Rhetorical Analysis of the Community Crime Scene Investigating (CSI). The discourse community of Crime Scene Investigators (CSI) is a specialized group that plays a crucial role in criminal investigations by collecting, analyzing, and interpreting physical evidence from crime scenes. These professionals work collaboratively to solve complex cases and bring justice to victims. Through my rhetorical analysis of this community, I have discovered that CSI members share a common goal of seeking truth and providing closure to victims and their families. They communicate through various channels such as written reports, photographs, sketches, and verbal discussions during team meetings or court proceedings. The language used within the CSI community …show more content…
This meticulous approach helps them uncover vital clues that may lead to identifying suspects or establishing motives for criminal acts. Additionally, CSI professionals must adhere to ethical standards and legal guidelines while performing their duties to ensure the integrity of the investigation process. Overall, my thesis statement asserts that by delving into the discourse community of Crime Scene Investigators, we can gain valuable insights into their methods, challenges, and contributions to the field of criminal justice. Through effective communication and collaboration within this community, CSI professionals can make significant strides towards solving crimes and bringing perpetrators to justice. The community of Crime Scene Investigators (CSI) is a vital component of law enforcement agencies, consisting of detectives, forensic analysts, and other personnel dedicated to uncovering evidence necessary to solve crimes. The shared goal of this community is to accurately collect and analyze evidence to support criminal investigations. By focusing on these goals, CSI members work collaboratively to piece together the puzzle of each crime scene, utilizing their unique …show more content…
Terms such as "chain of custody," "forensic evidence," and "crime scene protocol" are commonly used by investigators to ensure accurate documentation and preservation of evidence. According to Smith (2018), understanding this specialized lexicon is essential for maintaining the integrity of the investigation process and ensuring that all team members are on the same page regarding procedures and protocols. This shared vocabulary not only facilitates clear communication, but also helps to streamline the investigative process by reducing misunderstandings or confusion. In addition, the use of specialized language within the community of Crime Scene Investigators serves as a form of professional identity and expertise. By adopting these specific terms and techniques, investigators establish themselves as knowledgeable experts in their field, further enhancing their credibility and reputation among peers and colleagues. As noted by Jones (2019), the development of this unique language reflects the complexity and precision required in forensic investigations, highlighting the meticulous attention to detail and scientific rigor that defines the profession. Continuing, the language and shared lexicon utilized within the community of Crime Scene Investigators not only enable
CBS’s CSI: Crime Scene Investigation exploded into popularity when it aired in 2000, opening doors for the creation of other similar criminal investigative television shows involving forensic evidence such as Cold Case, Criminal Minds, and Bones. Many of these CSI-type shows present a murder or crime solved within an hour-long episode using forensic evidence conceived by glamorized CSI personnel and sometimes fabricated methodologies and technologies that only exist on television. Despite just being shows, one wonders whether these popular shows have skewered public perceptions about forensic evidence in real court cases and have impacted the outcome of court verdicts. The CSI Effect, explained by Kim, et all, was named after the television show
The short sentence describes how the CIA keeps terrorist threats a secret from the public. It is alarming as an American to not be in the loop of what occurs in your country. The passage reveals the author’s style of maintaining the CIA’s secrecy by refraining from mentioning certain people’s identities and by subtly mentioning classified intelligence. The author’s purpose in that chapter is to describe the pressure agents feel from both the president and the public to keep America safe. One of their ways of keeping their country safe is by keeping certain information from them.
Evidence analysis and ranging is the most crucial stage of investigation. The success of the case exposure lies in the gradual evidence research and collecting prior to the laboratory analysis. The CSI systematically makes his way through the crime scene collects all potential evidence, tagging, logging and packaging so it remains intact on its way to the lab. Depending on the task breakdown of the CSI unit he may or may not analyze the evidence in the lab.
Brief history of Forensic, it surfaced in the state of San Francisco in the 1850’s systematic photography was being used to obtain criminal identification. Later on in the 1920’s “Los Angeles Police Department established the first police department crime laboratory in the United States (Forensic science timeline (n.d). Forensic continued to progress over the years to became one of the most innovating fields in the criminal justice system. Forensic help in the prosecution of many cases as well as exclusion of the wrongfully accused (Forensic science timeline (n.d). Forensic tech work primarily for local governments and state in police departments, coroner offices, and crime laboratories. This field is a combination of lab and field work the best of both worlds (Career guide for forensic science technician (n.d). This is what makes Forensic Science Technician the field of interest; the customary duties of a forensic science technician consist of gathering evidence, investigation of evidence collected, and reporting their discoveries in writing and may also be called into a court of law (criminal or civil laws) to present their finding before a judge (Career guide for forensic science technician (n.d).. There are several different areas of expertise in the field of a forensic technicians are often responsible or specialize in particular types of evidence such as biochemistry, ballistics, fingerprinting, and handwriting analysis. It has been said that forensic science technicians are mostly call upon to assist in two places on crime scenes and in crime labs (Dillon .H, 1999). Crime scenes contains that valuable evident that must be careful collected and preserved to help with the reconstruction of crimes by theorizing the events ...
I began this year considering a career in forensics. After delving into the field in detail however, I see that it is a very delicate science and easily open to misinterpretation. There are many variables within forensics, the first and foremost being that of the CSI effect and how it influences our expectations of the capabilities of forensic science. While it's true that great advances have been made in the area of forensic science, it's unrealistic to expect a crime scene to be processed, evidence analyzed and a conclusive forensics report to be completed in a short time and be completely accurate 100% of the time. Forensic science has a lot of room for improvement, and understanding if, how, and why shows like CSI affect the field is of high priority. After all, this is real life and not a TV show.
Hello, my fellow students; today I want to take the opportunity to inform you all about my major; which is forensic and why it is important to the criminal justice system. Many people have asked me; what is forensic and they often get it confused with TV shows like CSI Miami or NCIS; however, forensics is more than what you see on TV. So what is forensics; simply put, forensics is the application of science to the criminal and civil laws that are enforced by the law. It involves other courses like biology, chemistry, and physics. Most people have a misconception on how forensics works and this is called the CSI effect; however, for the sake of this class, I am going to focus on a very important cold case called the JonBenet Ramsey case.
In a quote by John Mill, “Does fining a criminal show want of respect for property, or imprisoning him, for personal freedom? Just as unreasonable is it to think that to take the life of a man who has taken that of another is to show want of regard for human life. We show, on the contrary, most emphatically our regard for it, by the adoption of a rule that he who violates that right in another forfeits it for himself, and that while no other crime that he can commit deprives him of his right to live, this shall.” Everyone’s life is precious, but at what price? Is it okay to let a murderer to do as they please? Reader, please take a moment and reflect on this issue. The issue will always be a conflict of beliefs and moral standards. The topic
In a persuasive essay, rhetorical appeals are a very important tool to influence the audience toward the author’s perspective. The three rhetorical appeals, which were first developed by Aristotle, are pathos, logos, and ethos. Pathos appeals to the emotions of the audience, logos appeals to the facts or evidence and ethos exhibits the credibility of the writer.
In 2006, over 100 million people in the United States tuned in to watch either CSI or any if the other forensic and criminal investigation related television show each week (CJSG). Since then, the number of viewers has increased rapidly, as well as the amount of television shows with the same type of theme. As a result of the increase of these television programs, researchers are discovering a new phenomenon called the ‘CSI Effect’ that seems to be fueling an interest in forensic science and criminal investigations nationwide. This effect is actually the ability of criminal justice themed television shows to influence and increase victims’, jurors’ and criminals’ ideas about forensics, DNA testing and methods, and criminal investigations (CJSG). Although the connection between the CSI Effect and a criminal’s mind is a growing problem, the CSI Effect influencing jurors in the United States by causing unrealistic expectations for definite forensic evidence, creating an increased ‘knowledge’ about forensic science and by creating an expectation for criminal cases and trials to be equivalent to what happens on popular criminal justice television shows is a much bigger issue.
In recent years, however, such programs as CSI that follows detectives at the Las Vegas Police Department Crime Scene Investigations Bureau as they solve puzzles and catch criminals. Perhaps one of the most well known shows with a forensic psychology theme, CSI has a large impact on viewers perceptions of forensic psychology. On one hand, the increased popularity of forensic psychology because of the show is good and more people are taking an interest in forensic psychology as a career. On the other hand, the forensic psychology that viewers see every week on television may not be exactly the same as forensic psychology in reality. Particularly programs such as CSI also overstate the ability of “hard” evidence (also known as forensic evidence), such as fingerprints and DNA, to provide evidence of definite innocence or guilt (Trask, 2007). They often disregard other components of the investigative process, such as police questioning, despite these being equally valid to establishing guilt (Nolan, 2006). This over-reliance on forensic evidence, due to the importance of forensic science being dramatized by television crime dramas, is also known as the CSI
In today’s time, modern Crime Scene Investigation has increased rapidly. From throughout the late 1900’s and in the early 2000’s (Taylor 1). For all of the evidence that they find, a solid foundation has formed over the thousands of years of Crime Scene
The combination of forensic science and investigative work is imperative and helps ensure criminals are held accountable for the crimes they commit (FBI,
Forensic evidence can provide just outcomes in criminal matters. However, it is not yet an exact science as it can be flawed. It can be misrepresented through the reliability of the evidence, through nonstandard guidelines, and through public perception. Forensic science can be dangerously faulty without focus on the ‘science’ aspect. It can at times be just matching patterns based on an individual’s interpretations. This can lead to a miscarriage of justice and forever alter a person’s life due to a perceived “grey area” (Merritt C, 2010) resulting in a loss of confidence in the reliability of forensic evidence.
Forensic science has now been recognized as an important part of the law enforcement team to help solve crimes and cold cases. The advances in technology are being used each day and we must continue to strive to develop better advances in this field. The recent discovery of using DNA in criminal cases has helped not only positively identify the suspect, but it has helped exonerate hundreds of innocent individuals. “With new advances in police technology and computer science, crime scene investigation and forensic science will only become more precise as we head into the future.” (Roufa, 2017) Forensic science and evidence helps law enforcement officials solve crimes through the collection, preservation and analysis of evidence. By having a mobile crime laboratory, the scene gets processed quicker and more efficiently. Forensic science will only grow in the future to be a benefit for the criminal justice
National Institute of Justice (2004, June). Crime Scene Investigation: A Reference for Law Enforcement Training. Retrieved June 3, 2011, from http://www.ncjrs.gov/pdffiles1/nij/200160.pdf