Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Essay about political structure
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
In many situations when things are different, some things are the same. Animal Farm, Julius Caesar, and Fahrenheit 451 have totally different environments with similar threads. In each of these books there seems to be underlying themes that connect with each other. With such a wide variance in backgrounds it’s hard to believe that this could be true. In each book dystopia comes from the hope of a utopia. This dystopia comes from corruptions created by power. There is an old saying that says “Power corrupts, and absolute power corrupts absolutely”. Utopia, dystopia, power, and corruption are the most common messages conveyed by the authors of these books.
(TS) In Animal Farm the animals wanted the best for the farm, but in the end, things were worse. (CD) Old Major tells the farm of a dream he had where the farm rebelled agai nst Man and the whole farm agreed that this was a good idea. (CM) This was basically a utopia for the farm, but things started to go bad shortly after they fulfilled this dream. (CM) Soon after the rebellion the pigs started to believe they were superior to all the others animals which was not the case. (CD) Seven Commandments were written after Mr. Jones gets over-powered by the animals, some of these include “No animal shall wear clothes…No animal shall kill any other animal… All Animals are equal” (Orwell 24-25). (CM) The commandments were written to better the farm and if followed they may have created a utopia. (CM) The pigs, especially Napoleon started to change and break the rules thus ruining the hope of a utopic society. (CS) A hope of a utopia will be created by fulfilled dreams is not always the case, Animal Farm shows that some fulfilled dreams become a dystopia.
(TS) Animal Farm shows a perfect ...
... middle of paper ...
...t… Serenity, Montag. Peace Montag. Take your fight outside. Better yet, into the incinerator” (Bradbury 57). Basically Beatty is telling Montag instead of dealing with problems that he should just burn them, which is probably why this society is bad. Covering up the cause for a problem never solves it. In Fahrenheit 451 thinking independently is frowned upon. Individuals are individuals not matter what the government want them to be. Removing free will of individual thinking caused an unmotivated society. The taking away of creativity and individuality created disorder out of a process to make order.
Works Cited
Bradbury, Ray. Fahrenheit 451. New York: Simon & Schuster Paperbacks, 2013. Print.
Orwell, George. Animal Farm. New York: Glencoe McGraw Hill, 2000. Print.
Shakespeare, William. No Fear Shakespeare Julius Caesar. New York: Spark Publishing, 2003.
Print.
When one fears what one does not understand, he often becomes defensive, avoiding it at all costs. This is the problem facing Guy Montag; his society absolutely deplores challenge. Anything that can be perceived as offensive is banished. In their eyes, books are cursed objects which make people think. Without literature, the public’s thought is suppressed, and they live mindless lives. In the book, Fahrenheit 451 by Ray Bradbury, Beatty is the captain of the firemen. As a fireman, Beatty acts as the controlling arm for this suppression. He is the one harshly guiding the public towards apathy by burning their books. However, when seen as just a man, Beatty is not important. He is one fireman against millions of books. He is important because of what he represents to Montag, which is: the censorship of information, an impetus to learn, and what
Montag witnesses a woman burn along with the books in her house at the hands of him and his co-workers. The next day, he is too traumatized to go to work and stays at home instead. Beatty, Montag’s boss, pays him an unexpected visit and attempts to console his troubled mind. In an effort to comfort Montag, Beatty explains that “ ‘[w]e must all be alike. Not everyone born free and equal, as the Constitution says, but everyone made equal. Each man the image of every other; then all are happy, for there are no mountains to make them cower, to judge themselves against. So! A book is a loaded gun in the house next door. Burn it. [....] Breach man’s mind. [T]here was no longer need of firemen for the old purposes. [...] [A]s custodians of our peace of mind, [...] [t]hat’s you, Montag, and that’s me” (Bradbury 55-56). As shown by his statement that everyone is not “born free and equal, as the Constitution says, but [...] made equal’ ” so that there is nothing “ ‘to judge themselves against,’ ” Beatty is explaining the reasoning behind their society’s mindset. He justifies the death of the woman by implying that those who are different are also catalysts for conflict. Bradbury’s simile identifies the corruption of their government as they strip people of their rights in order to effectively control the mass population. Meanwhile, Montag absorbs this new perspective, no longer left in his state of unawareness. In addition, his own purpose in life is being defined in terms of society when Beatty claims that “there was no longer need of firemen for the old purposes. [...] [A]s custodians of our peace of mind, [...] [t]hat’s you, Montag, and that’s me.” Provided with this reasoning, Montag is finally able to begin forming an understanding of how the world operates through society’s perception. Similar to Montag, the prisoner begins his ascension
...r, to judge themselves against."(Bradbury 58). The government is trying to create a society where all are equal and where everyone “seems” happy. Beatty is trying to tell Montag to be like everyone else, to remain as a “normal” fireman, to continue burning books, to continue being “happy” with his life. The severe government control is the final factor that leads to the dystopian government.
In Ray Bradbury’s Fahrenheit 451, Bradbury uses the life of Guy Montag, a fireman in a near future dystopia, to make an argument against mindless conformity and blissful ignorance. In Bradbury’s world, the firemen that Montag is a part of create fires to burn books instead of putting out fires. By burning books, the firemen eliminate anything that might be controversial and make people think, thus creating a conforming population that never live a full life. Montag is part of this population for nearly 30 years of his life, until he meets a young girl, Clarisse, who makes him think. And the more he thinks, the more he realizes how no one thinks. Upon making this realization, Montag does the opposite of what he is supposed to; he begins to read. The more he reads and the more he thinks, the more he sees how the utopia he thought he lived in, is anything but. Montag then makes an escape from this society that has banished him because he has tried to gain true happiness through knowledge. This is the main point that Bradbury is trying to make through the book; the only solution to conformity and ignorance is knowledge because it provides things that the society can not offer: perspective on life, the difference between good and evil, and how the world works.
When Beatty commanders Montag to burn his house, Montag has no choice since Hound is watching. While Montag was burning his house, he feels like he is burning all his memories. In the book it quotes; “The books leapt and danced like roasted birds, their wings ablaze with red and yellow features” (Brandbury117). Once in Montag’s life, he was satisfied doing his job. Instead of reading books, people watch television mindlessly. Now he realises book are important because it creates an adventure in a person’s life. In the quote, Bradbury is emphasizing each story has a life of its own, and a reader brings a different point of view to each story. When the books were being burnt, it is like burning birds that are trying to fly to freedom. This quote supports the theme censorship because in the society of Fahrenheit 451 books are ban and since Montag did not follow the law, as a result, books are being burned. Bradbury successful uses this simile to develop the theme of
Guy Montag, a fireman in a technologically oriented society, goes against the government to find true happiness. Bradbury’s novel, Fahrenheit 451, takes place in a dystopian society in a futuristic America where firemen do not put out fires, but rather use fire to eradicate books. This society lavishes ignorance and looks down upon intelligence. The inappropriate use of leisure time in Montag 's world is the biggest contributor to their deficient society, because people no longer have complex personalities, good socializing, parenting, or critical thinking skills.
Of all literary works regarding dystopian societies, Ray Bradbury’s Fahrenheit 451 is perhaps one of the most bluntly shocking, insightful, and relatable of them. Set in a United States of the future, this novel contains a government that has banned books and a society that constantly watches television. However, Guy Montag, a fireman (one who burns books as opposed to actually putting out fires) discovers books and a spark of desire for knowledge is ignited within him. Unfortunately his boss, the belligerent Captain Beatty, catches on to his newfound thirst for literature. A man of great duplicity, Beatty sets up Montag to ultimately have his home destroyed and to be expulsed from the city. On the other hand, Beatty is a much rounder character than initially apparent. Beatty himself was once an ardent reader, and he even uses literature to his advantage against Montag. Moreover, Beatty is a critical character in Fahrenheit 451 because of his morbid cruelty, obscene hypocrisy, and overall regret for his life.
Two of the most iconic dystopian novels are 1984 by George Orwell and Fahrenheit 451 by Ray Bradbury. These novels expanded the genre significantly and while having different details about Dystopian life, share remarkable similarities. Throughout the novels, similar themes such as media control and war demonstrate that both authors share common ideas about what would be important in Dystopian life. On the other hand, the way in which the authors approach each issue highlights a difference in both time period and values.
"Burn everything that causes feelings and will get your mind going," is what Beatty's mindset is; he thinks firemen should burn books to keep everything the way it is. The society lives on simple pleasures in life that do not require any thought once so ever. They forget their own problems with constantly watching TV. There's no time at all for thinking. However, it does not make peoples thoughts completely disappear; it only keeps their minds distracted all the time, so they forget.
Captain Beatty, supports the idea that books make others unhappy, because reading them make people confront different ideas, this leads to large differences and thus disagreement between people. For example, Beatty tells Montag that if we read about dogs then we offend those who want to read about cats. Also, if we read about Asians the rest of the world would feel unimportant. Beatty, also, tells Montag that the government was not the one that started burning the books. It was the very same people, who gradually ceased to read, analyze, relate and think abstractly; so when the government began to burn books, no one noticed. Therefore, the Captain is trying to persuade Montag to continue burning books, in order to prevent future problems. But, internally, Montag was not convinced by the ideas that Beatty explained to him.
“Behind his mask of conformity, Montag gradually undergoes a change of values. Montag realized his life had been meaningless without books” (Liukkonen). In the beginning of the novel, Montag said, “It was a pleasure to burn. It was a special pleasure to see things eaten, to see things blackened and changed” (Bradbury 3). For most of his life, Montag conformed just like the other members of society. He set things on fire because it was his job and did not question whether or not it was the right thing to do. Throughout the story, however, he grew to find and voice his own opinions and resisted the conformity that his society stressed. When Montag had to decide whether or not to burn Beatty to death, he proved himself by not giving in to what was expected. He killed the captain of the police department, which was an entirely defiant act (Bradbury
The pigs developed Old Major’s teaching into a complete system of thought: Animalism. Rules of equality, formality, and hard work was proclaimed and encoded in The Seven Commandments - ';an unalterable law.'; The animals enthusiasm was expressed through a hymn, ';Beasts of England.';
In the film and the literature, Animal Farm, by George Orwell, both contain differences and similarities in several divergent paths. For instance, for both novel and the film, both contain a similarities, as for an illustration, Old Major makes a desirable speech to the animals to start a rebellion against man and humanity, because the mistreatment and inequality was horridly increased to when the level of uncomfortability was very unignorable. In this event, the first meeting held in the old barn, waiting for Old Major to speak his loud and vain speech, whom is an elderly and knowledgeable pig who had a vision for the future of the farm, for animals to run the farm instead of humans, in which newfangled into, Animal Farm. In this film and novel,
ANIMAL FARM About 80 per-cent of all the animals on Animal Farm completely followed the seven commandments. The other 20 per-cent of the animals would rarely follow all the rules and they were often treated like a piece of dirt. All the animals on Animal Farm were treated differently according to their social status, where in today’s society everyone should treat everyone equally. The characters in Animal Farm had many diverse characteristics, some of the animals were powerful, stupid, and sneaky First of all, Napoleon is a huge Berkshire boar and he clearly is the most powerful of all the animals. He was able to take complete leadership of the farm because he secretly trained the dogs to attack Snowball. George Orwell writes, “ ‘Never mind the milk, comrades!’ cried Napoleon, placing himself in front of the buckets. ‘That will be attended to, the harvest is more important’ (817).&nb describe Napoleon as a leader, “ ‘long live Comrade Napoleon’ ” (846). All the animals on the farm (no matter what Napoleon did to them) would treat him as a powerful leader and whatever he said they would do. Often Orwell stirs up controversy about the rebellion, “ ‘forward in the name of the rebellion. ‘Long live Animal Farm!’ ‘Long live Comrade Napoleon!’ ‘Napoleon is always right.’
Authority in a society is a necessary evil which when unfettered, results in the abuse of power. Power has long been considered a corrupting and a disrupting force in function and in influence. Underlying motives and greed fuel those who seek to gain and or abuse this power. The Crucible examines this twisted force as it corrupts societies’ clergy, blinds its justices, and empowers those who seek to abuse it. Arthur Miller shows how power can be a corrupting influence and how it can blind the judgment of authoritative figures.