Controversies In Andrew Jackson's Presidency

620 Words2 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: Jackson is responsible under the Indian Removal Act

Andrew Jackson
Jackson faced many controversies in his lifetime especially in his term of presidency. Some of Jackson’s controversies were The Indian Removal Act, The South Carolina Nullification, and The United States National Bank. When Jackson did all of the things he did he thought it was going to benefit the people. Some did some didn’t. All of which he handled a little different but most were handled in about the same way, by force.
The Indian Removal Act
In 1829 Andrew Jackson wrote a message to congress discussing the problem with the Indians living within the states. He said that they were either to live by the laws of the state or they would move them somewhere else by force. When they put this into place they offered the Indians free land and happiness. The trip to their new homes which was in Kansas was long and hard. Many people died on the trip to Kansas and once they got to their new homes it was cramped and a desert land which was what Lewis and Clark called it when they visited Kansas before the Indians came. The good thing was that even though they didn’t know at first Kansas had really rich soil which
He found out that they were using the money to gamble and if they won they would keep all their winnings for themselves but if they lost they would make the bank pay for it and take other people's money to pay it off. Jackson called the bankers vipers and theives. If Jackson didn’t get rid of them he said it would be a sin on his behalf because he knew about it and it cost many people lots of money. Jackson also knew that they would hurt his political reputation. He knew he had to get rid of them at any cost. Once Jackson became president he followed up on his threat and shut them down immediately. He had the least amount of debt from the people in his term of presidency. Jackson handled this situation well because he did what he had to to help the

Show More
Related

  • Pros And Cons Of Andrew Jackson

    820 Words  | 2 Pages

    In the summer of 1832 and Congress renewed the Bank’s charter even though it wasn’t due until 1836. Jackson hesitated to approve of the charter, so Henry Clay and Nicholas Biddle went on the offensive to attempt to persuade Jackson to pass the bill. Jackson, having had his opinion on the banks cemented by Clay’s presence in the organization, then committed to de-establishing the Second National Bank. He waged war against Biddle in particular to make sure Biddle lost power. He vetoed the bank bill, and after winning the race to be reelected, he closed Biddle’s bank. He ordered his Secretary of the Treasury to move money from the Second National Bank to smaller, state banks. When Congress returned from its summer recess, it censured him for his actions. In 1836, Bank of US was dead, and the new democratic-congressmen expunged Jackson’s censure. Because Jackson had no formal plan for managing the nation’s funds after the Second National Bank closed, it caused problems in Van Buren’s administration. He destroyed the Bank of the United States, in the main, for personal reasons. Jackson hated the bank before his presidency because as a wealthy land and slave owner he had lost money due to its fiscal policies. He believed that Congress had no right under the constitution to charter a

    Read More

  • Andrew Jackson and the Bank War

    2332 Words  | 5 Pages

    ...lso difficult to relate to Jackson’s actions, since other factors occurring during the post- 1834 time period also affected the panic and not just the down fall of the Second Bank. Therefore, Jackson’s anti- bank views were not simply based on personal prejudice, the Second Bank had many questionable principles that had to be terminated.

    Read More

  • Jacksonian Democracy Dbq

    1046 Words  | 3 Pages

    Jackson was a strong opponent of the unequal and aristocrat dominated economic structure of most of America. He was very against the Bank of America because he believed it to have a monopoly on banking and felt that it was owned and run unjustly by wealthy aristocrats who were not always Americans (B). It must also be noted however, that while the Bank of America was undoubtedly corrupt (Nicholas Biddle is known to have given sums of money to close friends, and was also known to regularly bribe newspapers and similar media.) it also did what it was supposed to do very well. It provided money and credit to many of the lower classes that Jackson defended, and also was the source of much economic growth. As a result of this veto Jackson established pet banks in many Western areas to try to appease his main group of supporters and build up the rivalry between the agrarian South and West and the industrial North (C). Many immigrants found that one of the first things they discovered upon entering America was a sense of economic equality and lack of poverty, which are exactly the things Jackson was working towards (D). The case Charles River Bridge v. Warren Bridge decided that a charter given a person or group to do a service does not allow that group to have complete rights over this service. This decision supports the Jacksonian Democracy ideas that the rights of the community are more important than the rights of business (H).

    Read More

  • How Democratic Was Andrew Jackson Dbq

    589 Words  | 2 Pages

    The bank would be more for the rich and the foreign, but have no benefits for the poor. Jackson’s political rival, Daniel Webster, believes that this letter from Jackson showed just how evil Jackson was. Webster does not think Jackson was vetoing for the good of the people, but to ‘stir the pot’. By Jackson sending this letter, it causes a stir between the rich and the poor. The poor would feel imbalanced against the poor, and arguments would rush out.

    Read More

  • Andrew Jackson Document Based Question

    1140 Words  | 3 Pages

    Throughout the Jacksonian era the Jacksonians proved to be violators of the United States Constitution and not the guardians they believed themselves to be. Both the Jacksonians and President Jackson went against the Supreme Courts regarding cases that were said to be constitutional. In the Supreme Court case of Cherokee Nation v. Georgia, the Supreme Court ruled in favor of the Cherokee Nation. This ruling of the Supreme Court did not stop Jackson and the Jacksonians from driving the Cherokees off of their land, and by doing this the Constitution was violated. Also, when dealing with the south, Jackson and the Jacksonians were not guardians of the US Constitution. In vetoing the national bank, Jackson did so because he thought that the act that created it was not compatible with the constitution. However, the Supreme Court had already ruled that the bank was constitutional. In this act Jackson and the Jacksonians were not guarding the constitution, but they were utilizing it to suit their own needs. However sometimes the Judiciary and Executive branches agree such as the incident when South Carolina declared a reduced tariff void and threatened to secede, President Jackson responded in an unconstitutional manner. Jackson threatened to send militia to enforce the tariff implementation and the Jacksonian Congress passed a bill approving this military force, if necessary.

    Read More

  • Cruel and Inhuman Treatment of Native Americans by the Colonists

    1498 Words  | 3 Pages

    Unfortunately, this great relationship that was built between the natives and the colonists of mutual respect and gain was coming to a screeching halt. In the start of the 1830s, the United States government began to realize it’s newfound strength and stability. It was decided that the nation had new and growing needs and aspirations, one of these being the idea of “Manifest Destiny”. Its continuous growth in population began to require much more resources and ultimately, land. The government started off as simply bargaining and persuading the Indian tribes to push west from their homeland. The Indians began to disagree and peacefully object and fight back. The United States government then felt they had no other option but to use force. In Indian Removal Act was signed by Andrew Jackson on May 18, 1830. This ultimately resulted in the relocation of the Eastern tribes out west, even as far as to the edge of the Great Plains. A copy of this act is laid out for you in the book, Th...

    Read More

  • Andrew Jackson: A Man of Contradition

    2209 Words  | 5 Pages

    Andrew Jackson has been described as a great hero of his time and a man who was atrocious and would destroy the Union. Andrew Jackson accomplished a great number of things during his life but some of his actions were quite questionable. Looking from the present to the past gives insight into areas where the events can be examined more objectively. However, it is vital when examining past events to keep in mind the mindsets of the past. People had a different point of view and a different perspective than the current one. This must be kept in the forward part of the mind to understand the actions of those in the past. This paper will serve as a guide into the life of Andrew Jackson, his trials and tribulations, decisions and contradictions. From the beginning of his life, he was headstrong and that would lead him straight into the history books.

    Read More

  • Compare And Contrast Jefferson And Jacksonian Democracy

    1011 Words  | 3 Pages

    He was elected by popular vote. Jackson wanted to cater to the common people. Jackson was the first president to become a democrat. The other presidents before him were either a federalist, democratic-republican or a republican. He vetoed more than twelve bills than his six predecessors. He wanted to make sure his people were treated fairly. The first president, George Washington, to the sixth president, John Quincy Adams, only vetoed nine bills. The first six presidents before him were wealthy and educated. Andrew Jackson did not have much money and felt education was not really necessary. Overall, Jackson seemed to be a hero compared to the other presidents before him.

    Read More

  • Andrew Jackson: The People's King

    835 Words  | 2 Pages

    ... one of the stipulations and had to be settled. The removal of the Natives in an effort to protect the American people on the frontier proceeded, and was all the region of present-day Oklahoma, as shown in document L. These actions are viewed as cruel and unjust, but it was the way that would’ve dealt the least damage. Further delaying the issue would’ve soon set into altercations between the various Native tribes and the United States of America. In retrospect, Jackson served to protect the people.

    Read More

  • Conflict Between Andrew Jackson And The Cherokee

    1197 Words  | 3 Pages

    Some of these individual efforts worsened the outcome for the whole tribe. Jackson’s manipulative ways of handling this situation in office and out of office forced the Cherokee to make hard decisions, and I feel like these decision makers for the Cherokee failed miserably. The reason behind the lack of attack on Jackson is quite obvious, politicians have been acting like politicians well since the very beginning. As selfish and egocentric as his view was, he knew what the was going to do, and being president of this powerful nation not much any one nation could do to stop him let alone the nation of a tribe.

    Read More

  • Andrew Jackson

    713 Words  | 2 Pages

    Another example of how President Andrew Jackson shirked his responsibilities is by promoting legislation in favor of Indian removal and politically enforcing his actions through many means. He did this by signing many treaties in favor of the government, breaking treaties that were in favor of the Indians, building a systematic approach to Indian removal, and forcing Indians to sign treaties.

    Read More

  • How Did John Quincy Adams Win The Election Of 2000 Dbq

    625 Words  | 2 Pages

    Jackson detested the National Bank, so he decided to veto it once he became the president. He thought it favored the rich more than the common people. “It appears that more than a fourth part of the stock is held by foreigners and the (rest) is held by a few hundred of our own citizens, chiefly of the richest class,” Jackson stated in Document 2. To solve this problem, he transported deposits to smaller state buildings that were run by his intimates to allow for the access of people from all classes. Upon doing this, he was thinking as an autocrat. He might have been trying to balance out the money within the states, but this wasn’t the best solution, He made this decision while favoring the common people, plus he didn’t even think of the higher class

    Read More

  • The Legacy Of Andrew Jackson

    1363 Words  | 3 Pages

    Andrew Jackson is one of the most controversial presidents. Many regard him as a war hero, the father of the Democratic Party, an inspiring leader, and a spokesman for the common man. While there is plenty to praise about the seventh president, his legacy is tarnished by his racism, disregard for the law of the land, cruelty towards the Native Americans, and ruthless temper. Jackson was an intriguing man who was multi-faceted. One must not look at a singular dimension, and cast judgment on him as a whole. To accurately evaluate one of the most complex presidents, it is crucial to observe Jackson from all possible angles. Prior lifestyle, hardships in life, political ideology, lifestyle of the time, political developments, and his character

    Read More

  • What You Pawn I Will Redeem Analysis

    1679 Words  | 4 Pages

    Jackson wants to find something that will make him feel like he has done something for his culture and his people. These sayings contradict his actions because every time he gets closer to gaining more money, he spends it. In the long run, Jackson’s pitfalls did not stop his determination to gain back the regalia and ultimately find his personal identity. Given that he is Native American, the reader might assume that Jackson has a feeling of resentment towards white people due to the displacement of his people. From the beginning of the story, Jackson reveals a protective feeling caused by white people.

    Read More

  • Jeffersonian and Jacksonian Democracy

    1470 Words  | 3 Pages

    He was the first president to be chosen by the people and his background was not that of a typical president. He was not born into a rich family. Jackson favored the general public rather than the wealthy. His election shifted the balance of power from the wealthy East Coast, to farmers and small businesspeople in the west. Jackson vetoed more bills than all previous presidents did in an attempt to help the common man.

    Read More

More about Controversies In Andrew Jackson's Presidency

Open Document