Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Conservatism and liberalism
Conservatism and liberalism
Conservatism and liberalism similarities
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
In 18th and 19th century Europe, three main political ideologies arose. They were liberalism, conservatism, and socialism. These later broke into sub-ideologies. Liberalism gave rise to American liberalism and American conservatism, while socialism broke into itself as well as its violent counterpart, communism. Each emphasises society is constructed in a different way. Liberalism is focused on citizens as individuals, conservatism is more concerned with society as a community, and socialism sees society as economic classes. This paper focuses on the differences between liberalism and conservatism, as well as the American political parties and how the Tea Party fits in.
The United States’ political system is built off variations of liberalism.
…show more content…
Liberalism was first developed in medieval Europe as the ideology for the underdogs (Shively 28). Liberalism is concerned with the advancement of the individual, and the idea that every citizen should advance their talents to the fullest in order to help their society thrive. Some of the basic liberal principles are that democracy is the proper form of government, citizens should have intellectual freedoms, government interference should remain minimal, citizens should be able to regulate their own economic activity, and having power over each other is wrong (Shively 30). Liberalism followed the British colonists to America, where it continued to grow and flourish. It then became the basis for the government, and American Liberalism and American Conservatism blossomed out of it. Liberalism was formed as a reaction to the existing social patterns, but it was not accepted by those who favored the previous system.
Conservatism is an ideology that emphasizes the importance of community as a whole (Shively 31). The United States has never seen had first hand experience with true conservatism, only American Conservatism. While liberalism emphasizes the importance of governmental restraint, conservatism requires a strong government to provide order and maintain standards of morality. This ideology also focuses on the importance of religion and traditional moral values (Shively 33). Conservatism also tends to oppose feminism and instead, is more concerned with tradition and family …show more content…
values. American Liberalism is supportive of the underdogs, this is displayed through concerns for economic equality. American Liberals tend to support programs like Social Security and Medicare/Medicaid. They also show support for minorities (by gender, sexual orientation, or race). This is displayed in their views on issues like same-sex marriage, women’s rights, and abortion. Liberals favor environmental protection, such as interest in developing renewable energy resources (Funk 1). As well as defense of freedom of expression, as shown by the American Civil Liberties Union (Shively 25). American conservatism is passionate about keeping the government interference in the citizens’ lives. This idea has increased support for weakened gun control. In business they advocate for less government control and consumers being able to make decisions free of government regulation (Shively 25). Conservatism also includes a strong advocacy for protecting morality and spirituality. This has led to opposition to issues like abortion. Conservatism typically opposes legalized same-sex marriage because it does not fit well within Christianity. The Tea Party describes itself as “a grassroots movement that calls awareness to any issue which challenges the security, sovereignty, or domestic tranquility of our beloved nation, the United States of America” (Tea Party 1).
They were established in 2004, though they date their beginnings back to the Boston Tea Party of 1774 (Tea Party 1). The Tea Party has 15 “non-negotiable core beliefs” that include “illegal aliens are here illegally, pro-domestic employment is indispensable, a strong military is essential, special interests must be eliminated, gun ownership is sacred, government must be downsized, the national budget must be balanced, deficit spending must end, bailout and stimulus plans are illegal, reducing personal income taxes is a must, reducing business income taxes is mandatory, political offices must be available to average citizens, intrusive government must be stopped, English as our core language is required, traditional family values are encouraged.” (Tea Party 1). All this comes directly from the Tea Party’s official website. Many of these values line up with conservative beliefs, like gun rights and a less intrusive government. However, most of their values are vague and unrealistic. They claim “bailout and stimulus plans are illegal” but political parties do not have the authority to decide what is and is not legal. Also, even though they claim to have roots going back to the Revolutionary War, the “president” of the Tea Party very simply states “we
are a Christian nation” on his website. However, the United States was founded on the principle of religious freedom, the colonists were trying to escape such rigid religious guidelines when they founded the country. The constitution even prohibits the establishment of a national religion. While the Tea Party has some similarities to American conservatism, they are not identical. The Tea Party is more radical and shows little constructive planning for the country. They have a lot of vague ideas for policy changes, but these ideas are not even relevant to what the government is able to do. They want a “less intrusive government” but also think “traditional family values” should be encouraged, when the federal government has very little say in family affairs as it is. Forcing their “traditions” on families would only extend the government’s power, which is exactly what they’re fighting against. This paper has demonstrated the differences between the basic ideologies liberalism and conservatism. Specifically, liberalism is focused on the ability of every citizen to advance him/herself to their fullest potential. While conservatism is concerned with the good of the community as a whole. Liberalism broke down into the ideologies of the two main American political parties. American liberalism is characterized by the support of the underdog, and ultimately the quest of equality of opportunity for everyone. American conservatism focuses on minimizing government involvement, especially in business. It also strives to keep morality and spirituality intact. The Tea Party is a radical sub-sect of conservatism and shares some similar values. They both agree on loosened gun control and minimal government interference. However, the Tea Party goes beyond emphasizing morality and spirituality and considers the country a “Christian nation”, outrightly contradicting the constitution. While the Tea Party is a portion of the United States’ conservative population, they do not represent the entire party, only an extremist few.
Many people believe that the Boston Tea Party arose just because of the Tea Act that came into play in 1773, but in-fact, this major statement arose from two issues surrounding the British Empire in 1765. The first of the issues was that the British East India Company was at risk of going under and the Parliament was finding ways to bring it back. The second issue was that there was a continuing dispute about the extent of the Parliament’s authority. Many colonists believe that the Parliament went overboard with their power and the people were concerned about the future. Attempting to resolve these two major issues, the North Ministry only worsened the problem and produced a showdown that would eventually result in revolution.
Now fast forward to a colony on mars. It is a brand new colony and is using past historic figures, ideas, and events to use as a government. The best option for this colony would be to have a democratic government, not to be confused with the democrat party. This government would be voted on by the people as actual votes. There would be a president, but their job would be to make sure that the officials underneath are doing the duty they are supposed to do, and to make sure things that are voted on are followed through. But one thing that is evident in some laws and the reason for the move to mars is the need to advance as a society. Everything would be decided by majority vote when it comes to elections. Everyone would have equal rights;
Throughout The Shoemaker and the Tea Party, Alfred Young clearly walks us through the ordinary life of George Robert Twelves Hewes. Some main topics discussed are: average people in historical events, how groups of people view the past, and how memories are shaped over time. Hewes is not the only person discussed in the story, yet this book is essentially a biography of his life. Young touches all of the topics through talking about the different times in Hewes’ life. Ultimately, within this essay, I will demonstrate the understanding of The Shoemaker and the Tea Party, and effectively discuss the main topics during the course of this story.
In Tea Party, Keller illustrates aging, with Hester and Alma, as their minds and bodies begin to weaken, and she uses the sisters’ dialogue to show how they become isolated, forgotten, lonely, and desperate for human interaction.
In the late 1800’s a group of Americans decided that something needed to be done about the decline of moral and ethical values in most Americans. These people called themselves the progressives and started one of the most comprehensive reform movements in the United States to this day. Progressivism became so widespread that by the end of World War I, anyone who didn’t agree with Progressive ideals was labeled a communist. The Progressives had four major goals that they wished to accomplish. These four goals were to democratize America, to Americanize America, the humanization of capitalism and rationalization of the economy. Each goal dealt with a different aspect of America’s society that the Progressives thought needed help. The way these goals were accomplished was to get laws passed that would reform the practices of many Americans. Progressives held that in order to bring American back to its old time, rural values people would need to attend church more.
In the late1960’s American politics were shifting at a National level with liberalism being less supported as its politics were perceived as flawed, both by people on the left who thought that liberalism was not as effective as more radical political enterprises and by conservatives who believed that liberal politics were ostensibly crippling the American economy.
During the late 19th and early 20th century both the Populist Party and Progressive movement wanted to preserve some things, while also addressing the need for reform. Although many of the ideas and goals of these “Third parties” were initially not legislated and considered far-fetched, many of these ideas later became fundamental laws throughout American history. The Populists and Progressives were both grass roots movements, and addressed the needs of the poor and powerless, for the Populists it was farmers and for the Progressives it was urban lower and middle class workers. These two movements attempted to bring the powerless peoples issues to national politics. The Populists and Progressives wanted to preserve some American ideals of the past, such as a sense of community and the ability for farmers and workers to live happily without economic strains. Populists were more oriented to the plight of the farmer while the Progressives included women's rights, and protection of the consumer and labor.
Conservatives, on the contrary believe that public social welfare services should be funded and controlled by the public. They believe in personal responsibility, limited government; in fact the lowest decentralized level of government that is possible. Conservatives deem that decision-making at the level of the individual states is preferable to federal supervision. “Conservatives are less inclined to support widespread entitlement programs which provide for the welfa...
Are you Republican or Democrat? Maybe you are Conservative or Liberal? What do these terms mean and how did they begin? Classical Conservatism is defined as “a political philosophy emphasizing the need for the principles of natural law and transcendent moral order.”(Frohnen, Beer, and Nelson, 2006) Classical Liberalism is described as “a philosophy committed to the ideal of limited government and liberty of individuals including freedom of religion, speech, press, assembly, and free markets.” (Hudelson, 1999) These two ideas have shaped our philosophies and parties for centuries to come. These philosophies were made possible by many bright men of the time like Edmund Burke, John Adams, John Locke and Adam Smith.
When George Henry Evans cited the unalienable rights of the Declaration of Independence and that, “’to secure these rights’ against the undue influence of other classes of society, prudence… dictates the necessity of the organization of a party, who shall…prevent dangerous combinations to subvert these indefeasible and fundamental privileges”, he called for a party to become the sentinel of the original American democracy. And for many, the Jacksonian Democratic Party filled that role. The Democrats, who pursued a democracy that entailed economic and social independence for the common citizen, faced harsh opposition from the Whig Party in the Second American Party System. But apart from the political tensions of the era, the mid-1800’s were host to numerous movements and events that embodied, and didn’t embody, the Democratic ideals. Thus, it would be foolish to claim that the Democratic period merely represented a raising of the American democratic banner and even more foolish to ascribe any other black-and-white evaluation to this period. Rather, during a time of national and individual transformation, of economic missions, and of social revision, the Jacksonian Democrats succeeded in expanding their reality of individual liberty, in creating the circumstances for further change, and in falling short of some of their grandiose ideals for the “common citizen”.
- During the twentieth century conservatism lost their faith in a central government and focussed on the rights of property, independent of the state, and the rights of individuals to be free of government interference
Cooper, Barry, Allan Kornberg and William Mishler. The Resurgence of Conservatism in Anglo-American Democracies. Durham: Duke University Press, 1988. Print.
During the midst of the American Revolution, revolutionary leaders realized that in order to survive, a government must be established. They no longer had reliance on Great Britain. They must develop a government that is not only sustainable, but one that would not resemble the governance of Britain. As a result, a radical ideology called “republicanism” arose. Republicanism would forever be ingrained in the history of America. Republicanism was “a way of life, a core ideology, an uncompromising commitment to liberty and equality.”
Since the tea party movement is such a diverse mixture of groups, there is a large spectrum of ideals within it. Regardl...
In this essay, I will be discussing Liberalism and Socialism, what exactly they entail, and how they were and are still used in societies today. Liberalism is defined as a political orientation that favors social progress by reform and by changing laws rather than by revolution. Socialism is defined as a political and economic theory of social organization that advocates that the means of production, distribution, and exchange should be owned or regulated by the community as a whole. While the intentions of liberalist and socialist governments are the same, what makes them different is how they believe is the best ways to obtain a prosperous and peaceful nation.