Crime: The Draper V. US Case

610 Words2 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: Crime scene evidence collection

The flow crime starts off with a crime being committed. Crime is defined as any offense which a person can be arrested for. The person must make a complaint. An investigation will begin after the complaint is made. The investigation will allow the police officer to find evidences on the victim. This gives the officer probable to detain the victim. Probable cause is definition in the Draper v. U.S. case. Next, the suspect will be arrested. They will be then taken into custody for booking. During the booking process, the name, address, mug shot and finger prints will be taken. This is a precaution just in case the suspect wants to flee. The suspect will appearance in court. There the suspect charges will be read out loud. The most important …show more content…

During this time, he prosecutor will call their witnesses to testify. The defense counsel will also be allowed to cross examine or question the witnesses as well. The preliminary hearing can sometime end the case before it goes to trial. If the magistrate finds probable cause then an information is filed with the court. Indictment or Information are the charging documents used to formally charge a defendant with a crime. The arraignment will be formal charges are read. The defendant is asked to state whether he is guilty, not guilty, or he can plead no contest. The case will then go to trial. The are two types of trials bench and jury. If defendant is charged with a serious offense which means he could serve six months or more imprisoned, then he is entitled to a jury trial by the sixth amendment. Then the trial has to be random selection of his peers. These individual must not know the defendant. If the defendant is found guilty. they will then be sentence by the court. The courts then found out if this is defendant’s first time or is the defendant a repeated offender. The defendant sentence to either jail, probation, fines, or the death sentence in some states. The defendant will complete their punishment for the crime and will be set back into the

Show More
Related

  • An Analysis of the Dred Scott Decision and The People Vs. Hall

    326 Words  | 1 Pages

    The People vs. Hall and Dread Scott Decision both were very interesting cases. Their similarities zoomed to expose the preamble of the Constitution and make the authors of it think over what they meant by "all men are created equal." This question is still present today, are all men created equal? Or does it mean by men, the white Americans with European decent?

    Read More

  • The Casey Anthony Trial: The Trial Of O. J. Simpson

    1077 Words  | 3 Pages

    Jurors will thoroughly inspect and weigh over the evidence provided, and process any and all possible scenarios through the elements of crime. If the evidence does not support the prosecutor 's argument and the elements of the crime beyond a reasonable doubt, the jury must pronounce the defendant not guilty. If questionable or irrelevant evidence is included in the criminal proceeding, it is the duty of the prosecutor or defendant 's counsel to object and insist that the evidence be excluded by the presiding

    Read More

  • Analysis Of My Cousin Vinny

    1232 Words  | 3 Pages

    Now that we have discussed the pretrial occurrences, we get into the trial portion of the court process. This is the portion of the process in which both the defense and the prosecution present their cases to the jury, the judge, and the rest of the courtroom. To select a jury, the bring in potential jurors and ask them questions,

    Read More

  • The History of the Criminal Justice System in America

    439 Words  | 1 Pages

    The criminal justice system has been evolving since the first colonists came to America. At first, the colonists used a criminal justice system that mirrored those in England, France, and Holland. Slowly the French and Dutch influences faded away leaving what was considered the English common law system. The common law system was nothing more than a set of rules used to solve problems within the communities. This system was not based on laws or codes, but simply that of previous decisions handed down by judges. Although rudimentary, this common law system did make the distinction between misdemeanors and the more serious crimes known as felonies.

    Read More

  • People Accused Of Violent Crimes Should Not Be Allowed To Post Bail

    805 Words  | 2 Pages

    It all rests in the judge's hands. When a judge looks at a person accused of a

    Read More

  • Racial Discrimination in the U.S. Justice System

    4767 Words  | 10 Pages

    U.S. Department of Justice. 2002. “What is the Sequence of Events in the Criminal Justice System?”

    Read More

  • The Significance of Jury Trials in U.S. Criminal Cases

    1662 Words  | 4 Pages

    The U.S. recognizes the right to jury trial in virtually all criminal cases, including misdemeanor and felony. Twelve members make up a jury. The Sixth Amendment guarantees anyone facing a penalty of no less than six months imprisonment a jury trial. In reality, the Sixth Amendment does entitle the defendant to a jury trial if their offense is punishable by a period of below six months imprisonment. A jury trial helps to check or test out unfetthered prosecutorial power (Ward 83). Prosecutors must decide how and what to charge the defendant while considering that a jury will eventually decide their case upon presenting the evidence. In most cases, prosecutors have enormous powers when making a decision about charging a defendant with a criminal

    Read More

  • The Plessy V. Ferguson Trial

    1223 Words  | 3 Pages

    Civil Rights are rights of any individual to receive equal treatment. According to Merriam - Webster, “Discrimination is the act of being prejudiced or having a prejudicial outlook, action, or treatment against any other race” was very common in the United States during 1890’s. In the 1890’s, the United States was approaching its lowest point of race relations between whites and blacks. The number of lynchings increased to 230 murders in 1892 and continued to increase year after year. On June 7th, 1892, an unassuming, well dressed shoemaker from New Orleans named Homer Plessy bought a first class ticket from the East Louisiana Railroad and boarded a passenger car designated for whites only. When the ride came to an end, Plessy had been arrested

    Read More

  • Organized Crime: The Whitey Bulger Case

    1293 Words  | 3 Pages

    As we look at criminal cases that are prolific, and make us wonder I became enamored with the Whitey Bulger case. This was a criminal case that go my attention because of the fact James Joseph Bulger Jr. evaded law enforcement for so many years. But the reason behind that would grasp my attention even further. Organized crime has always been an interest to me because of the secrecy and the loyalty behind the Cosa Nostra. I specifically picked Whitey Bulger for the simple fact he wasn't the typical mobster we see in film. Also the fact the Federal Bureau of Investigation was compromised due to the fact their agents were bought and were a large part in why Whitey Bulger was able to evade law enforcement for so long.

    Read More

  • Why Our Nation's Founding Fathers Choose To Be Ruled Under Rule Of Law

    821 Words  | 2 Pages

    There is a Centuries long debate as to why our Nation’s Founding Fathers chose for us to be ruled under rule of law instead of rule of man. Our Founding Fathers founded this nation on a promotion “We the People”. They ruled that we should be led under the rule of law rather than the rule of man for multiple reasons. Our government now though is stipulating whether or not the old American government made the right choice, when compared to other foreign countries. At the beginning of our country the Constitution was not meant to be read as a collection a suggestions rather as a way to get men away from their old tendencies. Those were the days where the rights of the average man were the top priority of the government. Today however we need to remember that the rule of the law is supposed to focus on the rights of the citizens and not on who is wearing what in Hollywood. Over the years we have ruined our government, even Woodrow Wilson said, “I have unwillingly ruined my government.” The factors now included in Rule of Law are a little different from they were 250 years ago. To find out why the Founding Fathers Chose Rule of Law we need to look at several reasons why our nations’ officials like or don’t like the rule of law. We must also look at whether the factors are too much at this point for our nations to change and go another way with our leadership and the way we run our country.

    Read More

  • Sequence Of Events In A Typical Trial Process

    540 Words  | 2 Pages

    Typically, before trial occurs the pretrial process takes place. During the pretrial process a defendant is arrested on probable cause and makes their first appearance in court. Following the first appearance an arraignment is set within thirty-three days. Pre-trial motions are brought before a judge in order to discuss what evidence and information should be used at trial. Before going to trial defendants or prosecutors have the opportunity to make plea bargains in an effort to overt going to trial. Once all pretrial duties are done, then the trial process occurs. The first step in going to trial is “voir dire”, selecting individuals for a jury through questioning. Both the prosecutor and defense attorneys are given a certain number of strikes during the jury selection. Once a jury is completely selected the actual trial process beings with opening statements begins. Any evidence that wants to be used during the trial is present by the plaintiff “case-in-chief”. Witnesses are questioned and cross examined once questioning is done closing arguments are made trying to persuade the jury to

    Read More

  • Classmates And Boatwright: The Trial Court Process

    304 Words  | 1 Pages

    Trial court is the first step in taking a case before a judge or a jury. A trial court is where disputes should be handled. In trial court a case can be criminal or civil to be heard at this level. In trial court a judge or a jury can hear testimony and listen to what witnesses have to say. Once the evidence and testimony is heard a judgment must be made that follows the law. Also evidence can be provided and in this case of a car being damaged things like photos or estimates of repairs can be submitted for consideration.

    Read More

  • Understanding the Initial Stages of the Judicial Process

    2126 Words  | 5 Pages

    This is the arraignment process. “Some states require arraignments in all felony and misdemeanor cases – any case in which the defendant faces possible incarceration, whether in jail or prison. Some states require arraignments only in felony cases” (Baldwin, 2016). This is done through an information or an indictment. The defendant is also informed of the specifics in the process and the criminal actions. The defendant must enter a plea, which usually means stating guilty or not guilty. Typically, defendants plead not guilty and a trial date is established (Fradella & Neubauer). The arraignment pretty much means that the defendant, more than likely, is

    Read More

  • Opening Statement Analysis

    432 Words  | 1 Pages

    The stages of a criminal trial are as follows: Selecting of jurors: persons swore to deliver a verdict in a case submitted to them. The reading of the criminal complaint by the court clerk. Prosecution makes an opening statement summarizing the case its desires to present. The defense will follow with its opening statement but are not required to do so. The evidence is submitted by the prosecution and witnesses are questioned. Each element of the crime is established by the prosecution beyond a reasonable doubt. If the prosecutions did not make its case as the defendant feel reliable, the defense can choose to rest. A motion for dismissing is submitted. If the prosecution's evidence is not sufficient for conviction, the judge can agree with the defense and instructs the jury to acquit or exonerate the defense or

    Read More

  • Criminal Trial Process Analysis

    554 Words  | 2 Pages

    A criminal trial consists of eight steps that must be followed in chronological order: trial initiation, jury selection, opening statements, presentation of evidence, closing arguments, judge’s charge to the jury, jury deliberations, and verdict. Each stage of the process is executed to offer a fair trial and to ensure that the rights of the accused are not violated.

    Read More

More about Crime: The Draper V. US Case

Open Document