Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Analysis of crime and punishment dostoevsky
Analysis of crime and punishment dostoevsky
Analysis of crime and punishment dostoevsky
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Analysis of crime and punishment dostoevsky
Fyodor Dostoyevsky’s novel, Crime and Punishment, employs themes of “crime and punishment, guilt and innocence, the Ubermensch/ Superman theory, psychological exploration, and atonement and forgiveness” (qtd. by Collins). In conjunction with these themes, Dostoyevsky creates a multitude of foil characters to reflect the protagonist of the novel, Raskolnikov. [F]oil [is] a character [utilized] to point to […] some aspect of the second character (“foil”). Raskolnikov’s driving traits are primarily emphasized by the characterization of Luzhin, Razmuhin, and Svidrigailov. “Raskol” genuinely translates into “schism or split” (Shipman). By providing foil characters, Raskolnikov’s distinctions within his character become evident.
“Razum” translates into “reason or intelligence” (“Crime and Punishment”). Therefore, in the novel, Razmuhin is utilized to provide Raskolnikov with a reasonable approach to his predicament while enlightening him with his intelligence. Razmuhin perceives Raskolnikov as a friend and presents an obligation to him as a friend. He emphasizes the state of Raskolnikov’s self-depreciating condition which takes a toll on Raskolnikov’s mental state. Razmuhin’s captivation by Dounia reveals his interest in protecting Raskolnikov also. When Dostoyevsky’s character Zossimov makes a remark about the “fetching little girl,” Razmuhin’s protective nature flares (165; part 3, ch. 1). Dounia hardly needs protection on the account that she is a bold individual. She displays it by blatantly suggesting Luzhin may not be “the husband for [her]” while in the presence of others and by disregarding his request for a meeting with her mother and her alone (Dostoyevsky 238-9; part 4, ch. 2).Raskolnikov often reasons with himself to justif...
... middle of paper ...
...tted which was swept under the rug by Marfa Petrovna yet came back to ultimately slay her. In addition to this, Raskolnikov happens to express more selflessness as he finally goes to confess and right his wrong of letting the wrongfully accused suffer.
The foil characters illustrate progress in Raskolnikov from being self-absorbed while harboring the guilt of his sin and struggling with his Superman theory to his contemplative and pre-meditative states when in sound mind to distinguish illusions from reality to Raskolnikov openly confessing and admitting he is not able to step over crime. Raskolnikov is an ordinary individual who tested extraordinary measures and failed miserably. The strengths and weaknesses of Luzhin, Svidrigailov, and Razmuhin combine self-centeredness with philanthropy and reason to portray the main characteristics of Dostoyevsky’s Raskolnikov.
Often times in literature, we are presented with quintessential characters that are all placed into the conventional categories of either good or bad. In these pieces, we are usually able to differentiate the characters and discover their true intentions from reading only a few chapters. However, in some remarkable pieces of work, authors create characters that are so realistic and so complex that we are unable to distinguish them as purely good or evil. In the novel Crime and Punishment, Fyodor Dostoevsky develops the morally ambiguous characters of Raskolnikov and Svidrigailov to provide us with an interesting read and to give us a chance to evaluate each character.
As the story unfolds, Dostoevsky introduces the reader to Raskolnikov, a troubled young man who is extremely isolated from those who surround him. He lives in a small, dingy, dusty, and dirty room in a small unattractive house. He lives in an abstract world neglecting the real. He is quite separate from all the people with whom he has contact. In the opening chapter, Raskolnikov is said to be, "so completely absorbed in himself, and isolated from his fellows that he dreaded meeting, not only his landlady, but any one at all" (1). People come physically close to him, but everyone is forced to remain distant mentally. He walks through the crowded, noisy, dirty streets of St. Petersburg physically but somehow he never does so mentally, moving through the streets like a zombie, not a man. He is not aware of his location and often jostles bewildered pedestrians. Therefore, at the outset of the novel Dostoevsky illustrates the apparent schism between the mind and body of Raskolnikov.
Raskolnikov is obsessed with his “superman theory”. He is constantly trying to prove that he is part of the 10% of extraordinary people in the world. He wants to become an eminent figure such as Napoleon. At first he believed that the murders he committed would make him part of this elite class. Once he realized that he had made mistakes during the crime he began to question his theory. After much frustration he decided to go to the scene of the crime. This gave him a rush that made him feel invincible. He believed that this would prove if, or if not he was “super”. Once he realized that he wasn’t part of this class, he suffered a mental breakdown. This pushed him to confess his crime to Sonya. She helped him rationalize his crime and admit his guilt. The outcome of this conversation was that it helped him admit his fate.
However, it soon emerges that he, despite the physical nature of his situation, has a very active mind. To reveal whether he is of a special "breed" of humans, he finds it necessary to kill, and the unfortunate subjects of his experiment are an old pawnbroker and her sister. After the murders, Raskolnikov is subject to a series of mental and emotional changes, eventually leading to his confession and, later, his arrest, trial and eight-year prison sentence.
In Dostoevsky's Crime and Punishment, Raskalnikov undergoes a period of extreme psychological upheaval. By comparing this death and rebirth of Raskalnikov's psyche to the story of the resurrection of Lazarus, Dostoevsky emphasizes not only the gravity of his crimes, but also the importance of acceptance of guilt.
The character’s suffering is thrown in the readers face right from the beginning. Raskolnikov’s suffering has two apparent layers, “he was crushed by poverty, but the anxieties of his position had of late ceased to weigh upon him” (1). It seems that the suffering caused from his current state of mind is so great that he does not even feel the suffering caused by his poverty. Throughout Crime and Punishment Raskolnikov’s main point of suffering is caused by his inability to let others know of the crime he has committed and as a result he alienates himself from those who show him compassion (156). As the novel progresses he decides to tell Sonia because expressing his crimes would alleviate some of the suffering, however, her morals encompass the idea that it is inconceivable to “go on living” without suffering and “expiation” (416). At this confession, the reader is presented with a righteous character (probably the most) that does not judge Raskolnikov for what he has done but instead sympathizes and tells him that turning himself in and bearing the consequences will relieve him of the suffering caused mentally.
Dostoevsky was made aware of the problems with Nihilistic ideas while he was exiled in Siberia. Crime and Punishment was Dostoevsky’s first attempt at a psychological analysis of a person’s inner struggles to rationalize this radicalism. Raskolnikov represents that intelligentsia and is being used by Dostoevsky to portray and warn against succumbing to these ideals. Dostoevsky uses Raskolnikov’s life to illustrate the implications and applications of this Nihilist to the public and then expands upon it in Demons.
Fyodor Dostoevsky’s Crime and Punishment begins with Rodion Romanovich Raskolnikov living in poverty and isolation in St. Petersburg. The reader soon learns that he was, until somewhat recently, a successful student at the local university. His character at that point was not uncommon. However, the environment of the grim and individualistic city eventually encourages Raskolnikov’s undeveloped detachment and sense of superiority to its current state of desperation. This state is worsening when Raskolnikov visits an old pawnbroker to sell a watch. During the visit, the reader slowly realizes that Raskolnikov plans to murder the woman with his superiority as a justification. After the Raskolnikov commits the murder, the novel deeply explores his psychology, yet it also touches on countless other topics including nihilism, the idea of a “superman,” and the value of human life. In this way, the greatness of Crime and Punishment comes not just from its examination of the main topic of the psychology of isolation and murder, but the variety topics which naturally arise in the discussion.
In Crime and Punishment, we see Raskolnikov caught between reason and will, the human needs for personal freedom and the need to submit to authority. He spends most of the first two parts stuck between wanting to act and wanting to observe. After he acts and murders the old woman, he spends much time contemplating confession. Raskolnikov seems trapped in his world although there is really nothing holding him back; he chooses not to flee and not to confess, but still acts as though he's suffocation (perhaps guilt?)In both novels defeat seems inevitable. Both characters believe that normal man is stupid, unsatisfied and confused. Perhaps they are right, but both characters fail to see the positive aspects of humans; the closest was the scene between the narrator of Notes from the Underground and Liza. In this scene he almost lets the human side show, rather than the insecure, closed off person he normally is.
In his novel Crime and Punishment Fyodor Dostoevsky uses Raskolnikov as a vessel for several different philosophies that were particularly prominent at the time in order to obliquely express his opinions concerning those schools of thought. Raskolnikov begins his journey in Crime and Punishment with a nihilistic worldview and eventually transitions to a more optimistic one strongly resembling Christian existentialism, the philosophy Dostoevsky preferred, although it could be argued that it is not a complete conversion. Nonetheless, by the end of his journey Raskolnikov has undergone a fundamental shift in character. This transformation is due in large part to the influence other characters have on him, particularly Sonia. Raskolnikov’s relationship with Sonia plays a significant role in furthering his character development and shaping the philosophical themes of the novel.
This hero is often brave but maintains a sense of comedic relief. This character also remains calm and keeps his bearings in high pressure situations. In Crime and Punishment, Raskolnikov fits this role perfectly. Although Rask has shown that in some tense positions he has been seen fainting or maybe showing a slight sense of error, it is always done strategically. Rask often battles himself, but to the outside world he is displayed as witty and cunning. Various situations arise that involve Raskolnikov using satire to cleverly maneuver through sticky situations. This is especially shown when Portify Petrovitch brings Raskolnikov in for questioning, and the scenes that follow immediately after. The man that was the supposed surprise for Raskolnikov proceeds to Raskolnikov’s room and apologizes. Raskolnikov ends Part Four by uttering, “It all cuts both ways, now it all cuts both ways.” followed by the narration of “and now he went out more confident than ever.” (311). Here, Raskolnikov exhibits his control of the
The moral side of Raskolnikov's mind requires absolution in a Christian manner. This need obliviates his claim to be a Nietzchean superman, and illustrates that all humans have a desire for morality. Throughout the book, he constantly desires to confess, even when visiting the police station. "I'll go in, fall on my knees, and confess everything" (p.84), he thought; later, he considered if it was "better to cast off the burd...
After the botched crime Raskolnikov is plagued his failures. "He was conscious at the time that he had forgotten something that he ought not forget, and he tortured himself." (107) After he carelessly kills both women, and allows for the evidence to be found, Raskolnikov realizes he did not commit the perfect crime. This devastates his ego, so he tries to cling to his previous self perception. He is also plagued with feelings of guilt. His guilt, combined with the mistakes he made during the crime, shatter his self perception of perfection.
...nfess his crimes in front of everyone. By admitting to his crimes, God would forgive his sins. Sonya is an important individual in Raskolinkov’s life because she gives him strength to confess and redeem himself.. As they both found in love at the ending, Raskolinkov starts following the theory of the ordinary men. He has a relationship with another ordinary person who helps him understand morals.
Raskolnikov's article, "On Crime," is vital to the understanding of his beliefs. This article also has a profound effect on Crime and Punishment as a whole, the subject matter being one of the main themes of the novel. The idea of the "extraordinary man" is referred to literally throughout the book, but also notable is the subconscious effect the idea has on Raskolnikov. Sometimes Raskolnikov is not even aware of this influence. It is important to note originality, or the ability to "utter a new word," as a defining characteristic of the extraordinary man. Therefore, we must take into account the presence of similar ideas, those of Pisarev, Nietzsche, and nihilism, as these might bring to light the possibility that Raskolnikov is not original, a possibility that haunts him throughout the novel.