Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Characteristic of italian baroque art
Proto-baroque paintings
Baroque vs renaissance paintings
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Characteristic of italian baroque art
Correggio’s Mannerist Assumption of the Virgin and Fra Andrea Pozzo’s Italian Baroque The Glorification of St. Ignatius, both illustrate exemplary visions of illusionistic images and mean to celebrate Christianity with both Correggio’s visualization of Catholicism’s key doctrines and Pozzo’s illustration glorifying the Jesuit order. Both church domes frescoes include heavenly, illusory images of looking into the heavens, making viewers feel as if they were being pulled up into the heavens and inspired awe, while bolstering the faith of the churchgoers.
Corregio, Antonio Allegri, was born in Correggio a small farming community in the Po valley. He may have received some basic training in the art from his uncle, the painter Lorenzo Allegri, or from the artist Francesco de Bianchi Ferrari, however his first real inspiration came from Andrea Mantegna, who may have also trained him (Ekserdjian). His work is also inspired by
…show more content…
Lorenzo Costa, Leonardo Da Vinci, Raphael, and Michelangelo. In 1522 he received a commission from wealthy citizens of Parma to paint the dome, apse as well as the choir vault of Parma Cathedral thanks to his successful work done in the two Benedictine churches of San Benedetto Po and S Paolo. Crowning Parma’s most important sacred space, The Assumption of The Virgin not only illustrates her joyful reunion with her son, it also visualizes key Catholic doctrines, celebrates the city’s return to Papal States and symbolizes the final union of the faithful with the divine (Khan). Though it is an octagonal dome, Correggio makes it feel as if it is wholly circular and seamless. Its illusionistic imagery with his use of one point perspective, foreshortened figures and Mannerism’s ambiguous space all help to make the viewer feel as if they were part of the scene and instilled stronger feelings of devotion and as such is considered part of the Catholic counter-reformation against Protestantism. While the contract didn’t specify the fresco’s subject, there is no doubt that the Assumption was always intended for the dome as the cathedral was actually dedicated to the Virgin’s assumption (Eskerdijan, 242).
Correggio used red chalk cartoons/designos to plan his work and there have also been suggestions that he may have used wax or clay models along with a small-scale model of the dome in order to study the di sotto in su “from below to above” perspective (Ekserdjian). The base of the dome, the squinches are decorated with the four saints of Parma: St. John the Baptist, St. Hilary, St. Bernard & St. Thomas; just above that the apostles gaze in wonder & bewilderment, while throngs of angels swirl around the Virgin Mary to accompany her to reunite with son Christ. Eve is there alongside the Virgin with apple in outstretched hand, as well as Adam who stands over with the men, holding his hand over his chest; both actions seem to suggest their acknowledgement for their parts in the original sin for which the Virgin’s son sacrificed
himself. However, what should have been Correggio’s lifetime achievement may not have been very well received. The anecdote about one of the canons of the cathedral denouncing it as “a stew of frogs’ legs” is apparently supported by a letter by Bernardino Gatti, written when he was at work on the cupola of the Steccata, in which he refers ominously, to what happened to Correggio at the cathedral (Ekserdijan, 254). Correggio never garnered as much popularity as he did posthumously, especially amongst Italian Baroque artists who found a kindred spirit in him (Ekserdjian). One such member of the Italian Baroque movement was Fra Andrea Pozzo. Pozzo was an Italian painter, architect, stage designer and an accomplished mathematician and wrote a treatise on perspective, releasing Perspectiva Pictorum et Architecturm in 1702 (Bussagli, 74). In 1665 he joined the Society of Jesus and remained a lay brother for the rest of his life, producing his most significant work for the order. His early works show the influence of the Lombard school which is characterized by a sculptural sense of form and dramatic gesture and is seen throughout his use of intense color and dramatic chiaroscuro (Bösel). In 1681 he was summoned to Rome by the General of the Order, Padre Giovanni Paolo Oliva, where he was initially used as a stage designer until leaders of the order saw the illusory images he was creating and commissioned him for larger frescos such as The Glorification of St. Ignatius. In 1684 he began working on the completion of the Church of St. Ignazio, where his first task was to find an aesthetically pleasing fix to the dome of the crossing that had been unfinished by Orazio Grassi; he did so by painting a false perspective of a dome with a lantern on a tambour of canvas meant to be set inside the already painted dome (Bösel). He then started working on The Glorification of St. Ignatius fresco on the nave vault honoring the church’s namesake, the founder of the Jesuit Order of which dealt with Catholic education and missionary work around the world. Using quadratura, perspective di sotto in sù, and a central focal point he created illusionistic imagery of the architecture of the building extending and opening up into the heavens giving the viewer the effect of feeling as if they were being pulled into the heavens, much like Correggio’s Assumption. Drawing from the most recent achievements of Roman fresco painting, virtuoso grouping of figures in deep space and flickering patterns of light and shade, and combining it with early Baroque’s quadrature technique, Pozzo created a fresco that surpasses all earlier works with its dynamic effect and power of persuasion (Bösel). The image focuses on St Ignatius and his work with the Jesuit order; in the center of this heavenly space between Heaven & Earth, Christ receives St. Ignatius in the presence of personifications of the four corners of the world. A woman riding a camel depicts Asia, a black-skinned woman riding a crocodile depicts Africa, a bare-breasted woman wielding an arrow, wearing a feather headdress and riding a mountain lion is America and a blonde woman wearing a crown, holding a scepter & riding a horse represents Europe. The main message behind this is that the Jesuit order has sent missionaries throughout all the four corners of the world to educate the people about Christianity as well as to help those in need. The Glorification of St. Ignatius is also considered part of the Catholic Counter-Reformation as all of the elements within the image helped to ensure & bolster the faithful’s devotion to the Catholic Church. Both Correggio and Pozzo masterfully demonstrate awe-inspiring illusionistic images within church domes that celebrate Christianity & Catholicism. Each is highly successful in opening up the domes to a heavenly space, breaking down the sense of reality and spiritually engaging the viewer into feeling as if they are part of the scene resulting in a reaffirmation of devotion to the church. In Correggio’s Assumption of the Virgin the narrative behind is that of the Virgin after her death being escorted up into heaven and being reunited with her son; in Pozzo’s The Glorification of St. Ignatius not only is St. Ignatius going up into heaven but the four corners of the world is rising up into heaven due to the missionary work of the Jesuit order.
Another example of Christian iconography is The Transfiguration. It is located in the Church of Saint Catherine’s monaster...
In the two different depictions of the scene Betrayal of Christ, Duccio and Giotto show their different styles on how they compose their paintings. The first decision into the composure of the painting would be the comparison of the size of surface they chose to paint on. Duccio in comparison to Giotto chooses to work on a wooden panel no wider than a foot, and Giotto went with a plaster surface with a width of ten feet. This detail alone lets the viewer know that Giotto’s artwork is embedded in detail and visual consumption. The size difference is the factor between who see’s it and what they see; the fine details and symbolism of the narrative will be better understood if the viewer can see every detail.
Gentileschi’s Judith Slaying Holofernes epitomizes the style of artwork during the Italian Baroque era. By using a Catholic subject and key elements and techniques essential to baroque art such as chiaroscuro and foreshortening, she was able to create a piece that gushes drama and realism. Without the use of all of these elements the effect would be lost, but instead the piece is one that moves the viewer with its direct and gritty realism of the religious subject, evoking emotion in a way that leaves the viewer in awe.
John looks down towards the Christ Child, and he together with the child and Mary form a triangular composition on the left side of the frame with the Christ Child as the focus. St. John is the patron saint of Florence, referencing Sellaio’s Florentine origin. He holds his hands together similar to the Christ Child, in reference to praying for his wellbeing. He also smiles reverently, matching Christ and Mary to establish the happiness brought by Christ’s birth.
There is deep space on a flat surface. The museum wall caption mentions “Roman art Inspiration”, and this is evident in the Fra Carnevale, as the painting captures the church in the early days with the people dressed in long, colorful robes flowing to the floor. The church in this context the roman church is a place of culture where people are free to express themselves and their different ideologies. The church belongs to everyone and everyone is welcome. Lastly, there are striking examples of architectural fantasy and expertly calculated mathematical perspective (Metropolitan Museum of Art, 1951).
The artists of the Baroque had a remarkably different style than artists of the Renaissance due to their different approach to form, space, and composition. This extreme differentiation in style resulted in a very different treatment of narrative. Perhaps this drastic stylistic difference between the Renaissance and Baroque in their treatment of form, space, and composition and how these characteristics effect the narrative of a painting cannot be seen more than in comparing Perugino’s Christ Delivering the Keys of the Kingdom to St. Peter from the Early Renaissance to Caravaggio’s Conversion of St. Paul from the Baroque.Perugino was one of the greatest masters of the Early Renaissance whose style ischaracterized by the Renaissance ideals of purity, simplicity, and exceptional symmetry of composition. His approach to form in Christ Delivering the Keys of the Kingdom to St.Peter was very linear. He outlined all the figures with a black line giving them a sense of stability, permanence, and power in their environment, but restricting the figures’ sense of movement. In fact, the figures seem to not move at all, but rather are merely locked at a specific moment in time by their rigid outline. Perugino’s approach to the figures’themselves is extremely humanistic and classical. He shines light on the figures in a clear, even way, keeping with the rational and uncluttered meaning of the work. His figures are all locked in a contrapposto pose engaging in intellectual conversation with their neighbor, giving a strong sense of classical rationality. The figures are repeated over and over such as this to convey a rational response and to show the viewer clarity. Perugino’s approach to space was also very rational and simple. He organizes space along three simple planes: foreground, middle ground, and background. Christ and Saint Peter occupy the center foreground and solemn choruses of saints and citizens occupy the rest of the foreground. The middle distance is filled with miscellaneous figures, which complement the front group, emphasizing its density and order, by their scattered arrangement. Buildings from the Renaissance and triumphal arches from Roman antiquity occupy the background, reinforcing the overall classical message to the
The main theme can simply be seen easily is religion. At first glance you can see why the title is so fitting. The Angel is seen pointing up while hold a tombstone, as if leading Jesus up. Jesus is shown above him pointing in the same direction almost as if talking about heaven. You can tell who Jesus is not only by his placement but by the cloth, light halo, and possible makes on his head from the thorn crown. The dramatic size as well gives it a religious feel. Cecco again shows he uncanny ability to resemble Caravaggio to build connection. Caravaggio’s work surround religion had the ability to provide “ direct communication..[and] establish” a bond “between the spectator and the sacred scene[s]” (Chorpenning 145).“When standing up close I felt that looking up I was another person there looking to where he is pointing. The dramatic scene is something to behold in person that is so interesting. The contrast of the angel and Jesus who are lighter than anyone else from the dark background make them stand out. The light sources that help bring in contrast is like a ray of light or even a spotlight light. The way the light falls helps reinforce the importance of Jesus and
The ability to create a picture of The Annunciation in one’s mind is a key factor in understanding the analysis of the work. Francisco de Zurbaran approaches the painting with a naturalistic style. The painting features a room in which a woman – like angel is seen at the left kneeling on the ground before the Virgin Mary. The figure of Mary is placed between a chair and a small wooden table draped with a green cloth. Mary disregards an open Bible on the table, as she appears solemn while staring at the floor. Floating above the two main figures in the upper left side of the painting are cherubs resting on a bed of clouds. They happily gaze down at Mary with eyes from Heaven.
While the Flemish were proficient in oil painting, Italian Renaissance artists continued their predecessor’s use of tempera. Furthermore, the paintings were ultimately created for different purposes and separate viewers. Although both works are centered on the defining moment of the annunciation, The Merode Altarpiece incorporates this scene into a secular setting, therefore differing from Fra Angelico’s The Annunciation which was painted for a monastery. Finally, Flemish and Italian Renaissance paintings differ in levels of realism. Although the Flemish painters were skilled in portraying realism of physical forms, they lacked a full understanding of linear perspective. In contrast, the Italian Renaissance artists were well versed in linear perspective but lacked a complete grasp of the natural
The two works I have chosen to explore for the final project are a stone sculpture by Gislebertus, and a Fresco by Giotto, both titled Last Judgment. Gislebertus’ stone sculpture is from the Romanesque era, made between 1120-1135 and is located at the Church of St. Lazare’s Tympanum in Autun, France. Giotto’s Reformation Art is a Fresco from the Late Gothic or Proto-Renaissance/Renaissance era, dated 1306 and is located at the Scrovegni Arena Chapel in Padua, Italy. My focus will be on discovering each artwork’s Christian representation and function during these periods. Although the artists use strikingly different methods to deliver their message, each convey the same theme and significant influence of their time; a persons’ soul was ultimately subject to divine judgment. Through a beautiful fresco painting and an artistic carving of stone, both works of art tell their own narrative that encourages us to examine
In the Florence Cathedral, Florence, Italy, there is a cathedral church whose octagonal dome, built without the aid of scaffolding, was considered the greatest engineering feat of the early Renaissance. Dedicated to Santa Maria del Fiore, Our Lady of the Flower, it is also known as the Duomo, after the Italian word for cathedral. Created by many great Early Modern artists, this piece of architecture is a perfect example the Renaissance style. We can come to a better understanding of why this is so by exploring what the characteristics of the Renaissance “style”. To understand the properties of the Florence Cathedral that fit the Early Modern style, I will begin with a description and its history. The cathedral's architectural style, although greatly influenced by French Gothic elements remained distinctively Florentine, especially the geometric patterns of red, green, and white marble on the building's exterior. Construction of the cathedral began in 1294 on the site of a Christian church founded in the 6th or 7th century and continued until 1436. Several celebrated Italian architects were involved in the project, including Giotto, Arnolfo di Cambio, Andrea Orcagna, and, most notably, Filippo Brunelleschi, who was responsible for designing and building the dome. The cathedral's exterior is ornamented with sculpture and mosaics by Italian artists Donatello, Nanni di Banco, and Domenico Ghirlandaio, among others. The building's stained-glass windows are the work of the Italian architect and artist Lorenzo Ghiberti, and the interior is decorated with sculpture and fresco paintings by several Renaissance masters. Construction of the campanile (bell tower), situated to the right of the entrance to the Duomo, was begun by Giotto and completed according to his plans in 1359, after his death. Nearly 278 ft high, the campanile is embellished with red, green, and white marble panels of relief sculpture by Italian artists Andrea Pisano and Luca della Robbia, and niches with sculpted figures by Donatello and other masters. Facing the cathedral and campanile is a smaller, octagonal structure, the Baptistery of San Giovanni, noted for its gilt-bronze doors, elaborately worked in high relief by Andrea Pisano and Lorenzo Ghiberti. With that background information about the cathedral, one question comes to mind: what is it that makes the Renaissance style distinct? Renaissa...
Piero della Francesca presented an iconic image of the Renaissance in Italy in his own way, highlighting the two most important idols of the Catholic church, Jesus Christ and the Virgin Mary. Through oil paint, he connected sacred biblical meanings into his own masterpiece. He devoted Christ to portray him in a scene of blessing with his surroundings and other holy figures. The Madonna and Child with Two Angels (Senigallia Madonna), is a piece created with such emphasized meaning and such divinity of the holy, Jesus Christ and his mother the Virgin Mary.
I chose “The Martyrdom of St. Matthew” as the painting that best illustrates the baroque period. The reasons surrounding my decision are clear in Caravaggio’s painting. Here Caravaggio uses the entire canvas to illustrate complexity, flow, and chiaroscuro. The painting depicts the source of lighting to be coming from the left side of the plane. The brightest light focuses directly on Matthew’s executioner who intends to strike Matthew with an old balcanic hand weapon. Caravaggio masterfully illustrates the use of lighting by casting believable shadows. As an example, the shadow of the handle on balcanic hand weapon reflects on the executioner’s left thigh and knee. Another shadow appears on the executioner’s right inner thigh. The lighting source to the left of the executioner, the executioner, St. Matthews, the boy, the 2 observer’s bottom, right, and the fainter lighting upper left of the canvas illustrates the technique of visual movement. The lighting is placed strategically, causing visual movement within the piece. For example, the illumination of the executioner’s forearm directs my attention to the angel who appears to be handing St. Matthew a palm leaf. As a result, my eyes then focuses on the body of St. Matthew, lying on the bottom of the altar, then my eyes shifts up toward the Angle’s arm. The lighting on the angel's arm contrasted with the darkness of the palm leaf forces the viewer to look at the hand to see what St. Matthew is reaching for. The boy fleeing the scene further draws in the viewer. The two adult observers at the bottom right of the painting are illuminated but not as bright as the two main characters. Next, my attention is drawn to the man lying on the bottom steps, left side of the canv...
... the way that the artwork is resembled in the religious background of the gospel but reconstructed in to a celebrating impression. Throughout the fresco painting it depicts the myth of the Christ’s three fold temptations relating back to the article that “distinction between fresco and panel painting is sharp, and that painters are seen as competitors amongst themselves discriminating also, between the difference in genuine attempts in being better then the other.” Baxandall, “Conditions of Trade,” 26. in relation, the painting concerns the painter’s conscious response to picture trade, and the non-isolation in pictorial interests.
In a brightly-lit corner of St Peter’s Basilica, sitting behind a clear panel of glass, is Michelangelo’s Pietà. A marble-white sculpture of the Mother Mary, her eyes downcast, gazes at her Son who lies dead across her lap. She seems both devastated and deep in thought. She is young and beautiful, in line with the old belief that a perfect soul meant a perfect outward appearance (Smart 122). She is famous and celebrated, and is visited by Christians from every nation.