Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Public schools and religion issues
Separation of church and state in public school settings
Separation of church and state in public school settings
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Public schools and religion issues
Creationism, and evolution have been challenging each other since Charles Darwin published his work in 1859. Creationism is the belief that an all powerful being created the world, and how it works was all to his design. The main example of creationism will be Christianity. Evolution is the belief that over centuries of time species adapt in a more fitting organism for their environment. The most macroevolution would be primates becoming humans. In an ideal classroom environment all origin stories of the earth would be a class able to be taught in a high school setting as an elective. An example of this that is in use today would be mythology class. It explains how the world was created in a non-evolution based ways. Although this is the ideal, and wouldn't be possible due to social backlash as …show more content…
The biggest legal reason that creationism should not be taught is in the constitutions first amendment which states Church and State must remain separate. Many creationist tried to pass laws to get both creationism, and evolutionism taught within a science course. Having said that the Supreme Court still found it unconstitutional on multiple occasions. As it was not teaching to inform, but creationism was being taught in the hopes of promoting creationism, and such God. Evolution does not require creationism to work, but creationism does require some evolution to be evident as previously stated from the intelligent design theorists. As quoted in What should schools teach by Kathiann M, Kowalski shares quotes from Stephen J. Gould. “Does evolutionary theory deny God’s existence? ‘Certainly not,’ Gould replied. ‘Evolution as a science does not talk about the existence of a creator,’ he added. ‘It is quite consistent with or without one, so long as the creator works by natural laws.’” Gould was a renowned expert in this topic, and was brought in to consult the Supreme Court about such cases on creationism in
Robert Root-Bernstein and Donald L. McEachron, “Teaching Theories: The Evolution-Creation Controversy,” The American Biology Teacher, Vol. 44, No. 7 (Oct…1982). This article, written by Robert Root-Bernstein and Donald L. McEachron sheds light on the controversy of evolution vs creationism in schools and the validity of each being called a scientific theory. The work was created to answer the questions, “Which of these theories is truly scientific and which is a religious belief? Which should be taught in schools?” The article concluded in favor of evolution as a valid scientific theory that should be taught rather than creationism, but also mentioned the worth of understanding the latter.
The Scopes Trial, formally known as The State of Tennessee vs. Scopes but given the nickname “The Monkey Trial”, has been credited as starting the popular legal dispute between evolution and creationism in the court, and its impact in the 20’s was immeasurable.
The theory of Evolution was developed by Charles Darwin throughout his life and published in 1859 in a book called "The Origin of Species." In brief, it states that all living things on earth evolved over time and that natural selection is how they evolve. Natural selection is the process by which entire populations change in response to their environment. It works because those who are better adapted to the environment reproduce at a higher rate than those who are less suited for the environment (Biology, 2001). It is widely accepted that humans evolved from primates. That is why the trial had the nickname of "Monkey Trial". In contrast, the theory of Divine Creation states that the universe was created in seven days by God and that animals have not evolved since. One can see clear differences between these two theories.
Evolution, also known as descent with modification, is a phrase Darwin used in proposing the evolution of Earth’s many species. Charles Darwin noticed that the descendants of ancestral species were different from the present day forms of species. Darwinism is a theory of biological evolution developed by Charles Darwin who was an English naturalist. He expounded the theory of evolution in his book of the Origin Species in 1859. He expresses that all types of organisms emerge and develop through natural selection, small, acquired traits that expands the individuals of capacity, survival, and reproduction. In this book, Darwin theorized that animals and plants evolve and develop with the aid of the creator through the process of natural selection.
Evolution and Creationism are both fact and theory but the question is which one should be taught in schools? Only a few school distracts have approved the teaching of evolution because it has more senitific evidence than creationism to prove that it is true. According to a new Gallup poll, just 39% of Americans believe in evolution. The Gallup polls also show that those Americans with higher education believe in the theory of evolution as opposed to those with only high school diplomas. The polls found that 74% Americans with post-graduate degrees believe in evolution theory compared to 21% of Americans with only high school diplomas. The Gallup polls suggest that the belief in the theory of evolution is associated with education. Evolution should be taught in schools because it has more scientific evidence to support it than creationism does. Also, public schools should not teach things that have to do with God, such as creationism, because the Constitution requires the separation of church and state. Finally, if we do not allow schools to teach evolution it would be a form censo...
In the United States, the average child goes through public funded schools that have a basic curriculum. According to the Texas Education Agency, some of the subjects include science, mathematics, social studies, English, and more. Nowhere in the subject is religion included. The basic curriculum is made in order to give students skills, knowledge, and to help develop the minds of the future. In science class, evolution is taught either briefly or detailed. It is taught because it is a popular theory that did not seem to choose a certain religion. So why believe that religion and science can be taught together? The evolution of Earth and the universe can be believed in any way an individual chooses.
Teaching of evolution has several issues. One of the main issue is that it is unfair to some students with a background of Christianity. Christians believe in Creationism, meaning God created the whole world or if not, most of the world. Darwin's theory of Evolution is complete contradictory of this. In the Bible, it is stated that God made humans in His image while Darwin's theory says that Humans evolved from monkeys. It is basically proving that God, does not exist, violating the first amendment, Freedom of Belief. The first amendment states "..respecting the establishment of religion..." When Christian students listen and are forced to learn the theory of Evolution, it is restricting them to worship without obstacles and is therefore, disrespecting the establishment of religion by defying the existence of God. "If Genesis were interpreted as symbolic, as a myth, fable or fantasy, then the entire role of Jesus would have to be reinterpreted."(http://www.religioustolerance.org/ev_school.htm)
Creation or evolution? Such a question holds significant importance to the human race, raising further questions such as where did we come from, how did we get here, and more importantly where are we, the human race, going and where will we end up? Creationism, as cited from Oxford Dictionary, is “The belief that the universe and living organisms originate from specific acts of divine creation, as in the biblical account, rather than by natural processes such as evolution,” answers in its very definition one of humanity 's great questions referring to our origin. A religion such as Christianity, stated by the Bible and religious doctrine has its own set of answers to our origin as a human race. Similarly, the theory of Evolution is, as stated by the Oxford dictionary “The process by which different kinds of living organism are
happen? If not, then why should science teachers teach that life evolved over billions of
Branch, Glenn. "Intelligent Design is not Science, and Should not Join Evolution in the Classroom." usnews.com. U.S.News & World Report, 2 Feb. 2009. Web. 21 Mar. 2012.
The law, on the other hand, had a different idea about these other theories with numerous bans from schools, claiming them to be against the Second Amendment. Despite the bitter debate of whether or not it is valid and right to teach (primarily alone) the theory of evolution lies as being the most reliable and accurate way to teach how the modern world came to be. Science is purely a study of what can be seen and tested in the world. That concept is shown in the following quote: “Science is the method of testing natural explanations for natural explanations for natural objects and events. Phenomenon that can be observed are amiable to scientific investigation” (“NSTA.”).
The information presented in evolution studies must be viewed with an open mind since there is no definite proof or law of evolution. The dilemma boils down to science vs. religion. God has been our creator since beginning of time, but the discoveries of recent science are sudde...
In a scientific aspect, the existence of an intelligent designer cannot be denied, due to the lack of evidence that contradicts otherwise. On the other hand, creationists cannot prove the existence of an intelligent designer but indefinitely believe through a concept called faith. In addition, both concepts agree that microevolution occurs. For example, since the arrival of sparrows to North America, mutations have occurred from different locations.
However, the majority or schools now only teach one theory and do not introduce an alternate theory. This is basically supporting only one belief and it is not incorporating any others. Creationism is a valuable and recognizable belief that 42% of Americans actually believe in, why should it not be incorporated in school curriculum? As many like to pick apart Creationism and prove that it does not have support to back it up, Einstein being a pantheist, even stated that as he learned more about the universe, the more he believed in a high power of some kind (Grigg para. 25). Therofore someone with such high respect and with great knowledge, eventually even believed in “something.”
The evolution theory, one of the most significant theories, laid groundwork for the study of modern biological science. This theory has lead scientists into unending debates due to lack of empirical supports. Until the mid-eighteenth century, when Charles Darwin came up with an explanation to evolution, scientists, then, began to endorse this hypothesis. In “Natural Selection,” Darwin explains the natural selection, a plausible mechanism that causes evolution, to gain approval of his cynical audience for his evolution theory. He supports his claim with numerous examples of animals and plants that have developed traits beneficial for survival. A century later, Stephen Jay Gould, influenced by Darwin’s work, supports the evolution theory with a different method. In “Evolution as Fact and Theory,” Gould, in contrast to Darwin, criticizes his detractors, the creationists who believe that every life form is the creation of a supernatural being, to reinforce the validity of the evolution theory. Gould undermines creationism by emphasizing its misused concepts of theory and popular philosophy, proving that it is not science. Besides denouncing creationism, Gould also provides theoretical examples as evidence to prove evolution is a theory. Despite their different approaches, both Darwin and Gould effectively prove the existence of evolution.