The United States is world renowned for its medical system. Names like the Mayo Clinic, John Hopkins, and Duke are all common household names when it comes to ground breaking medical service. Many people from across the planet come to the USA to have medical procedures done. But is it really all that? According to Michael Moore and his 2007 documentary entitled, “Sicko” the USA’s medical system is not as great as it seems. Corruption, a word that is defined as the impairment of integrity, virtue, or moral principle, is running rampant in the medical system. Moore uses vivid imagery, intense interviews, and concession to persuade his audience that medical industry is corrupt in a way and that universal or more affordable healthcare is not that …show more content…
Many of the stories that are told by the people in the film are either filled with happiness or complete somber. One of the happiest moments in the film which actually started out pretty grime took place within the last fifteen minute. Those last fifteen minutes included the 9/11 first responders going to Cuba to receive the treatment they had fought for here in the United States. The moment they walked into the Havana Hospital was probably one of the most monumental moments in the movie. It is filled with bliss and relief. After watching this whole documentary, the audience would have seen this and probably thought to themselves, “How refreshing to see these people who served this country during its darkest time since Pearl Harbor receive the treatment they deserve.” This not only resonates with the audience making them happy to see these hero treated like they should be, but it also incites anger because they shouldn’t have to leave the country and go to the USA’s so called “enemy” to receive treatment. The audience thinks about how that could be their family suffering because the medicine or the operation they need is too expensive. Another great example of emotional appeal in Moore’s documentary is the story of the woman and her husband who had cancer. After finding out that the husband’s brother was a perfect donor for bone marrow they were told by their insurance company that they would not pay for the …show more content…
Moore reestablishes his ethos by just having people tell their stories and not just himself merely saying what he believes. Additionally, the pathos and logos intertwined within in the stories told by the interviewees creates deep personal connections between the audience members and the story tellers themselves. The use of all three aspects of rhetoric renders the audience feeling that action on the subject is urgent. The audience no longer wants to feel like they need to make sure they go to the right hospital to get treatment but just the closest. They no longer want their country to be looked at by citizens of other countries as a burden to come to because they need special insurance just in case they are injured while they are here. Therefore, Moore has effectively changed the way the audience thinks about how healthcare is run in
Daniel Stone, a practicing physician in internal medicine, writes “Our Big Appetite for Healthcare” to argue how California’s healthcare needs to change. In the article, Stone discusses how California’s “more is better” health care is costly, inefficient, and insignificant. The author creates his argument with the methods of appeals; logos, a logical appeal, and ethos, an ethical appeal. Stone establishes his argument by mainly using logos with indicative reasoning to support his argument.
The theme of The Catcher in the Rye is simple. J. D. Salinger uses this novel to draw a clear distinction between the purity of childhood and the wickedness attained when one reaches adulthood. Salinger uses multiple literary devices including diction, symbolism, tone, and even the title of the novel to drive home his ideas about the innocence of children and the corruption of the world.
The Frontline documentary, Obama’s Deal, tracks the course of Obama’s healthcare reform and the steps taken by the administration to get the bill passed. Healthcare was, and remains, one of the biggest platforms of the Obama administration and one of our nation’s greatest challenges. The film starts with Obama’s election into the White House in 2009. Rahm Emanuel, who had worked for the Clinton administration, was brought in to advise Obama on the reform. To win, Emanuel knew that Obama would have to move quickly as his campaign would be strongest at the beginning. But his crucial flaw was having Obama take a back seat on his own political agenda. Emanuel tried to change his mistakes from the Clinton administration’s healthcare failure, and
Sicko, a film by Michael Moore was released in 2007. The film investigates health care system in the United States. One would definitely get amazed by the facts and figures explained in this documentary. The movie explains failing health care system in the United States. America has advance medical technology, big hospitals, and educated health care professionals, but these facilities are not universal. The film starts by talking about true American stories; what some people have experienced from current health care system, those who had and did not had health insurances. The story starts by Adam, one of 50 million people in America who does not have health insurance. Due to an accident Adam required a medical treatment, but for the reason of not having any insurance he puts stitches on his leg by himself. The second story was about Rick, who accidentally cut the top of his two fingers, middle and the ring while working on the table saw. As a result of not having health insurance, Rick could not put the top of his middle finger back because it was costing 60,000 dollars and he did not had the money. So, he decided to put his ring finger back because it cost 12,000 dollars which he could afford. The movie does not go into the detail of 50 million people who do not have health insurance, but it’s about 250 million Americans who do have health insurance.
Agenda setting is the process that determines appropriate solutions to a certain problem of a given field (Kingdon, 3). The process itself consists of three streams: problems, policies, and politics (Kingdon, 16). These separate streams interact when windows of opportunity are open – solutions are fitted with problems, and the impetus for this relationship is amenable political forces (Kingdon, 20). Prominent agendas are determined by the problem or political streams, while solutions are crafted in in the policy stream (Kingdon, 20). In the field of health care, the agenda setting is based upon the high number of uninsured citizens, the rising cost of medical care, the development of Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (PPACA) in response to this issue, and the key players that debate whether governmental involvement is the correct approach in the issue of universal healthcare.
This movie is a wonderful production starting from 1960 and ending in 1969 covering all the different things that occurred during this unbelievable decade. The movie takes place in many different areas starring two main families; a very suburban, white family who were excepting of blacks, and a very positive black family trying to push black rights in Mississippi. The movie portrayed many historical events while also including the families and how the two were intertwined. These families were very different, yet so much alike, they both portrayed what to me the whole ‘message’ of the movie was. Although everyone was so different they all faced such drastic decisions and issues that affected everyone in so many different ways. It wasn’t like one person’s pain was easier to handle than another is that’s like saying Vietnam was harder on those men than on the men that stood for black rights or vice versa, everyone faced these equally hard issues. So it seemed everyone was very emotionally involved. In fact our whole country was very involved in president elections and campaigns against the war, it seemed everyone really cared.
Reese, Philip. Public Agenda Foundation. The Health Care Crisis: Containing Costs, Expanding Coverage. New York: McGraw, 2002.
With congress passing ObamaCare last year we are taking baby steps towards a health system overhaul we so desperately need. The skeptics, though, still argue against it, citing the costs as too much or that it’s un-american. Health care is a basic need for everyone, and as such should be right protected and provided for by the government. There are great, economic, moral, and social benefits to be reaped, and so it is important for our government to continue down this path its started and also important for Americans to provide our full support. There is much to overcome to completely reverse the direction of the health system, and I’m sure it will take many years for the results to pay off, but I’m glad we’ve at least provided the groundwork for future generations to build
Michael Moore used comical tactics as a way to appeal to his audience in this piece of literature. Michael Moore’s argument is that capitalism is destroying the nation’s economy rather than helping to develop it. The poor are suffering, while the richer are getting richer. The arguments that Moore used may not be considered tangible by all, but he definitely did have the evidence to support his argument. Michael Moore purpose was to expose this ground breaking issue of the dominance of corporate America through video. He used the web source as a source to get his message across because he knew the internet would be accessible to many people. Moore in this film used the different elements of reasoning to identify the message he was sending to his audience.
Reinventing Healthcare-A Fred Friendly Seminar was produced in 2008. The film explores the current issues in health care at that time. This paper explores the issues that were addressed in the movie and compares them to the problems of health care today.
Despite the established health care facilities in the United States, most citizens do not have access to proper medical care. We must appreciate from the very onset that a healthy and strong nation must have a proper health care system. Such a health system should be available and affordable to all. The cost of health services is high. In fact, the ...
Among the 13 nations that have advanced modern medical facilities, USA is ranked 12th and this is primarily because the service brought on board overly by the entire medical industry is poor. World Health Organization equates medical service in US to that offered in less technologically ...
The U.S. healthcare system is very complex in structure hence it can be appraised with diverse perspectives. From one viewpoint it is described as the most unparalleled health care system in the world, what with the cutting-edge medical technology, the high quality human resources, and the constantly-modernized facilities that are symbolic of the system. This is in addition to the proliferation of innovations aimed at increasing life expectancy and enhancing the quality of life as well as diagnostic and treatment options. At the other extreme are the fair criticisms of the system as being fragmented, inefficient and costly. What are the problems with the U.S. healthcare system? These are the questions this opinion paper tries to propound.
Rising medical costs are a worldwide problem, but nowhere are they higher than in the U.S. Although Americans with good health insurance coverage may get the best medical treatment in the world, the health of the average American, as measured by life expectancy and infant mortality, is below the average of other major industrial countries. Inefficiency, fraud and the expense of malpractice suits are often blamed for high U.S. costs, but the major reason is overinvestment in technology and personnel.
Massive profits can be made by insurance companies and doctors alike. The profits American doctors are known to have high paying salaries as a result of the stress on medical quality. Even though these doctors are paid quite well, they often work tough hours and have to act impartial while also trying to achieve the best care they can. It proves to be a tough job, and requires a lot of training. If the pay is not sufficient, medical quality cannot be properly assured. The PBS frontline video previously mentioned also explored the healthcare system found in Switzerland. The video displayed that the system was under strain, but the drug companies were still making a profit due to the United States market which is less regulated (PBS Frontline, 2008). It seems if the country is not profitable for companies, they will focus research and time on other areas, diverting research and time away from the quality healthcare required locally. The healthcare systems around the world gives insight of what other people have tried, but what is the best way to address this