Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The three explanations of deviance sociology
3 theories of deviance and their application
The three explanations of deviance sociology
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: The three explanations of deviance sociology
The fourth edition of Constructions of Deviance is a compilation of peer edited articles from multiple authors, addressing social-psychological concepts surrounding deviance. The book is di-vided into ten sections, each section of articles discuss a selected issue related to deviance. It starts with how to define it, established social theories, studying deviance, stigma association, individual verses organizational deviance, and the differences between a deviant act and deviant personality. Deviance is anything that violates a society’s established norms at a given time, both informal and codified. Penalties for violations of such norms range from being considered odd or strange to social condemnation, and even fines or prison. The book makes …show more content…
The attitudes, behaviors, and conditions that cultures identify as deviance speak to the values that shape a society. Understanding culture is a large part of any military operation, which is exemplified in the military’s use of the PMESII/ASCOP variables in defining an operational environment. Understanding cultural deviance is especially important for those who conduct counterintelligence activities. Cultures consider individuals who commit espionage to deviant and are likely to have other associated deviant thoughts or behaviors. Studies show certain behavioral patterns are associated with the conduct of espionage. Behaviors like patterns of lying, risk-taking/thrill-seeking, vindictiveness, lack of remorse/empathy, manipulativeness, and grandiosity are all deviant behaviors that increase the risk of espionage. The control theory of deviance postulates that a weak societal bond is one of the root causes of deviance. The Defense Personnel and Security Research Center released a report asserting that a weak societal/organizational bond between the society/organization and its members increases the vulnerability to insider espionage. Societies can also consider traits/behaviors some might consider to be positive as deviance. For example, religious belief is generally considered positive in most cultures, however excessive religious belief could exhibit with extremist
Social deviancy is the violation of social norms. A deviant is someone who rejects folkways and mores. Any action that violates the values or rules of a social group is deviant behavior. In order to actually be characterized as a deviant, the individual must be detected committing a deviant act and be stigmatized by society. A stigma is a mark of social disgrace, setting the deviant apart from the group. Criminality is healthy for society. Deviance affirms our cultural values and norms. Responding to deviance clarifies moral boundaries and brings people together. There will always be people who break society’s rules and that’s important.
Adler, Patricia A., and Adler Peter. Constructions of Deviance: Social Power, Context, and Interaction. 6th ed. Belmont: Thomas/Wadsworth, 2009.
Crime is an irrelevant concept as it is tied to the formal social control mechanism of the State; deviance is a concept that is owned by sociology thus our study should be the sociology of deviance, rather than criminology
Societies are founded on various social norms. Norms can best be defined as a set of acceptable attitudes and practices by a given society. These norms however are found to vary from one society or cultural setting o the other. Deviance on the other hand is simply when one does something that goes against the set societal norms. Deviance is gauged on a scale of attitudes and behavior contradicting to acceptable social standards (Samuels, 2012).
In the study of Sociology of Deviance, sociologists develop theories and perspective in explaining the account for deviant and studying of how the society reacts. It is an interesting field to study because the difference and changes of deviance and social norms have a significant impact on individuals and groups. In this essay, I will examine varies definitions and perspective of Erikson and Heckerts respectively in respect to the following concepts: deviance serves certain functions for society, the typology of positive and negative deviance and the "middle class norms", and the labelling perspective on deviance.
Deviant behavior is sociologically defined as, when someone departs from the “norms”. Most of the time when someone says deviance they think against the law or acting out in a negative behavior. To sociologists it can be both positive and negative. While most crimes are deviant, they are not always. Norms can be classified into two categories, mores and folkways. Mores are informal rules that are not written; when mores are broken, they can have serious punishments and sanctions. Folkways are informal rules that are just expected to be followed, but have no real repercussions.
Goode, E 2006, 'IS THE DEVIANCE CONCEPT STILL RELEVANT TO SOCIOLOGY?', Sociological Spectrum, 26, 6, pp. 547-558, SocINDEX with Full Text, EBSCOhost, viewed 3 June 2014.
There exists conflicting theories among sociologists in the area of determining why a person is considered to be a deviant, and the reasons behind why he or she has committed a deviant act. From a positivistic perspective, deviance is based on biological or social determinism. Alternatively, from a constructionist perspective, deviance is created and assigned by society. Both perspectives seek to give a theory for why a person may become known as deviant. Although they both view similar acts as deviant, the basic differences between positivists and constructionists theories are clear.
Sociologists understand the concept of deviance in a variety of ways. It is the result of unsuccessful socialization, the solutions are usually intended to change the mind of the individual, and that order needs to remain maintained. Norms determine whether something is deviant or normal. So deviance depends on the social status and power of the person, the social context in which the behavior occurs, and the historical place it takes place in. Deviance is all about violating the day to day norms and is usually considered to be wrong, bad, or immoral.
Deviance is the behavior and the standards of expectations of a group or society. It is also behavior that is considered dangerous, threatening or offensive. The people that are deviant are often labeled to be weirdos, oddballs, or creeps. In the United States, people with tattoos, drug addicts, alcoholics, and compulsive gamblers are all considered deviant. Sociologists believe that everybody is deviant from time to time. They believe each person will violate a social norm in certain situations. People are considered deviant if they don't stand for the national anthem at a sports event, dress casually to a fancy restaurant, or skip classes. One category of deviance is Crime. Crime is a violation of norms that have been formally enacted into a law. Another category of deviance is humorous. Deviance is relative, what is deviant in one group or society may not be deviant in another group or society.
norms are those that are highly important to either most members in a society or
Deviance is defined as actions or behaviors that violate socials norms. In turn the concept of deviance is dependent on the social observation and perception. “By it’s very nature, the constructionism through which people define and interpret actions or appearances is always “social.” ”(Henry, 2009 , p. 6) One’s perception of a situation may be completely different from another depending on cultural and social factors. The way someone talks, walks, dresses, and holds themselves are all factors that attribute to how someone perceives another. In some cases what is socially or normally acceptable to one person is deviant in another’s eyes. For this reason there is a lot of gray area involving the topic of deviance because actions and behaviors are so diversely interpreted.
In sociology, the term deviance refers to all violations of social rules, regardless of their seriousness (Essentials of Sociology 136). Deviance is an individual or organizational behavior that violates societal norms and is usually accompanied by negative reactions from others. According to a sociologist S. Becker, he stated that it is not the act itself that makes an action deviant, but rather how society reacts to it.
Deviance is amongst other things a consequence of the response of others to a persons act. Students of deviance can not assume that they are dealing with a homogenous category. When they study people who have been labelled deviant (Howard Becker)
Labelling theory maintains that an act is deviant when people notice it and then take action to label it as a violation and apply appropriate sanctions (Lorber, 1967:303). Moreover, in this theory, deviance is perceives not as psychological or physical flow but as the outcome of social process which involves conflicting values of social groups, social language of labels, social reactions and expectations (Lorber, 1967:303). Lorber (1967:303) maintains that deviance as a label given by the society has different consequences depending on the type if deviance inferred by the label. He further maintains that one of the social label of deviance attributes maliciousness of the deviance and carries with it the consequences of the punishment (Lorber, 1967:303). The second kind of deviance is accidental, meaning attaining something without the individual wanting to be deviant.