Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Observing court papers
Roles and function of a judge
Role and function of judges
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Observing court papers
Throughout the three hours, the man that was sitting on the raised platform gave the two groups of professional looking men and women turns in speaking to him from the podium in the middle of the room which was made of wood. These men and women would speak for about 30 minutes each, and would ask questions to other individuals that were brought in by guards and were told to sit underneath the man with power on the first level of the raised platform. These individuals would answer questions by the professional looking men and women and then they were escorted out. As they were escorted outside the room or to empty seats behind the wooden bar we realized that they were crying, looked upset, and angry. At that point, we knew that they were part …show more content…
The location and size of this territory was based upon the importance of the role and the influence the individual played in the court room. For example, observers in the room did not take part in the case and did not have to speak; therefore, they were seated behind the wooden bar on benches with other people, as their comfort and interaction was not needed. In contrast, the Judge and the lawyers played an important role in the court room, as they make arguments, support arguments, and ask questions. As a result, they were seated at the front of the courtroom where they were close to the man in the glass cage and the twelve men and women of the …show more content…
According to the second mode of claiming legitimate authority, those who exercise authority do so because they continue a tradition and support preservation and continuation of existing values and social ties (Demers, 2015: 26). Thus, traditional authority is used by the authority figure as there is no better way to rule than to obtain the consent of those being rules. As a matter of fact, traditional authority along with the actual legal requirement the observers, lawyers, and jury obey the judge as his traditional authority “has always existed”. However, traditional authority is not codified in impersonal rules unlike legal authority which is written down and widely considered as a formal norm (Demers, 2015:
Steve Bogira, a prizewinning writer, spent a year observing Chicago's Cook County Criminal Courthouse. The author focuses on two main issues, the death penalty and innocent defendants who are getting convicted by the pressure of plea bargains, which will be the focus of this review. The book tells many different stories that are told by defendants, prosecutors, a judge, clerks, and jurors; all the people who are being affected and contributing to the miscarriage of justice in today’s courtrooms.
a relationship to the courtroom and his cell, but also connected to the geographical setting of the
“The trial was brought to a speedy conclusion. Not only did Judge Evans find the twelve guilty, fine them $100 each, and committed them to jail, but five people in the courtroom who had served as witnesses for the defense arrested. […] The police were then instructed to transfer the seventeen prisoners that night to the county jail”(30).
The architecture of the courtroom establishes clear power disparities within the courtroom setting. The physical dimensions of Courtroom 5.1 were organised in such a way that the hierarchal nature of the court is visually clear from the moment you step into the room. The stratification of power amongst the courtroom actors is displayed through the ‘structural elevation’ of the seating (Carlen, 1976, pp. 50). The magistrate is seated at the uppermost level at the bench facing the defendant, solicitors and public gallery. This particular positioning demonstrates pre-eminence which allows com...
The chief justice John Marshall dominated the supreme court for over 30 years.The Marshall court permanently affected the federal government with the decision of major court cases.The Marshall court established the federal government role in the economy and their role in the interstate commerce. The results of the Marshall court strengthened the power of the judicial branch established the concept of implied powers,and the right of America Indians. The Marshall court strengthened the federal government.
During my visit to the Lafourche Parish District Attorney 's Office, I heard a copious amount of information that proved to be interesting, surprising, and some of it familiar to what I already knew or had learned in class. The first speaker, Joe Soignet, assistant district attorney, gave me a sense of what actually happens in a court case, specifically the process of selecting a jury. I had an idea of how picking a jury goes because of stories from friends and family who had been called for jury duty. I knew from them that as long as you answer with very strong opinions you can get out of jury duty. What I learned in class, however, is that picking a jury can take a long time, the right to a jury trial is guaranteed by the 17th Amendment and
On August 14, 1971, the twelve men that were given the role as “prisoner” were arrested without warning and taken to the police station on charges of burglary and armed robbery in front of their family and friends. There they were processed, fingerprinted and photographed, by the police. Then were blindfolded as they were transferred to the mock prison that was built in one of the basement of a campus building. They were deloused, had their heads shaven, and given their uniform and ID number and then placed in a cell as they would in a real prison setting. The other twelve men were the “guards”, those men were given a guard’s uniform, sunglasses, and a baton. Their orders only being to do what they thought was necessary to keep order in the prison but not to use any kind of violence. Even though the first day was uneventful you could see within hours both groups began to settle into their roles very quickly. It wasn’t until the second day there was a situation when the prisoner started a rebellion, which made the guards further adopt their role and began using more mental
During the late 1800’s to the mid 1900’s, the United States was tainted by the stain of the slavery era, especially in the southern states. There was a great prejudice against blacks and the white majority was able to prevent them from practicing their basic rights, especially the right to vote and the right to get an education. When people started to question why there should be this segregation within society, they brought the issues to the United States Supreme Court. These conflicts resulted in the Supreme Court cases, Plessy v. Ferguson and Brown v. Board of Education, two of the most influential court cases in United States history.
“Witness for the Prosecution” superbly demonstrated a realist view of the operating procedures in a courtroom. The actors within the courtroom were easy to identify, and the steps transitioned smoothly from the arrest to the reading of the verdict. The murder trial of Leonard Vole provided realistic insight into how laws on the books are used in courtroom proceedings. With the inferior elements noted, the superior element of the court system in “Witness for the Prosecution” was the use of the adversary system. Both sides of the adversary system were flawlessly protrayed when the prosecution and defense squared off in the courtroom.
The courts have the function of giving the public a chance to present themselves whether to prosecute or defend themselves if any disputes against them rise. It is known to everyone that a court is a place where disputes can be settled while using the right and proper procedures. In the Criminal court is the luxury of going through a tedious process of breaking a law. Once you have been arrested and have to go to court because of the arrest, you now have a criminal case appointed against you. The court is also the place where a just, fair and unbiased trial can be heard so that it would not cause any disadvantage to either of the party involved in the dispute. The parties are given a chance to represent themselves or to choose to have a legal representative, which is mostly preferred by many.
Throughout our lectures in C101, Professor Berk has constantly emphasized the uniqueness and adaptability of American law. Built up from a foundation of common law, the American legal system allows citizens to transform concerns or perceived injuries into legal actions and keep potential wrongdoers in check, equalizing the playing field between the elites and average Americans. However, an integral factor of this legal system is knowledge of legal proceedings and of one’s own rights. When Americans are ignorant to the extent of their own rights or fall victim to predatory legislations that diminish these rights, American legal consciousness suffers for it, and the judicial system loses its equalizing power. Through the examples of both Judge
When power becomes legitimate, it is then recognized as authority (Denhardt et al, 2001). Power becomes authority when it is accepted and even desired by society. As stated by the course study notes, “authority refers to a situation where a person (or group) has been formally granted a leadership position”. An individual has authority when everyday norms and regulations support the exercising of power by that individual. In an organizational setting, “authority is hierarchal and vested in positions” (Week 9 Study Notes), which are defined by “organizational charts, positions and rules” (Week 9 Study Notes). Generally, power in authority also involves the possibility of rewards such as promotions and good performance reviews.
For my field experience, I chose to attend a court case. On October 14th, 2015 I went to the District of Columbia court and watched a sentencing. It was not at all what I initially expected although after sitting in class for several weeks I was not shocked by it. What surprised me most was the informal, personal nature that the whole process had. The experience was interesting and I feel that I learned a lot from it.
Judicial Precedent "Within the present system of precedent in the English legal system, judges have very little discretion in their decision making." Judges have always been relied upon to interpret and apply the law. Therefore, their decisions should be fair and consistent so as the individuals seeking legal remedies would have more faith in the judicial system of the state. AS the UK has not a very complete and/or codified constitution, this doctrine is very much relied on as contrasted with other countries which seemed to have provisions for virtually any kind of offence, like France or the US where judges had only to refer to legislation.
In Intro to Criminal Justice class, I had the opportunity to learn about the Criminal Justice System more thoroughly. I learned that there are three components that make up the Criminal Justice System such as the courts, law enforcement, and corrections. Each component has its own role in making sure the the Criminal Justice System is functioning properly. If one of these components are not efficient the Criminal Justice system will not be as strong as it could be.