Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Essay The Importance Of Creativity In Schools
Creativity and education essay
Importance of creativity in schools dissertation
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Essay The Importance Of Creativity In Schools
Albert Einstein once said, “To raise new questions, new possibilities; to regard old problems from a new angle, requires creative imagination and marks real advance in science”. Mr. Einstein highlights an important aspect in his quote which is “Creativity”, he explains how creativity is the basis of everything that we do such as the way we learn. Creativity is unlimited especially in the eyes of students. A class of creativity should be held in schools for the unheard voices held in the mind of students. These voices must be heard in order for the future to have success it not only needs but deserves.
A student spending an average of 8 hours a day in school without the right to express themselves only to follow the rules is analyzed as a job well done. Over the years a student’s freedom to express their creativity has diminished. However, who’s to blame? The school system has taken the voices of the children who are our future. In the video “I Sued the School System” by Prince Ea, he says “I call school to the stand and accuse him of killing creativity, individuality and
…show more content…
Creativity crumbles the walls of limitation giving everyone the opportunity to be heard and it doesn’t necessarily mean verbal communication it can be written, made, drawn, danced, and etc. Mr. Ea indicates “Working to bring the spirit out of each and every student”. This clarifies the seriousness to let every student express themselves by just giving them the time and energy to hear every child independently. Reminding them how important they are and their voices. Subsequently, Mr.Ea conveys, “So let’s attend to their dreams and there’s no telling what we can achieve”. This demonstrates the positive outcome of giving a person the chance to speak. Creativity will not only teach a student to learn to speak up for themselves, follow their dreams, but also realize the impact they can
Along with a strong appeal to logos, the speaker uses a sentimental tone to support the points that we stopped kids from doing creative things. From his personal experience, Robinson maintains, “When you were kids, things you liked, on the grounds that you would never get a job.” The essence of the speaker’s argument is that we only encourage our kids for doing something worthy. When we say that things they like to do have no scope, this emotionally affects kids. Ultimately, guardian just put the weight of their ambitions on the delicate shoulders of their kids. This builds the pressure on students to meets with the expectations of their guardian. Therefore, one should understand that every child has his own specialty, potential, and liking.
All students, and children especially, have tremendous talents, which are forgotten when their minds walk through the school door. Their forever developing talents and favorite interests are left for an uncreative school environment. I, for one, have always been taught and believed in an education, or following the guidelines of another, was essential in achieving wealth and success later in life. However, after listening to Robinson’s argumentative speech, I realize creativity and a valued education coincide with each other. To justify myself, creativity and thinking outside the box has led to many of the world’s advancements. Therefore, when teaching future leaders, and future generations of employees and employers, teaching creativity in a forever rapidly changing and unpredictable world would have benefits. At last, I believe that the educational system puts too much emphasis on a substantial, everyday American future over one’s happiness in a later life. Every human being is already born a unique artist, never made into one; constantly growing into a more talented
Imagine a world without artists, poets, inventors, authors, or designers… Can’t do it? You don’t have to .All you have to do is look at the students being molded by the American public school system, a group of boring conforming unimaginative robots. The problem with the American school system, as argued by John Taylor Gatto in his article “Against School”, is that it’s designed to create students to conform and adapt, to determine their social roles. Schools don’t pay nearly as much attention in encouraging the students to think more critically or creative as they do in making sure they are labeled by some absurd “standardized test”. The school system needs to focus on creating a group of innovators, creative students who think outside the
Robinson, Ken. “How Schools Kill Creativity.” Online video clip. TED. Ted, Feb 2006. Web. 26 March 2014.
The constant debate over the school systems in America, have yielded a discussion over whether these school systems promote individuality through ones’ schoolwork or if the whole system is set up to conform every student. Some important issues to discuss when looking at schools causing individuality or conformity are school dress codes, rigid school schedules and classes, and little creativity promoted in schools.
Horsey’s cartoon captures an exaggerated view of what most public school classrooms look like today. With these exaggerations, Horsey is successful in demonstrating the apparent contrast in the ways the arts are treated in comparison to how standardized tests are treated. The machines on some children’s heads shows what schools want students to think about, tests and what they need to do to pass. This illustrates the issues of the current No Child Left Behind laws and epitomizes the way schools and students think.
What they neglect to realize is that most problems are unpredictable. So when a student faces a challenge not taught in the classroom, they will be incapable of solving or getting out of the situation. Once the formula does not work, creativity becomes a necessity. Some even fear the mere thought of imagination, since new possibilities open up the risk of failure or not being accepted. Students hold back their curiosity once they realize that teachers are unwilling to answer their question if it differs even slightly from the curriculum. These are the exact reasons our youth’s power to create fades. The value of creativity is beyond words; our society thrives on innovation. Take the stereotypical example of Bill Gates—he became a billionaire with the help of his creative thinking. So why would creativity not be the heart of our education system? Simply because there is not enough time or enough people willing to put in the
There are a whole lot of programs or curriculums out there that try to talk about the environmental and academic needs of children. In this paper, I will try my best to discuss the five components of the Creative Curriculum framework, as well as the philosophies, theories, and research behind its foundation.
In Sir Ken Robinson’s Ted Talk video, he had many major points that relate to the definition and importance of creativity. A major point how creativity is as important in education as literacy. According to Sir Ken Robinson, “we should treat it with the same status. He explains is that education is used to prepare use for the future, but the future is unpredictable.”.
Creativity is one of the mission of a teacher in every age, and discipline. As he may be creative to motivate students, he has to generate creativity in his pupils. In this way, understanding the relation between the neurobiology of creativity and its cognition is useful to every teacher.
In conclusion to some up this essay the term ‘creativity’ will always cause a debate in the educational system as. There will always be difficulty defining it as many use the term too loosely to have a definitive meaning. It requires risk taking, it is difficult to portray creativity when schools are so obsessed with right or wrong answers for ways of doing things. Society teaches us the risks are bad because the government and its policies interfere with our own choices and decisions.
Rather than preparing students to be thoughtful, self-directed and ethical beings capable of arriving at social truths through critical dilemmas, schools prepare students to be ‘rubber stamps’ with dictatorial work and political structures, train students for work by providing the student with a limited set of skills and information to do a particular job, and discourage the chase of individuality and creativity. (Dewey, 1916).
Anna Quindlen writes about how to foster creativity in children, and by extension adults, by doing nothing and allowing their minds to foster creativity during this time, free time. She expresses her thoughts in “Doing nothing is something” short essay. Quindlen proposes that kids are too busy and do not have enough free time. In this down time or free time they make their own adventures and form their own ideas. She presents the idea that to even start the creative process of creating literature, music, and art one must have free time to let the mind wonder and create.
Creativity is crucial – it can determine if someone is Van Gogh or Da Vinci while someone is mediocre or fatuous. Therefore, some central arguments in school regalia are the inadequacy of rights and artistic ability returned to students; however, some pupils are jubilant, and even bolster the topic themselves. Students should not have to expose their insignia or label and should instead assert their talent or passion via academically (Boutelle 4). Thus, academics are a vigorous way to express one another and be distinguished in a specific approach that does not modify their freedom. Furthermore, the set of regulations stated by the Supreme Court tackle the following responses. First, it is within the power of the constitutional government - which allows the school board to create such a policy. In addition, it needs to stimulate a substantial interest; and the interest is unrelated to suppressing the expression of the student. Furthermore, the incidental restrictions on the expression are less than necessary to promote the interest (Vopat 4) (Konheim-Kalkstein 3). Nonetheless, this will produce some dissatisfaction regarding some undergraduates.
Using creativity in the classroom will create strong students and help better them for the future. Now, students are just being taught to what is on the test. They do not learn how to be leaders, how to work in groups, people skills, or how to use their mind that is not just for memorizing the information. “The challenge now is to transform education systems into something better suited to the real needs of the 21st century. At the heart of this transformation there has to be a radically different view of human intelligence and of creativity” (Robinson K., 2011, p. 14). Using creativity and technology will allow the students to enjoy learning more. I noticed in my final project, that other students who weren’t education majors, saw this problem too. Many of them did not see creativity in a classroom, they felt that the school system was creating them into robots that taught them all how to think a certain way. Ken Robinson feels that, “we don’t grow into creativity; we grow out of it. Often we are educated out of it.” (2011, p. 49). Teachers should be teaching students how to be creative, and how to think on their own, so students will be able to go far in the future and succeed in any job they