As it is written: “There is no one righteous, not even one” Known for his raw, punctuation-barren prose and biblical symbolism, Cormac McCarthy is one of the most highly regarded writers of our time. In his novel, No Country for Old Men, McCarthy explores biblical doctrine in a parabolic manner and illustrates the depravity of society through his signature macabre lens. Through a story about a drug deal gone awry and the deadly chase that ensues, McCarthy unravels a theological discussion about man’s relationship with sin. His bloody story is one that parallels Romans 3:10, which says: “There is no one righteous, not even one”(English Standard Version Rom. 3:10). Through the actions of a hitman, a war veteran and a sheriff, he reveals that human righteousness is impossible due to our …show more content…
inherent sinful nature.
The antagonist of No Country is an emotionless, compassionless hitman by the name of Anton Chigurh; his victims do not understand him, police are baffled by his exploits and the reader is stunned by his ruthlessness. McCarthy created this Herod-esque character to represent a man who is driven solely by his evil nature, possessing “principles that transcend money or drugs or anything like that” (McCarthy, 153), and are instead rooted in pride, power and death. The opening scene of McCarthy’s novel describes a brutal killing that involves an innocent state trooper, Anton Chigurh and an asphyxiation with handcuffs. Later, Chigurh reveals that he “let [the trooper] take [him] into town in handcuffs”(174), because he “wanted to see if [he] could extricate [himself] by an act of will”(175). Not only did Chigurh commit a sin of murder but also, he arrogantly flaunts his murderous talents in a self-righteous manner. Clearly, this murder was in effort to satisfy an inner sinful pride. Further, This demonstrates Chigurh’s susceptibility to his sinful nature; he was consumed by his evil pride and consequently committed a sinful act, thus making
him unrighteous. Intertwined with his evil pride is a strong lust for power that influences many killings of innocent people. During the murder of Carla Jean, Anton remarks that “even a nonbeliever might find it useful to model himself after God” (256). Here, Anton reveals that The reason he kills so many innocent people is because he has a blasphemous desire to act as though he were God. By determining their fate through his murderous sin, Chigurh is able to satisfy this primordial covetous for power. In addition, Chigurh possesses a desire for murder itself. During a deadly confrontation with another hitman named Carson Wells, Anton refuses a bribe saying, “It’s a good payday. It’s just the wrong currency… [death] doesn’t mean to me what it does to you” (174-177). This passage contrasts both hitmen’s motives. Wells is a hitman for monetary gain while, Chigurh murders to quench his thirst for the sin itself. Subsequently, Chigurh dispatches Wells despite his knowledge of the stolen money and satisfies his desire for murder. Chigurh did not oppose his inherent evil nature in any of these situations but instead embraced it and was consumed by it and as a result, he committed countless sins. In Contrast to Chigurh’s homicidal opening, Llewelyn Moss appears to be a source of righteousness at the outset of the novel. Despite this initial perception, Moss quickly demonstrates that he is plagued by the love of money, a sinful desire similar to that of Chigurh and detrimental pride. At the beginning of the novel, Llewelyn stumbles across a large sum of money within the carnage of a spoiled drug deal. Even though there “was the dead certainty that someone was going to come for the money”(19), Moss was undeterred from stealing the money, because in his opinion, “His whole life was sitting there in front of him. Day after day until he was dead. All of it cooked down into forty pounds of paper in a satchel.”(18). Moss’ love of money is so strong in this situation that he disregards the implications of theft and exposes himself and his loved ones to the imminent wrath of the cartel. This impulsive decision catalyzes his descent into more sin and instigates Chigurh’s relentless torment. Parabolically, McCarthy reveals the truth that: “the love of money is a root of all kinds of evils… through this craving some have… pierced themselves with many pangs.” (1 Tim. 6:10). Moreover, Moss’ love for money lead him to realize a desire to continue his sinfulness. When questioned about his criminal status, he remarked that: “[he was] sorry [he] didn’t start sooner” (228). At this point, it is evident that Llewelyn has possesses a natural inclination and attraction to sin. He no longer commits sins for protection from Chigurh but, instead continues to sin for pleasure. Ultimately, Moss’ criminal activity comes to an abrupt halt when he is captured and murdered by Chigurh. However, only after his death does the power of his pride fully manifest itself. Even though Moss “had the opportunity to remove [Carla Jean] from harm’s way... he chose not to do so”(256), because his Chigurh’s conditions were humiliating. Although he valued Carla Jean’s life, his pride was worth more. Through this, McCarthy illustrates the strength that evil pride has upon a man. Essentially, McCarthy’s portrayal of Moss shows that even men who appear righteous are inherently evil within. Although Sheriff Ed Tom Bell may seem to be the most righteous character in the novel, he too is driven by sinful motives. Subtly, through pride, selfishness and realizations McCarthy uses Sheriff Bell to illustrate unrighteous nature. Early on in the novel, Tom describes an incident where a he parked his cruiser outside a cafe just after a killer had “ shot all the glass out of one side of [it]” (39). In his recollection, Tom admits that he arrogantly “show[ed] out” (39), in effort to impress the cafes patrons and gain their admiration. As Sheriff, Tom has the obligation to enact justice upon criminals to protect his county's people but he failed to do so. In this situation, Tom disregarded the safety of his people to quench his sinful pride. Later in the story, McCarthy begins to reveal Tom’s struggle with selfishness through a flashback to his experience as a soldier. After taking a “blood oath to look after the men”(268) in his regiment, Tom selfishly abandons his post, leaving behind wounded and unprotected men to be killed by Nazis. Regretfully, he admits that: “if [he] was supposed to die over there doing what [he]’d given his word to do, then that’s what [he] should have done”( 278). Naturally, when faced with the possibility of death, Ed Tom’s intrinsic self-preservation won out over his obligation to protect his comrades. McCarthy’s parabolic writing is evident, as he uses Tom’s selfish nature to show that: “whoever knows the right thing to do and fails to do it, for him it is sin”( Jam. 4:17), furthering his argument about man’s unrighteousness. At the end of the novel, Bell’s trajectory concludes with the realization of his sinfulness, saying: “I always thought that when I got older I’d be good enough for God to come into my life in some way. he didn’t. I don't blame him. If I was him I’d have the same opinion about me that he does”(283). This expression of conviction shows that Sheriff Tom understands he is still sinful despite his good works. As hard as he tries, he is unable to be righteous like God because of his sinful nature. Ed Tom Bell is portrayed as a righteous character but, with inspection, it is revealed that McCarthy wished to show that even great men are unrighteous at their core. In No Country For Old Men, the actions of Chigurh, Moss and Bell contrast on the surface. With further analysis, it is evident that each character possesses an inherent evil nature that has been present since their conception (Psa. 51:5). McCarthy’s illustration of this sobering truth provokes
In Cormac McCarthy’s book The Road, the two main characters struggle to keep moving forward. Their motivation to push onward is found in the bottom levels of Maslow’s hierarchy of needs; which are physiological, safety, and emotional. Each of the levels are equally important in order for the man to reach self-actualization. In order to reach the top level, however, the man must fulfill the bottom levels first.
...g him, the ending of this story would be much different. The more high-class society refuses to help those in need, and care only of their own gain the less lower society will have increasing criminal activity. Criminals have to do their part also, staying blind and letting societies inner workings manipulate them does not help anyone especially not themselves. By over expressing society and making a simple-minded hero, Callaghan creates an extreme example of what can happen when society denies rehabilitation. If everyone in this story had worked together in a positive way Red Ryan’s life and Kip Caley’s fictional story may have had a happier ending
From an objective viewpoint, morality is merely a result of beliefs and values instilled by a singular culture: an action might fit moral codes for one but may be heinous for another. Purpose is dependent on morality for its basis; consequently, a lack of clear morality due to conflicting ideas leads to a lack of purpose. In war, purpose is the driving force behind the movement of troops and determination of individuals. Therefore, if there is no clear purpose, then soldiers must instead rely on honor. Honor – independent of purpose – draws upon loyalty and self-image to distract from the lack of clear moral boundaries. In his novel Going After Cacciato, Tim O’Brien uses the character Cacciato to show the contrast between purpose and honor,
Flannery O’Connor and William Faulkner refuse to surrender to the temptation of writing fanciful stories where the hero defeats the villain and everyone lives happily ever after. Instead, these two writers reveal realistic portrayals of death and the downfall of man. Remarkably, O’Connor and Faulkner’s most emotionally degraded characters fail to believe that an omnipotent deity controls their fate. This belief directly correlates to the characters’ inability to follow a strict set of morals or value human life. On the other hand, one might expect Faulkner and O’Connor’s “Christian” characters to starkly contrast the vile heathens who deny the existence of God. However, these characters struggle to follow their own standards of morality.
Heroes are not always credited for their honesty and righteousness. This is the view towards society that Robert Cormier exhibits in the novel ¡§I am the Cheese¡¨, where the individual is punished for standing up to himself. In this society, the non-valiant are rewarded for their ignorance and compliance, narrated through the characters of Grey and Whipper. Moreover, Robert Cormier portrays this society to be void of truth and justice. This is seen through exploring the innocence behind Adam¡¦s parents¡¦ suffering and death. Nevertheless, the author holds reserve for truth and justice when Adam tries to complete the puzzle of his past.
In Cormac McCarthy’s The Road, the author makes various references to the Bible and to religion. Those references also can be compared on how they have changed the way of humans in real life. Along with how the boy maintains his innocence throughout this whole book even when he witnessed events that could’ve changed him. The man tried to the best of his abilities to preserve the innocence of the boy. Through all of the obstacles that they both faced, the man managed to keep the boy safe and even in his last moments he was sure that he taught his boy how to tell when people were good.
Chigurh the main antagonist of the film No Country for Old Men by Ethan and Joel Coen may seem like cold blooded and emotionless killer which is kind of correct but he is not a psychotic killer with no morals. Even the worst criminals have some form of morals. Chigurh's morals are just not easily understandable since most people do not see in the perspective of Chigurh a paid
The chosen sequence I will analyze is the Production/Editing of the film No Country for Old Men. This film which came out in 2007 was based on the novel written by Cormac MaCarthy of the same name. The movie was written/adapted, and directed by Joel and Ethan Coen (a.k.a. the Coen brothers). The film is often referred to as a neo-western thriller due to its degree of genre mixing as it tells the story of an ordinary man whom by chance stumbles on a fortune that is not his, and the ensuing cat-and-mouse drama as the paths of three men are brought together into the desert landscape of 1980s Texas.
Anton Chigurh is a hired psychopathic hit man in charge of recovering the money. Sheriff Bell is a local Texas sheriff committed to save Moss's life but is unsuccessful. This novel should be considered an important piece of American literature because we see the effects of greed, violence, and corruption. McCarthy really brings these characteristics to life in this novel. McCarthy is an American novelist, playwright and screenwriter.
In Cormac McCarthy’s novel, The Crossing, McCarthy uses techniques to convey the impact of the experience on the main character. McCarthy uses imagery, tone, and figurative language often to help the readers actually get into the story and helps them become part of it. McCarthy uses those techniques to get readers more involved in the story like they were in it themselves. As I read the story I imagine being in the man’s place and couldn't imagine doing what he did.
As the motivational speaker Rob Liano says, “Knowledge on its own is nothing, but the application of useful knowledge, now that is powerful.” Agree or not, but in the novel Inherit the Wind by Jerome Lawrence and Robert E. Lee, the application of knowledge leads the city of Hillsboro to accept the unprecedented ideas which they quickly oppose due to the conflict with their religious principles. Bertram Cates, a school teacher, is on trial for teaching evolution to his class, and the closely-knit Christian community of Hillsboro strictly opposes any theory that questions the Bible’s legitimacy. The infamous defense attorney, Henry Drummond, defends Cates and Matthew Harrison Brady, who is a firm believer in Christianity and three time presidential
What type of person comes to mind when one hears “sinner”? Perhaps the mind is clogged with pictures of demonic entities or violence. Others may conjure up images of the Ten Commandments. “The Life You Save may be your Own” by Flannery O’Connor is filled with sin. This story focuses on faith, religion, and refusing redemption. From sayings and signs to the author’s view of faith, one can learn about how sin can affect the lives of these characters.
One Flew Over the Cuckoo’s Nest, written by Ken Kesey is a confronting novel that captures the essence of power and manipulation and the battle to maintain it. Set in a psychiatric ward in 1960s America, Kesey explores Nurse Ratched’s oppressive rule over the ward and her continual manipulation and exploitation of the weak and fragile patients. The arrival of R. P. McMurphy and his rebellious and defiant ways leads to a series of battles between the two characters as they struggle to maintain a position of power and status within the ward. Kesey presents the ideas of vulnerability and strength using a variety of literary devices and explains these ideas through how characters’ behaviours are influenced by the power of knowledge. Through his characters, Kesey explores the consequences of manipulation and exploitation, the injustice and lack of care that the patients are subject to, the results of rebellion and the consequential growth in confidence of the patients, and the boundaries between sanity and insanity, with devastating effect, echoing the conflicts of his time.
The setting of McCarthy’s No Country for Old Men is mostly 1980s Texas. The action takes place in both rural and wilderness areas in Texas as well as in towns along the Texas-Mexico border. For a short period of time, the setting briefly turns to a hospital in Mexico. The story takes place during the drug wars of the 1980s. With the drug wars came a lawlessness reminiscent of organized crime in the 1920s when Al Capone ruled Chicago or of cowboy outlaws during the early settlement of the west.
No matter how hard one may try, no matter how hard one pretends, the inevitable is the absolute. Cat’s Cradle, by Kurt Vonnegut explores the futility of human action or inaction in deterring the imminent. Vonnegut encapsulates this idea within the made-up religion of “Bokononism”. A religion of realism, followers of Bokononism are called to find comfort in knowing that whatever does happen was always going to happen; therefore, the inevitable is unavoidable and should be embraced.