Conservatism

1015 Words3 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: Conservatism in 1815-1848

In the Nineteenth Century the natural order of conservatism was challenged by new ideology such as Marxism and Liberalism. Conservatism was the norm and dominated Europe at the time so of course people were going to challenge monarchs because of their disagreement with the way they ruled. So I am here to show why conservatism is better for countries than liberalistic ideas. Also I will give sufficient reasoning why the conservative limits on voting should not change and why the limits are best for a country.
Conservatism believes in a strong central leadership such as monarchs. So the only people running and making decisions are a select few which include the king and elites entrusted by the king and these mostly consist of male property owners. I believe this is how a country is ran properly because you have a select few making all the decisions and this small group is educated and know what is best for the country. These elites are suited to make these decisions unlike peasants who all they do is work in the field. Also conservatism has a strong church leadership keeping the monarchs in order to make the best decisions. This is ideal for a country because God has been leading his people to prosperous lives and keeping them safe all throughout history so no need to abandon him know. Church officials are the only people that know what God wants for the nation because that is what they do for a living. Interpret God’s word and pray to him for answers and guidance. It only makes sense the Church should run hand in hand with the monarchs to do what is best for the country. With that select group of leaders leading the nation it sets limits and limits are good for the government. It set clear lines on what needs to be done and how ...

... middle of paper ...

...helps the country, produce better goods. If I was a peasant I would be perfectly happy with not having that great stress on me but instead on someone that is equip to handle that stress. I would already be stressed enough working my crops and I would not want anything else on my plate. That is why the voting limits of male property owners only having the right to vote should stay in place and not change to everyone has the right to vote like the liberals wish for.
With liberalism coming to light during this time of great power of monarchs I shed a small light on only a few things that show why conservatism is the better route for a nation. Conservatism has been the norm for a long time and rightfully so. I dismissed some of liberalism views and had reasoning why they should be dismissed. Also I showed why the voting limits that are in place should stay in place.

Show More
Related

  • Conservatism Between 1815-1851 in Prussia, France and Austria

    870 Words  | 2 Pages

    Between 1815 and 1851, there was an increase in conservative demands and ideals across Europe. Three nations fit into this mold exceptionally well, one of them being Prussia. The other nation that best shows how conservative ideals achieved their goals is France and how it changed after the restoration of the Bourbon monarchy. The third nation being, Austria and how the rulers handled the discontent of the different minority groups within it’s borders.

    Read More

  • The Fall of the Liberal Consensus

    1910 Words  | 4 Pages

    Looking at the United States in 1965, it would seem that the future of the liberal consensus was well entrenched. The anti-war movement was in full swing, civil rights were moving forward, and Johnson's Great Society was working to alleviate the plight of the poor in America. Yet, by 1968 the liberal consensus had fallen apart, which led to the triumph of conservatism with the election of President Reagan in 1980. The question must be posed, how in the course of 15 years did liberal consensus fall apart and conservatism rise to the forefront? What were the decisive factors that caused the fracturing of what seemed to be such a powerful political force? In looking at the period from 1968 to the triumph of Reagan in 1980, America was shaken to the core by the Watergate scandal, the stalling of economic growth, gas shortages, and the Vietnam War. In an era that included the amount of turbulence that the 1970's did, it is not difficult to imagine that conservatism come to power. In this paper I will analyze how the liberal consensus went from one of its high points in 1965 to one of its lows in 1968. From there I will show how conservatism rose to power by the 1980 elections. In doing so, I will look at how factors within the American economy, civil rights issues, and political workings of the United States contributed to the fracturing of the liberal consensus and the rise of conservatism.

    Read More

  • Populism

    941 Words  | 2 Pages

    The People's Party, also known as the "Populists", was a short-lived political party in the United States established in 1891 during the Populist movement. It was most important in 1892-96, and then rapidly faded away. Based among poor, white cotton farmers in the South and hard-pressed wheat farmers in the plain states, it represented a radical crusading form of agrarianism and hostility to banks, railroads, and elites generally. It sometimes formed coalitions with labor unions, and in 1896, the Democrats endorsed their presidential nominee, William Jennings Bryan. The terms "populist" and "populism" are commonly used for anti-elitist appeals in opposition to established interests and mainstream parties. Though the party did not win much of anything it did however shape the United States we know today.

    Read More

  • Freedom of Religion: THe Maryland Toleration Act

    901 Words  | 2 Pages

    ...es by merely proclaiming the value of those teachings, at other times by having those teachings influence laws. The ‘Religious Right’ is a term used in America to describe right-wing religious (for example: Protestant, Evangelical, and more recently, Christian and Catholic) political factions. While the ‘White Religious Right’ constitutes only 14% of the American population as of 2000, the year of George W. Bush’s first election to the office, this portion of American society believes that separation of church and state is not explicit in the American Constitution and that the United States was ‘founded by Christians as a Christian Nation.’ The Religious Right argues that the Establishment Clause bars the federal government from establishing or sponsoring a state church (e.g. the Church of England), but does not prevent the government from acknowledging religion.

    Read More

  • The Political Spectrum

    995 Words  | 2 Pages

    - During the twentieth century conservatism lost their faith in a central government and focussed on the rights of property, independent of the state, and the rights of individuals to be free of government interference

    Read More

  • Libertarianism

    1135 Words  | 3 Pages

    For centuries philosophers have debated over the presence of free will. As a result of these often-heated arguments, many factions have evolved, the two most prominent being the schools of Libertarianism and of Determinism. Within these two schools of thought lies another debate, that of compatibilism, or whether or not the two believes can co-exist. In his essay, Has the Self “Free Will”?, C.A. Campbell, a staunch non-compatiblist and libertarian, attempts to explain the Libertarian argument.

    Read More

  • The New Right

    1588 Words  | 4 Pages

    By adding social issues to the conservative agenda, the New Right weakened the establishment’s movement, contradicting and discrediting its fundamental principles. The new social agenda contradicted Old Right’s belief in limited government and individual rights. Today, the New Right continues to grow and the Christian Right continues to gain political power. Republican candidates are considered politically dead unless they secure the support of the Christian Coalition. Before the New Right comes to embody “conservativism” within American political discourse, Old Right conservatives must discard the dissenter’s social initiatives and reclaim the establishment’s conservative agenda: remove the New Right’s social agenda, return to establishment’s conservative ideals, and develop policies based on limited government, free market, and individual liberty.

    Read More

  • American Republican Ideology

    1855 Words  | 4 Pages

    that it was up to them to shape the way this new land would function,

    Read More

  • The Conservative Movement

    1550 Words  | 4 Pages

    The conservative movement has played a crucial role in American politics in the post war era. Ronald Story and Bruce Laurie indentify various elements of the American conservatism. These elements include challenging authoritarian governments and modernist culture, upholding tradition, Christian religion and the rule of law, defending western civilization, and supporting republicanism. American conservatism has been characterized by competing ideologies and tension throughout history. The Americans who are politically liberal and economically conservative favor free trade, minimal state intervention, low taxes, and a small government. On the other hand, conservatives hold the view that American traditional values are normally undermined by secularism. Social conservatives have always opposed same-sex marriages and abortion, and instead have been supporting the idea of integrating prayer into the school curriculum (Story and Laurie 1).

    Read More

  • Essay On Liberalism And Conservatism

    1885 Words  | 4 Pages

    The pieces on liberalism and conservatism has shown how different the two ideologies mean compared to the labels we see in American politics. The media has made it seems as though conservatives (which in the U.S. is becoming synonymous with Republican) is all against change, while liberals (Democrats) lie in the exact opposite of the spectrum: promoting changes. However, the essays by Locke, Berlin, and Oakeshott showed us how the two ideologies are much deeper than that. It is not just a manual of how to govern a nation, but rather ideals and philosophies. Furthermore, while contemporary politics have created an illusion that there is a clear and definite distinction between liberalism and conservatism, these essays show that they actually do overlap in many ways. In "Two Concepts of Liberty", Berlin categorizes liberty as "positive" and "negative". Positive liberty defines freedom as an individual being able to control his life and decisions in his own interests. On the other hand, in negative liberty, freedom exist when an individual is free from external interference. The major difference between the two concepts of liberty is that positive liberty focuses on the capability of an...

    Read More

  • Liberalism And Freedom

    2856 Words  | 6 Pages

    one may ask whether or not the ideas and goals of classical liberalism have been

    Read More

  • Conservatism In The Republican Party

    390 Words  | 1 Pages

    The Republicans had been slowly moving more toward conservatism (ideological Leftism) since Barry Goldwater won the Republican nomination for president in 1964, but they truly started to gain national momentum with the addition of southern racial segregationists, and the religious Right to the Republican party. This broadened coalition, combined with the difficulties that Democratic President Jimmy Carter (1977-81) experienced in office led to the election of conservative Republican Pres. Ronald Reagan. For more on the evolution of conservatism in the Republican party, you should look up a woman named Phyllis Schlafly, but the pivotal point was 1994 in my opinion. President George H.W. Bush who was certainly more moderate than Ronald Reagan

    Read More

  • Modern Liberalism And Modern Conservatism

    2261 Words  | 5 Pages

    Modern liberalism and modern conservatism are both political outlooks that involve acceptance or support of the balance of the degree of social equality and social inequality; while they tend to avoid political changes that would result in extreme deviation of society to either side. Modern liberalism and modern conservatism tend not to be as centrist or middle-of-the-road ideologies as they once could be. Ideology is a set of ideas and beliefs that guide the goals, expectations, and actions of a group (Webster’s Dictionary). Individuals who are conservative or liberal tend to have views that align within a political party, whether it be Republican or democratic, but this is not always the case. There are conservative democrats, such as, Jim Costa and Jim Cooper and there are liberal republicans, such as, Nathaniel Banks and George Washington Julian. Another name for conservative democrats would be blue dog democrats while the nickname for liberal republicans is the Rockefeller republicans. These two ideologies tend to be more of the centrist ideologies. Modern liberals tend to be members of the Democratic Party because they support a wide range of welfare programs and government support of the public sector and tighter corporate regulations (PP Modern Liberalism). U.S. Conservatism evolved from classical liberalism, which makes them similar, yet there is many differences between modern conservatism and modern liberalism. There are principles and tenets that govern each ideology. A tenant is a belief or idea that is held as being true from a group (Webster’s Dictionary). In understanding both ideologies, it is imperative to have an understanding of classical liberalism. Classical liberalism was built on ideas from the seventeenth ...

    Read More

  • Fukuyama's The End of History

    1898 Words  | 4 Pages

    middle of paper ... ... This comment suggests that the current idea, liberalism, may just be a phase in human ideology that has spread worldwide. Though he made a compelling argument and posed thought provoking questions that supported his argument, the flaws in his argument, after stringent analysis, contradict his main points. Works Cited Ferguson, C. (Director).

    Read More

  • Conservatism Essay

    1620 Words  | 4 Pages

    However, conservatism was founded as an opposition to new emerging ideas such as socialism in order to keep social order and restore tradition. Early conservatism can be seen as a disbeliever but over time it has adapted to have its own distinct set of core ideas that protect social order and tradition. Without social order and tradition conservatives believe society will go into the unknown creating chaos and fear. In short, early conservatism may be a disbelief but conservatism today is a set coherent

    Read More

More about Conservatism

Open Document