More handpicked essays just for you.
George washington speeaks at the constituional convention
Essay about constitutional convention george washington
George washington speeaks at the constituional convention
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Constitutional Convention: Day by Day Occurrences
May 29, 1787
After these few short days of the convention here in Philadelphia, I
realized that it would be important to keep personal records of this
convention to assist in future discussion. This will also help me with
remembering details of the events.
Today the "Virginia Plan" was presented by that state's delegates.
They proposed a series of many resolutions that seemed well thought out to
me. The plan was written by James Madison but was given to us by Edmund
Randolph who was a very effective speaker and clear orator.
I enjoyed listening to the resolutions and the fresh new ideas I heard
in the Virginia Plan. First, the Virginia Plan recommended a bicameral
legislature with representation to be determined by the size of the
population in each area. The lower body of this legislature would be
elected by voters while the upper house would be elected by the members of
the lower house.
Every night the delegates go down to the taverns at Head House Square
and discuss what they have heard. I will debate with them the notions
which we have been privy to. One of my personal goals of this convention
is to talk freely with Ben Franklin about his ideas about government. Mr.
Franklin has traveled widely and has seen many nations. He is old and wise
and I want to talk to him before he passes away. Right now he is at the
age of 81, I think.
May 31
Recently the convention has become vexatious. The summers in this
towne are very humid. We are forced to keep the window open everywhere.
Flies are about at all times and it is hard to concentrate. Also, some of
the discussions at this convention are sluggish and tiresome.
One good thing about the weather is that it has given me time to
reflect on the Virginia Plan proposed a few day ago.
The one point I disagree with regarding the Virginia Plan is that it
gives more power to all the states with higher population, thus giving the
smaller states no voice.
June 3
It is a shame that Tom Jefferson, Mr. Madison's Virginia neighbor, is
Some people, such as Patrick Henry during his Speech to the Virginia State Constitutional Ratification Convention (Doc.
The meeting in Philadelphia was successful, it is known as the Constitutional Conventional. James Madison went to the meeting in Philadelphia it was his idea to create the United States in a republican model. The people would have the power in the form of representatives. Madison and his fellow Virginians came up with the details and a plan for the new government, it was known as the Virginia Plan. And Madison became known as the father of the constitution.
...al system. Alexander Hamilton and James Madison were the true authors of The Federalist Papers. They were strong advocates for the U.S Constitution and wanted to show people the flaws of the old system.
Humanity, according to Nietzsche, is infected by an illness. It is the kind of illness that has infected every single man, religious or non-religious alike. It is his aim to release his readers from the illness. In much the same way as a doctor, he wishes to do so by primarily sourcing the cause of the illness, and secondly by diagnosing it. It is Nietzsche’s belief that this metaphoric illness is morality.
The 1787 Constitutional Convention was paramount in unifying the states after the Revolutionary War. However, in order to do so, the convention had to compromise on many issues instead of addressing them with all due haste. This caused the convention to leave many issues unresolved. Most notably were the issues of slavery, race, secession, and states’ rights. Through the Civil War and the Reconstruction, these issues were resolved, and in the process the powers of the federal government were greatly expanded.
The system of justice that Nietzsche employs although somewhat cynical has a substantial amount of merit as a form of justice, which is present in our society. This is demonstrated through the depiction of the creditor/debtor relationship that exists in our democratic societies, and the equalization process that occurs, and furthermore that Nietzsche is correct to assess justice as such a principle. The issue is most obvious in the penal system; however it is also prevalent in personal day-to-day relationships as well as political structures.
This piece of work will try to find the answer to the question ‘In Nietzsche’s first essay in the Genealogy of Morals, does he give a clear idea of what good and bad truly are and what his opinion of those ideas is’. It will give a brief overview of his first essay, it will also go into greater detail of what he claims good and bad truly are, and finally look at what he is trying to prove with this argument. It will look at his background in order to see if and how that has influenced his work and opinions.
James Madison, a delegate and one of the main supporters of a stronger national authority, had thought ahead and drew up the Virginia Plan before the convention in Philadelphia began. Thus, it became the first discussion of the committee (Roche 19).
Overall, the lifestyle changes brought forth by guilt are portrayed through Hawthorne’s use of Biblical allusions. When guilt shadows over an individual’s mind, they often forgot how to differentiate between what they should do and what they’re actually doing. Instead of accepting the guilt and moving on, many express their guilt through actions. When the choice of destroying guilt, or letting it destroy you, comes up, individuals tend to select the option that involves less doing, since they are already ashamed of their deeds.
The idea of a National Executive was first proposed on Tuesday, May 29th, 1787, by Edmund Randolph, Governor of Virginia, during his opening speech of the convention. His proposal, which became known as the Virginia Plan, set out a blueprint for the convention to fol...
In creating the Constitution, the states had several different reactions, including a rather defensive reaction, but also an understanding reaction. As a document that provided the laws of the land and the rights of its people. It directs its attention to the many problems in this country; it offered quite a challenge because the document lent itself to several views and interpretations, depending upon the individual reading it. It is clear that the founders’ perspectives as white, wealthy or elite class, American citizens would play a role in the creation and implementation of The Constitution.
In conclusion, there is no absolute truth or meaning behind the concepts and values of guilt and bad conscience except for the meanings that human beings give it. Because of the meanings that human beings give values and concepts, Nietzsche is free to argue that in his opinion, guilt and bad conscience goes in opposition to his role against morality because it can conflict with the moral codes in society. Depending on what society considers morally right determines if a certain concept or value will go against it. As Nietzsche might have mentioned before, the history and meanings behind a concept or value are not created by the world but is created by different groups with different cultural heritages and beliefs.
The Constitutional Convention was a political assembly that occurred between May and September of 1787 in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, and determined how America was going to be governed. Following the drastic failure of the Articles of Confederation, the Framers gathered, looking toward a new ideal: one with a stronger national government, which would unify the states as one sovereign country. Prompted by the outset of the majority of its proponents, the conference had unanimously concurred the creation of a constitution, which directed the new government. However, the drafting process of the composition was greatly debated, as economic differences between the states created many conflicts.
Freud describes guilt as a feeling originating from either fear of authority or fear of the super-ego, which deviates from one’s foundational ego. Guilt in itself is something that a person feels due to acting in a “bad” way or simply having the intention to do. People are not automatically inclined to believe acting in a certain way is “bad” and, as Freud states, the only reason people develop this sense of guilt is once more the result of an inner “fear of loss of love” (71). Thus, guilt is not an inborn state of emotion; again, it is created as a result of being surrounded by and influenced by other humans. On the other hand, remorse is a feeling that occurs after an individual has acted in a “bad” way. Freud claims that remorse is a term that should be used to describe when someone feels guilty because of and after acting in such a way. The most prominent factor involved with these two emotions is conflict in several different forms such as “conflict due to ambivalence” and “of the eternal struggle between Eros and the instinct of destruction or death” (79). The definitions of guilt and remorse formulated by Freud contribute to the idea that mentality is far more something that is developed by external influences rather than
Descartes was an important philosopher in the seventeenth century and one of the reasons why was his view on God. Because of his knowledge and inspiration that November 10, he has been able to elaborate on philosophy. He had a mission to accomplish during his life, a mission to see the truth. He was able to accomplish this mission by seeking the truth of God, algebra and geometry, reasoning, and many other theories that have caused him to be called the father of modern philosophy.