Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Essays on crime rates
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Essays on crime rates
Crime is something that will be around for many years; it is not something that will just disappear from our society. The United States has a high crime rate and this crime rate ranges from drug possession to murder. The question is what crimes are redeemable for incarceration? There is not a definite line due to the fact each crime is different and the penalties can differ. However, when is comes to murder there should not be a second thought about the life sentence. Acts such as drug possession,however, should not be held to a life sentence.
As of 2012, there were about 47.7% prisoners in state and federal prisons for violent crimes in the United States according to Procon.org. This crime included murder, manslaughter, non-negligent manslaughter, rape, other sexual assault, robbery, assault, and other violent crimes. I believe that any crime dealing with murder should automatically deal
…show more content…
with an individual being imprisoned for their entire lives. This includes the individuals that admit that they committed a criminal act, but seek to excuse their behavior by reason of mental illness that satisfies the definition of legal insanity. There is no excuse to harm anyone; the violence that has been spread around the united states is unjust. The only way to fix the problem is to show the individuals that violent crimes are not something that should be taken lightly. I do not find it unlawful to demand an individual to be imprisoned for the rest of their life if in fact they took another human's life or did any other unlawful act such as sexual assault and rape. For example, when it comes to the Brock Turner case I believe he should have been in prison for the rest of his life. Other people that have been in his shoes are still in prison, what makes him any different? The grotesque thoughts of individuals harming another individual is disgusting; there is a fine line between what is taught and the violence portrayed in media settings. There is not a good enough reason why any many should not be held responsible for his action when it comes to abusing a woman. In regards to both murder and sexual assault or rape, there should not be a second thought about imprisoning an individual for the rest of his life. The individual made the choice to do a wrong action, now it is his turn to receive the consequences of the previous choices made. So in turn, yes there are cases where I believe life imprisonment is necessary and would not give it a second thought. Violent crimes deserve the so-called harsh punishment that fits the crime itself. On the other hand there are some crimes such as drug possession, that I find not to be a crime worth imprisoning someone for their entire life. Now this is not to say that drug are not a negative thing in society, but I do not find such a hard punishment is required for drugs and other illegal substances. This is one of the “acts” that is currently illegal by incarceration and should not be. This is because it is not harming other people, yes it may be harming the individual that is using the drugs or other substances, but it could give more time to look into more serious cases such as murder. Drug possession is one of the many drug related offences that cause for individuals to be imprisoned.According to the Sentencing Project: Fact Sheet Trend In U.S Corrections, harsh sentencing laws such as mandatory minimums keep many people convicted of drug offenses in prison for longer periods of time: in 1986, people released after serving time for a federal drug offense had spent an average of 22 months in prison. By 2004, people convicted on federal drug offenses were expected to serve almost three times that length: 62 months in prison. At the federal level, people incarcerated on a drug conviction make up half the prison population. At the state level, the number of people in prison for drug offenses has increased since 1980. When looking at these numbers it is safe to say that drugs are prevalent in today's society but I do not feel as if people should be imprisoned for life due to the negative impacts of drugs. Yes, drugs alone are illegal but there should not be more focus on drugs and more time spent on holding them in prison compared to other crimes that may have a more serious impact such as a life lost due to someone else's choice. Lastly, I do not think that all people would change if rehabilitates in prison. This is because not all individuals are willing to change who they are to start over in a way to begin a new life. The basic idea of rehabilitation through imprisonment is that a person who has been incarcerated will never want to be sent back to prison after they have been set free. It is hoped that an inmate’s experiences while locked up will leave such a lasting impression that a former prisoner will do whatever it takes to avoid a second term.Unfortunately, research has consistently shown that time spent in prison does not successfully rehabilitate most inmates, and the majority of criminals return to a life of crime almost immediately. Rehabilitation of prisoners is an extremely difficult process, according to Crime Museum.While in prison inmates are segregated from the general public and forced to live in a society with people for whom crime is a way of life. For many, time spent in prison will push them farther into a life of crime, but for others, the horrors of prison life and the lessons they learn there are enough to deter them from committing crimes again in the future. To conclude my finals thoughts about punishments of crimes, the incarcerations aspect of it all, and the thought of rehabilitation in prison I will leave beliefs on the situation brief.
I personally think that any crime that has to deal with murder or rape should automatically be given the life sentence, there is not a clear explanation on why someone would be fascinated by hurting or even murdering an individual. Along with this idea of incarceration, I do not find the illegal act of drugs and other substances deemable of the life sentence. There are other crimes in the world that need attention and I do not find drugs a giant problem. Furthermore, I do not believe once the majority of prisoners are let out of prison that the rehabilitation will stick with that individual. Crimes depending on the severity of the action deserves imprisonment, however, there is a line to how much time is enough. After the insight provided I do believe all crimes involving violent actions call for incarceration. Penalties for all crimes can vary in all circumstances; some more severe than
others.
Criminals who are sentenced to life in prison still have a chance to kill again. According to Terri Langford’s article “Rookie Prison Guard Killed Escorting Violent Inmate” a man with life in prison murdered a rookie prison guard. “A rookie Texas Department of Criminal Justice guard was beaten to death Wednesday at a northeast Texas prison as he was transporting an inmate with an extensive history of attempted escapes and previous beatings of prison personnel from a day room to a cell.” (The Texas Tribune). This is clear that life in prison is a more deadly route. When the death penalty is enforced on a murderer, that murderer can't end the life of other innocent
The death penalty is a fair criminal punishment but too many people it is not lawful or right. The United States spends on average 39 million dollars a year on prisoners. One reason for this is the cost of the punishment. In Indiana the average capital case resulting in the death penalty is over $449,987 while the average cost for life without parole is $42,658. This is resulting in a 38 percent greater total cost of life without parole. Age is a tremendous factor in determining the death penalty, if the person is under 18 the death penalty is forbidden in all states. (“Death
The death penalty is way more expensive, time consuming with little success, and puts innocent people at stake. Life without parole gives fast, harsh, and specific punishment. It supplies lawfulness to survivors of murder victims. Sentencing dangerous offenders to life without parole is the most reasonable alternative for general security and any victim’s families. For offenders who do not pose a threat to the general public should be placed on probation or parole to help save money that can be used for more useful things within the state.
Violent criminals will always exist in society and the death penalty will only decrease these numbers gradually, however every violent criminal that does not exists in society makes society a safer place. Placing these criminals in prison with a life sentence does not deter them from committing another crime. This just enables them to plan, plot and proceed with the next murder, escape or worse.
One alternative to the death penalty is rehabilitation. Prisons in Louisiana should not be viewed solely as confinement for inmates, but as a last resort for those looking to make serious life changes, even if they are condemned to life in prison. Since prisons are rapidly reaching maximum capacity, the government should really be looking to reform its current statutes to provide a rehabilitation center for criminals and provide a safer environment for all involved in the prison system. Prisons that have implemented rehabilitation programs such as The Second Chance Program have documented a 10% decrease in criminal recidivism. In turn, fewer prisoners are coming through the judicial system. Prisoners that desire to once again become contributing members of society should be urged to do so, and should be given the necessary materials in order to achieve this. Rehabilitation can also include things like job training and education. Statistics show that well educated criminals are less likely to relapse into a life of crime and are more likely to continue using their learned skills, even if they have been granted life without parole.
Secondly, in my eyes it is one of the only fair punishments allowed by the judicial system. Personally, I think that the murderer should suffer the exact fate that their victim did. Some people might say to give the murderer life in prison. This is hardly a punishment at all. Today, due to overcrowding in prisons, a lot of prisoners don’t serve their full sentence. Would you want one of these convicts to be a murderer? I can honestly tell you, "no, I wouldn’t." Another thing about today’s prisons is that the prisoners get free meals, clothes, bed, electricity, air conditioning and heating, cable and many other luxuries that make it a comfortable place to live if you get used to the people.
I believe that life sentences not only do nothing to fix the problem of wrong doing, but are also taxing on our economy.
The amount of money that is going towards Incarceration has grown exponentially over the decades, while it contributes to the economic troubles of schools in America today . Just in the US there is a population count of 2.3 million prisoners locked up and over half are locked from a drug related charges. While each prisoner lives there on the people's taxes. He or she does not contribute to the world at all, we are wasting this money. If we don’t slow down the spending on incarceration, eventually our education department will run low on funds. If we let this happen to our country, our future in America doesn’t look very bright.
The United States of America has 5 percent of the world’s population and currently is responsible for 25 percent of the world’s incarcerated individuals. This is an alarming number. This disproportionate ratio has been growing over recent decades. The war on drugs that was started under the administration of President Ronald Reagan has caused this measure to worsen. Most arrest are concentrated in lower income communities that are predominantly non-white and are at the lower end of the income range. This has caused an already medically underserved community to suffer further disparities in health care and overall health. This review concludes that the policy of over-incarcerating the individuals, who would be better served through rehabilitation and community intervention, is causing a devastating destruction of family units and the health of our citizens.
The world will always be full of crime, thus it is necessary for scientist to grow along with the gruesome and increasing amount of violations. Due to this it sparked scientist to develop crime theories in which emerged to explain why crime is caused by individuals. Some of the few theories that have advanced over the past century and provided many answers to why crimes are committed are biological theories, psychological theories and learning theories. These theories provide an insight to its first use and change in order to provide answers.
Some people prefer to give the murder life in prison. Others argue that the punishment does not out the crime. In support of their position, they point the fact that many prisoners do not serve their full sentence. Some prisoners even live very comfortable. Thus burdening taxpayers with the cost of their incarceration some people feel that it is ok and others feel that criminals live in prison off of other people's hard money.
The first reason why death penalty should be allowed and get more active is life sentence is costly. According to “What is the Average Cost to House Inmates in Prison”, the average cost of housing an inmate in the U.S. was $31,286 in 2012 for per year. According to the “Who, what, where and why”, the United States has roughly 2.4 million people in prisons. Therefore, the money which America pays to keep prisoners who are in prisons is about $75120000000 for per year.
Growing up Catholic and pro life I don't believe anyone has the right to take another's life away. God gave life and only he can take it away. As I learn more and more about these possible solutions or needs for the death penalty I'm indecisive. I have heard of cases where the criminal escapes high security and gets out to the public causing even more harm. I believe that if a criminal escapes jail once then, the death penalty can be taken as an option. The whole purpose of jail or the capital punishment is to keep the society free from harm and when one person violates that, jail time should always be applied. Once the criminal has a chance to do it again, they need a higher form of punishment. It is a difficult decision to make since it is a person's life and even after reading texts and stories of individuals affected in one way or another I don't have a clear cut perspective on the death penalty. I believe that each case is unique and should be viewed in a specific
As I searched the address of my home, I encountered several crime reports that I was unaware of. It is shocking to see how many crimes have been committed in less than a year. Not only am I surprise by the amount of crimes, but by the fact that they are so close to home. It is crazy how only some areas are shown in the news, but how come I never heard of crimes around my neighborhood. It is obvious to see how crimes are only shown in the news when they are in a violent area such as the city of Baltimore. However, in the last couple months I have heard of Glen Burnie mentioned in the news about crimes that have been reported which is very sad to hear because soon the reputation of Glen Burnie will be ruined, and no one is going to want to move here anymore.
If a criminal is sentenced to life in jail, then the cost of their imprisonment would be many times this. In the USA, the average cost per prisoner annually in jail is $29,000. The cost of the drugs used for the lethal injection is believed to be $86.08. This is far less than the cost of keeping a prisoner in jail, and would save the government money that could be used to try and make the community a better and safer place. Secondly, many believe that capital punishment is right because of the justice given to the victim’s family.