The Corruption of Innocence
Sigmund Freud’s psychoanalytic theory of personality development precisely describes a person’s concealed characteristics. As a part of the pleasure principle, the id is the element that satisfies one’s urges and desires for pleasure as well as immediate gratification. William Golding depicts the obscure side of humanity using significant details that are described in Lord of the Flies. The novel unveils with the children realizing that they are stranded on an island where Ralph, the protagonist, becomes chief and aims for rescue. Contradicting to the protagonist, Jack turns into a vicious person who has a thirst for power and dominance due to his dissatisfaction with failing to hunt for food. Conflicts continue
…show more content…
to arise when the children claim to have seen a beast in the jungle; therefore, throws everyone into a state of fear and agony. By establishing the novel’s setting on an isolated island, William Golding implies the darkness of human nature through the character’s behaviours, which ultimately has the power to destroy civilization. Jack’s hyperbolizing ambition of exterminating the beast allows his inner mentality of fear to dominate his morality, thus influencing him to kill his first victim. Jack, in the mindset of thinking that Simon is the crawling beast stumbling into the chanting circle, Jack hollers to inform the littluns their unanimous goal of execution. Disregarding Simon’s ominous words, Jack roars, “‘Kill the pig! Cut his throat! Spill his blood! Do him in!’” (Golding 168). The intention of eliminating the “evil” in order to survive, controls Jack’s mind as he progresses towards Simon’s execution. Jack’s anxiety of the beast’s appearance causes him and the hunters to become savages. The continuous chantings and dancing created by Jack represents the initiation of savagery, which are embedded into the characters’ heads as it becomes a threshold, creating the children’s loss of innocence. Simon’s death is the first symbolic tragedy that occurs to create a dreadful atmosphere and reveals the characters’ attitudes in distress. Furthermore, the chants also act as a persuasive technique to gather the children around Simon before his death. Mob mentality entitles Jack and his hunters to use appalling actions towards Simon. As Simon incautiously falters onto the sand: “The crowd surged after [him], poured down the rock, leaped onto [him] screamed, struck, bit, and tore. There were no words, and no movements but the tearing of teeth and claws” (168). Jack is so immersed into killing the evil that he misinterprets Simon as the beast. Unfortunately, Simon’s stumble onto the platform gives Jack the chance to kill him. As the children observe Jack’s actions, they are pressured into committing the same murderous attempt as him. The irrational influence leads the rest of the children to adapt similar behaviours portrayed by Jack, thus creating the first scene of murder in the novel. Jack’s original intention of killing the beast is for the protection of himself and the tribe. Instead, he turns paranoid even after killing Simon. The aftermath of murdering Simon did not satisfy Jack’s thoughts of the beast; therefore, he continues his demands for gate watching and alertness in case of the reoccurrence of the “immortal” beast. Eventually, Roger, another influenced savage who considers himself authoritative, follows Jack’s lead and commits the second murderous act killing another victim. Witnessing the fight between Ralph and Jack, Roger steps in and begins to fire rocks from above Castle Rock, which resulted in the manslaughter of Piggy. The original thought of having a calm negotiation with Jack becomes heated up when Roger launches the rock, targeting Piggy’s head: “Piggy’s arms and legs twitched a bit, like a pig’s after it has been killed” (200). Piggy is identified for his intellectualism apart from all of the other characters on the island. Ralph and Piggy’s “talk” with Jack did not proceed as expected when Roger starts to throw rocks at them. Roger's behaviour is impacted by Jack who demonstrates various activities which sufficiently displays his irrational behaviour. After being inveigled, Roger performs a similar crime by murdering the innocent. The downfall of Piggy expresses the destruction of civilization of the characters. Although Roger is to blame for his atrocious actions, Jack’s propensity displays his insouciant emotions at Piggy’s tragic death. Contradicting emotions are shown by Jack when he is satisfied with Roger’s murdering act but is unconcerned about Piggy’s death. Jack exposes his emotions as he exclaims, “See? See? That’s what you’ll get! I meant that! There isn’t a tribe for you anymore! The conch is gone---” (200). Feeling no interest or affection for Piggy’s death, Jack is clearly described as one of the cruellest and savagest characters on the island. Jack’s cruel personality is adapted from him trying to survive throughout his journey on the inhabited island where no viable grownups are in control. His ignorance and lack of compassion towards the tragedy shows his heinous behaviour. Jack displays his exhilaration at Ralph as he loudly clamours about his authority. Ralph is now alone, with no tribe, no friends, and loses hope in humanity. Therefore, Piggy’s downfall is a heartbreaking yet crucial part of the book because it indicates revelation of the continuous loss of a humane society. Lastly, Jack’s tribe makes their final decision for murder by attempting to exterminate Ralph.
Roger plans his crime by sharpening a stick at both ends as he aims to put Ralph’s head on a stick, just like Jack did when he offered the sow’s head on a stick to Lord of the Flies. The plan to kill the last person against the Savage tribe progresses as: “Roger sharpened a stick at both ends” (210). Roger’s action is significant because he recalls when Jack hunts the sow and sticks its head on one end of a stick and the other in the ground in front of the cave as an offering to the Lord of the Flies. He is another character that has adapted into savagery through his survival on the island. When Roger sharpens both ends of a stick, this foreshadows to what he will do to Ralph. Not only does Roger treat Ralph like a pig, but he tries to kill Ralph; ultimately putting his head on one end of the stick. Roger also considers to give Ralph’s head to Lord of the Flies as an offering. Their plan advances the next morning when the entire tribe collaborates on the final murderous attempt. The characters fully turns corrupt and the last chance of returning back to innocence vanishes when Jack’s tribe set a blazing fire to the island. Due to the various obstacles and difficulties trying to locate Ralph: “They had smoked him out and set the island on fire” (217). Jack’s idea of setting the entire island on fire is ludicrous. He is always against Ralph’s idea of a signal fire, and he even steals it to cook the pigs, but in the end he decides to burns the entire island just to murder Ralph. Jack only focuses on how he can smoke out Ralph in order to kill him, but this is also what ultimately leads to the children’s rescue. This is evidence of the complete savageness that is overpowering and in control of Jack’s innocence. Through the various murderous attempts to kill Ralph, Jack never succeeds and in return, all of his actions exhibit his malevolent behaviour and his lack of
civilization. In conclusion, by inaugurating the novel’s setting on an isolated island, William Golding insinuates the evilness of humanity through the character’s behaviours, which fundamentally has the ability to destroy civilization. The loss of civilization initializes when Jack convinces the tribe that Simon is the beast, which leads to Simon’s death, due to mob mentality. The stoning and manslaughtering of Piggy evokes tension as Jack disregards his death and proceeds to intimidate Ralph. In the end, Jack’s tribe completely transforms into savages by sharpening a stick at both ends, and burning the entire island to lure Ralph out to his death. Ideologies from Lord of the Flies is significant because the theme darkness of humanity is continuously portrayed in the current society. People’s behaviours and attitudes change when their psychological mind senses fear and threats. William Golding implicitly expresses these ideologies throughout the book to help the readers understand the importance of order and discipline in our society.
Lord of the Flies was written by a British author in 1954. The book is about a group of British school boys that crash on an island and have to survive. During their time on the island they turn their backs on being civil and become savages. Ralph is the elected leader and always thinks civil. Jack leaves the group and starts a tribe with the boys and is a savage. Piggy is a boy who is knowable. Simon is compared to Jesus through the book and is the only naturally “good” character. The littleuns are the littler kids on the island. Roger is a cruel older boy who is Jack’s lieutenant. Samneric are twins who are close to Ralph but, are manipulated by Jack later on. In the book Lord of the Flies by William Golding some of the characters represent id, ego, and superego. Id, ego, and super ego are the three parts of the psychic apparatus expressed by Sigmund Freud’s structural model of the psyche. Golding expresses his message of evil and how it is natural in every person, and how we must recognize and control it through id, ego, and superego.
The book Lord of the Flies by William Golding is an exhilarating novel that is full of courage, bravery, and manhood. It is a book that constantly displays the clash between two platoons of savage juveniles mostly between Jack and Ralph who are the main characters of the book. The Kids become stranded on an island with no adults for miles. The youngsters bring their past knowledge from the civilized world to the Island and create a set of rules along with assigned jobs like building shelters or gathering more wood for the fire. As time went on and days past some of the kids including Jack started to veer off the rules path and begin doing there own thing. The transformation of Jack from temperately rebellious to exceptionally
William Golding’s novel ‘The Lord of The Flies’ tells the story of a group of English boys isolated on a desert island, left to attempt to retain civilisation. In the novel, Golding shows one of the boys, Jack, to change significantly. At the beginning of the book, Jack’s character desires power and although he does not immediately get it, he retains the values of civilized behaviour. However, as the story proceeds, his character becomes more savage, leaving behind the values of society. Jack uses fear of the beast to control the other boys and he changes to become the book’s representation of savagery, violence and domination. He is first taken over with an obsession to hunt, which leads to a change in his physical appearance This change of character is significant as he leads the other boys into savagery, representing Golding’s views of there being a bad and unforgiving nature to every human.
It’s one of the most famous stories to ever exist, the story of how two people changed what defines us as humans. It’s the story of Adam, Eve, a serpent, and the unbecoming of mankind, the Fall of Man. This iconic account has been the premise for many works over the centuries. Today, Lord of the Flies by William Golding is considered one of the most influential novels of our time, not only for its adventurous story of stranded boys on a lost island, but also because of its allegorical tale of the true fault in man’s soul. William Golding leans heavily upon the Biblical account of the Fall of Man to highlight man’s depravity in his novel, Lord of the Flies.
Lord of the Flies is a novel written by William Golding in 1954 about a group of young British boys who have been stranded alone together on an island with no adults. During the novel the diverse group of boys struggle to create structure within a society that they constructed by themselves. Golding uses many unique literary devices including characterization, imagery, symbolism and many more. The three main characters, Ralph, Piggy, and Jack are each representative of the three main literary devices, ethos, logos, and pathos. Beyond the characterization the novel stands out because of Golding’s dramatic use of objective symbolism, throughout the novel he uses symbols like the conch, fire, and Piggy’s glasses to represent how power has evolved and to show how civilized or uncivilized the boys are acting. It is almost inarguable that the entire novel is one big allegory in itself, the way that Golding portrays the development of savagery among the boys is a clear representation of how society was changing during the time the novel was published. Golding is writing during
As much as everyone would like to believe that all people are inherently good, the illusion of innocence that is often presumed throughout childhood makes the revelation of human nature especially hard to bear. Arthur Koestler said, “Nothing is more sad than the death of an illusion”, and this one is certainly a very hard reality to cope with. In the novel Lord of the Flies, the author William Golding tells the story of a group of British schoolboys who crash land on an uninhabited island in the midst of a world war, and how they regress from civilization to savagery. By conveying Ralph’s reactions to the deaths of Simon and Piggy, providing detailed, symbolic imagery of the cliffs and the lagoon, and showing Ralph’s despair at his new understanding
Imagine flying on a plane and crash landing on an unknown island with a select group of people. How would humans deal as a result of this horrific situation? Is cruelty and violence the only solution when it comes down to it? In Lord of the Flies, William Golding explores the relationship between children in a similar conflict and shows how savagery takes over civilization. Lord of the Flies proves to show that the natural human instincts of cruelty and savagery will take over instead of logic and reasoning. William shows how Jack, the perpetrator in the book, uses cruelty and fear for social and political gain to ultimately take over, while on the other hand shows how Ralph falters and loses power without using cruelty and fear. In Lord of
Set in a futuristic world, William Golding's novel, Lord of the Flies, is a great example of how the id, ego, and superego of people fade in or out of people placed in different situations. For example, when a group of boys crashes an island with no adults, Jack Merridew changes into a savage little boy due to his protruding id. Though, like many of the boys, Jack’s first impressions include a clean and responsible little boy, his character becomes impulsive and violent
There is madness at the heart of every man, or at least that is what it seems William Golding is trying to teach us in his novel Lord of the Flies. In the novel, the newest world war has found its way to England and in an attempt to save them, rich English parents are sending their sons off to who knows where. In a cruel twist of fate though, the boy’s plane crashes on a deserted island, and the only thing to keep them company is the war overhead and the bodies that fall to earth. The longer they stay there and await rescue, the more madness begins to consume them, some more than others. Those that fall victim to this most strongly are the three main characters, Jack, Piggy, and Ralph. The novel though, is not only about their decent into madness but is also an allegory for the madness inside of every man. It takes a point of view similar to that of Hobbes. essentially that man is a great savage at heart and that he is only controlled by the shackles created by society and government. Golding shows this through the use of his three main characters as representations of the three pieces of Freud’s theory of human psychology. Jack as the instinct driven id, Piggy as the greater good centered super-ego, and Ralph as the self thought centered ego.But the three of those alone do not make a good novel. Golding needed a power piece to create the conflict, which
William Golding’s novel, Lord of the Flies, is one of symbolism and allegory. William Golding uses his novel to prove fear to be mankind’s greatest weakness. The allegory in this novel reveals that not only is fear mankind’s greatest weakness, but it also brings out the inner-beast in people; forcing mankind into either insanity or their own destruction. William Golding captures this allegory through symbolism in the characters of Ralph, Jack, and the Lord of the Flies (the beast), as well as using their interactions with each other and the island.
Although there are many interpretations of Golding’s Lord of the Flies, one of the most important is one that involves an examination of Freudian ideas. The main characters personify Sigmund Freud’s theory of the divisions of the human mind; thus, Jack, Ralph, Piggy and Simon are metaphors for the id, ego, and the super-ego of Freudian psychology, respectively. The inclusion of psychological concepts in this literary work distinguish it as a commentary on human nature, beyond labels of “adventure” or “coming of age” novel. Many readers are left in shock upon reading Golding’s masterpiece because of the children’s loss of innocence, but most fail to consider
“I think that’s the real loss of innocence: the first time you glimpse the boundaries that will limit your potential” (Steve Toltz). In the previous quote, Steve Toltz discusses the transition from innocence to corruption. William Golding’s Lord of the Flies illustrates the loss of innocence through various characters: Jack, who struggles with pride and a thirst for power; Roger, who revels in the pain of others and uses fear to control the boys; Simon, who represents the demise of purity when humans are at their most savage; Ralph, who illustrates the struggle people endure when attempting to be civilized near the savage; and Piggy, who suffers because he has the only technology necessary to survive. Golding enforces the theory that true innocence will often pay the price to sustain true evil by arranging the characters' personalities and actions in a way that correlates to the effects of Darwin's evolution theory, "survival of the fittest" (). Jack is a good example of this as he exerts power over the weak and uses his skills in hunting to survive. The thirst to prove his masculinity overrides his innate purity, effectively corrupting him. Jack’s loss of innocence begins a domino effect that begins to influence the others.
William Golding’s Lord of the Flies shows man’s inhumanity to man. This novel shows readers good vs. evil through children. It uses their way of coping with being stranded on an island to show us how corrupt humans really are.
William Golding's first book, Lord of the Flies, is the story of a group of boys of different backgrounds who are marooned on an unknown island when their plane crashes. As the boys try to organize and formulate a plan to get rescued, they begin to separate and as a result of the dissension a band of savage tribal hunters is formed. Eventually the "stranded boys in Lord of the Flies almost entirely shake off civilized behavior: (Riley 1: 119). When the confusion finally leads to a manhunt [for Ralph], the reader realizes that despite the strong sense of British character and civility that has been instilled in the youth throughout their lives, the boys have backpedaled and shown the underlying savage side existent in all humans. "Golding senses that institutions and order imposed from without are temporary, but man's irrationality and urge for destruction are enduring" (Riley 1: 119). The novel shows the reader how easy it is to revert back to the evil nature inherent in man. If a group of well-conditioned school boys can ultimately wind up committing various extreme travesties, one can imagine what adults, leaders of society, are capable of doing under the pressures of trying to maintain world relations.
William Golding wrote of his novel "Lord of the Flies" that the theme was an attempt to explore how the defects society are based largely on human nature rather than the structure of civilization. Golding used "Lord of the Flies" to allegorically explain that the architecture of a society depends on the morality of the individual rather than a social or political construction, regardless of its inherent merit or esteem.