Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Crime statistics analyzing
Essay of police cruelty
Essay of police cruelty
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Crime statistics analyzing
How and Why Statistical Data Should Be Used to Support Criminal Justice Policy Many people have misgivings about statistics. The saying “facts speak louder than statistics”, and there are three types of lies: 1) lies, 2) damn lies, 3) and statistics, are ever present in most people’s minds, including those of policymakers, judges, and litigants. Another popular saying is “If you laid all the statistics in the world head to toe, they still would not reach a conclusion” (Paul & Williams, 2003). With all that being said, policymakers and litigants often utilize data to prove points, assist in making crucial decisions, and often the problem is not the data or statistics, rather they simply require interpretation so people can understand …show more content…
The issue with statistics in criminal justice policy making is mainly: 1) Understanding the variables, and 2) Most criminal justice statistics are rarely collected in a controlled condition that tests research hypothesis. Questions that pertain to causation, such as whether a policy change has attained the desired effect, or if a specific treatment program is returning the results desired, can almost never be answered in a straightforward way. Using specific tools of the statistical trade can narrow the plausible explanations, but a single, plausible answer may never come about (Paul & Williams, 2003). Statistics are now used on an increasing basis to regulate the criminal justice system, as well as measure the needs and desires of a society, community, or facility. Most people gain their knowledge of criminal policy through social attitudes of friends and families, whereas using statistics allows them to gain knowledge of what is occurring at a certain time period. This allows policymakers, litigants, and judges to adapt to whatever the data is presenting. Another important attribute that statistics bring to the fight for criminal justice policy is to assist criminal justice officials a researched, proven way to protect individuals more appropriately, spend wiser using their limited budgets, and measure performance across the entire criminal justice process, from policy making, to policy enforcement, …show more content…
They are “Descriptive Statistics”, which help describe, show, or summarize data that may have patterns emerge from the data. The other type of analysis is “Inference Statistics”, which provides data from a sample of a population, where the entire population cannot be tested for information. This data comes from several sources, and is integral in every aspect of proper statistical criminal justice analysis. The first and foremost of these institutions is the Bureau of Justice Statistics, led by the Department of Justice. It is responsible for the administration, regulation, oversight, compilation, and provision of criminal justice statistics, done through specified research ("Shocking facts from the Bureau of Justice Statistics",
Crime data is a resource being used to help understand who the victims are, their age, race, what type of crime they have committed. The more information someone has about crime the more prepared they can be to deal with the victim, evaluate programs that help prevent crime. There are several official sources used UCR, NCVS, NIBRS that are used. There are pros and cons to each source and the following information will include some of the positive and some of the negatives points of each report. This is not inclusive by any means, there are many different various pros and cons of each report.
Our government, the United States of America, is knowingly responsible for providing its citizens with factual crime data that can be used to inform them of the effectiveness of current criminological practices. The data provided is collected and analyzed by a number of government agencies, but it is not limited to this, as we often send data to independent contractors to analyze for us.
In contemporary society, there are various methodologies for collecting data (Linden 2012). That being said, there are pros and cons to each that are based on reliability and validity; where reliability is consistency of the statistics, and validity is a measure of how accurate the results are in accordance with the research topic. This ties in with how this paper will explore the Uniform Crime Report system (UCR); a measure of crime that is used the most. UCR statistics reflect the crimes that are reported to the police throughout the country. victimization and self-report surveys, which are statistics that reinforce the findings revealed by the UCR, will also be explored. Lastly, the issue of media coverage of crime news will be examined.
The FBI uses Statistics to solve hundreds of cases, statistics allow the FBI to make predictions to solve a case before they have evidence enough to solve it. Since the FBI is the United States largest law enforcement agency focused mainly on United States soil the FBI needs a way to stay organized so the FBI built a computer program called ViCAP. ViCAP is a database to hold all of the FBI’s crimes. This program can be used to find a similar case in years passed and look back to see what kind of person the statistics point to. The FBI uses advanced statistics compiled by using the mean (average), and looking at the type of person who committed the crime, the severity of the crime, and the age of the person who committed the crime. While out in the field, FBI agents take notes on even the smallest thing that could give a hint to solving a case such as if the crime scene is organized denotes multiple offenses. Statistics are also compiled when looking for a stolen item such as money from a bank, for example, if money is stolen; statistics might tell you where to look, the age, gender, ethnicity, and type of person (down to the car they might drive). Statistics are especially important wh...
Wilson, James. “Do the time, lower the crime” Too many people behind bars? The statistics suggest otherwise (2008) 1-3. Print.
The United States has a larger percent of its population incarcerated than any other country. America is responsible for a quarter of the world’s inmates, and its incarceration rate is growing exponentially. The expense generated by these overcrowded prisons cost the country a substantial amount of money every year. While people are incarcerated for a number of reasons, the country’s prisons are focused on punishment rather than reform, and the result is a misguided system that fails to rehabilitate criminals or discourage crime. The ineffectiveness of the United States’ criminal justice system is caused by mass incarceration of non-violent offenders, racial profiling, and a high rate of recidivism.
The individuals within our society have allowed we the people to assess and measure the level of focus and implementation of our justice system to remedy the modern day crime which conflict with the very existence of our social order. Enlightening us to the devices that will further, establish the order of our society, resides in our ability to observe the Individual’s rights for public order.
(Schmalleger and Smykla, 2011). When prison and jail rates are combined, The United States imprison 756 people per 100,000 population, up from 684 in 2000, and 601 in 1995. Crime rates, however, depending on some states that have identical population, surprisingly have widely different rates of incarceration. Bowman and Waltman did an investigation on felony sentencing and in their investigation they found that the preference of the public weigh heavily on the sentencing of violent offenders. According to prison administrators, levels of imprisonment are frequently influenced more by political decisions than by levels of crime or rates of detection of crime (Schmalleger and Smykla, 2011). Bowers and Waltman also concluded that the choice of high or low imprisonment rates are decided by jurisdictions. That choice is reflected in the sentencing patterns that are adopted by
No theories are presented; instead, the authors elect to analyze secondary data from previous studies, surveys, experiments, and other social science literature. Although some of the research cited was conducted by one (or both) authors previously, most of the data comes from Gallup Polls, federal statistics, and literature or experiments published by other criminologists in journals or books.
Mass incarceration has caused the prison’s populations to increase dramatically. The reason for this increase in population is because of the sentencing policies that put a lot of men and women in prison for an unjust amount of time. The prison population has be caused by periods of high crime rates, by the medias assembly line approach to the production of news stories that bend the truth of the crimes, and by political figures preying on citizens fear. For example, this fear can be seen in “Richard Nixon’s famous campaign call for “law and order” spoke to those fears, hostilities, and racist underpinnings” (Mauer pg. 52). This causes law enforcement to focus on crimes that involve violent crimes/offenders. Such as, gang members, drive by shootings, drug dealers, and serial killers. Instead of our law agencies focusing their attention on the fundamental causes of crime. Such as, why these crimes are committed, the family, and preventive services. These agencies choose to fight crime by establishing a “War On Drugs” and with “Get Tough” sentencing policies. These policies include “three strikes laws, mandatory minimum sentences, and juvenile waives laws which allows kids to be trialed as adults.
Today, half of state prisoners are serving time for nonviolent crimes. Over half of federal prisoners are serving time for drug crimes. Mass incarceration seems to be extremely expensive and a waste of money. It is believed to be a massive failure. Increased punishments and jailing have been declining in effectiveness for more than thirty years. Violent crime rates fell by more than fifty percent between 1991 and 2013, while property crime declined by forty-six percent, according to FBI statistics. Yet between 1990 and 2009, the prison population in the U.S. more than doubled, jumping from 771,243 to over 1.6 million (Nadia Prupis, 2015). While jailing may have at first had a positive result on the crime rate, it has reached a point of being less and less worth all the effort. Income growth and an aging population each had a greater effect on the decline in national crime rates than jailing. Mass incarceration and tough-on-crime policies have had huge social and money-related consequences--from its eighty billion dollars per-year price tag to its many societal costs, including an increased risk of recidivism due to barbarous conditions in prison and a lack of after-release reintegration opportunities. The government needs to rethink their strategy and their policies that are bad
According to the Bureau of Justice Statistics, in the year 1980 we had approximately 501,900 persons incarcerated across the United States. By the year 2000, that figure has jumped to over 2,014,000 prisoners. The current level of incarceration represents the continuation of a 25-year escalation of the nation's prison and jail population beginning in 1973. Currently the U.S. rate of 672 per 100,000 is second only to Russia, and represents a level of incarceration that is 6-10 times that of most industrialized nations. The rise in prison population in recent years is particularly remarkable given that crime rates have been falling nationally since 1992. With less crime, one might assume that fewer people would be sentenced to prison. This trend has been overridden by the increasing impact of lengthy mandatory sentencing policies.
The ideology of increased arrests rates and more likely incarceration has greatly contributed to the growing prison population. As some analysts argue that the billions spent by the federal, state, and local governments on the crime problem is “paying off” (American Corrections, 2016), some results may show otherwise. In the
During most of America’s recorded history, measuring crime and violence was not an accurate science. Crime statistics were recorded at local levels, but oftentimes this was not a priority of law enforcement agencies. Furthermore, statistics were often skewed to reflect better performance of these agencies than was the case. Only recently, during the last generation, has crime statistics been measured on a national level to determine crime patterns. The easiest crimes to measure, because of their nature, were homicide and auto theft.
I now know that criminology prefer to highlight the correlations between crimes’ social climates and criminals’ psychological states of mind. While some argues that criminal behavior is a result of individuals’ association with criminal peers, other claims that crime is a reflection of an individual’s genetic disadvantages. I have come to learn that there are no universally agreed formulas on decoding crimes and criminal behaviors. What we have, however, is a manual full of academic opinions and subjective views that have emerged alongside of the development of criminology. At the same time, the volume of conflicting perspectives that I have stumble upon in studying criminology reminded me again that the success of our current assessment models has yet to be determined. Thus, the study of criminology is an appropriate practice that will further prepare me to conduct meaningful research on legal studies and to provide accurate and in-depth findings in the near