Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Literary analysis everyday use
Horror movie analysis
Literary analysis help
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
“The Monkey Paw” by W.W. Jacobs is a horror story, about a cursed monkey’s paw. In the story, it shows that for every action there are good or bad consequences. For an example, if someone has a B- in math and one thought that he was good and didn’t study for a test, he may fail. He thought it won’t affect him, but then he didn’t study again for a test and failed when he went to go check he grades he found out that in math he had a D. There are many examples for this in “The Monkey Paw”. Therefore, in every action, there are consequences, good or bad.
In the story “The Monkey Paw” it shows examples of, how for every action there are consequences good or bad. Mr. White shows us that when he uses the monkey’s paw he wished without thinking of the consequences. Mr. White wished for 200 pounds of money. However, when the White’s received the 200 pounds they got news that their son Herbert was dead. In the text, it states “He was caught in the machinery, said the visitor at length in a low voice. Caught in the machinery, repeated Mr. White, in a dazed fashion, yes...I was to say that Maw and Meggins disclaim all responsibility, continued the other. They admit no liability at all, but in consideration of your son’s services, they wish to present you with a
…show more content…
certain sum as compensation...How much? Two hundred pounds,” This shows that the White’s should have listened to Sergeant-Major Morris warnings about the monkey’s paw. For this, it shows that by wishing for 200 pounds there consequence was their son’s death. Another example forms the passage “The Monkey Paw” is when he used the paw to wish for his son to live again. Of course, there was a side effect to him. He changed, he was dangerous, he was different, and wasn’t their son anymore. Herbert was alive but at the same time still dead. In the passage it says “You’re afraid of your own son, she cried, struggling. Let me go. I’m coming, Herbert; I’m coming. There was another knock and another. The old women with a sudden wrench broke free and ran from the room. Her husband followed to the landing and called offer her appealing as she hurried downstairs...But her husband was on his hands and knees, groping wildly, on the floor in search of the paw. If he could only find it before that thing outside got in.” The piece of evidence shows us that the monkey’s paw is dangerous and they should haven’t used it again. For this, it shows that by Mr. White wishing for their son to live again the consequence was that he was different, changed and very dangerous. There are many examples of for every action there are good and bad consequences for them.
One example is when they let Sergeant-Major Morris into their house. By letting Sergeant-Major Morris into their house they got the cursed paw. If it wasn’t for Sergeant-Major Morris the White’s son would still be alive and they would have been the same. For this action, by letting Sergeant-Major Morris into the house for a drink their consequence was that Sergeant-Major Morris told them about the monkey’s paw and its power to grant wishes but with a price. Even though Sergeant-Major Morris warned them they didn’t listen. So this tells us that by inviting Sergeant-Major Morris and the monkey’s paw they lost a
son. For every action, there are consequences, good or bad. The story “The Monkey Paw” there was an example like when Mr. White wished for 200 pounds or when he wished for their son to live again and when they let Sergeant-Major Morris into their home and gave them the monkey's paw. So in conclusion in the story “The Monkey Paw” it shows many examples of for every action there is the consequence, good and bad.
Another reason why The Monkey's Paw explains foreshadowing with suspense or tension because in the article the author writes again "A rat," said the old man, in shaking tones—"a rat. It passed me on the stairs."
“I warn you of the consequences” - “The Monkey's Paw” (page 89) this essay will be comparing and contrasting Two stories “The Monkey's paw” by w.w. Jacobs and “The Third wish” by Joan Aiken. In “The Monkey's paw” and “The Third Wish” the mood and setting are almost completely different, If it wasn't for the theme this book wouldn't be so similar .
In the book, The Pearl, by John Steinbeck, and the short story “The Monkey's Paw” by W.W. Jacobs, both authors would agree that in these stories, if you intervene with your destiny/fate, a bad outcome is sure to happen.In The Pearl, Kino finds the pearl of the world. Kino wants to sell the pearl, in return for money, but the pearl ends up bringing the opposite of prosperity and brings bad fortune. Also, In “The Monkey's Paw”, Mr.White also wishes for money, but as he is warned, terrible things come when u interrupt with your fate.
One may stutter over the conception that a monkey’s paw holds the power to determine fate, rather than siding with freewill. In the short story, “The Monkey’s Paw,” an average family, located in the middle class discovers a monkey’s paw and are told that they had three wishes upon that magical, yet deceiving item. However, their decisions cost them several, unintended consequences, due to greed within the human mind. The author, W.W. Jacobs uses symbolism, foreshadowing, and irony to convey the peril of wish fulfillment and the dangers of interfering with fate.
Three wishes, an old Indian curse, and a mummified paw, that was cut from a monkey. This is going to be exciting! “The Monkey’s Paw” is a short story written by W.W. Jacobs in the early 1900’s just after the turn of the centenary. Even though the text is short, it grabs the reader’s attention and keeps them on the edge of their seats until the very end. As exhilarating as this thriller is to read, unfortunately like many literary works written during that time, “The Monkey’s Paw,” is demeaning towards women and goes against feminist literary criticism’s principles and ideologies.
talks to his son. ‘Hark at the wind’, tells us that Mr White is very
The Signifying Monkey is an embodiment of the poor man’s values and dreams: He is weak and only has his speaking skills (slang ‘mouthpiece’) to survive on, and he uses it to play the powers of the jungle against one another. The same way a pimp survives on his ‘mouthpiece’ by using fast talk, sweet talk, jive, and jaw-blockin’.
The cause in the Monkeys paw is that the Whites son dies. The White’s son shockingly dies in a machine, “he was caught in the machinery,” said the worker. The White’s feel responsible because of the wish they made for money. The wait to see if their son was still alive after wishing on the monkeys paw brought great distress, so much so that Mrs. White fainted. The Monkeys Paw creates suspense, by showing us all the emotions from the characters while they wait to see if their son will return with the last wish. In the Monkeys Paw if they did not make a wish for money, then their son would still be alive. If these things wouldn’t have happened the White’s
When children are born, they are innocent because their minds are essentially a blank sheet of paper. In a civilized society, adults try to protect the children from being exposed to harmful influences, such as murder or crime. However, in “The Lottery,” when Tessie Hutchinson is chosen as the winner, Jackson describes that “someone [gives] little Davy Hutchinson few pebbles” so that he can also stone his mother. In this quote, Jackson uses the world “little” to describe Davy Hutchinson, suggesting that he is young and innocent, but the villagers still give him the stone, encouraging him to kill his own mother. By intentionally arming the children with stones, the villagers are dehumanized. This quote depicts the villagers’ immorality because they are deliberately training the children to murder in order to preserve the tradition of the lottery. The moment Mrs. Hutchinson is picked as the winner, Jackson notes that “the children [have] stones already” (Jackson 7). The children’s naturally gather the stones without anyone telling them. Additionally, their action shows that the concept of murdering a person for no reason has been imprinted on their minds. Nonetheless, the children cannot be blamed because the villagers allow the children to participate in the violent ceremony, suggesting the villagers’ extreme barbarism and savagery. Through the dehumanization of the villagers, Jackson
In every village it is always difficult to try and change they ways of the people. What one village sees as wrong, another may see as right. Some of the villagers may be stubborn enough to not change traditions that physically affect a person. Mr. Joe Summers is a man who ran the coal business for the village. He was a man who had time for civic activities, but no one really liked him. The reason as to why no one liked him was because “[H]e had no children, and his wife was a scold” (Jackson ). Mr. Summers had the privilege of carrying the revered wooden black box. Along side of Mr. Summers stood another man by the name of Mr. Harry Graves. Mr. Graves was the man who helped, Mr. Summers, make the slips of paper that would be used in the lottery, and he took the three-legged stool to the site of the lottery; which is where the black box was supposed to rest on. “Every year, after the lottery, Mr. Summers began talking again about a new box, but every year the subject was allowed to fade off without anything's being done” (Jackson ). The box was never changed because no one wa...
.... "An overview of “The Monkey's Paw”." Short Stories for Students. Detroit: Gale, 2002. Literature Resource Center. Web. 15 Apr. 2011.
In the novel The Boy in the Striped Pajamas by John Boyne, the consequences involve many things. One of the consequences is that families are torn apart, both of the persecuted, and the persecutors, demonstrated by Bruno and Shmuel’s families. Another is that persecution creates violent and ruthless people, as we see with Lieutenant Kotler and Gretel. The final consequence is that people are starved, physically abused, and forced into manual labour during the persecution, such as Pavel and Shmuel.
I will just take it home and see what this fake thing can do.” The man went back to his house and sat down on the chair in the dining room staring at the monkey’s paw. He told his wife and daughter about how the old fakir gave him the monkey’s paw and how it granted wishes. The man said to the monkey’s paw “I wish for a million dollars.”
The narrator of the short story, “The Balek Scales,” had a grandfather that lived in an antiquated time when his people and him were ruled by the Baleks. The Baleks seemed to be fair, but really were not. They cheated people out of their money for many years without the people knowing it. Then, the people find out that they were being cheated cheated. So, they created a quick, makeshift plan to steal the book that had all of the payments recorded in it. The stole it to find out how much money the people were owed and tried to help bring justice to the people. The text states, “made their way into my great-grandfather’s front room, shooting and stabbing as they came, and removed the scales and the book by force” (Boll 218). The example from the text shows how the people were fighting for fairness, even if their relatives and peers were being maimed. The fact that the people never quit, even when their loved ones were being killed, shows just how unselfish the people were when fighting for justice. When people display acts of unselfishness, it often times leads to fairness and