Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Essay on the importance of religious tolerance
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Essay on the importance of religious tolerance
Cosmic Humanists approach ethics from their theological foundation of pantheism-they believe there are ultimately gods in the world. Since many Cosmic Humanists believe in many Gods, this gives them the right to write their moral rules. According to there ethics of judgment, no one may decide whether another’s actions are right or wrong. Many Cosmic Humanists use the word tolerance that is used to denote acceptance of differing moral views. Tolerance has traditionally meant a respectful attitude towards those with whom one disagrees. Lastly, Cosmic Humanist believes that Karma is the universal system of
Tim LaHaye is one of the most influential religious leaders in the United States today. In 2001, Evangelical Studies Bulletin named him as the most influential Christian leader for the past quarter century. He is mostly known for the Left Behind series of apocalyptic fiction, which he co-wrote with Jerry B. Jenkins. However, this paper will talk about LaHaye’s book, The Battle for the Mind, which is one of his most important works but was not included in the Left Behind series.
In the beginning there was only darkness. For many millions of years this darkness remained. There were no stars, no sun, and no earth. But one day something very special happened. The darkness created light. It was a very small amount of light but it was just enough. The light became the husband of the dark. After a long while both the light and the dark became bored. The light began to insult the dark and the light replied with equally harsh insults. "You are not as beautiful as I!" said the light. "Ha! You are much uglier than I!" said the dark.
... and also towards the wellness of all human being in general. There is not anyone watching over me or judging my moral code. However, I just feel responsible for my actions; a moral code should always be in my consciousness, and it tells me how to act in all situations. A thing to remember about these theories is that they are concerned with the greater good. Utilitarians do not care about a person personal life or whether a person actions happen to hurt some people. As long as the results of a person’s actions lead to more pleasure than pain, you are in the clear. For me, being a good person means doing good, and make good decisions. Human beings are not to be viewed as a means to an end but as ends in themselves. Utilitarianism believes that humans are to be treated with respect, but respect must take into account the everyday situations in which a person live.
Imagine that you are able to teleport to the not too distant future. In this world you discover that disease and poverty are no longer causes for human suffering, world hunger has become eliminated from society, and space travel is as easy as snapping your fingers. Cryonics, nanotechnology, cloning, genetic enhancement, artificial intelligence, and brain chips are all common technologies at a doctor’s office. You gasp as a friendly sounding electronic voice cries out, “Welcome to the future Natural!” You are unsure of whether being called a Natural is an insult or not, so you feign a half-hearted hello at the posthuman in front of you. Getting over the initial shock you ask the posthuman, “Who are you?” The posthuman gives an electronic sounding chuckle and shakes his head. He replies, “I am a Posthuman, and you Natural, are in Utopia. Welcome.”
Now, on the other end of the religious spectrum, lies the religious humanists; and though they do respect historical religions and mans humble beginnings, they are more concerned with present day man and that of the future. Religious humanists are concerned with maintaining social well- being and establishing social interactions and communication. Also, religious humanists believe in bettering ones life through achievements and reason rather than religious hopes and faith. They (religious humanists) associate personal happiness, and a better human condition with the self and those around us rather than a god.
A common misconception of humanist is that they do not understand right and wrong, however Patrick Henry understands that “the eternal difference between right and wrong does not fluctuate, it is immutable” (Henry). Henry’s acknowledgment of good versus evil shows that he comprehends when good or evil is being done. In the Media one hears stories of people doing good works “teen buying young children gifts”, “ man doing good deeds for strangers”, and countless good deeds that continue to go un noticed. (Earl and Shaw) A common theme in these articles about normal everyday people doing good deeds is that when they do them they feel as if they are helping to improve the world. Although some people have been put into bad circumstances such as the “Oklahoma Testicular cancer patient [who] does good deeds for strangers”, they are still choosing to do charitable works so that they can enjoy this life. (Shaw) Those who make this world enjoyable are more likely to enter in communion with God in Heaven, this statement is a belief of many humanists. Humanist believe that not only can this life be good, but it is God’s hope that people do enjoy it; for reasons such like these humanist believe people do good so
In Francis Fukuyama’s “Transhumanism”, he discusses the many complexities and contradictions surrounding transhumanism. He persuades his audience through logic and reason to convey the factual side of human nature, and as to why human nature is too fragile to alter. There is a certain balance to the human body and mental functions, and the temptations of transhumanism incredibly endanger this important harmony. Fukuyama goes on to discuss human character, emotion, and morality to show why transhumanism is counterproductive.
The Comparison of the Creation of the Universe and Origin of Man and New Species
There are several attributes used to describe the transcendence of God, such as eternal—having no beginning or end; omnipresent—present everywhere; omnipotent—all powerful; and omniscient—all knowing. However, some theologians add the attributes of God being immutable and impassible, which are sources of debate today within Christianity. God’s immutability means he is unchanging and God’s impassibility means he is incapable of suffering or being affected by anything.1 Furthermore, two theologians, Jürgen Moltmann and Hans Kung have written on this subject in order to define and bring further clarity to God’s immutability and whether or not God is impassible. Moltmann focuses on the suffering of God, and Kung zeros in on the unchangeableness
When did being human become not good enough? Transhumanism theories strive toward the perfect human, a posthuman, which can be achieved through modern technology. In the opinion of transhumanists, humans are constantly subject to change and their calling is to transcend their body and brain in order to reach their full potential. While this may have positive effects for the people involved, such as immunity toward hereditary diseases, Down syndrome for example, the question arises what is considered ethical in these practices. Three ethical issues arise when considering transhumanism. Firstly, should we extend our mortality and take away the chance for another human to live life on this earth to the fullest? Secondly, once the human race is perfect, we will not know what makes us unique and gives us our personality. Thirdly, the ability to breed perfect humans brings with it the possibility of a subspecies, due to the affordability of the specific technology. Finally, the need for enhancement comes down to parents wanting the best for their children, but it soon ends up being about their child being perfect.
“The common outcry, which is justly made on behalf of human rights - for example, the right to health, to home, to work, to family, to culture - is false and illusory if the right to life, the most basic and fundamental right and the condition of all other personal rights is not defended with maximum determination.” -- Pope John Paul II
The humanistic perspective on personality deals exclusively with human behavior. Humanistic psychologists believe that human nature includes a natural drive towards personal growth, that humans have the freedom to choose what they do regardless of environmental factors, and humans are mostly conscious beings and are not controlled by unconscious needs and conflicts. They also believe that a person's subjective view of the world is more important than objective reality. Two of the humanistic theorists that have made an impact of humanism are Carl Rogers and Abraham Maslow.
This paper discusses how cosmology and how philosophy can be connected to one another. In order to explain this reason, the paper is broken down into three subtitles which are: metaphysics, religion, and ontology. Each part connects to cosmology in one term or another. In each subtopic, it will discuss the topic, its background in the philosophical review. As a result, in the conclusion, it will discuss how cosmology compares to them all.
Humans may be one of the most complex species on this earth thus far. We are the only known species who contemplates their existence so deeply and writes novels worth of work on it. But what exactly does it mean to be a human and how is our humanness defined? For centuries philosophers have written countless works on what they believe makes a person truly humane and how we differentiate between those who are “bad” and those who are “good” humans. In a world that is so subjective and that has so many opinions, routes, and options this may be one of the hardest concepts to define.
Our society is very different now than it was decades ago. A society is the aggregate of people living together in an ordered community. Most humans, which are man or earthly beings, in our society are unfortunately no longer human beings. Being human essentially means having the ability to think rationally and to make connections both physically and spiritually along with have a relationship with other beings. We have built our lives around so many complex concepts that they have taken away our humanity. Humanity is the kindness, graciousness, human kind. Our lives revolve too much around technology, morality, money, consumerism, laws, values and beauty. These concepts have spoiled the definition of being human. Our civilization is formed