More handpicked essays just for you.
Truman's foreign policy
United States and Soviet Union foreign policy in the Cold War era
Policy of containment
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Truman's foreign policy
Containment and the Cold War
In February 1946, George F. Kennan, an American diplomat in Moscow, proposed a policy of containment. Containment is the blocking of another nation’s attempts to spread its influence. During the late 1940s and early 1950s the United States used this policy against the Soviets. The United States wanted to take measures to prevent any extension of communist rule to other countries. The conflicting U.S. and Soviet aims in Eastern Europe led to the Cold War. The Berlin airlift, formation of NATO, and the Truman Doctrine all relate to this policy of containment.
At the end of WWII, the United States, Great Britain, and France occupied the western zone of Germany while the Soviet Union occupied the east. In 1948, Britain, France, and the U.S. combined their territories to make one nation. Stalin then discovered a loophole. He closed all highway and rail routes into West Berlin. This meant no food or fuel could reach that part of the city. In an attempt to break the blockade, American and British officials started the Berlin airlift. For 327 days, planes carrying food and supplies into West Berlin took off and landed every few minutes. West Berlin might not have made it if it wasn’t for the airlift. By May 1949, the Soviet Union realized it was beaten and lifted the blockade. By using the policy of containment, the Americans and the British were able to defeat the Soviets.
After the Soviets b...
Presidents Harry Truman and Dwight Eisenhower shared many similarities yet still many differences when it came to Cold War foreign policies. Truman’s foreign policies revolved around the Truman Doctrine, which stated that the United States would financially support Greece and Turkey . Despite Truman’s and Eisenhower’s differing political parties, the foreign policies of the presidents shared several similarities. The main differences between the two presidents can be attributed to differing circumstances during their years in office. Both Truman and Eisenhower sought to eliminate communism and support civil rights, but Truman emphasized international relations and the American economy while Eisenhower dealt more with domestic issues around civil rights.
Influenced by the fear of communism by American society and containment beliefs of people like George Kennan, who advocated that the US should use diplomatic, economic, and military action to contain communism, Truman established the Truman Doctrine, which stated that the US would protect democracies throughout the world, pledging the US would fight it around the world. This doctrine was an extension to both the Monroe Doctrine and the Roosevelt Corollary. In dealing with foreign policy, Truman did everything to protect nations of being consumed by communism, such as the Berlin Airlift, in which Truman decided to avoid the Soviet blockade of West Berlin and flew supplies directly over to the people in need. In Asia, Truman decided to use limited warfare, meaning the lack of atomic weapons, and was highly criticized by Douglas MacArthur, commander of the army, who he later dismissed for not following US policy.
The dictionary definition of of the word containment means the action or policy of preventing the expansion of a hostile country or influence. The United States during the the Cold War used the Containment policy to prevent the USSR for pushing its communism throught Europe and the world.
During the Cold War, the United States engaged in many aggressive policies both at home and abroad, in which to fight communism and the spread of communist ideas. Faced with a new challenge and new global responsibilities, the U.S. needed to retain what it had fought so strongly for in World War II. It needed to contain the communist ideas pouring from the Soviet Union while preventing communist influence at home, without triggering World War III. With the policies of containment, McCarthyism, and brinkmanship, the United States hoped to effectively stop the spread of communism and their newest threat, the Soviet Union. After the war, the United States and the Soviet Union had very different ideas on how to rebuild.
However, there are ways to correct the issues with the present system. If all 50 states and other countries around the world were to institute stricter regulations, such as those mentioned above, it would help make owning exotics safer. Animals like lions and puff adders have no place being in anyone’s home, but other animals like ball pythons and leopard geckos are reasonable. The most important thing that the authorities can do to help regulate the exotic pet trade and reduce the potential damage caused by it, is to educate the public. It is essential that people be involved in and aware of decisions that are being made. Especially decisions that concern their safety and that of the world around
Do you think that keeping exotic animals as pets should be legal? Well, I think that owning exotic animals as pets should be illegal. First, safety is a main concern for both the animals and for people. Secondly, it cost a very large amount of money to properly care for these animals; money people usually don’t have by themselves. Finally, it is against the law in many places to own these animals. Exotic animals should not be kept as pets.
In 1945 Germany divided Berlin into four zones. The Soviet Union, United States, Britain, and France all had a zone. From 1945 until 1961 Germans were free to go from East to West Berlin. On August 13, 1961, groggy citizens watched as workers began digging holes and jackhammering sidewalks, making way for the barbed wire that would eventually divided the East and the West. Armed troops stood guard at the crossing points between the two sides. By the morning of August 14, Soviet troops surrounded the city and by the end of that night the freedom to move freely between the two sections of Berlin ended. But even before the wall went up East Berlin had tried to push West Berlin away by cutting off all food and supplies to them. On June 27, 1948, the Berlin Airlift occurred. The United States and Britain combined their zones and came together as o...
Prior to the construction of the Berlin Wall, boarders between East and West Germany were closed in 1952 because of tension between Communists and Democratic superpowers and the only open crossing left in Berlin. West Germany was blockaded by the Soviets and only kept alive because of air drops made by the Western Allies (Time). The Soviets had to do something about the mass amount of people leaving Soviet East Berlin for West Berlin, and the non-communist world.
On June 5th 1945, Germany lost WWII. The allied powers of the United States, the United Kingdom and the USSR won. They decided to divide Germany into four different zones: one each for the US, UK, USSR and France. The city of Berlin was also divided into four zones. Unfortunately the city of Berlin was right in the middle on the Russian zone, surrounded by land and waterways that were controlled by Russians. When differences and disagreements start with the Soviet Union, Stalin would try to use Berlin to force the other allies into agreeing with his vision of the future. The Berlin blockade ad the Berlin airlift that followed was caused buy political and economic differences between the united states and its allies and the soviet union and how they wanted to treat Germany after WWII.
The extent to which the fact that the Western Allies did not respond with violence but with the airlift and its success was a main factor to its end will be assessed. The significance of the agreement made between the Soviets and the US in lifting not only the Berlin Blockade but also the Western counter blockade will also be evaluated. The reasons for the implementation of the blockade, the actions of the superpowers that do not contribute to the failure of the blockade, and the consequences of this crisis will not be investigated. The analysis will be done by researching different views on the blockade’s failure and the events leading up to it.... ...
People cannot identify dietary and common needs for the animals because their demands may vary (Should Wild). These animals are accustomed by nature and are only used to eating what they find in the wild. Exotic animals hunt for their food, so they grow larger than regular domesticated pets. Humans tend to underestimate the possible growth of exotic animals, they can become more massive and overpower the owner (Should Wild). Since the exotic animals become out of control, the owners kill, abandon, and even leave them to die. The animals are not being taken care of properly due to, the imprisonment from the negligent owners (ASPCA). They are basically being kept captive when they are chained and in cages. Theses type of animals are not familiar with being confined, therefore; this becomes a danger for them because they have to adapt to their new way of living. Walking exotic animals around the neighborhood, will not give them the proper exercise they need, these animals are used to being out in the open walking for miles (ASPCA). Owners will get bitten or scratched sometimes even both, from trying to remove the animal to protect themselves during a conflict with the animal (ASPCA). Being in the correct
In most places owning a dog or cat is second nature, but what about a tiger, bear or maybe python? Exotic pet ownership is far from having a clear right or wrong answer but it is in need of a ban for both the protection of animal and owner. For exotic pet owners, owning a wild beast insures a sense of power and uniqueness. It is also their way of contributing to the conservation of a species by having a “backup population” once human population growth and habitat destruction has resulted in extinction (Slater 113). But in reality the ownership of wild animals as pets only helps to damage already fragile ecosystems, both the one from which they came from and the new one in which they find themselves. Captivity strips an animal of a natural life in the wild, free of confinement and unsuitable care. Finally, the risks to humans are very large; injuries inflicted from exotic pets are dangerous and possibly deadly. Bans vary from state to state, ranging from no ban to partial ban to complete ban, but even in states with full bans, exotic pet ownership still occurs. Private ownership of an exotic animal as a pet should be banned in the US, due to disruptions in ecosystems, the dangers that wild animals are exposed too, and the risks to the owners of these pets.
Anyone can buy an exotic animal. The exotic animal pet trade is an extremely large business that is harmful to the animals. “Many don’t survive the journey
I’m against exotic pets what about you. A Lot of people already agree, that wild animals should not be pets. For example, they could turn you and that could be very dangerous. Another reason is that the wild animals can escape which mean that they will be out in public that would be very dangerous.
Pets can be cool and all, but they can be a lot to handle at times. Especially if you own a Exotic pet. Exotic pets can range from monkeys all the way to lions. Some of the problems of owning a Exotic pet are that they can cost a lot of money to raise, when they are older they can have a higher chance of harming you, or that it takes a longer time to take care of than a regular pet like a dog or a cat. If you want to own an Exotic pet, go ahead, but know they will take hours out of your life.