On October 27,1998, the Copyright Term Extension Act (CTEA) was signed into law by President Bill Clinton. At the time the European Union had adopted a directive requiring its states to establish the new copyright terms of the life of the author plus and additional seventy years. In order to keep the balance of payment the United States had to adjust the copyright terms. Otherwise under the “rule of shorter term,” the United States copyrights would not be protected in Europe past the expiration of the shorter U.S. term.
The CTEA also had important incentives for creators as well. For example, song writer Alan Menken testified: ‘If it becomes clear that insufficient copyright protection available to provide that support, there will be less incentive to try to make one’s living as a creator.’ This is also true for corporate copyright owners, such as Disney Corp, who rely on the income from works to finance productions, as well as the ultimate beneficiary- the public domain. Witch will be enriched by the added inflow of creative intellectual works over a long term.
…show more content…
It extended the copyright act for individuals from, the life of the author plus and additional fifty years, to the life of the author plus and additional seventy years. As for works of corporate authorship the CTEA extended the copyright from seventy-five years to one hundred and twenty years after creation or ninety-five years after publication, whichever endpoint comes first. For works prior to January 1,1978, the copyright was increased by twenty years to a total of ninety-five years. Any other works that are unclaimed are referred to as “orphan works”, these types of works are still presumed to be cover under the copyright act as
...nd a strong message that the illegal distribution of copyrighted works has consequences, but if individuals are willing to step forward on their own, we want to go the extra step and extend this option" (RIAA 1).
Details of copyright law vary between nation countries, however, many nations share a common interest through two international copyright treaty membership agreements, the Berne Convention (which consists of 164 member states) and the Buenos Aires Convention (which is an agreement between North and South American countries,) The treaties, established in order to protect an authors’/creators’ original work from copying - whether it be literary, dramatic, design, musical or artistic.
The central message of this text is that increasingly, outdated copyright laws are being manipulated and put to use in a ludicrous manner. This is resulting in the suppression of people’s ability to generate and share their own creative expressions.
“Copyright is a fundamental right of ownership and protection common to all of the arts” (O’Hara & Beard, 2006, p. 8). “It is a form of intellectual Property (IP)” and it gives the owner exclusive rights to the copyright (O’Hara & Beard, 2006, p. 11).
...s. In short, this is an important issue to consider because composers deserve to be financially credited with their work.
Abstract: In 1995 Lance Rose and Esther Dyson wrote articles in Wired Magazine expressing polarized views on the future of copyright law and copyright infringement. This essay reviews those articles, analyzes each article's accuracy as defined by current trends years later.
...ts new and old artist from having their original forms of expression stolen. A performing artist or songwriter should have a good understanding of the factors of the copyright law. An artist always wants to protect their work so the wrong people can not abuse it. By having a deep knowledge about the copyright law, the artists can save themselves from paying endless unnecessary legal fees.
Public domain - after a copyright on a work runs out it passes into the public domain, where everyone and no one owns the work.
Copyright Law of the United States of America. (2013). Retrieved from Copyright United States Copyright Office.
Although online file sharing debuted in 1999, lawmakers and copyright industries are just beginning to address the myriad questions the practice has generated. In At Issue: Internet Piracy, authors attempt to answer some of those questions.
All of us know about the crimes committed every day by people all over the world. Theft, assault, grand theft auto, underage drinking, fraud, prostitution, and rape. But what about crimes on the internet? Last year, SOPA (Stop Online Piracy Act) was introduced to the world. If this bill was passed, many sites would have to censor certain pieces of information, as well as remove a lot of the content already uploaded. SOPA would also crack down on terminating torrent sites, which are used to share files such as music, movies, video games, e-books, and whatever else is a digital file. In my opinion, SOPA should not be passed due to the fact that censoring information on the internet is an act against the first amendment. SOPA should not be passed due to the fact that it goes against the first amendment and will lead to a corrupt information sharing system.
Harwood, E. (May 2004). Staying Afloat in the Internet Stream: How to Keep Web Radio from Drowning in Digital Copyright Royalties, Federal Communications Law Journal, 56(3), 673-697.
However, in recent years, it is not uncommon to see copyright in the possession of a third party other than the creator. These companies make use of copyright as an investment and financial tools to gain profit. In this case, the use of copyright loses its original purpose of protecting the creator, but used as a mean for financial gain. This could possibly hinder creativity as innovation becomes a financial tool catered to the tastes of the general public, while the less marketable new ideas goes unnoticed by the general public under the copyright laws. It is crucial to note that online platforms such as blogs, Facebook and Youtube, and people making their music/works available online for free shows the rapid surge in the number of people willing to sacrifice their copyrights to market themselves to the world. In this highly saturated market, copyright laws can become less relevant as marketing and business is placed on higher
Copyright infringement is a major issue with media ethics. Many people confuse copyright infringement with trademark infringement (Miller, 2012). However, copyright infringement is when someone unlawfully uses a particular work that is protected by copyright law. These works can include: movies, pictures, songs, albums, artwork, pieces of literature, and newspapers. There is no reason for any of the previous to be copyright infringed, because there are ways to correctly cite all of them as sources, without illegally copyright infringing them. Most people simply do not use their resources to help them with their citing.