Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Contract law rules
TITLE AREA: law of contract Case Information SPECIFIC AREA OF LAW: - Unsigned Contracts/Ticket Cases (imposed terms) BACKGROUND Contract: a contract is a lawful agreement between two or more parties within their contractual capacities, communicating their intentions to each other, without vagueness, being of the same mind and seriously intending to create legal obligations which are possible in performance. Ticket cases: these refer to notices, tickets and other unsigned documents. Imposed terms: are the terms put on the other party without his or her concern CONDITIONS OR GENERAL RULE A court must make an enquiry to ascertain:- • Whether all the essential elements that make up a valid contract in implied terms are there or if the contract is void, voidable or valid. • Whether Font must be of good size • Whether the Commercial paper is used as per requirement. • whether the printing on a ticket was clear or not clear and not partly obscured or obscured, • Whether the recipient of the ticket was made aware …show more content…
If that is so, then the ticket-holder is bound by those terms; if not, then the court will return to the general test of whether reasonable notice of the terms was given. CITATION (1) The case of Parker Vs The South Eastern Railway Company (1877) illustrates the restrictions on this concept where Parker and Gabell checked their luggage on a train. The two were given tickets with a number on one side, and small print on the other side. The small print stated that the railway would not be responsible for bags lost worth more than 10 pounds. Both respondents had received the tickets before but had never read the small print. They both lost their bags, and brought actions against South Eastern for the value of the bags and their contents both were greater than 10 pounds.
There are also many more case precedence of being allowed to pursue this case, Khanna vs Microdata Corp showed the court siding in the case of the Plaintiff when he was discharged from his company providing no “just cause” thus severing the implied–in-law covenant that was established during the course of his employment. I would also like to point out “Dare v. Montana Petroleum Marketing” in which job security and a right to be treated fairly was assumed to of been had (Breach of an Implied Covenant of Good Faith and Fair Dealing.
In order to have a valid contract, there are six elements that need to be established. The following is a defined list of these elements, as well as analysis pertaining to the case at hand.
-formed when parties have reached agreement on essential terms and have intention to create legal obligation. parties, obliged to perform o...
Cooley’s Inviolability of Telegraphic Correspondence advocated for protecting correspondence sent via this relatively new technology from “unreasonable searches and seizures.” As support, Cooley turned first to the influential English case of Entick v. Carrington, in which English government agents entered a private domicile and seized private papers. Cooley writes:
The article "When is a contract legally enforceable?", helped me understand legally enforceable because it talks about the elements of a contract which are "offer and acceptance, legal consideration, capacity to create a
Contracts are legally enforceable promises. There are two requirements for contract formation: agreement and consideration. An agreement involves a valid offer being made by an offeror to an offeree and said offer being validly accepted by the offeree and communicated to the offeror. The second requirement is consideration, meaning the two parties exchange something of legal value. Contracts serve the purpose of ensuring stability, predictability, and certainty, as well as deterring defection, in business dealings. The objective theory of contract law states that only the language of the contract should be considered in contract interpretation. This theory ignores entirely the intent of the parties. However, contract law is largely
A legal discussion of the contractual breaches and their related legal elements will be examined in this section. Some of the legal issues surrounding the contractual breaches include, the legal implications of the Uniform Commercial Code (U.C.C.), the defendant’s engagement in and outputs contract while under a requirements contract with my company, the doctrine of estoppel, and the issues of good faith and fair dealing. The definitions and some of the legal implications of the implied and requirements contracts were discussed in the preceding sections. An implied contract is defined as a “contract that is established by the conduct of a party rather than by the party’s written or spoken words” (Kubasek, Brennan, & Browne, 2015,
A contract of employment is an agreement between an employer and employee, forming the basis of an employment relationship; enforceable by law. Contracts of employment may be given orally or in writing: Employment Rights Act 1996 s 230(2) and commence immediately. Actual written contracts require an employee's signature and the signature of a company representative. Contracts of employment can involve both express and implied terms and can appear in many forms. The express terms, being those which both parties have agreed to, whether by signing a contractual document or acting in a particular way are seldom found in just one document. Terms are repeatedly found in an array of documents, whether they be from the actual formal contract, written statements or an employee handbook. The two latter documents are just some examples of prima facia non contractual documents.
Plain error can help a substantive right angle in the defense for the introduction of improper presentation. In the battle of inadmissible evidence a jury trial will be deemed necessary for the case. The jury case will ultimately provide the possibility of any evidence to be thrown out and therefore should take notice to plain error. The main predominance in this case suggest that even though evidence was found to be exclusively vital to the case it can also be legally fought for the evidence to be inadmissible. For example, Mapp v. Ohio (1961) 236 “police officers forced their way into Dollree Mapp's house without a proper search warrant. Police believed that Mapp was harboring a suspected bomber, and demanded entry. No suspect was found, but police discovered a trunk of
An offer continues in existence, capable of acceptance until it is brought to an end.
The express terms , that parties put down in the contract that is in writing and stated in the contract and cannot be ignored .
A contract is an agreement which has its specified terms and conditions between two or more parties in which there is a promise to do something in return for a benefit.
Void and Voidable Contracts Void Contracts: A contract is void if it is worthless, that is, not
A contract is an agreement between two parties in which one party agrees to perform some actions in return of some consideration. These promises are legally binding. The contract can be for exchange of goods, services, property and so on. A contract can be oral as well as written and also it can be part oral and part written but it is useful to have written contract otherwise issues can be created in future. But both the written as well as oral contract is legally enforceable. Also if there is a breach of contract, there are certain remedies for that which are discussed later in the assignment. There are certain elements which need to be present in a contract. These elements are discussed in the detail in the assignment. (Clarke,
A contract is generally considered to be an exchange of promises or an agreement between parties which in due course legally binds the parties; this can be enforced by the English Law. A contract is always, referred to the basic foundations of Contract Law, which refers to promises being kept amongst two parties. It is clear that all people make contracts nowadays and do not even consider for a moment that they are forming contracts; these can be formal or informal, oral or written.