Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Religious and ethical issues with euthanasia
Religious and ethical issues with euthanasia
Moral permissibility of voluntary active euthanasia and physician-assisted suicide
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Religious and ethical issues with euthanasia
Killing Me Softly Brittany Maynard, a 29-year-old woman, discovers she has brain cancer. She looks back on her full life; traveling the world, teaching orphans overseas, climbing mountains, falling in love, and getting married. So young, but has experienced so much joy. Now, she looks ahead at the future. “Diagnosed with a rapidly growing brain tumor, Maynard says she faces a debilitating, painful and certain death.” (Luscombe 1). Treatment for this aggressive dark matter can extend her life to a median survival of 14.6 months, 30% may live up to two years. After doing her research, she chooses to not spend the next year battling the inevitable outcome of death. She chooses to face “death with dignity.” Susan Trossman refers to Maynard in …show more content…
Ancient Rome approved of voluntary suicide and continued to sanction it through the Middle Ages.”( Lachman 121). Since then, the introduction of the Christian church is believed to be the reason behind the changed views by pointing out what they considered sinful nature. In 1990 “Dr. Death”, or Dr. Kavorkian began helping patients commit suicide. “By the end of 1996 Kevorkian had assisted in beyond 40 suicides,” “by his own count, by 1997 he had assisted in at least 130.” (Darr 31, 32). One of the most recent highly publicized related examples is of course Brittany Maynard. She moved to Oregon to gain advantage of the states Assisted Suicide …show more content…
In my opinion you are playing God either way. Someone chose to place the feeding tube, maybe the person(s) placed one with hopes she would come back and overcome. When this did not happen, they decided to let her pass. Do we know if she had made a decision before to accept treatment of such a nature? This is one circumstance in which, if the patient had a living will, this could have all been avoided. I can not condemn the family for trying to give her time to recover from her current state. The exceedingly important opposition in the debate on PAS, AE, and Withdrawal of life sustaining medical treatments, is the religious argument. Ethically, “the sanctity of life overrides the right of individuals to choose how and when they will die.” (Ersek49). The basic definition of suicide is the act of knowingly committing an act that will cause one 's self death. With that in mind, if a person knows that smoking will eventually kill them, is that not a form of suicide. If a doctor tells a patient that his arteries will continue clogging and if they do not exercise and start eating right, they will experience a heart attack and die, and the patient does nothing, is this not a form of slow suicide? People are slowly killing themselves sooner everyday by their decisions. If a patient with cancer decide to chose PAS, are they not just killing themselves sooner? Yes, I admit it is certainly quicker than eating a pound
Brittany Maynard was a twenty nine year old woman who married her husband just a year before she passed away. Before she passed, she was diagnosed with a terminal disease, brain cancer. Her doctors gave her six months to live and using treatment might shorten her already short amount of time that she had left to live. Maynard and her family uprooted from their home in San Francisco, California and moved to Portland, Oregon. In Oregon, she planned to get new physicians and after attending appointments, she could be prescribed a lethal pill that would end her life. She wanted to live her last six months happily, and she didn’t want to suffer and have her family watch her suffer. (Death) She wanted to be able to end her life on her own terms, and not when the cancer says that she had to. She received a lot of unkind criticism for her choice. Death with Dignity Act, or the use of assisted suicide is morally justifiable, especially in Brittany Maynard’s
Both Brittany Maynard and Craig Ewert ultimately did not want to die, but they were aware they were dying. They both suffered from a terminal illness that would eventually take their life. Their worst fear was to spend their last days, in a state of stress and pain. At the same time, they would inflict suffering on their loved ones as their family witnessed their painful death. Brittany and Craig believed in the notion of dying with dignity. The states where they both resided did not allow “active voluntary euthanasia or mercy killing at the patient’s request” (Vaughn 269). As a result, they both had to leave their homes to a place that allowed them to get aid in dying. Brittany and Craig were able to die with dignity and peace. Both avoiding
Let's mention a known name in the euthanasia field, Dr. Jack Kevorkian. If this name sounds unfamiliar, then you have been one of the lucky few people to have been living in a cave for the last nine years. Dr. Kevorkian is considered to some as a patriarch, here to serve mankind. Yet others consider him to be an evil villain, a devil's advocate so to speak. Physician assisted suicide has not mentioned in the news recently. But just as you are reading this paper and I'm typing, it's happening. This hyperlink will take you to a web page that depicts in depth how many people Dr. Kevorkian has assisted in taking their lives.
Imagine a family member being extremely ill and suffering from day to day. When they decide they cannot take the pain any more, would you want them to pull through for you or would you fulfill their dying wish and let the doctor pull the plug? Could you even make a decision? Many people would not allow such an event to happen because with all the pain and confusion the patient is enduring may cause confusion and suicidal tendencies. However, there are people who believe otherwise. This is called physician-assisted suicide. Physician-assisted suicide (PAS) is a controversial topic that causes much debate. Though it is only legal in the three states Oregon, Washington and Montana, there are many people who are for it and think it can be necessary. Even with morals put aside, Physician-assisted suicide should be illegal because it will be a huge violation of the oath every doctor must abide by, there would be no real way to distinguish between people who are suffering and the people who are faking or depressed, and it causes a lot of confusion to people with new diseases or new strands of disease that does not have a clear cure.
In all cases in the United States we start by looking at our Nation 's history, lawful customs, and practices. In pretty much every western democracy it is a wrongdoing to support a suicide. The States ' aided suicide bans are not advancements. Rather, they are longstanding outflows of the States ' dedication to the insurance and protection of all human life. Besides, the dominant part of States in this nation have laws forcing criminal punishments on one who aids an alternate to carry out suicide. “Though deeply rooted, the State 's ' assisted-suicide bans have in recent years been reexamined and, generally, reaffirmed. Because of advances in medicine and technology, Americans today are increasingly likely to die in institutions, from chronic illnesses(http://law2.umkc.edu).” So why would you let these people live out a inevitable death in a hospital bed suffering when we have the technology and resources to take them out of their pain and suffering. It is morally incorrect and wrong to force someone to live out a life they don 't want to live. However in recent years the States have took the initiative to solve this problem. Recently five states have voted to legalize physician assisted suicide in their state them including Denver, New Mexico, Montana, Oregon and Washington. A recent case that involved physician assisted suicide was Baxter vs Montana where someone with Leukemia
Brittany Maynard was a 29 year old woman, she was thriving and loving life then, she was diagnosed with terminal brain cancer. Brittany did a lot of research about her cancer and she finally realized that there wouldn’t be any good outcome. After fighting the cancer for months, she had the option of living in her home with hospice coming in and caring for her. Brittany made the decision to move to Oregon with her family to be protected by the Death with Dignity law. She wanted to be able to die when it felt ‘right’. She wanted to say when enough was enough and she said all her goodbyes. Brittany also didn’t want to have hospice take care of her, because she would just be suffering and in pain for who knows how long, wondering when the time will be that she dies. Her family would have to sit there and watch that day by day. How could a family do that? Brittany chose not to go through radiation and lived her life to the fullest with her family happy and smiling, until that time felt ‘right’ and she couldn’t go on any longer. She actually had the medication for a long time, before she took it, because she didn’t want to die, but dying was going to happen anyway. She wanted to die on her terms. When my suffering becomes too great, I can say to all those I love, "I love you; come be by my side,
In 1999 a well known physician, Jack Kevorkian, was convicted of second degree murder. One might think that Kevorkian committed the terrible crime of murdering someone, but that is actually far from the truth. Kevorkian was convicted because of something a little unusual; he helped a patient with assisted suicide. Alexander Stingl, a sociologist and science historian, and M. Lee, authors of “Assisted Suicide: An Overview,” define assisted suicide as “any case in which a doctor gives a patient (usually someone with a terminal illness) the means to carry out their own suicide by using a lethal dose of medication.” Kevorkian was convicted because as of right now, assisted suicide is illegal in the United States with the exceptions of Oregon, Montana, and Washington. Huge controversy rose over this case because some feel assisted suicide is a civil right whereas others feel it is unnecessary. Assisted suicide is a practice that has long been debated.
It first describes the life-altering events that lead to Maynard choosing to end her life prematurely due to her debilitating illness that would deteriorate her body as the months went by. After explaining that Maynard succeeded in dying 3 days prior to the release of this article, it goes into depth of the arguments between advocates and those against her choice. It also lists the states and their requirements for permitting a terminally ill subject to end their own life with the help of their Physician. Using graphs and pictures enables the article to further explain the different matters and elements of the
The patient might just be waiting for the disease they have caught to kill them, but it does not always go so quickly . ¨Ending a patient's life by injection, with the added solace that it will be quick and painless, is much easier than this constant physical and emotional care¨ (Ezekiel Emanuel, 1997, p. 75). If a patient is terminally ill and will not get better, it allows them to end the suffering. If the physician has to keep a constant eye on the patient and they need constant care and the patient is not getting better, the option is there if they want to end all of it they can. Sometimes dealing with all of the physical care like medications and not being able to live completely normal with a disease is hard. It can get extremely hard and stressful that all the patients can think about doing is ending it, this alternative gives the patient a painless option. According to Somerville (2009), ¨… respect for people's rights to autonomy and self determination means everyone has a right to die at a time of their choosing¨ ( p.4). The patient deserves to choose whether they want to keep fighting or if they cannot go any farther. The patient should not have to push through a fight they have been fighting and know they cannot win. According to Kevorkian ¨the patient decides when it's best to go.¨ Nobody tells the patient when they have to end their lives, they understand their body and know
Although widely condoned around the world, only one nation, the Netherlands has made physician assisted suicide legal. Five states tried Washington in 1991, California in 1992, Michigan in 1998,and main in 2000, Oregon in 1994 approved the “Death with Dignity Act” it won 51 percent to 49 percent. 91 people committed suicide with the aid of a physician in the first four years the law was in effect.
Oftentimes when one hears the term Physician Assisted Suicide (hereafter PAS) the words cruel and unethical come to mind. On October 27, 1997 Oregon passed the Death with Dignity Act, this act would allow terminally ill Oregon residents to end their lives through a voluntary self-administered dose of lethal medications that are prescribed by a physician (Death with Dignity Act) . This has become a vital, medical and social movement. Having a choice should mean that a terminally ill patient is entitled to the choice to pursue PAS. If people have the right to refuse lifesaving treatments, such as chemo and palliative care, then the choice of ending life with PAS should be a choice that is allowed.
According to West’s Encyclopedia of American Law, between 1990 and 1999, a well-known advocate for physician assisted suicide, Jack Kevorkian helped 130 patients end their lives. He began the debate on assisted suicide by assisting a man with committing suicide on national television. According to Dr. Kevorkian, “The voluntary self-elimination of individual and mortally diseased or crippled lives taken collectively can only enhance the preservation of public health and welfare” (Kevorkian). In other words, Kevor...
Assisted death can consist of either voluntary euthanasia or physical-assisted suicide. Voluntary suicide is when a doctor purposely administers drugs to force death upon a person, while physical-assisted suicide is when a doctor aids someone in committing suicide by presenting drugs for self administration by a family member or loved one (Tomlinson). This procedure is legal in Vermont, Oregon, Washington, New Mexico and recently passed in California. In 2014, Brittany Maynard, a young Californian woman with terminal brain cancer became an advocate for the terminally ill and took her own life under Oregon aid-in-dying law (The Brittany Maynard Fund). Maynard states, “Every terminally ill American deserves the choice to die with dignity… Freedom from prolonged pain and suffering is a most basic human right” (Firger). Having the ability to...
As patients come closer to the end of their lives, certain organs stop performing as well as they use to. People are unable to do simple tasks like putting on clothes, going to the restroom without assistance, eat on our own, and sometimes even breathe without the help of a machine. Needing to depend on someone for everything suddenly brings feelings of helplessness much like an infant feels. It is easy to see why some patients with terminal illnesses would seek any type of relief from this hardship, even if that relief is suicide. Euthanasia or assisted suicide is where a physician would give a patient an aid in dying. “Assisted suicide is a controversial medical and ethical issue based on the question of whether, in certain situations, Medical practioners should be allowed to help patients actively determine the time and circumstances of their death” (Lee). “Arguments for and against assisted suicide (sometimes called the “right to die” debate) are complicated by the fact that they come from very many different points of view: medical issues, ethical issues, legal issues, religious issues, and social issues all play a part in shaping people’s opinions on the subject” (Lee). Euthanasia should not be legalized because it is considered murder, it goes against physicians’ Hippocratic Oath, violates the Controlled
They leave their family in dismay, and some people even mourn for their loved one. Although the right to die law takes lives early, the patient has enough time to do whatever their last breath will take. Brittany Maynard, who was diagnosed with a terminal brain tumor, moved to Oregon to take advantage of the right to die law. She knew that death was coming early to take her, so she decided to take euthanasia a few days after her husband’s birthday, October 26. Knowing well, that her condition would be worse by her birthday, November 19, she decided that November 1 would be the last day of her life. She would spend her last few years traveling and volunteering. “ I am proud of the life I have lived,” says Maynard. “ I am happy I did all the traveling and volunteering I did. I would never take back any of those choices (Egan 68).” She left this world with her final sayings and fun times. Her family and husband state that she lived a pure life with no regrets. Every ill patient wants to have their final breath knowing that they were surrounded by