write to political treaties, like the most famous one The Prince. His short work all revolved around monarchal rule and that survival is just man’s capacity for determine his own destiny in opposition to power of fate. His work has been referred as a handbook for politicians on the use of ruthless, self-serving, and serving cunning, and it even inspired the term “Machiavellian.” Many believe the books title “The Prince” was based on Cesare Borgia, some considered a satire. Pope Clement VII condemned The Prince because of its endorsement of fuel by fear and deceit. He died on June 21, 1527. His tomb is in Santa Croce in Florence which he had been banned from entering during the last years of his
During the time 1469, a child by the name of Niccolo Di Bernardo Del Machiavelli was born. Some may know him as an Italian philosopher, humanist, or an evil minded fellow associated with the corruptness of totalitarian government. In Machiavelli’s home state of Florence, he introduces the modern political theory. Hoping to gain influence with the ruling Medici family, Niccolo wrote a pamphlet called The Prince (Prezzolini). Niccolo lived a nondescript childhood and his main political experience in his youth was watching Savonarola from afar.
For a guy like Machiavelli, who is very complicated, the way he view things, you cannot just pin point what exactly he is trying to portray, that made us also confused on what really is his intention. On the other side, Machiavelli is indeed wise enough to come up with this kind of book, I can say that I may misunderstood his actions and all, but going back to his objective which is the reunification of Italy and get rid of the Papacy, and get back with republican government, it is truly enough to say that every philosopher’s behaviour is dependent on the time and kind of government they are born into. One thing to consider is that Machiavelli eagerness to abolish church as he pertains that is one reason that hinders in the reunification of Italy. We are all aware that absolutism does not last longer, I believe that the concept of Machiavelli about